Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133953
題名: 主觀幸福感、工作滿足度與國軍離職傾向關聯之研究-以陸軍工兵部隊為例
A Study of the Relationship between Subjective Well-being, Job Satisfaction and National Army`s Turnover Intention–A Case of the Army Engineer Corps
作者: 曾雅鈴
Zeng, Ya-Ling
貢獻者: 羅光達
Luo, Guang-Da
曾雅鈴
Zeng, Ya-Ling
關鍵詞: 主觀幸福感
工作滿足度
離職傾向
邏輯斯迴歸
Subjective well-being
Job satisfaction
Turnover intention
Logistic regression
日期: 2020
上傳時間: 1-Feb-2021
摘要: 立法院於2011年12月中旬立法院立法通過《兵役法》第16條修正案,一年期義務役士兵於2011年底全數退伍,改徵集4個月役期的常備兵役軍事訓練,部隊主力改以志願役官、士、兵為主,依據2019年公布之國防報告書資料顯示,國軍人員編現比已達85%,然留營率僅75%,換言之,志願役士官兵是否能在部隊長留久用,發揮戰力,為國防部當前重要的課題。就基層幹部而言,提高留營率為人才招募之重點,然現役軍人離職傾向之原因甚多,在部隊福利及薪資待遇優於民間企業的狀況下,本研究試圖以心理因素-主觀幸福感及工作滿足為切入點,探究其與離職傾向之關聯並提出建議事項。\n在本研究中主要抽樣對象為陸軍工兵部隊,針對軍官、士官與士兵包含領導職類等各階級人員,採隨機抽樣方式實施問卷抽樣,並經過二元及序數邏輯斯迴歸(binary logistic and ordered logistic regression)來探討離職傾向與解釋變數當中的關係,在本研究中應用的解釋變數為主觀幸福感及工作滿足度等兩項變數。經過實證分析其結果在解釋變數中工作滿足為顯著,也就是說工作滿足對於離職傾向有明顯的影響。
The Legislative Yuan passed the 16th Amendment to the Military Service Law in mid-December 2011. The government announced that the one-year compulsory soldiers will be discharged from the military at the end of 2011. Taiwan has recruited soldiers for military training for a four-month service period, and the main force such as the officers and soldiers, have been changed to all voluntary recruits. According to Taiwan’s national defense report published in 2019, the exiting overall personnel compilation ratio of armed forces has reached 85%, but the retention rate is only 75%. To rephrase it, whether the volunteers can stay in the military for a long time and exert their combat power is an important issue for the Ministry of National Defense. Nowadays, increasing the retention rate is the focus of military recruitment. Despite the fact that the current benefits and salaries of the military are better than those of some private enterprises, there are still reasons cause the military personnel’s turnover intention. This research attempts to use the subjective well-being of psychological factors and job satisfaction as the starting point to explore its relationship with turnover intention and make recommendations.\nIn this study, the main sampling object is the Army Corps of Engineers, and we use simple random sampling survey for officers, non-commissioned officers and privates, including leaders and other ranks. This study uses Binary Logistic and Ordered Logistic Regression to explore the relationship between turnover intention and predicted variables. The predictive variables used in this study are subjective well-being and job satisfaction. After empirical analysis, the result of job satisfaction is significant in the forecast varia-bles, which means that job satisfaction has a significant impact on turnover intention.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n中華民國108年國防報告書編纂委員會(編)(2019)。中華民國108年國防報告書。臺北市:國防部。\n王大明、黃永全與林若蕎(2018)。工作價值觀、組織承諾、工作滿足與留任意願關係之研究-以國籍民航機師為例。觀光產業與航空管理期刊,1(1),頁70-94。\n主計總處(2014)。國民幸福指數年報。臺北市:主計總處。\n余民寧、陳柏霖與陳玉樺(2018)。巔峰型教師的樣貌:圓滿幸福、知覺工作壓力、靈性幸福感及心理健康之關係。教育心理學報,50(1),頁1-30。\n吳明隆(2009)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務(第2版)。 臺北市:五南圖書。\n吳明隆(2014)。論文寫作與量化研究(第4版)。臺北市:五南圖書。\n吳國中(2014)。精進士官、士兵留營意願之研究。海軍學術雙月刊,48(2),頁45-65。\n李旭梅與蔡碧珊(2016)。職場友誼與離職意圖關係之研究:以幸福感為中介效果。明新學報,42(1),頁125-141。\n周瑛琪與顏炘怡(2015)。管理心理學(第2版)。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。\n林坤霖、柳瑞泰與白家欣(2019)。國軍不動產管理人員工作滿足與離職傾向關係之研究。全球商業經營管理學報,11,頁69-79。\n林延柔(2019)。工作壓力、工作滿意度及主觀幸福感之相關性研究 -以中部某公立醫院護理人員為例。中臺科技大學醫療暨健康產業管理系碩士班,未出版,台中市。\n林銘翰(2019)。1人1床+獨立衛浴!國軍「興安專案」全新營舍新竹啟用,2019年09月10日,取自:https://www.ettoday.net/news/20190910/1532527.htm\n施建彬與陸洛(譯)(1997)。幸福心理學(M. Argyle原著)。臺北市:巨流圖書。\n施蕙華與曾麗娟(2003)。工作壓力感受、社會支持、工作滿意與離職傾向之關連性研究-以職業軍官為例。復興崗學報,79,頁37-53。\n洪哲政(2019)。國軍戰鬥部隊苦 七種部隊至今編現比低於8成,2019年10月15日,取自:https://udn.com/news/story/10930/410-4564\n洪嘉盈(譯)(1998)。兩因素理論(F. Herzberg, F. M. Mau-sner, & B. Snyderman原著)。臺北市:實學社。\n洪彰鴻(2009)。肥胖與體適能表現─邏輯斯回歸之應用。弘光人文社會學報,10,頁209-232。\n高旭繁(2013)。通往華人幸福之路:性格特質與文化價值的雙重作用。本土心理學研究,39,頁165-214。\n國防部(2019)。國防部施政績效報告,2019年09月11日,取自: https://www.mnd.gov.tw/PublishTabs.aspx?parentId=5609&Node-Id=560901&title=%E6%94%BF%E5%BA%9C%E8%B3%87%E8%-A8%8A%E5%85%AC%E9%96%8B&SelectStyle=%E6%96%BD%-E6%94%BF%E7%B8%BE%E6%95%88%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8-A%E5%9C%8B%E9%98%B2%E9%83%A8\n張紹勳(2016)。Stata與高等統計分析。臺北市:五南圖書。\n張翠芬、陳重光與陳敏加(2016)。不同類型醫院護理人員特質、工作壓力、工作滿意度與離職傾向之相關性研究-以六家地區醫院及四家區域醫院為例。澄清醫護管理雜誌,12(2),頁28-38。\n許士軍(1977)。工作滿足、個人特徵與組織氣候-文獻檢討及實證研究。國立政治大學學報,35,頁13-56。\n許金田與蔡慧霈(2015)。同事無禮對待對離職傾向與組織公民行為的影響歷程:以國防組織成員為例。國防管理學報,36(1),頁19-35。\n許庭瑜與江品俞(2019)。志願役士兵對工作滿意、組織承諾與離職傾向差異-以南部地區志願役士兵為例。管理科學研究,13(1),頁49-62。\n許順旺、江郁智與張子菁(2018)。員工的情緒智慧重要嗎?以情緒智慧調解工作滿足、幸福感與離職意圖之相關研究-以國際觀光旅館為例。輔仁民生學誌,24(2),頁25-51。\n許順旺、蘇紅文與蕭君安(2012)。國際觀光旅館主管工作控制及要求、工作滿足、組織承諾與離職傾向之相關研究-以工作經驗為干擾變項。餐旅暨觀光,9(2),頁91-111。\n陳國勝與陳佩君(2007)。國際觀光旅館廚務人員角色壓力、工作滿足、組織承諾與離職傾向關係之研究。遠東學報,24(1),頁55-76。\n陳銘薰與黃新龍(2019)。工作壓力、幸福感、組織承諾與離職傾向關聯之研究-以國軍軍士官為例。商管科技季刊,20(2),頁157-179。\n陸洛(1998)。中國人幸福感之內涵、測量及相關因素探討。國家科學委員會研究彙刊:人文及社會科學,8(1),頁115-137。\n彭錦鵬與李俊達(2014年12月)。影響主觀幸福感因素之研究。「2014台灣政治學會年會暨『當前全球民主實踐的再思考:困境、挑戰與突破』國際學術研討會」。臺灣大學社會科學院。\n游懿萱與李立心(譯)(2016)。一次搞懂統計與分析:大數據時代的必勝競爭力(D. M. Levine & D. F. Stephan原著)。臺北市:商周出版。\n辜詠琳(2016)。「長官,您幸福嗎?」─探討國軍幹部職家衝突、主觀幸福感、留職意願與工作鑲嵌的影響。國防大學運籌管理學系,未出版,桃園縣。\n黃光國(2011)。論「含攝文化的心理學」。本土心理學研究,36,頁79-110。\n黃昆輝與張德銳(2000)。工作滿足,2020年12月,取自:http://term.naer.edu.tw/detail/1302183/\n黃英忠(2007)。管理學概論。高雄市:麗文文化事業。\n黃純真、陳佩卿與游景新(2017)。旅行業員工生涯發展對工作滿足與離職傾向影響之研究。觀光與休閒管理期刊,5(2),頁57-67。\n黃新福與趙家儀(2016)。工作倦怠對員工幸福感與留任意願影響之研究—以員工福利方案滿意度為調節變項。管理資訊計算,5(2),頁12-27。\n楊國樞(1980)。生活素質的心理學觀。中華心理學刊,22,頁11-24。\n楊國樞(1997)。心理學研究的本土契合性及其相關問題。本土心理學研究,8,頁75-120。\n楊國樞(2005)。本土心理學的意義與發展。台北:遠流出版公司。\n劉仲矩與周玉涵(2016)。公部門人員情緒勒索認知、工作壓力與離職傾向關聯之研究。人力資源管理學報,16(1),頁43-68。\n劉和楨、柯慧青、洪淑貞與蘇文凱(2014)。護理人員知覺職場靈性程度對離職意圖與退卻行為之研究-幸福感的中介效果。管理實務與理論研究,8(2),頁105-119。\n劉宜君、林昭吟、陳敦源與賴怡樺(2018)。以組織氣候中介跨專業職能認知與工作滿足感關係之初探性研究:以衛生福利中高階人員為例。臺灣社會福利學刊,14(2),頁71-113。\n劉應興(譯)(2009)。類別資料分析導論(Alan Agresti原著)(初版)。台北市:華泰文化。\n蔡明呈(2013)。員工幸福感、組織承諾與離職傾向之關係─以某空軍基地志願役士官為例。國立臺東大學資訊管理學系碩士班,未出版,台東縣。\n蔡政廷與林弘昌(2018)。影響醫療機構護理人員離職傾向因素之初探-以台灣北區某區域醫院為例。科技與人力教育季刊,5(1),頁49-66。\n謝麗珠與梁慧雯(2019)。從組織承諾與工作滿足探討日間照顧中心照顧服務員人力管理之改善。台灣健康照顧研究學刊,20,頁51-71。\n顏慧與丁淑芳(譯)(2014)。統計學:基礎與應用(G. Keller原著)。臺北市:新加坡商聖智學習。\n魏勇剛、龍長權、宋武(譯)(2011)。量表編製理論與應用(R. F. DeVellis原著)。臺北市:五南圖書。\n嚴志龍與鄭中平(2017)。給論文寫作者的統計指南:傻瓜也會跑統計修訂版。臺北市:五南圖書。\n蘇仲泓(2018)。義務役走入歷史?國防部:4個月軍事訓練仍屬義務役,2018年12月17日,取自:https://www.storm.mg/articl-e/721132\n\n英文部分\nAbelson, M. A. (1986) . Strategic management of turnover: a model for the health service administrator. Health care management review, 11 (2) , 61-71.\nAdams, J. S. (1963) . Towards an understanding of inequity. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 67 (5) , 422.\nAndrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1976) . Social rndicators of well-being. New York: Plenum.\nCampbell, J. J., Dunnette, M. D., Lawler, E. E., & Weick, K. E. (1970) . Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.\nCummins, R. A., Lau, A. A., Mellor, D., & Stokes, M. A. (2009) . Encouraging governments to enhance the happiness of their nation: step 1: understand subjective well-being. Social indicators research, 91 (1) , 23-36.\nDiener. (1984) . Subjective well-being. Psychological bulletin, 95 (3) , 542-575.\nDiener, & Lucas, R. E. (1999) . Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.\nDiener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) . The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.\nDillman, D. (2000) . Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Jon Wiley & Sons.\nGhiselli, R. F., La Lopa, J. M., & Bai, B. (2001) . Job satisfaction, life satisfaction, and turnover intent: Among food-service managers. Cornell hotel and restaurant administration quarterly, 42 (2) , 28-37.\nHoppock, R. (1935) . Job satisfaction. New York: Harper.\nKeyes, C. L., & Magyar-Moe, J. L. (2003) . The measurement and utility of adult subjective well-being. Positive psychological assessment: A handbook of models and measures. Washington: American Psychological Association.\nLikert, R. (1932) . A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology, 140, 1-55.\nLocke, E. A. (1976) . The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnettee (Ed.) . Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. New York: Wiley.\nMaslow, A. H. (1954) . Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.\nMiller, H. E., Katerberg, R., & Hulin, C. L. (1979) . Evaluation of the mobley, horner, and hollingsworth model of employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 64 (5) , 509-517.\nMobley, W. H. (1977) . Intermediate linkages in the relationship between job satisfaction and employee turnover. Journal of applied psychology, 62(2), 237-240.\nMudor, H. (2011) . Conceptual framework on the relationship between human resource management practices, job satisfaction, and turnover. Journal of economics and behavioral studies, 2 (2) , 41-49.\nSkinner, B. F. (1987) . Whatever happened to psychology as the science of behavior? American psychologist, 42 (8) , 780-786.\nSmith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969) . The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.\nSpector, P. E. (1997) . Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3) . California: Sage publications.\nStetz, M. C., Castro, C. A., & Bliese, P. D. (2007) . The impact of deactivation uncertainty, workload, and organizational constraint-s on reservists` psychological well-being and turnover intentions. Military medicine, 172 (6) , 576-580.\nVeenhoven, R. (2009). Well-being in nations and well-being of nations. Social indicators research, 91 (1) , 5-21.\nVroom, V. H. (1964) . Work and motivation. Oxford, England: Wiley.\nWeiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., & England, G. W. (1967) . Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation, 22, 120-120.\nWong, C. A., & Laschinger, H. K. S. (2015) . The influence of frontline manager job strain on burnout, commitment and turnover intention: a cross-sectional study. International journal of nursing studies, 52 (12) , 1824-1833.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
108921311
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108921311
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
131101.pdf4.25 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.