Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/133991| 題名: | 稀缺推廣的負面影響：消費者未獲得商品的衝擊 Negative Effects of Scarcity Promotion: When Consumers not Getting Goods |
作者: | 許雅婷 Hsu, Ya-Ting |
貢獻者: | 林穎青 許雅婷 Hsu, Ya-Ting |
關鍵詞: | 稀缺推廣 消費者未獲得商品 稀缺程度高低 有無金錢成本 消費者行動時間早晚 歸因 Scarcity promotion Consumers not obtaining goods The level of scarcity Whether there is a monetary cost Consumers action time Attribution |
日期: | 2020 | 上傳時間: | 1-Feb-2021 | 摘要: | 「稀缺推廣」是實務上常用的行銷策略，尤其，伴隨科技進步帶動各種銷售模式興起，如電話銷售、電視購物、電子商務、直播等，廠商推出限定優惠名額試圖增加消費者購買行為的現象更為普遍，數量限制某種程度上顯示商品的稀缺性，但實際觀察可發現有消費者付諸行動後卻未獲得商品的情況，故本研究聚焦於消費者未獲得稀缺商品的情境，進一步探討「稀缺程度高低」對消費者可能產生的負面影響。\n實驗一採3 （稀缺程度高低：稀缺程度高/無說明數量/稀缺程度低）×2 （有無金錢成本：有金錢成本/無金錢成本） 二因子組間實驗設計，實驗二採3 （稀缺程度高低：稀缺程度高/無說明數量/稀缺程度低）×2 （行動時間早晚：行動時間早/行動時間晚） 二因子組間實驗設計，兩個實驗皆探討「歸因」中介效果。研究結果顯示：(一) 和「無說明數量」的情境相比，「稀缺程度高」情境下之消費者會有較高的「再次拜訪意願」、(二) 在「有金錢成本」下，「稀缺程度高低」對消費者的「總體滿意度」、「推薦意願」、「再次拜訪意願」和「品牌態度」皆沒有顯著差異、(三) 在「無金錢成本」下，僅和「稀缺程度低」的情境相比，「稀缺程度高」情境下的消費者會有較高的「再次拜訪意願」、(四) 和「行動時間晚」的消費者相比，「行動時間早」的消費者最終沒有獲得商品，會產生較低的「總體滿意度」、「推薦意願」、「再次拜訪意願」和「品牌態度」，同時， (五) 「歸因」在本研究兩個實驗中不具中介效果。 “Scarcity Promotion” is a common marketing strategy. With the advance of technology, followed by various innovative sales models, it is more common for manufacturers to roll out limited offers with certain quotas, to encourage consumer purchase. However, quantitative restrictions can result in product scarcity; thus, acquisition cannot be ensured even if consumers require them. This research focuses on the situation where consumers do not obtain scarce commodities, and distinguishes possibly negative effects on consumers due to different levels of scarcity. Experiment 1 adopts a 3 × 2 two-factor inter-group experimental design, consisting of the degree of scarcity (high scarcity/quantity without explanation/low scarcity), and money cost (with or without). Experiment 2’s 3 × 2 design consists of the degree of scarcity (high scarcity/number of unspecified/low scarcity), and action time (early or late). Both experiments explore the mediation effect of “attribution.” First, consumers in the “high scarcity” scenario, compared with those in “unspecified quantity,” have higher “willingness to visit again.” Second, where “pecuniary cost” exists, “level of scarcity” has no significant effect on consumers’ “overall satisfaction,” “willingness to recommend,” “willingness to visit again,” and “brand attitude.” Third, without pecuniary cost, consumers express higher “willingness to visit again” in “high scarcity” than in “low scarcity.” Fourth, compared with consumers who act late, early consumers who do not obtain goods ultimately have lower “overall satisfaction,” “willingness to recommend,” “willingness to visit again,” and “brand attitude.” Fifth, “attribution” has no intermediary effect in either experiment. |
參考文獻: | 中文文獻\n上線君（民108年11月7日）。雙11營銷套路總結：這三大實用套路，你不能不知道！【線上論壇】。取自https://bit.ly/3cGUVI5\n王宏仁（譯）（民 99）。消費社會學（原作者：P. Corrigan）。臺北市：群學出版。（原著出版年：1997）。\n今年電子購物業營收可望再創新猷【最新消息】（民108年8月）。產業經濟統計簡訊。取自https://bit.ly/3ldXOUn\n交通部觀光局(民108)。106年國人旅遊狀況調查（公共版）(AG020017)【原始數據】。中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-AG020017-3\n李麗滿（民107年2月6日）。春節檔期看旺 全年百貨營業額 有望衝上3,350億。工商時報。取自https://bit.ly/3nVFAYI\n李征坤、楊雙貴、劉智惠、劉文斌（民107）。消費者不得不學的消費心理學。臺北市：崧燁文化事業有限公司。\n吳莉瑋（譯）（民 102）。年輕人的經濟課【PDF格式】。取自\nhttps://bit.ly/2KMNlln\n林秀雲（譯）（民105）。社會科學研究方法（3版）（原作者：E. Babbie）。臺北市：雙葉書廊 （原著出版年：1975）。\n林俊成（民107年2月26日）。衛生紙心理學－搶購，荷包瘦讓決策更難受【部落格文字資料】。取自 https://bit.ly/33iWA3q\n胡曉鵬（民102）。微觀經濟學：理論拓展與應用。上海市中國大陸：上海社會科學院出版社。\n指尖商機看俏！我國電子購物業近7年平均成長7.4% 【最新消息】（民107年2月）。產業經濟統計簡訊。取自 https://bit.ly/3j8hcQJ\n唐玄輝、林穎謙（民100）。情境故事法運用於跨領域合作的問題與影響。設計學報，16(3)， 21–44。\n陳鉦達、謝安田（民98）。消費者個人特質及從眾消費傾向間關係之研究。稻江學報，3(3)，204–222。\n莫倩（民98）。大眾文化與網絡文化。北京市中國大陸：北京郵電大學出版社。\n商業團體分業標準（民108年08月19日）。\n彭子洋、胡欣、潘曦（民107）。西方經濟學習題集（微觀部分 第2版）。成都市中國大陸：西南財經大學出版社。\n廖淑伶、馬友薏（民105）。行銷管理（3版）（原作者：P. Kotler & G. Armstrong）。新北市:高立圖書。（原著出版年：1980）。\n蔡美娟、魏文郡（民107）。零售業電子商務發展現況及調查規劃。主計月刊，749，72–79。\n謝樹寬（譯）（民 104）。匱乏經濟學:為什麼老是在趕deadline? 為什麼老是覺得時間和金錢不夠用?（原作者：S. Mullainathan & E. Shafir）。臺北市:遠流。（原著出版年：2013）。\n英文文獻\nAguirre-Rodriguez, A. (2013). The Effect of Consumer Persuasion Knowledge on Scarcity Appeal Persuasiveness. Journal of Advertising, 42(4), 371–379.\nAronson, E. & Linder, D. (1965). Gain and loss of esteem as determinants of interpersonal attractiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1(2), 156–171.\nAllport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. New York: Henry Holt and Company.\nAdams, G., Bruckmüller, S., & Decker, S. (2012). Self and agency in context: Ecologies of abundance and scarcity. International Perspectives in Psychology: Research,\nPractice, Consultation, 1(3), 141–153.\nAnggreeni, I., & van der Voort, M. C. (2008). Tracing the Scenarios in Scenario-Based Product Design: A study to support scenario generation. Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal, 2(4), 123–136.\nAggarwal, P., Jun, S.Y., & Huh, J. H. (2011). Scarcity messages: A consumer competition perspective. Journal of Advertising, 40(3), 19–30.\nAsch, S. E. (1951). Effect of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(4), 394–400.\n———. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A majority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1–70.\nBeck, C. S. (2009). Communication Yearbook 33. New York, NY & London: Routledge.\nBalota, D. A., & Marsh, E. J. (2004). Cognitive Psychology: Key Readings. New York, NY: Psychology Press.\nBrehm, J. W. (1966). A Theory of Psychological Reactance. New York, NY: Academic Press.\nBateson, J. E. G., & Hui, M. K. (1992). The Ecological Validity of Photographic Slides and Videotapes in Simulating the Service Setting. Journal of Consumer\nResearch, 19(2), 271–281.\nBrock, T. C. (1968). Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change. In A. G. Greenwald, T. C. Brock, & T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 243–275). New York, NY: Academic Press.\nBearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. (1983). Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports. Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 21–28.\nChattopadhyay, A., & Basu, K. (1990). Humor in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Prior Brand\nEvaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(4), 466–476.\nCastro, I. A., Morales, A. C. & Nowlis, S. M. (2013). The Influence of Disorganized Shelf Displays and Limited Product Quantity on Consumer Purchase. Journal of Marketing, 77(4), 118–133.\nCôté, J. E. (1993). Foundations of a Psychoanalytic Social Psychology: Neo-Eriksonian Propositions Regarding the Relationship between Psychic Structure and Cultural Institutions. Developmental Review, 13(1), 31–53.\n———. (1996). Sociological Perspectives on Identity\nFormation: The Culture-Identity Link and Identity Capital. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 417–428.\nCarroll, J. M. (2000). Five Reasons for Scenario-Based Design. Interacting with Computers, 13(1), 43–60.\nClee, M. A., & Wicklund, R. A. (1980). Consumer Behavior and Psychological Reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 389–405.\nCampbell, R. L. (1992). Will the real scenario please stand up? ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, 24(2), 6–8.\nCialdini, R. B. (1993). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York, NY: William Morrow e Company.\n———. (2008). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.\nDeci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum Press.\nDeci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press.\nFestjens, A., Bruyneel, S., Diecidue, E., & Dewitte, S. (2015). Time-based versus money-based decision making under risk: An experimental investigation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 50, 52–72.\nFromkin, H. L. (1970). Uniqueness deprivation and valuation of unavailable and novel experiences. Proceedings of the 78th Annual Convention of the American\nPsychological Association, 7, 479–480.\nFromkin, H. L., & Brock, T. C. (1973). Erotic materials: A commodity Theory Analysis of the Enhanced Desirability that May Accompany Their Unavailability. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 3(3), 219–231.\nFolkes, V.S. (1984). Consumer reactions to product failure: An attributional approach. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 398–409.\nFolkes, V.S., Koletsky, S. & Graham, J. L. (1987). A Field Study of Causal Inferences and Consumer Reaction: The View from the Airport. Journal of Consumer\nResearch, l3(4), 534–539.\nGierl, H., Plantsch, M., & Schweidler, J. (2008). Scarcity effects on sales volume in retail. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(1), 45–61.\nGriskevicius, V., Ackerman, J. M., Cantú, S. M., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E., Simpson, J. A., Thompson, M. E., & Tybur, J. M. (2013). When the Economy Falters, Do People Spend or Save? Responses to Resource Scarcity Depend on Childhood Environments. Psychological Science, 24(2), 197–205.\nGriskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Sundie, J. .M., Cialdini, R.B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Fear and Loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, Emotion, and\nPersuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 384–395.\nHayes, A. F. (2018). Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. White paper downloadable from https://bit.ly/2YXMWAp\nHall, E. T. (1976). Beyond Culture. New York, NY: Anchor Press-Doubleday.\nHeider, F. (1958). The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.\nHelson, H. (1964). Adaptation-Level Theory: An Experimental and Systematic Approach to Behavior. New York, NY: Harper & Row.\nHammock, T., & Brehm, J. W. (1966). The attractiveness of choice alternatives when freedom to choose is eliminated by a social agent. Journal of Personality, 34(4), 546–554.\nJung, J. M., & Kellaris, J. J. (2004). Cross-national Differences in Proneness to Scarcity Effects: The Moderating Roles of Familiarity, Uncertainty Avoidance, and Need for Cognitive Closure. Psychology & Marketing, 21(9), 739–753.\nKirmani, A, & Zhu, R. J. (2007). Vigilant Against Manipulation: The Effect of Regulatory Focus on the Use of Persuasion Knowledge. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(4), 688–701.\nKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. ECONOMETRICA, 47(2), 263–292.\nKu, H. H., Kuo, C. C., & Kuo, T. W. (2012). The Effect of Scarcity on the Purchase Intentions of Prevention and Promotion Motivated Consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 29(8), 541–548.\nKarat, J. (1995). “Scenario use on the design of a speech recognition system.” In J.M. Carroll (Ed.). Scenario-based design: Envisioning Work and Technology in System Development. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, 109–133.\nKristofferson, K., Mcferran, B., Morales, A. C., & Dahl, D. W., (2017). The Dark Side of Scarcity Promotions: How Exposure to Limited-Quantity Promotions Can Induce Aggression. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(5), 683–706.\nKoch, S. (1956). Behavior as “intrinsically” regulated: Work notes toward a pre-theory of phenomena called “motivational.” Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 4, 42–87.\n———. (1961). Psychological Science versus The Science-Humanism Antinomy: Intimations of a Significant Science of Man. American Psychologist, 16(10), 629–639.\nLeclerc, F., Schmitt, B. H., & Dubé, L. (1995). Waiting Time and Decision Making: Is Time like Money? Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 110–119.\nLessne, G. J., & Notarantonio, E. M. (1988). The Effect of Limits in Retail Advertisements: A Reactance Theory Perspective. Psychology and Marketing, 5(l), 33–44.\nLoewenstein, G., Read, D., & Baumeister, R. F., eds. (2003). Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.\nLaran, J., Janiszewski, C., & Salerno, A. (2016). Exploring the Differences Between Conscious and Unconscious Goal Pursuit. Journal of Marketing Research,\n53(3), 442–458.\nLaran, J., & Salerno, A. (2013). Life-History Strategy, Food Choice, and Caloric Consumption. Psychological Science, 24(2), 167–173.\nLynn, M. (1991). Scarcity Effects on Value: A Quantitative Review of the Commodity Theory Literature. Psychology and Marketing, 8(1), 43–57.\n———. (1992). Scarcity’s Enhancement of Desirability: The Role of Naive Economic Theories. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 67–78.\nLynn, M., & Harris, J. (1997). Individual Differences in the Pursuit of Self-Uniqueness Through Consumption. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27(21), 1861–1883.\nLee, S. Y., Oh, S., & Jung, S. (2014). The Effects of Scarcity Appeal on Product Evaluation: Consumers’ Cognitive Resources and Company Reputation. Social\nBehavior and Personality: An international journal, 42(5), 743–756.\n———. (2016). Mood Affects Consumer Inferences of Marketers` Scarcity Claim As a Sales Tactic. Social Behavior and Personality, 44(7), 1163–1172.\nLea, S. E. G., & Webley, P. (2006). Money as tool, money as drug: The biological psychology of a strong incentive. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 161–209.\nLiu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The Happiness of Giving: The Time-Ask Effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 543–557.\nMukherjee, A., & Lee, S. Y. (2016). Scarcity Appeals in Advertising: The Moderating Role of Expectation of Scarcity. Journal of Advertising, 45(2), 256–268.\nMogilner, C., & Aaker, J. (2009). “The Time vs. Money Effect”: Shifting Product Attitudes and Decisions through Personal Connection. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 277–291.\nMoore, J. J., & Rodgers, S. L. (2005). An Examination of Advertising Credibility and Skepticism in Five Different Media Using the Persuasion Knowledge Model. Lubbock: American Academy of Advertising.\nMonroe, K. B. (1973). Buyers` Subjective Perceptions of Price. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(1), 70–80.\nNunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory: Second Edition. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.\nNail, P. R. (1986). Toward an Integration of Some Models and Theories of Social Response. Psychological Bulletin, 100(2), 190–206.\nNürnberg, R. O. (2015). The Effects of Product Scarcity on Consumer Behavior: A Meta-Analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Europa-Universität Viadrina Frankfurt).\nRetrieved from https://bit.ly/37MEglp\nOk, C., Back, K.J., & Shanklin, C. (2006). Service Recovery Paradox: Implications from an Experimental Study in a Restaurant Setting in a Restaurant Setting.\nJournal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 14(3), 17–33.\nOkada, E. M., & Hoch, S. J. (2004). Spending Time versus Spending Money. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 313–323.\nOlson, J. C. (1974). Cue Properties of price: Literature review and theoretical considerations (No. 20). College of Business Administration, Pennsylvania State University.\nOsés-Eraso, N., Udina, F., & Viladrich-Grau, M. (2008). Environmental versus Human-Induced Scarcity in the\nCommons: Do They Trigger the Same Response? Environmental and Resource Economics, 40(4), 529–550.\nOliver, R. L. (1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469.\nParker, J. R., & Lehmann, D. R. (2011). When shelf-based scarcity impacts consumer preferences. Journal of Retailing, 87(2), 142–155.\nPropp, V. (1958). Morphology of the folktale. The Hague: Mouton. (Original work pub-lished 1928).\nRao, A. R., & Monroe, K. B. (1989). The Effect of Price, Brand Name, and Store Name on Buyers` perceptions of Product Quality: An Integrative Review. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 351–357.\nRoux, C., Goldsmith, K., & Bonezzi, A. (2015). On the Psychology of Scarcity: When Reminders of Resource\nScarcity Promote Selfish (and Generous) Behavior.\nJournal of Consumer Research, 42(4), 615–631.\nRiesman, D., Denney, R., & Glazer, N. (1950). The Lonely Crowd: A Study of the Changing American Character. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.\nRobertson, T. S., Zielinski, J., & Ward, S. (1984). Consumer Behavior. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.\nSnyder, C. R. (1992). Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 9–24.\nSnyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1977). Abnormality as a Positive Characteristic: The Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Need for Uniqueness. Journal of Abnorma1 Psychology, 86(5), 518–527.\n———. (1980). Uniqueness: The Human Pursuit of Difference. New York, NY: Plenum, 145, 382–391.\nTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, 185(4157), 1124–1131.\nTian, K. T., Bearden, W. O., & Hunter, G. L. (2001). Consumers’ Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 50–66.\nTsiros, M., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T., Jr. (2004). The Role of Attributions in Customer Satisfaction: A\nReexamination. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 476–483.\nTan, S. J., & Chua, S. H. (2004). “While stocks last!” Impact of framing on consumers’ perception of sales promotions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(5), 343–355.\nTang, Z., Zhang, H., Yan, A., & Qu, C. (2017). Time Is Money: The Decision Making of Smartphone High Users in Gain and Loss Intertemporal Choice. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 363.\nvan Herpen, E. V., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2005). How Product Scarcity Impacts on Choice: Snob and Bandwagon Effects. Advances in Consumer Research, 32,\n623–624.\nVohs, K., Baumeister, R., & Chin, J. (2007). Feeling Duped: Emotional, Motivational, and Cognitive Aspects of Being Exploited by Others. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 127–141.\nVohs, K. D, Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The Psychological Consequences of Money. Science, 314(5802), 1154–1156.\nVerhallen, T. M. M. (1982). Scarcity and Consumer Choice Behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2(4), 299–322.\nVerhallen, T. M. M., & Robben, H. S. J. (1994). Scarcity and preference: An experiment on unavailability and product evaluation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 15(2), 315–331.\nVaerenbergh, Y.V., Orsingher, C., Vermeir, I. & Larivière, B. (2014). A Meta-Analysis of Relationships Linking Service Failure Attributions to Customer Outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 17(4), 381–398.\nWeiner, B. (1982). An attribution Theory of Motivation and Emotion. Series in Clinical & Community Psychology: Achievement, Stress, & Anxiety, 223–245.\n———. (1985). An Attributional Theory of Achievement Motivation and Emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.\n———. (2000). Attributional Thoughts about Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(3), 382–387.\nWirtz, J. & Mattila, A, (2004). Consumer responses to compensation, speed of recovery and apology after a service failure. International Journal of Service\nIndustry Management, 15(2), 150–166.\nWoodworth, R. S. (1918). DYNAMIC PSYCHOLOGY. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.\nWorchel, S., Lee, J., & Adewole, A. (1975). Effects of Supply and Demand on Ratings of Object Value. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(5), 906–914.\nWilkie, W. L. (1994). Consumer Behavior (3rd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons Inc., 380–381.\nYi, Y., & La, S. (2004). What Influences the Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Repurchase Intention? Investigating the Effects of Adjusted Expectations and Customer Loyalty. Psychology and Marketing, 21(5), 351–\n373.\nZhu, M., & Ratner, R. K. (2015). Scarcity Polarizes Preferences: The Impact on Choice Among Multiple Items in a Product Class. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(1), 13–26. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 104464024 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104464024 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 402401.pdf | 3.53 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.