Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134003| 題名: | 依「山」傍「水」的捍味戰士──文府國小抗空汙倡議行動深度報導 Citizen Science Fights against Air Pollution: An In-depth Story about Wen-Fu Elementary School`s Clean Air Advocacy Campaign |
作者: | 吳意萱 Wu, Yi-Xuan |
貢獻者: | 許瓊文 Hsu, Chiung-Wen 吳意萱 Wu, Yi-Xuan |
關鍵詞: | 空汙議題 公民科學 社會運動 環境倡議 environmental advocacy Air pollution issues citizen science social movement |
日期: | 2021 | 上傳時間: | 2-三月-2021 | 摘要: | 本深度報導主旨在探究並記錄2014-2016年高雄市左營區文府國小抗空汙行動，從「氣」捕惡鄰開始，如何展開一波波為好空氣而戰的具體行動。文府校園的大小公民扳倒了一家60多年歷史的東南水泥廠、使之遭長期勒令停工，但社會運動的漣漪並非至此止歇。研究者親身訪談校園公民，環保團體與之聯手，整合運用環境倡議策略；而傳播媒介更發揮臨門一腳的作用，環境議題透過媒介所引發的溢散效應，進而全面攻占媒體版面。然而，達成單一汙染廠家改善或停工目的，只是階段性目標，從法規改革與環境訴求進而提高運動層次，或能在社會運動中擴散至工業區環境品質的全方位拉升。過往文獻中，較少針對空汙抗爭行動的深度報導，期以爬梳成功的社運脈絡，提供往後可預期、不會停止的空汙行動中，參考並修正策略規劃、與反思環境改善升級的關鍵契機。 The goal of this in-depth story is to explore and record how the citizen science activities of the faculty and students of Wen-Fu Elementary School to combat air pollution between 2014 and 2016. The school is located in the Zuoying District of Kaohsiung City influenced by air pollution and odor for years. The campaign is launched to identify polluters and curb pollution emissions in the area by means of working with community residents and NGOs.\n\nThe faculty and students play as citizen scientists to make air pollution odor diaries and develop environmental curriculums to collect samples and conduct experiments. Eventually, the main polluter, a Kaohsiung-based 60-year-old cement factory, has been recognized. The government ordered a long-term suspension on its operation for environmental inspection. Their action has had a continuous effect on the community and the city.\n\nThis study tries to find the important characteristics to make this campaign possible, including the approach of citizen science, the cooperation with NGOs, and the relationship with mass media, and the strategy of an online campaign by an in-depth interview. The story sheds light that multi-actor community participation plays an important role in environmental protection campaigns, including residents, schools, authorities, and NGOs. In addition, the leading attitude to deal with mass media and making use of social media facilitate the movement. |
參考文獻: | 中文部分\n\n內政部（2019）。《內政統計年報》。取自https://www.moi.gov.tw/files/news_file/108%E5%B9%B4%E7%AC%AC44%E9%80%B1%E5%85%A7%E6%94%BF%E7%B5%B1%E8%A8%88%E9%80%9A%E5%A0%B1_%E4%BA%BA%E6%B0%91%E5%9C%98%E9%AB%94.pdf\n王斯音（2009）。〈非營利組織的社會行銷──檢視Kotler的社會行銷模型〉，臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。\n王維菁、馬綺韓、陳釗偉（2013）。〈網際網路時代的社會運動：以台灣環境運動組織為例〉，《資訊社會研究》，25：1-22。\n王惠蘭（2002）。《動物保護團體行銷傳播整合程度之分析──以臺中市世界聯合保護動物協會與中華民國動物福利環保協進會為例》，義守大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。\n江明修主編，1994，《非營利組織領導行為之研究》，行政院國科會專題研究計畫成果報告。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。\n江明修主編，2002，《非營利管理》。臺北：智勝文化。\n江明修、許世雨、劉祥孚（1999）。〈環保類非營利組織之策略聯盟〉，江明修（編），《第三部門：經營策略與社會參與》，頁271-304。臺北：智勝。\n李慧宜（2017）。〈大口呼吸多幸福〉，公共電視。\n何明修（2005）。《社會運動概論》。臺北：三民。\n何明修（2005）。《綠色民主：臺灣環境運動的研究》。臺北：群學。\n沈意婷（2018）。〈埔里PM2.5空汙減量自救會──環境倡議策略與困境挑戰之探討〉，暨南大學社會政策與社會工作學系碩士論文。\n杜文苓（2019）。〈公民科學、社區監測與環境知識建構〉，《人文與社會科學簡訊》21：1。\n杜文苓（2018）〈挑戰空汙問題界定的公民科學〉，《科技 社會 人3：跨領域新驛路》4-2：206-214。\n邱花妹（2018）。〈煙囪下的教室：環境的行動主義〉，《科技/社會/人3》，4：194-203\n林東泰（1996）。〈社會行銷的理論與實務〉，《社會教育學刊》，25：49-75。\n林盈筠（2020）。〈非營利組織倡議之研究：以中科台積電擴廠為例〉，東海大學行政管理暨政策學研究所碩士論文。\n林淑馨（2010）。《質性研究：理論與實務》。臺北：巨流。\n林瑜婷（2014）。〈非營利組織政策倡議之研究──以2008-2014年臺南老屋欣力為例〉，政治大學公共行政研究所碩士論文。\n林遠澤（2012）。〈論規範遵循之可期待性的理性基礎－試從對話倫理學的應用問題論道德、法權與政治責任的規範效力差異與作用互補〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，第24：285-330。\n林福岳（2012）。〈族群認同下的社區傳播──以美濃反水庫運動論述為研究脈絡〉，政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n林萬億（2002）。《當代社會工作：理論與方法》。臺北：五南。\n林鶴玲、鄭陸霖（2001）。〈台灣社運的網路經驗──一個探索性的研究〉，《台灣社會學刊》25：111-156。\n柯慧娟（2017）。〈文府國小抗空汙簡報〉。公民科學圓桌論壇。\n胡湘玲（1995）。《核工專家 VS. 反核專家》。臺北：前衛。\n倪炎元（2003）。《再現的政治：台灣報紙媒體對「他者」建構的論述分析》。臺北：韋伯文化。\n翁秀琪（1992）。《大眾傳播理論與實證》。臺北：三民書局。\n翁秀琪、許傳陽、蘇湘琦、楊韶彧、葉瓊瑜（1997）。《新聞與社會真實建構──大眾媒體、官方消息來源與社會運動的三角關係》。臺北：三民書局。\n高雄市立文府國民小學（2017）。〈文府國小──守護空品 文府爭氣小公民〉。\nhttps://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/25103/44703.pdf\n高雄市政府環境保護局（2016）。〈高雄市水泥業空氣汙染物排放標準草案公聽研商會議〉。http://air.ksepb.gov.tw/News/Detail/1024。\n徐世榮、黃信勳（2015）。〈第六章 高雄都：黨國資本下工業城市的徘徊〉，蕭新煌等合著《台灣地方環境史的教訓：五都四縣的大代誌》。臺北：巨流。\n陳平軒（2011）。〈從網路到街頭：反國光的動員經驗、成效與反省〉，《台灣社會研究》85：437-450。\n陳宜加、廖德修（2017）。〈高屏空品惡化 3測站達紅害〉。\nhttp://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20170202000233-260114\n陳順孝（2004）。〈活用大眾媒體、壯大另類媒體〉。\nhttps://axiao.tw/%E6%B4%BB%E7%94%A8%E5%A4%A7%E7%9C%BE%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94-%E5%A3%AF%E5%A4%A7%E5%8F%A6%E9%A1%9E%E5%AA%92%E9%AB%94-4add9448e1c4\n陳順孝（2005）。〈每個人都可以當記者：參與式新聞導論〉。\nhttps://axiao.tw/%E6%AF%8F%E5%80%8B%E4%BA%BA%E9%83%BD%E5%8F%AF%E4%BB%A5%E7%95%B6%E8%A8%98%E8%80%85-%E5%8F%83%E8%88%87%E5%BC%8F%E6%96%B0%E8%81%9E%E5%B0%8E%E8%AB%96-6056410ff7db\n莊文忠、徐明莉、張鐙文（2009）〈非營利組織的議程設定與政策倡議的形成：質研究的檢證〉。《公共行政學報》，33：121-163。\n張重昭（1985）。〈探討社會行銷的意義、內涵及未來發展〉，《社會科學論叢》，33：295-309。\n張桓凱（1997）。〈滅族恐懼的建構：草根組織和新聞媒體對蘭嶼反核廢運動的意義建構〉，中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。\n張傳佳（2012）。〈獨立/主流媒體的環境報導──以國光石化開發案為例〉，台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n黃惠萍（2016）。〈公民團體倡議策略與論述分析—以台灣動物社會研究會反海豹油個案為例〉，《傳播研究與實踐》，6：243-283。\n鄭宇君、陳百齡（2016）。〈探索線上公眾即時參與網絡化社運──以臺灣318運動為例〉，《傳播研究與實踐》6：141-144。\n鄭陸霖、林鶴玲（2001）。〈社運在網際網路上的展現：台灣社會運動網站的聯網分析〉，《台灣社會學》2：55-96。\n鄭國威（2011）。〈社會媒體與網路動員（2009-2011）〉，《台灣社會研究》85：451-482。\n潘淑滿（2003）。《質性研究：理論與應用》。臺北：心理。\n謝宗翰（2013）。〈國光石化開發案中止之探討：政策終結的觀點〉，政治大學國家發展研究所碩士論文。\n韓意慈（2013）。〈網際網路時代的非營利組織研究—實證研究的文獻檢視〉。《資訊社會研究》，24：56-73。\n\n\n英文部分\n\nAdvocacy Partnership. (2011). TB/MDR-TB Advocacy Tool Kit. Retrieved from www.advocacypartnership.org.\nAnstead, N. & O’Loughlin, B. (2010). The emerging viewer trait: Twitter responses to Nick Griffin’s appearance on BBC Question Time, School of Political, Social and International Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich. Retrieved on October 15, 2012, from\nhttp://www.uea.ac.uk/polopoly_fs/1.147340!Anstead_OLoughlin_BBCQT_Twitter_Final.pdf\nBerry, J. M. (1977). Lobbying for the people: The political behavior of public interest groups. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.\nBerry, J. M., & Arons, D. F. (2003). A voice for nonprofits, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.\nBrennan, L., & Binney, W. (2010). Fear, guilt, and shame appeals in social marketing. Journal of business Research, 63(2), 140-146.\nCarragee, K. M. (1991). News and Ideology. Journalism Monographs, 128, 1-30.\nEnvironmental Law Institute. (2004). A Toolkit For Environmental Advocacy In Africa. Retrieved from\nhttps://www.eli.org/sites/default/files/eli-pubs/toolkit-environmental-advocacy-africa.pdf\nGamson, W. and Moodigliani, A. (1980). Media discourse and Public opinion-- A constructionist approach, American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-35.\nGitlin, T. (2003). The whole world is watching: mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.\nGreenberg, J. & MacAulay, M. (2009). NPO 2.0 Exploring the web presence of environmental nonprofit organizations in Canada, Global Media Journal: Canadian Edition, 2 (1), 63-88.\nHabermas, J. (1999). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society.\nHainsworth, Brad E. (1990). Issues Management: An Overview, Public Relations Review, 16, 3-5.\nHampton, K. N. (2003). Grieving for a lost network: Collective action in a wired suburb. The Information Society 19(5), 417-428.\nHershenson, D. B., & Power, P. W. (1996). Community Counseling: Contemporary Theory and Practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.\nJeffrey M. Berry (1977). Lobbying for the People: The Political Behavior of Public Interest Groups, New Jersey: Princenton University Pressp (pp. 302-303).\nJenkins, J.G. (2006). Nonprofit organizations and political advocacy. In W.W. Powell and R. Steinberg (Eds.), The Nonprofit Sector: A research book (2nd). New Haven: Yale University Press.\nLuhmann, N. (1984), Public Opinion Select the Issues, In Noelle-Neumann (Eds.), The Spiral of Silence, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.\nMathes, R. & Pfetsch, B. (1991), The Role of Alternative Press in the Agenda-Building Process: the Spill-over effects and Media Opinion Leaderships, European Journal of Communication, 6, 33-62.\nMcNutt, J. G., & Boland, K. M. (1999). Electronic advocacy by non-profit organizations in social welfare policy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 432-451.\nMurdock, G., Schlesinger, P., Tumber, H. (1991). The Media Politics and Criminal Justices, British Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 398-420.\nNoelle-Neumann, E. & Mathes, R. (1987), The Events as Events and the Events as News: The Significance of Communication for Media Effects Research, European Journal of Communication, 2, 391-414.\nO’Rourke, D. & Macey, G. (2003). Community environmental policing: assessing new strategies of public participation in environment regulation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 22(3), 383-414.\nOttinger, G. (2010). Buckets of resistance: standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Science, Technology, and Human Values 32(2), 244-270.\nOttinger, G. (2012). Changing knowledge, local knowledge, and knowledge gaps: STS insights into procedural justice. Science, Technology, and Human Values 38(2), 250-270.\nOttinger, G. (2016). Social Movement-Based Citizen Science. In D. Cavalier and Eric B. Kennedy (Eds.), The Rightful Place of Science: Citizen Science, (pp. 89-104). Tempe, AZ: Consortium for Science, Policy, and Outcomes.\nPapacharissi, Z., & Maria de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266-282.\nScott, D. & Barnett, C. (2009). Something in the air: civic science and contentious environmental politics in post-apartheid South Africa. Geoforum, 40(3): 373-382.\nStein, L. (2009). Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of US movement websites, New Media & Society, 11(5), 749-771.\nSunley, M. R. (2007). Righting wrongs: advocacy principles, methods and practice.\nJournal of Community Practice, 17 (pp. 518-521).\nTheodore Roszak, T. (1994) The Cult of Information. London: University of California Press.\nTichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A. & Olive, C.N. (1989). Media Coverage and Social Movements, In Salmon, C. J. (Eds.), Information Campaign London: Sage.\nTurner, R. (1998). Democracy at work: Nonprofit use of Internet technology for public policy purposes. Washington, DC: OMB Watch.\nTurner, R. (2002). Public policy, technology, and the nonprofit sector: Motes from the field. In S. Hick & J. G. McNutt (Eds.), Advocacy and activism on the internet: Perspectives from community organization and social policy. Chicago, IL: Lyceum. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 傳播學院碩士在職專班 99941001 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099941001 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100101.pdf | 10.22 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.