Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134011| 題名: | 穿梭於虛擬與現實：上班族玩家在線上遊戲的社會資本運作之探討 Shuttling between Virtual and Reality: Discussion on Social Capital Operation of Online Games for Office Players |
作者: | 黃書瑋 Huang, Shu-Wei |
貢獻者: | 陳百齡 Chen, Pai-Lin 黃書瑋 Huang, Shu-Wei |
關鍵詞: | 上班族玩家 線上遊戲 第三空間 社會資本 線上／線下 Office players Online games The third place Social capital Online/Offline |
日期: | 2020 | 上傳時間: | 2-Mar-2021 | 摘要: | 在台灣，線上遊戲已成為人們重要的休閒娛樂選擇，其中上班族更是最主要的遊戲族群。爬梳以往研究，強調人際關係是上班族玩家參與線上遊戲的主要原因之一，但卻鮮少有研究或專文探析原是娛樂取向的線上遊戲，是如何轉變成上班族經營人際關係的重要工具？據此，本研究以線上遊戲、第三空間與社會資本理論為核心，探討上班族玩家在虛實空間中社會資本的運作。研究採取民族誌研究與深度訪談，以參與者／觀察者角度實地觀察上班族玩家在虛實空間的互動，對玩家所處空間與社會資本間的關聯性做深入討論。研究發現線上遊戲不受時間與空間限制之特性，成為繁忙的上班族歇腳喘息的第三空間，玩家混合著情感性與工具性目的參與線上遊戲，在工作場所、線上遊戲以及各式網路應用等混合性空間，與同事發展出遊戲戰友與日常好友的人際關係，有助於個體與群體轉換社會資本。此外，在線上／線下的空間中，社會資本中的網絡、資源、規範、信任等構面，對於個體與群體的社會資本交互影響。本研究提出線上遊戲對於企業、個人在社會資本有著正面與負面兩種影響，線上遊戲若使用得宜，將具有建立社會資本的潛力，有助於上班族玩家轉換資源與創造協作的可能性；若玩家彼此間對於遊戲的認知與價值產生差異，就有可能導致衝突的發生，破壞群體的信任感，造成社會資本的消逝。 In Taiwan, online games have become an important leisure and entertainment choice for people, and office workers are one of its target groups. Previous studies have emphasized that interpersonal relationships are one of the main reasons for office workers to participate in online games, but there are few studies or special articles analyzing how these online games, which were originally entertainment-oriented, have been transformed into an important tool for office workers to manage interpersonal relationships. Based on this notion, this study focused on the theories, the provision of so-called the third place and social capital of these online games and discussed the use of social capital by office workers in both the virtual and real space. The research adopted ethnography and in-depth interviews to observe the interaction between office players in virtual and real space from the perspective of participants/observers. The correlation between players` space and social capital was discussed in depth, as well. Research found that online games are not limited by time and space, as it has essentially become the third place for busy office workers to rest and be away from reality. Players participate in online games with a mixture of emotional and instrumental purposes. In the workplace, online games and various online applications, they assist developing interpersonal relationships with colleagues via being game comrades and daily friends, which becomes rather helpful for individuals and groups to transform social capital. In addition, in the online/offline space, the network, resources, norms, trust and other aspects of social capital have an interactive impact on both the personal and group’s social capital. This study proposed that online games have both positive and negative effects on the social capital of enterprises and individuals. If online games are effectively used, they will have the potential to establish social capital, which is helpful for office players to convert resources and create the possibility of cooperation. However, if players differ in their cognition and value of the game, it may instead lead to conflicts, destroy the trust of the group and cause the loss of social capital. |
參考文獻: | 〈Yahoo奇摩電玩大調查〉（無日期）。取自https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwlKufznZS4IZzU1cElXVXAwLXc/view\nEdward（2019年7月4日）。〈2019 年上半全球手機遊戲營收達 296 億美元 《王者榮耀》《FGO》《怪物彈珠》居前三〉，《巴哈姆特GNN新聞》。取自https://gnn.gamer.com.tw/detail.php?sn=182126\nEdward（2019年10月1日）。〈YouTube 調查指出台灣有 65% 網路人口為遊戲玩家 女性占 49% 每日上網時間達 5.6 小時〉，《巴哈姆特GNN新聞》。取自https://gnn.gamer.com.tw/detail.php?sn=186474\nLynn（2018年6月6日）。〈【Lynn寫點科普】硬體太貴的年代怎麼從遊戲賺錢？從街機、家用機到創世巨雄雅達利的崛起〉，《INSIDE》。取自https://www.inside.com.tw/article/13123-atari-pong\n卜玉梅（2012）。〈虛擬民族誌：田野、方法與倫理〉，《 社會學研究》，6: 217-236。\n方永泉（2012）。《遊戲、文化及教育》。臺北：學富。\n王曉雯（2002）。《辦公室團購對信任、知識分享、組織承諾與離職傾向之影響》。大同大學事業經營研究所碩士論文。\n石曉玲（2015）。〈跨文化外語教育的“第三空間”理論及其技術實現〉，《唐山學院學報》，28(5): 99-102。\n任敏、李璐、林虹譯（2008）。《結構洞：競爭的社會結構》。上海：人民。（原書Burt, R. [1992]. Structural Holes：The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.）\n江志倫（2015）。《社會資本對線上遊戲玩家之遊戲忠誠度研究-以英雄聯盟線上遊戲為例》。銘傳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。\n何新、張習濤（2007）。〈賽博空間在「三個世界」和「三個世界」的位置〉，《安徽廣播電視大學學報》，4: 103-106。\n何道寬譯（2007）。《遊戲的人：文化中遊戲成分的研究》。廣東：花城。（原書Huizinga, J. [1955]. Homo Ludens - A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: The Beacon Press.）\n吳紅雨（2012）。〈愛情的想像─中國熱播愛情劇的文本演變與受眾的解讀偏好〉，《傳播與社會學刊》，19: 105-140。\n吳皓筠（2015）。《社群網站之多重帳號使用戰術與人際關係研究-以上班族為例》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n呂佩容、張雅涵、林煒翔、戴培瑜、葉怡伶（2019）。〈職場團購不只是購物─探討上班族職場團購行為對職場友誼之影響〉，《科技與人力教育季刊》，5(4): 455-467。\n李宛蓉譯（2014）。《信任：社會德性與經濟繁榮》。臺北：立緒。（原書Fukuyama, F. [1995]. Trust: the Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York : Free Press.）\n李茂興、余伯泉譯（1995）。《工作社會心理學》。臺北：巨流。（原書Argyle, M. [1989]. The Social Psychology of Work. Harmondsworth: Penguin.）\n汪允文（2002）。《知識管理應用於營建業-使用企業入口網站之研究》。南華大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。\n谷玲玲、蘇惠君、陳泊均、黃彥翔（2005）。《線上集結、線上社群與線上動員》。（行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告NSC92-2412-H-002-018〉臺北市：臺灣大學新聞研究所。\n周之鼎（2018年1月24日）。〈僅12％台灣人不玩遊戲！104公開調查報告：65％台灣人月花千元玩遊戲〉，《ETtoday遊戲雲》。取自https://game.ettoday.net/article/1099900.htm\n周麗芳 (2002)。〈華人組織中的關係與社會網絡〉，《本土心理學研究》，18: 175-228。\n尚志英譯（1999）。《哲學研究》。臺北：桂冠圖書。（原書Wittgenstein, L. [1953]. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Londres: Kegan Paul.）\n林日璇（2016年9月7日）。〈為何Pokémon GO全球爆紅？〉，《科學月刊》。取自http://scimonth.blogspot.com/2016/08/pokemon-go_30.html\n林宛瑩、張昕之（2012）。〈「隱形少年」現形記：香港御宅族網際網路使用與社會資本建構初探〉，《新聞學研究》，112: 233-270。\n林南（2004）。〈教育制度與社會資本〉，《教育研究集刊》，50(4): 1-16。\n林娟娟、蘇政泓（2007）。〈以社群觀點研究線上遊戲使用者參與動機〉，《電子商務研究》，5(1): 31-53。\n林祐聖、葉欣怡譯（2005）。《社會資本》。臺北：弘智。（原書Lin, N. [2001]. Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n林欽榮（2002）。《人力資源管理》。臺北：揚智文化。\n林應嘉（2013）。〈在個人、社群與產業三構面下之遊戲模組玩家的行為意義〉，《資訊社會研究》，26: 1-30。\n邱世平（2008）。《R. Caillois的遊戲理論探討及其教育省思》。師範大學教育研究所碩士論文。\n邱正強（2010）。《連結或是疏離？論青少年重度使用線上遊戲的線上/線下社會脈絡》。臺灣大學社會研究所碩士論文。\n邱淑惠、陳家綺、陳重均（2010）。〈兒童在《楓之谷》做些甚麼？探討兒童玩線上遊戲的行為與態度〉，《教學科技與媒體》，94: 25-39。\n邱誌勇（2016）。〈實體與虛擬的並置參與：當代自造者運動的社群集結與想像〉，《考古人類學刊》，85: 83-108。\n姜波（2017）。《遊戲玩家社會資本的形式、累積與轉化 - 以MMORPG為例》。浙江大學傳播與國際文化研究所博士論文。\n柯舜智（2004）。〈虛擬空間，真實經驗：青少年與線上遊戲的互動意涵〉，《玄奘資訊傳播學報》，1: 123-149。\n洪蘭（2002）。〈導讀：語言就是口語化的梳理〉，洪莉（譯），《哈拉與抓虱的語言》。臺北：遠流。（原書Dunbar, R. [1996]. Grooming, Gossip and the Evolution of Language. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.）\n范麗娟（1994）。〈深度訪談簡介〉，《戶外遊憩研究》，7(2): 25-35。\n唐士哲（2004）。〈民族志學應用于網路研究的契機、問題，與挑戰〉，《資訊社會研究》，6: 59-90。\n孫春在（2011）。〈當數位遊戲進入校園〉，《新聞學研究》，108: 33-39。\n徐暄淯、葉玉青、嚴秀茹（2011）。〈探討虛擬消費社群之成員參與行為與其前因〉，《資訊管理學報》，18(4): 43-69。\n財團法人台灣網路資訊中心（2019）。《2019 台灣網路報告》。取自https://report.twnic.tw/2019/assets/download/TWNIC_TaiwanInternetReport_2019_CH.pdf\n張玉佩（2009）。〈遊戲、人生：從線上遊戲玩家探討網路世界與日常生活的結合〉，《新聞學研究》，98: 1-45。\n張玉佩（2011）。〈線上遊戲之閱聽人愉悅經驗探索〉，《中華傳播學刊》，19: 61-95。\n張玉佩（2013）。〈穿梭虛擬世界的遊戲少年：他∕她們的社會資本之累積與轉換〉，《中華傳播學刊》，23: 195-227。\n張玉佩、錢宛青（2020）。〈邁向成功老化的可能：樂齡玩家、手機遊戲與社會互動〉，《新聞學研究》，143: 1-53。\n張苙雲（2000）。〈制度信任及行為的信任意涵〉，《臺灣社會學刊》，23: 179-222。\n張詠菡（2015）。〈網路人際互動的連線與斷線〉，《康大學報》，5: 35-53。\n莊詠晴（2009）。《上班族對線上遊戲之行為研究》。明道大學管理研究所碩士論文。\n郭哲君、鄭志富、陳美燕（2012）。〈社會資本的流動：以社會網絡分析觀點論我國體育運動組織之資源發展〉，《中華體育季刊》，26(4): 455-467。\n郭峰淵、曾智義、吳守宏（2012）。〈社會網絡科技設計賦能與社會資本研究〉，《資訊管理學報》，19(1): 51-80。\n陳一帆（2011）。《從線下與線上文化資本及社會資本觀點探索社會性標記行為》。臺灣大學圖書資訊研究所碩士論文。\n陳心田（2003）。〈人際網絡、網絡利益與事業生涯成功〉，《管理評論》，22(4): 101-127。\n陳佳靖（2003）。〈網路空間‧人際關系：線上線下‧生活世界〉，《資訊社會研究》，4: 141-179。\n陳怡安（2002）。〈線上遊戲的魅力〉，《資訊社會研究》，3: 183-214。\n陳怡安（2003）。《線上遊戲的魅力：以重度玩家為例》。南華大學社會研究所碩士論文。\n陳彥廷、汪淇毓（2019）。〈探討消費價值對共享工作空間租用影響之研究-使用者態度為中介因子〉，《創新與經營管理學刊》，8(1): 61-76。\n陳禹辰、尚榮安、陳東龍、鄭靜婷（2012）。〈遊戲動機與線上遊戲持續參與意圖之研究：不同玩家族群之比較〉，《資訊管理學報》，19(2): 349-387。\n陳斐（2009）。〈深度訪談的障礙及其引導原則、對策〉，《新聞愛好者》，2009(2B): 82-83。\n陳智先（2009）。《線上遊戲社交性研究：玩家社交活動與「第三場域」的觀點》。交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n陳慶峰（2001）。《從心流(flow)理論探討線上遊戲參與者之網路使用行為》。南華大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文。\n傅仰止（2005）。〈社會資本的概念化與運作：論家人重疊網絡中的「時間投資」機制〉，《台灣社會學》，9: 165-203。\n曾真真、黃經智（2004）。〈虛擬社群之社會資本對資訊使用意願之影響〉，《中華管理評論》，7(2): 62-75。\n馮靜、甄峰、王晶（2015）。〈西方城市第三空間研究及其規劃思考〉，《國際城市規劃》，30(5): 16-21。\n黃于瑄（2009）。《成年人線上遊戲使用程度相關因素之探討》。臺中教育大學諮商與應用心理研究所碩士論文。\n黃光國（2001）。〈儒家關係主義的理論建構及其方法論基礎〉，《教育與社會研究》，2: 1-34。\n黃光國（2009）。《儒家關係主義 - 哲學反思、理論建構與實徵研究》。臺北：心理。\n黃厚銘（2001）。〈Heidegger 的哲學思想與資訊科技〉，《資訊社會研究》，1: 1-31。\n黃厚銘（2019）。〈遊戲—人類文明發展的推手〉，蘇威任（譯），《什麼是遊戲？》，頁4-10。臺北：開學文化。（原書Stéphane, C. [2007]. Qu’est-ce qu’un jeu. Paris: Philosophique Librairie J Vrin.）\n黃厚銘、曹家榮（2015）。〈「流動的」手機：液態現代性的時空架構與群己關係〉，《新聞學研究》，124: 39-81。\n黃品舜（2018）。《公共圖書館第三場域及建築設計影響對大眾使用之研究》。臺灣師範大學圖書資訊研究所碩士論文。\n愛范兒 （2019年4月23日）。〈Game Boy 走過 30 週年，任天堂帶給世界的不只是一部掌上型遊戲機〉，《3C新報》。取自https://ccc.technews.tw/2019/04/23/game-boy-30th-anniversary/\n楊宜音（2001）。〈自己人：一項有關中國人關係分類的個案研究〉，《本土心理學研究》，13: 277-316。\n楊淑晴、黃凱琳（2011）。〈國中生參與線上遊戲經驗與自我概念、生活適應與幸福感之研究〉，《教育資料與圖書館學》，48(3): 407-442。\n萬文隆（2004）。〈深度訪談在質性研究中的應用〉，《生活科技教育月刊》，37(4): 17-23。\n董虫草（2005）。〈胡伊青加的遊戲理論〉，《浙江大學學報》，35(3): 48-56。\n資誠（2019）。《2019-2023台灣娛樂暨媒體業展望》。取自https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-report/assets/taiwan-entertainment-and-media-outlook-2019-2023.pdf\n熊欣華（2007）。〈組織間信任〉，鄭伯壎（編），《組織行為研究在台灣：回顧與展望》。頁411-430。新北：桂冠。\n劉一民（1995）。《運動哲學研究》。臺北：師大書苑。\n劉少杰（2017）。〈網路空間的現實性、實踐性與群體性〉，《學習與探索》，259: 37-41。\n劉仲冬（1996）。〈民族誌研究法及實例〉，胡幼慧（編），《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》。頁173-193。臺北：巨流。\n蔡家安、康贊清、洪新原（2011）。〈從社會資本的互惠規範觀點探討虛擬社群中知識品質的影響因素〉，《電子商務學報》，13(1): 217-240。\n蔣鏡明、李宜孜譯（2002）。《圖解電子遊戲史》。臺北：麥格羅･希爾 。（原書DeMaria, R., & Wilson, J. L. [2002]. High Score!: The Illustrated History of Electronic Games. New York : McGraw-Hill.）\n鄭佑漢（2015）。《從社會資本觀點探討即時戰略遊戲玩家之人際互動－以線上遊戲「英雄聯盟」為例》。輔仁大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n閭佳譯（2016）《遊戲改變世界，讓現實更美好》。臺北：橡實文化。（原書McGonigal, J. [2011]. Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. London: Penguin.）\n蕭鴻勳（2011）。《線上遊戲玩出領導力-以國中/五專學生為例》。臺北大學社會研究所碩士論文。\n薛絢譯（1999）。《空間地圖》。臺北：台灣商務 。（原書Wertheim, M. [1999]. The pearly gates of cyberspace : a history of space from Dante to the Internet. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.）\n謝慧頡、江潤華（2018）。〈從電子遊戲發展史分析遊戲與控制器之關係演進〉，《工業設計》，138: 54-59。\n鍾沛君譯（2013）。《我們真的有自由意志嗎？：意識、抉擇與背後的大腦科學》。臺北：貓頭鷹 。（原書Gazzaniga, M. S. [2012]. Who’s in Charge？: Free Will and the Science of the Brain. New York : HarperCollins.）\n簡楚瑛（1993）。〈〔遊戲〕之定義、理論與發展的文獻探討〉，《新竹師院學報》，6: 108-117。\n羅中峰（2003年6月）。〈論社會脈絡中的友誼定位---一個社會學的觀點〉，「論友誼--一個哲學,社會學和政治學的跨學科觀點研討會」，宜蘭縣礁溪。\n邊燕傑、繆曉雷（2019）。〈論社會網路虛實轉換的雙重動力〉，《社會雜誌》，39(6): 1-22。\nAhmad, M. A. (2012). Computational trust in multiplayer online games. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minnesota.\nAllan, G., & Adams, R. G. (1998). Reflections on context. In R. G. Adams, & G. Allan (Eds.), Placing Friendship in Context (pp. 183-192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nBainbridge, W. S. (1989). Survey Research: A Computer-Assistant Introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.\nBaumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.\nBerman, E. M., West, J. P., & Richter, M. N. (2002). Workplace Relations: Friendship Patterns and Consequences (According To Managers). Public Administration Review, 62(2), 217-230.\nBest, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2006). Online interactions and social capital: Distinguishing between new and existing ties. Social Science Computer Review, 24(4), 395-410.\nBourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Eds.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Press.\nBourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.\nBuss, A. H. (2012). Pathway to individuality: Evolution and development of personality trait. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.\nCaillois, R. (2001). Man, Play and Game. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.\nCarr, D., Schott, G., Burn, A., & Buckingham, D. (2004). Doing game studies: A multi-method approach to the study of textuality, interactivity and narrative space. Media International Australia, Incorporating Culture & Policy, 110, 19-30.\nCastronova, E. (2005). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.\nChatman, J. A., & Flynn, F. J. (2001). The Influence of Demographic Heterogeneity on the Emergence and Consequences of Cooperative Norms in Work Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 956-974.\nCheek, J. M., & Buss, A. H. (1981). Shyness and sociability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(2), 330-339.\nChoi, D., & Kim, J. (2004). Why people continue to play online games: In search of critical design factors to increase customer loyalty to online contents. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 7(1), 11-24.\nClark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The Difference between Communal and Exchange Relationships: What it is and is Not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19(6), 684-691.\nCoate, J. (1998), Cyberspace Innkeeping: Building Online Community. Retrieved from http://cervisa.com/innkeeping.html\nColeman, J. S. (1990). Foundation of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nDalisay, F., Kushin, M. J., Yamamoto, M., Liu, Y. I. & Skalski, P. (2014). Motivations for game play and the social capital and civic potential of video games. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1399-1417.\nDelamere, F. M. (2011). Second life as a digitally mediated third place: Social capital in virtual world communities. In G. Crawford, V. K. Gosling, & B. Light (Eds.), Online gaming in context: The social and cultural significance of online games (pp. 236-248). New York, NY: Routledge.\nDonath, J. (2008). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13, 231-251.\nDowsett, A., & Jackson, M. (2019). The Effect of Violence and Competition within Video Games on Aggression, Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 22-27\nEllison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.\nErickson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.\nFelice, Y., & Amanda, J. J. (2017). Leisure Spaces, Community, and Third Places, Leisure Sciences, 39(3), 295-303.\nFukuyama, F. (2001). Social Capital, Civil Society and Development. Third World Quqrterly, 22(1), 7-20.\nGeertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.\nGlover, T. D., & Parry, D. C. (2009). A Third Place in the Everyday Lives of People Living with Cancer: Functions of Gilda`s Club of Greater Toronto. Health & Place, 15(1), 97-106.\nGranovetter, M. (1973). The Strength Of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.\nGriffith, D. & Harvey, M. (2004). The influence of individual and firm level social capital of marketing managers in a firm’s global network. Journal of World Business 39(3), 244-254.\nGriffiths, M. D., Davies, M. N. O., & Chappell, D. (2004). Online computer gaming: A comparison of adolescent and adult gamers. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 87-96.\nGrootaert, C., & van Bastelaer, T. (2002). Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A Multi-Disciplinary Tool for Practitioners. Washington: World Bank.\nGusfield, J. (1975). The Community: A Critical Response, Harper Colophon. New York: Harper & Row.\nHall, M. (2011). Anchoring and exposing in the third place: Regular identification at the boundaries of social realms. M/C Journal, 14(5). Retrieved from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/46658/\nHanifan, L. J. (1916). The rural school community center. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67, 130-138.\nHansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.\nHarmon, R. R., & Demirkan, H. (2011). The next wave of sustainable IT. IT Professional, 13, 19-25.\nHeim, M. (1993). The metaphysics of virtual reality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.\nHolmes, D. (1997). Virtual Identity: Communities of Broadcast, Communities of Interactivity. In D. Holmes (Eds.), Virtual Politics - Identity and Community in Cyberspace (pp. 26-45). London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.\nHsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information and Management, 41(7), 853-868.\nHuysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2004). Social capital and information technology: Current debates and research, Social capital and information technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.\nJansz, J., & Martens, L. (2005). Gaming at a LAN event: The social context of playing video games. New Media & Society, 7, 333-355.\nJason, C. N., & Sterling, S. (2014). Gamer Widow: A Phenomenological Study of Spouses of Online Video Game Addicts. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(4), 269-281.\nJason, J. J., Jaime, E. S., Robert, M. B., Christopher, J. F., Cameron, M., & James, H. F., (2013). Inferring Tie Strength from Online Directed Behavior. PLoS ONE, 8(1). Retrieved from https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0052168\nJeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Jian, G., & Casey, M. F. (2009). The impact of third places on community quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4, 333-345.\nJensen, M., Danziger, J., & Venkatesh, A. (2007). Civil society and cyber society: The role of the Internet in community associations and democratic politics. Information Society, 23(1), 39-50.\nJuul, J. (2005). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional world. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.\nKobayashi, T. (2010). Bridging social capital in online communities: Heterogeneity and social tolerance of online game players in Japan. Human Communication Research, 36, 546-569.\nKoh, J., & Kim, Y. G. (2004), Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An e-business perspective, Expert Systems with Applications, 26(2), 155-166.\nKozinets, R. V. (1997). I want to believe: A netnography of the x-philes’ subculture of consumption. In M. Brucks, & D. MacInnis (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, 24 (pp. 470-475). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.\nKozinets, R. V. (2010, October 14). Netnography: The marketer’s secret ingredient, MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/421208/netnography-the-marketers-secret-ingredient/\nKraatz, M. S. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizatisonal networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 621-643.\nKram, K. E., & Isabella, L. A. (1985). Mentoring Alternatives: The Role of Peer Relationships In Career Development. Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 110-132.\nKraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox. A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.\nLin, J. H. T. (2019). Strategic Social Grooming: Emergent Social Grooming Styles on Facebook, Social Capital and Well-Being. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 24, 90-107.\nLin, N. (1982). Social resources and instrumental action. In P. Marsden, & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis (pp. 131-146). Beverly Hills: Sage.\nLin, N., & Dumin, M. (1996). Access to occupation through social ties. Social Networks, 8, 365-385.\nLing, R. (2008). The mediation of ritual interaction via the mobile telephone. In J. E. Katz (Eds.), Handbook of communication studies (pp. 165-176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.\nMarcus. G. E., & J. Clifford, J. (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkley: California University Press.\nMcCue, K. (1988). Medical play: An expanded perspective. Children’s Health Care, 16(3), 157-171.\nMcLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extension of man. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.\nMemorovic, N., Fels, S., Anacleto, J., Calderon, R., Gobbo, F., & Carroll, J. (2014). Rethinking third places: Contemporary design with technology. The Journal of Community Informatics, 10(3). Retrieved from http://ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/1048/1116\nMurray, J. H. (2006). Toward a cultural theory of gaming: Digital games and the co-evolution of media, mind, and culture. Popular Communication, 4, 185-202.\nNahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.\nNardi, B. (2010). My Life as a Night Elf Priest: An Anthropological Account of World of Warcraft. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.\nNasaw, D. (1999). Going Out: The Rise and Fall of Public Amusements. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.\nNEWZOO. (2019). Global Games Market Report. Retrieved from https://newzoo.com/solutions/standard/market-forecasts/global-games-market-report/\nNicolas, D., Robert, J. M., & Eric, N. (2007). Virtual “Third Places”: A Case Study of Sociability in Massively Multiplayer Games. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16, 129-166.\nObst, P., Zinkiewicz, L., & Smith, S. G. (2002). Sense of Community in Science Fiction Fandom, Part 1: Understanding Sense of Community in An International Community of Interest. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 87-103.\nOldenburg, R. (1989). The Great Good Place: Cafes, Coffee Shops, Community Centers, Beauty Parlors, General Stores, Bars, Hangouts, and How They Get You Through the Day. New York: Paragon House.\nPage, R. (2012). Leveling Up: Playerkilling as Ethical Self-Cultivation. Journal of Games and Culture, 7(3), 238-257.\nPapadopoulos, T., Stamati, T., Nopparuch, P. (2013). Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs. International Journal of Information Management, 33(1), 133-146.\nPearce, C. (2009). Communities of Play: Emergent Cultures in Multiplayer Games and Virtual World. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT press.\nPeng, M. W., & Heath, P. S. (1996). The growth of the firm in planned economics in transition: Institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 492-528.\nPortes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.\nPreece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determinants and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(5), 347-356.\nPreece, J., & Shneiderman, B (2009). The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(1), 13-32\nPutnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65-78.\nPutnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.\nRheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.\nRosenbaum, M. S. (2006). Exploring the Social Supportive Role of Third Places in Consumers’ Lives. Journal of Service Research, 9(1), 59-72.\nRosenthal, E. A. (1996). Social networks and them performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicage.\nRubin, H. R., Watson, K. S. & Jambor, T. W. (1978). Free-play behaviors in preschool and kindergarten children. Child Development, 49, 534-536.\nRugel, R. P., (1987). Achieving congruence in Tavistock groups: Empirical findings and implications for group therapy, Small Group Research, 18(1), 108-117.\nSchultheiss, D. (2007). Long-term motivations to play MMOGs: A Longitudinal Study on Motivations. Experience and Behavior, 4, 344-348.\nSewell, W. H. (1992). A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1-29.\nSias, P. M., & Cahill, D. J. (1998). Form coworkers to friends: The development of peer friendships in the workplace. Western Journal of communication, 62(3), 273-299.\nSimmel, G. (1949). The sociology of sociability. American Journal of Sociology, 55, 254-261\nSong, S. H., & Olshfski, D. (2008). Friends at work: A comparative study of work attitudes in Seoul city government and New Jersey state government. Administration & Society, 40(2), 147-169.\nStatler, M., Roos, J., Victor, B. (2009). Ain`t Misbehavin`: Taking Play Seriously in Organizations. Journal of Change Management, 9(1), 87-107.\nSteinfield, C., DiMicco, J. M., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2009). Bowling online: social networking and social capital within the organization. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities and technologies (C&T ’09) (pp. 245-254). New York, NY: ACM Press.\nSteinkuehler, C. A. (2005). The New Third Place: Massively Multiplayer Online Gaming in American Youth Culture. Tidskrift Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 3(3), 17-32.\nSteinkuehler, C. A., & Williams D. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as “third places”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 885-909.\nTaylor, T. L. (2006). Play between worlds: Exploring online game culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press\nUphoff, N. (2000). Understanding Social Capital: Learning from the Analysis and Experience of Participation. In P. Dasgupta, & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective (pp. 215-252). DC: World Bank.\nVolker, B., Flap, H., & Mollenhorst, H. (2009). Changing Places: The Influence of Meeting Places on Recruiting Friends. In R. M. Hsung, N. Lin, & R. L. Breiger (Eds.), Contexts of Social Capital: Social Networks in Markets, Communities and Families (pp. 28-48). New York: Routledge.\nWalther, J. B. (1992). Interpersonal Effects in Computer-mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective, Communication Research, 19(1), 52-90.\nWasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005), Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice, MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 35-57.\nWellman, B. (2001). Computer networks as social networks, Science, 293(5537), 2031-2034.\nWilken, R. (2011). Bonds and bridges: Mobile phone use and social capital debates. In R. Ling, and S. Campbell (Eds.), Mobile Communication: Bringing Us Together and Tearing Us Apart (pp. 127-151). London: Transaction Publishers.\nWilliams, D. (2006). On and off the net: scales for social capital in an online era, Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 11(2), 593-628.\nWood, J. T. (2010). Interpersonal communication everyday encounters. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.\nWoolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcome. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11-17.\nZhong, Z. (2011). The Effect of Collective MMORPG Play on Gamers` Online and Offline Social Capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2352-2363. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 傳播學院碩士在職專班 107941016 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107941016 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101601.pdf | 3.05 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.