Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/134138
題名: 政治興趣與媒體使用對政治極化之影響
Impacts of political interest and media usage on political polarization
作者: 林南華
Lin, Nan-Hua
貢獻者: 俞振華
Yu, Chen-Hua
林南華
Lin, Nan-Hua
關鍵詞: 政治極化
政治興趣
媒體使用
部分等比例有序勝算對數模型
political polarization
political interest
media usage
partial proportional odds model
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 2-Mar-2021
摘要: 自西元2000年起,不論是菁英還是大眾層面,台灣都已出現政治極化的現象。其中除了菁英的動員,媒體可能是造成大眾政治極化的重要因素。近年來,網路的興起提供更多元便利的資訊管道,無形中造成民眾更常接觸相同政治立場的資訊。因此許多證據指出,網路媒體是造成政治極化的主因。\n本研究回顧國內外有關政治極化與媒體使用的相關文獻,爬梳大眾政治極化的成因,發現政治興趣可能是造成民眾政治極化的重要因素,而媒體使用可能扮演催化劑的角色。因此,本研究根據既有文獻,將政治極化區分為情感性極化與意識形態極化,並將媒體區分為網路媒體與傳統媒體,提出以政治興趣作為自變數、媒體使用時間作為調節變數的模型,觀察兩者對情感性極化以及意識形態極化的影響。\n經過部分等比例有序勝算對數模型的分析,結果顯示,當民眾沒有政治興趣,其網路媒體使用時間越長,則越不傾向較高程度的情感性極化,也越不傾向高程度的意識形態極化,然而,網路媒體使用時間與傳統媒體使用時間則沒有預期中的調節效果。
Taiwanese politics became extremely polarized at both the elite and popular levels since 2000. Besides the mobilization of elites, media would also be a critical factor to mass polarization. In recent years, the internet`s more convenient and diversified information channels have drawn the electorate into more exclusive echo chambers that disseminate information with homogenous political points of view. Therefore, evidence points to the internet media as the primary cause of political polarization.\nThis study reviews foreign and domestic literature concerning political polarization and media usage, and sort out the causes that led to the public`s political polarization. It is found that political interests may be the reason that caused political polarization, and the media was a catalyst.\nTherefore, this research divided political polarization into affective polarization and ideological polarization, and the media into internet media and conventional media, and proposed a model using political interest as the independent variable, and media usage time as the moderator, to observe the effects each of the two variables has on affective polarization and ideological polarization.\nPartial proportional odds model analysis indicates that when segments of the general public show no political interest, they are less likely to develop higher affective polarization with more prolonged internet media usage. However, internet media usage time and conventional media usage time do not have the expected moderating effect.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n王宏恩,2011,〈資訊提供與立法院政治信任-使用 IVOD 的探索性研究〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,8(3): 161-197。\n王嵩音,2017,〈是「異議」?還是「疏離」? 網路使用者的政治態度與政治參與〉,《傳播文化》,(16): 104-131。\n吳乃德,1993,〈國家認同與政黨支持:台灣政黨競爭的社會基礎〉,《中央研院 民族學研究所集刊》,74: 33-61。\n吳乃德,2005,〈麵包與愛情:初探台灣民眾民族認同的變動〉,《台灣政治學刊》,9(2): 5-39。\n吳重禮、林長志,2002,〈我國 2000 年總統選舉前後中央府會關係的政治影響:核四議題與府會互動的評析〉,《理論與政策》,16 (1): 73-98。\n吳重禮、許文賓,2003,〈誰是政黨認同者與獨立選民?-以二○○一年台灣地 區選民政黨認同的決定因素為例〉,《政治科學論叢》,(18): 101-140。\n林瓊珠,2013,〈政黨與候選人網站造訪者政治態度之探討〉,《法政學報》,(25): 177-205。\n俞振華、林啟耀,2013,〈解析台灣民眾統獨偏好:一個兩難又不確定的選擇〉,《台灣政治學刊》,17(2): 165-230。\n俞振華、翁定暐,2017,〈影響台灣民眾政治參與的因素:從公民規範認知的觀點出發〉,《調查研究-方法與應用》,(38): 9-56。\n耿曙、劉嘉薇與陳陸輝,2009,〈打破維持現狀的迷思:台灣民眾統獨抉擇中理念與務實的兩難〉,《台灣政治學刊》,13(2): 3-56。\n財團法人台灣網路資訊中心,2020,〈2019 台灣網路報告〉,財團法人台灣網路資訊中心:https://report.twnic.tw/2019/,檢索日期:2020 年 5 月 26 日。\n盛杏湲,2002,〈統獨議題與台灣選民的投票行為:一九九○年代的分析〉,《選舉研究》,9(1): 41-80。\n------ ,2008,〈政黨的國會領導與凝聚力-2000年政黨輪替前後的觀察〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,1(46): 1-46。\n盛杏湲、黃士豪,2006,〈臺灣民眾為什麼討厭立法院?〉,《臺灣民主季刊》, 3(3): 85-127。\n盛杏湲、陳義彥,2003,〈政治分歧與政黨競爭:二○○一年立法委員選舉的分 析〉,《選舉研究》,10(1): 7-40。\n陳義彥、陳陸輝,2003,〈模稜兩可的態度還是不確定的未來:台灣民眾統獨觀的解析〉,《中國大陸研究》,46(5): 1-20。\n國家通訊傳播委員會,2020,〈廣播電視事業許可家數〉,國家通訊傳播委員會網站:https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/news_detail.aspx?site_content_sn=2028& cate=0&keyword=&is_history=0&pages=0&sn_f=43127,檢索日期:2020年5月22日。\n黃秀端,2004,〈政黨輪替前後的立法院內投票結盟〉,《選舉研究》,11(1): 1- 32。\n黃秀端、陳鴻鈞,2006,〈國會中政黨席次大小對互動之影響―第三屆到第五屆的立法院記名表決探析〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,18(3): 385-415。\n黃紀、王德育,2012,《質變數與受限依變數的迴歸分析》,台北:五南出版社。\n蔡佳泓、徐永明、黃琇庭,2007,〈兩極化政治:解釋台灣 2004 總統大選〉,《選舉研究》,14(1): 1-31。\n蔡韻竹,2019,〈同中求異?政黨在記名表決中的形式與實質對立〉載於《國會 立法與國會監督》,黃秀端主編,臺北市: 五南。\n劉正山,2009,〈2008年總統大選競選期間政黨支持者選擇性接觸媒體傾向的分析〉,《選舉研究》,16(2): 51-70。\n劉昌德,2013,〈新聞媒體專業表現調查報告〉,台灣媒體觀察教育基金會:https://www.mediawatch.org.tw/news/9267,檢索日期:2020 年 5 月 27 日。\n劉嘉薇,2018,《臺灣民眾的媒體選擇與統獨立場》,臺北市: 五南。\n蕭怡靖,2006,〈臺灣閱報民眾的人口結構及政治態度之變遷-1992 至 2004年〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,3(4): 37-70。\n------,2013,〈書評: The Disappearing Center: Engaged Citizens, Polarization, and American Democracy by Alan I. Abramowitz〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,10(1): 131- 137。\n------,2014,〈從政黨情感溫度計解析台灣民眾的政治極化〉,《選舉研究》, 21(2): 1-42。\n------,2019,〈台灣民眾的黨性極化及其對民主態度的影響〉,《台灣政治學刊》, 23(2): 41-85。\n蕭怡靖、林聰吉,2013,〈台灣政治極化之初探:測量與分析〉,載於《台灣選舉與民主化調查(TEDS)方法論之回顧與前瞻》,黃紀主編,台北:五南 。\n蕭怡靖、鄭夙芬,2014,〈台灣民眾對左右意識型態的認知:以統獨議題取代左右意識型態檢測台灣的政黨極化〉,《台灣政治學刊》,18(2): 79-138。\n\n西文部分\nAbramowitz, Alan I. and Kyle L. Saunders. 1998. “Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate.” The Journal of Politics 60(3): 634-652.\n------. 2008. “Is Polarization a Myth?” The Journal of Politics 70(2): 542-555.\nAbramowitz, Alan I. 2010. The disappearing center: engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.\nAbramowitz, Alan I. and Steven Webster. 2016. “The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century.” Electoral Studies 41: 12-22.\nBarbera ́, Pablo, Andreu Casas, Jonathan Nagler, Patrick J. Egan, Richard Bonneau, John T. Jost, Joshua A. Tucker, 2019. “Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data.” American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883-901.\nBartels, Larry M. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.” Political Behavior 24(2): 117-150.\nBatto, Nathan F. and Emily Beaulieu 2020. “Partisan Conflict and Citizens’ Democratic Attitudes: How Partisanship Shapes Reactions to Legislative Brawls.” The Journal of Politics 82(1): 315-328.\nBorah, Porismita, Kjerstin Thorson, and Hyunseo Hwang. 2015. “Causes and Consequences of Selective Exposure Among Political Blog Readers: The Role of Hostile Media Perception in Motivated Media Use and Expressive Participation.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 12(2): 186-199.\nBoulianne, Shelley 2011. “Stimulating or Reinforcing Political Interest: Using Panel Data to Examine Reciprocal Effects Between News Media and Political Interest.” Political Communication 28(2): 147-162.\nBoxell, Levi, and Gentzkow, Matthew and Shapiro, Jesse M. 2017. “Is the Internet Causing Political Polarization? Evidence from Demographics” NBER Working Paper No. w23258.\nBrady, David W., and Harhrie C. Hahn. 2006. “Polarization Then and Now: A Historical Perspective” In Red and blue nation? Volume one, eds. Pietro S. Nivola and David W. Brady. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.\nBrady, William J., Julian A. Wills, John T. Jost , Joshua A. Tucker, and Jay J. Van Bavel. 2017. “Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(28): 7313-7318.\nCampbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.\nCampbell, James E. 2016. Polarized: making sense of a divided America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.\nChang, Wen-chun. 2018. “Media Use and Satisfaction with Democracy: Testing the Role of Political Interest.” Social Indicators Research 140(3): 999-1016.\nChu, Yun-han , Min-hua Huang, and Yu-tzung Chang. 2016. “Polarized Politics and Support for Democracy.” In Taiwan`s Democracy Challenged: The Chen Shui-bian Years, eds. Yun-han Chu, Larry Diamond, and Kharis Templeman, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\nCoe, Kevin, David Tewksbury, Bradley J. Bond, Kristin L. Drogos, Robert W. Porter, Ashley Yahn, and Yuanyuan Zhang. 2008. “Hostile News: Partisan Use and Perceptions of Cable News Programming.” Journal of Communication 58(2): 201- 219.\nConway, Margaret M. 1991. Political participation in the United States (2nd ed.). Washington, D.C: CQ Press.\nCox, Garry W., & Mathew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nDalton, R. J. 2008. The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences. Comparative Political Studies 41(7): 899–920.\nDavid, Clarissa C. 2009. “Learning Political Information From the News: A Closer Look at the Role of Motivation.” Journal of Communication 59(2): 243-261.\nDelli Carpini, Michael. X. and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters, New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.\nDelli Carpini, Michael. X. 2004. “Mediating democratic engagement: The impact of communications on citizens’ involvement in political and civic life.” In Handbook of political communication research, eds. Kaid, Lynda Lee. Mahwah: Routledge.\nDiMaggio, Paul., John Evans, and Bethany Bryson. 1996. “Have Americans` social attitudes become more polarized?” American Journal of Sociology, 102(3): 690-755.\nDrew, Dan. and David Weaver. 2006. “Voter Learning in The 2004 Presidential Election: Did The Media Matter?” Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 83(1), 25-42.\nFarrell, Henry. 2012. “The Consequences of the Internet for Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 15(1), 35-52.\nFestinger, Leon. 1957. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nFiorina, Morris. P., and Samuel J. Abrams. 2008. “Political Polarization in the American Public.” Annual Review Of Political Science 11(1): 563-588.\nFiorina, Morris. P., Samuel J. Abrams and Jeremy C. Pope. 2008. “Polarization in the American Public: Misconceptions and Misreadings.” The Journal of Politics 70(2): 556-560.\n------. 2011. Culture War?: the myth of a polarized America. Boston, Mass: Longman.\nFleisher, Richard, And John R. Bond. 2004. “The Shrinking Middle in the US Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 34(3): 429-451.\nFletcher, Richard, and Rasmus K. Nielsen. 2017. “Are News Audiences Increasingly Fragmented? A Cross-National Comparative Analysis of Cross-Platform News Audience Fragmentation and Duplication.” Journal of Communication 67(4), 476- 498.\nGarrett, R. Kelly. 2009. “Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14(2): 265-285.\nGarrett, R. Kelly. 2009. “Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking: Reframing the Selective Exposure Debate.” Journal of Communication 59(4): 676-699.\nGentzkow, Matthew and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2010. “What Drives Media Slant? Evidence From U.S. Daily Newspapers.” Econometrica 78(1), 35-71.\nGoldman, Seth K. and Diana C. Mutz. 2011. “The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure.” Political Communication 28(1): 42.\nHawang, Shiow-duan. 2016. “Executive-Legislative Relations under Divided Government.” In Taiwan`s Democracy Challenged ― The Chen Shui-bian Years , eds. Yun-han Chu, Larry Diamond and Kharis Templeman. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Pubublisher.\nHetherington, Marc J. 2009. “Review Article: Putting Polarization in Perspective.” British Journal of Political Science 39(2), 413-448.\n------. 2011. “Resurgent Mass Partisanship: The Role of Elite Polarization(Updated)” In Controversies in voting behavior (5th ed. ), eds. Niemi, Richard, Herbert F. Weisberg, and David C. Kimball. Washington, D.C.: CQ Pre\nHsiao, Yi-ching and Eric Chen-hua Yu. 2020. “Polarization Perception and Support for Democracy: The Case of Taiwan” Journal of Asian and African Studies 55(8): 1143-116.\nHsieh, John Fuh-Sheng, and Emerson M. S. Niou. 1996. “Salient issues in Taiwan`s electoral politics.” Electoral Studies 15(2), 219-235.\nHunter, James. D. 1991. Culture wars: the struggle to define America. New York : BasicBooks.\nHuang, Chi and Tzu-ching Kuo 2020, “Actual and Perceived Polarization on Independence-Unification Views in Taiwan” Presented at the 2020 TIGCR International Conference on Political Polarization: Perspectives of Governance and Communication, Taipei.\nIyengar, Shanto, and Kyu S. Hahn. 2009. “Red Media, Blue Media: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use.” Journal of Communication 59(1), 19-39.\nIyengar, Shanto, Gaurav Sood and Yphtach Lelkes. 2012. “Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 76(3), 405-431.\nIyengar, Shanto, and Sean J. Westwood. 2015. “Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3), 690-707.\nJohnson, Thomas J., and Barbara K. Kaye. 2003. “A Boost or Bust for Democracy?: How the Web Influenced Political Attitudes and Behaviors in the 1996 and 2000 Presidential Elections.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 8(3): 9-34.\nKimball, David C., and Cassie A. Gross. 2007. “The Growing Polarization of American Voters.” In The State of the Parties: The Changing Role of Contemporary American Parties (5th ed.), eds. John C. Green and Daniel J. Coffey. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.\nKlapper, Joseph T. 1960. The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.\nKsiazek, Thomas B., Edward C. Malthouse, and James G. Webster. 2010. “News- seekers and Avoiders: Exploring Patterns of Total News Consumption Across Media and the Relationship to Civic Participation.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 54(4), 551-568.\nLawrence, Eric., John Sides. and Henry Farrell. 2010. “Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 8(1), 141-157.\nLayman, Geoffrey C., Thomas M. Carsey, and Juliana M. Horowitz. 2006. “Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences.” Annual Review of Political Science 9(1), 83-110.\nLevendusky, M.S. 2010 “Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization”. Political Behavior 32: 111–131.\nLupia, Arthur., and Tasha S. Philpot. 2005. “Views from Inside the Net: How Websites Affect Young Adults` Political Interest.” The Journal of Politics 67(4), 1122- 1142.\nMcCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.\nMilbrath, Lester W., and Madan L. Goel. 1977. Political participation : how and why do people get involved in politics? Chicago: Rand McNally College Pub. Co.\nMullainathan, Sendhil, and Andrei Shleifer. 2005. “The Market for News.” American Economic Review, 95(4), 1031-1053.\nMutz, Diana C. 2006. “How the mass media divide us.” In Red and blue nation? Volume one, eds. Pietro S. Nivola and David W. Brady. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.\nNokken, Timothy P. and Keith T. Poole. 2004. “Congressional Party Defection in American History.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 29: 545-568.\nPariser, Eli. 2011. The filter bubble : what the Internet is hiding from you. New York: Penguin Press.\nPoole, Keith T. and Howard Rosenthal. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” The Journal of Politics 46(4): 1061-1079. doi:10.2307/2131242\nPrior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n------ . 2013. “Media and Political Polarization.” Annual Review Of Political Science 16(1): 101-127.\nStoker, Laura, and M. Kent Jennings. 2008. “Of Time and the Development of Partisan Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 52(3): 619-635.\nStrömbäck, Jesper, and Adam Shehata. 2010. “Media malaise or a virtuous circle? Exploring the causal relationships between news media exposure, political news attention and political interest.” European Journal of Political Research 49(5): 575- 597.\nStrömbäck, Jesper, Monika Djerf-Pierre, and Adam Shehata. 2013. “The Dynamics of Political Interest and News Media Consumption: A Longitudinal Perspective.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25: 414-435.\nStroud, Natalie J. 2008. “Media Use and Political Predispositions: Revisiting the Concept of Selective Exposure.” Political Behavior 30(3): 341-366.\n------. 2010. “Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure.” Journal of Communication 60(3): 556-576.\n------. 2011. Niche news the politics of news choice. New York: Oxford University Press.\nSunstein, Cass R. 2017. #Republic : divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.\nTajfel, Henri, and John C. Turner. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior.” In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds. Stephen Worchel and William G. Austin. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.\nTheriault, Sean M. 2008. Party polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nWang, Austin Horng-en. 2019. “The Myth of Polarization Among Taiwanese Voters: The Missing Middle.” Journal of East Asian Studies 19(3): 275-287.\nWebster, Steven, and Alan I. Abramowitz. 2017. “The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate.” American Politics Research 45(4): 621- 647.\nYu, Eric Chen-hua. 2016. "Partisanship and Public Opinion." In Taiwan`s Democracy Challenged: The Chen Shui-bian Years, eds. Yun-han Chu, Larry Diamond, and Kharis Templeman, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.\nZaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and origins of mass opinion. England: Cambridge University Press.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
政治學系
106252011
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106252011
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
201101.pdf3.25 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.