Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136040| 題名: | 形塑Tinder女同志：由數位認同到自我認同 Constructing Lesbians with Tinder : From Digital Imaginary to Self Identity |
作者: | 郭乃禎 Kuo, Nai-Chen |
貢獻者: | 劉慧雯 郭乃禎 Kuo, Nai-Chen |
關鍵詞: | Tinder 右滑邏輯 自我的技術 數位認同 主體建構 性別論述 Tinder swipe logic technology of the self digital imaginary subject construction gender discourse |
日期: | 2021 | 上傳時間: | 1-七月-2021 | 摘要: | 在異性戀主流的社會中，同志群體常「不被看見」。網路則提供同志追求身分實踐的場域。然而對於台灣女同志，T 婆／不分的性別腳本，儼然成為圈內的文化知識體系。即使在網路社群，T婆範疇也掌握了穩固的媒介社交與情慾互動的權力（胡郁盈，2018）。相對於此，Ferris & Duguay（2020）則發現女同志在交友軟體Tinder上所展現的自我，有機會動搖僵化的認同分類。\n本研究於是想提出另類的「分法」，是在Tinder的數位認同（digital imaginary）（Ferris & Duguay, 2020）中看見的「女同志」。Tinder可以作為一種自我的技術（technology of the self）（Foucault, 1997），讓台灣女同志用戶於其中形塑出不同的性別主體。同時，這樣另類的認同也在用戶與Tinder社群的互動機制中，形成一個有效運作的治理體系。研究將其命名為「Tinder女同志」。\n研究以網路民族誌進行參與觀察和深度訪談，從女同志使用Tinder的經驗，發現用戶可以在Tinder右滑邏輯（swipe logic）（David & Cambre, 2016）的結構中，形成「Tinder女同志」認同。右滑邏輯可分成三個層次：(1)介面強調的認識體系；(2)女同志用戶的交友策略；(3)Tinder社群的價值回饋。研究認為在T婆論述外，用戶能在Tinder場域，形塑人與技術物共構的「Tinder女同志」認同。 In a heteronormative society, LGBT（tongzhi）are often invisible. For LGBT, Internet can provide fields to practice their identities. However, when it comes to lesbians in Taiwan（nutongzhi）, there should be three categories of “T”, “Po”, “bufen”, referring to knowledge of gender and sexuality. Even in online communities, these categories dominate lesbians’ identity formation and social interaction. Compared to it, the dating app, Tinder, gives lesbian users ways of expressing themselves to destabilize rigid identity categories.\nThe study proposes alternative identity categories, discovered from the “digital imaginary” within Tinder. As the technology of the self, Tinder lets lesbian users construct a distinct gender subject, which I called “Tinder nutongzhi”, in its community and mechanism. Additionally, the specific identity discourse can be a system toward governmentality.\nCombining participant observations in online ethnography and deep interviews, the study delineates the “swipe logic”, constructing Tinder nutongzhi, from the experiences of lesbian users in Taiwan. The swipe logic contains three layers：(1) the profile system highlighted by the interface, (2) the strategies to match lesbians, (3) the value mechanism configured in the Tinder community. Through the construction, the study demonstrates how lesbian users becoming “Tinder nutongzhi”, a human–technology identity. |
參考文獻: | 米歇爾•福柯著，汪民安编（2015）。《自我技術 福柯文選3》。北京：北京大學出版社。——Foucault, M.,（1982）。《自我技術》\n何春蕤（2002）。〈認同的「體」現-打造跨性別〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》46:1-43。\n李依玲（2011）。《同志文本與台灣女同志自我身分建構──以17位台大批踢踢實業坊Lesbian板女同志板友為例》。成功大學台灣文學系碩博士班。\n李蕙庭（2017）。《隱私的游擊戰？匿名通訊中藏私現象之研究》。國立臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n林冠廷（2019）。《論男同志手機交友app的機會與限制》。政治大學社會學研究所碩士論文。\n林冠辰（2017）。《男同志手機交友軟體：身體意象與情慾展演的民族誌初探》。高雄醫學大學性別研究所碩士論文。\n柯采新（Calhoun, C.）（1997）。《同女出走》（張娟芬譯）。臺北市：女書文化。\n紀大偉（1997）。〈酷兒論：思考當代台灣酷兒與酷兒文學〉，紀大偉（編），《酷兒啟示錄—臺灣當代 Queer 論述讀本》，頁7-16。台北：元尊文化。\n胡郁盈（2018），〈認同不停轉換，類別不能不分：社群網站、跨國文化政治、與「T婆／不分」女同志認同型塑〉。《臺灣人類學刊》，16(1)：1-50。\n唐維敏譯（1996）。《大眾傳播研究方法》，臺北：五南。（原書 Jensen, K. B. & Jankowski, N. W. [Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication]）\n徐亮、陸興華譯（2003）。《表徵:文化表徵與意指實踐》。北京：商務印書館。（原書Hall, S.[1997]. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: Sage.）\n張彥南（2007）。《傅柯晚期論主體與自我技術》。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。\n張珈嫚（2018）。《開啟成人模式： 手機交友APP之使用動機、行為與效果研究》。交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n張美川（2016）。〈福柯的治理理論及其啟示〉。《社會理論學報》，19(1)：199-299。\n張娟芬（2011）。《愛的自由式》。台北：時報文化。\n梁德輝（2017）。〈從研讀Michel Foucault的「治理術」(Governmentality) 概念，反思自己作為社會工作者的經驗〉。《文化研究@嶺南》：58。檢索自：https://commons.ln.edu.hk/mcsln/vol58/iss1/4/\n莊蕙綺、王增勇、凃沛璇、胡哲瑋、吳雅雯［王增勇研究室］（2020）。〈導讀：鑲嵌在歷史中的老拉故事：世代、階級與科技〉，台灣同志諮詢熱線協會（編），《阿媽的女朋友：彩虹熟女的多彩青春》，頁17-47。台北：大塊文化。\n許佳琦（2018）。《口袋裡的秘密：使用交友軟體Wootalk的汙名管理策略》。政治大學傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程論文。\n許華軒（2017）。《女同志寂寞感與網路交友之相關研究》。淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士論文。\n陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的硏究》。台北：五南。\n陳志萍（2008）。〈精進網路研究方法─網路民族誌〉，《圖書資訊學研究》，2(2): 1-15。\n游美惠（2000）。〈內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用〉，《調查研究 第八期》，8: 5-42。\n黃子柔（2019）。《我們在微光中前進─ 男同志使用交友APP之困境與抉擇》。彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文。\n黃瑞祺（主編）（2005）。《再見傅柯：傅柯晚期思想新論》，台北：松慧。\n葉宗顯、黃元鵬譯（2012）。《發現女同性戀、男同性戀、雙性戀與跨性別》。台北：韋伯。（原書Meem, D.T., Gibson, M., &; Alexander, J.F. [2010]. Finding Out: An Introduction to LGBT Studies. Los Angeles: Sage.）\n臺大女同性戀文化研究社（1995）。《我們是女同性戀》。臺北市：碩人。\n臺灣同志諮詢熱線協會（2015）。2015認識同志摺頁。檢索自： https://hotline.org.tw/sites/hotline.org.tw/files/field_upload/2015%E8%AA%8D%E8%AD%98%E5%90%8C%E5%BF%97%E6%91%BA%E9%A0%81%E5%8F%8D%E9%9D%A2.pdf\n趙彥寧（2001）。《戴著草帽到處旅行：性別、權力、國家》。台北：巨流。\n劉北成、楊遠嬰譯（1992）。《規訓與懲罰──監獄的誕生》。臺北市：桂冠。（原書Foucault, M. [1977]. Discipline and punish : the birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.）\n劉仲冬（2008）。〈民族誌研究及實例〉，胡幼慧（編）， 《質性研究：理論、方法及本土女性研究實例》，頁145-160。台北：巨流。\n蔡佩諭（2014）。《現身與隱藏：初探女同志的臉書使用策略研究》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n蔣琬斯、游美惠（2011）。〈年輕女同志的親密關係、情慾探索與性實踐〉。《中華輔導與諮商學報》，31：160-183。\n鄭美里（1997）。《女兒圈：臺灣女同志的性別、家庭與圈內生活》。臺北市：女書文化。\n鄭美里（2001）。女同志的現象學評《愛的自由式：女同志故事書》。婦女與兩性研究通訊，60，13-16。\n鄭敏慧（1998）。《女同志網站的一些側寫》。〈性別與空間研究室通訊〉，5，135-144。\n賴皆興（2008）。《當代中共宗教論述建構之研究－兼論中共政教關係發展》。政治大學東亞研究所博士論文。\n謝采芳（2015）。《未曾消失的女同志網路聊天室：純文字網路介面中的自我展演與社交策略》。高雄醫學大學性別研究所碩士論文。\n簡至潔（2010）。《放輕鬆就能隨「性」做？從性邀約看女同志的性與親密關係》。高雄醫學大學性別研究所碩士論文。\n簡家欣（1997）。《喚出女同志：九○年代台灣女同志的論述形構與運動集結》。台灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文。\n簡溥辰（2016）。《哈囉，找什麼？臺灣男同志使用交友軟體的情況及影響因素》。台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。\n\nAhuvia, A.C., & Adelman, M.B. (1993). Market metaphors for meeting mates. Research in Consumer Behavior, 6, 55-83.\nAlbrechtslund, A. (2008). Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3).\nAnderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities. London; New York: Verso.\nAndrejevic, M. (2005). The work of watching one another: lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance & Society, 2(4): 479-497.\nArvidsson, A. (2006). ‘Quality singles’: Internet dating and the work of fantasy. New Media & Society, 8, 671-690.\nBlau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York, NY: John Wiley.\nBosch, T. (2011) Young Women and “Technologies of the Self”: Social Networking and Sexualities, Agenda 25(4): 75–86.\nBurgess, R. (1989). Field Research Sourcebook and Field Manual. London: Unwin Hyman.\nCaluya, G. (2010). The post-panoptic society? Reassessing Foucault in surveillance studies, Social Identities, 16(5): 621-633.\nCuff, E. C., Sharrock, W. W., & Francis, D. W. (1990). Perspective in Sociology. London: Unwin Hyman.\nDavid, G., & Cambre, C. (2016). Screened Intimacies: Tinder and the Swipe Logic. Social Media + Society, 2(2) 205630511664197.\nDawson, L. (2018). Playing femme and not playing it straight: Passing, performance, and queering time and place. Feral Feminisms, 2018(7), 86-101.\nDean, M. (2010). Govermentality: Power and Rule in Modern Society, London and Thousand Oaks: Sage.\nDilts, A. (2011). From `entrepreneur of the self` to `care of the self`: neo-liberal governmentality and Foucault`s ethics, Foucault Studies, 12, 130-146.\nDuguay, S. (2017). Dressing up Tinderella: Interrogating authenticity claims on the mobile dating app Tinder. Information, Communication & Society, 20(3), 351–367\nEves, A. (2004). Queer Theory, Butch/Femme Identities and Lesbian Space. Sexualities, 7(4), 480–496.\nFerris, L., & Duguay, S. (2020). Tinder’s lesbian digital imaginary: Investigating (im)permeable boundaries of sexual identity on a popular dating app. New Media & Society, 22(3): 489–506.\nFoucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock Publications.\nFoucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.\nFoucault, M. (1984). Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In Paul Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 76-100). Harmondsworth: Penguin.\nFoucault, M. (1993). About the beginning of the hermeneutics of the self: two lectures at Dartmouth, Political Theory, 21(2): 198-227.\nFoucault, M. (1997a) Sex, Power and the Politics of Identity. In P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley (Eds.), Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works (pp. 163-173). Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.\nFoucault, M. (1997b). Subjectivity and truth. In P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley (Eds.), Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works (pp. 87-94). Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.\nFoucault, M. (1997c) Technologies of the Self. In P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley (Eds.), Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works (pp. 223-251). Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.\nFoucault, M. (1997d) The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom. In P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley (Eds.), Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works (pp. 281-302). Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.\nFoucault, M. (1997e) The Birth of Biopolitics. In P. Rabinow, trans. R. Hurley (Eds.), Ethics, Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works (pp. 73-79). Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.\nFoucault, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78, (G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Picador.\nHaraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto Science: Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. (pp.149-181). New York; Routledge.\nHeino, R. D., Ellison, N. B., & Gibbs, J. L. (2010). Relationshopping: Investigating the market metaphor in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(4), 427–447.\nHerrera, A.P. (2017). Theorizing the lesbian hashtag: identity, community and the technological imperative to name the sexual self. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 22(3): 313–328.\nHightower, J. L. (2015). Producing desirable bodies: Boundary work in a lesbian niche dating site. Sexualities, 18(1–2), 20–36.\nHobbs, M., Owen, S., & Gerber, L. (2017). Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 271–284.\nJose, J. (1998). Biopolitics of the Subject: An Introduction to the Ideas of Michel Foucault, N.T.: Charles Darwin University Press.\nKozinets, R. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of star trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 67-88.\nKrueger, S., & Spilde, A.C. (2019). Judging books by their covers – Tinder interface, usage and sociocultural implications. Information, Communication & Society, 1-16.\nLemke, T. (2001). The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault`s lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality, Economy and Society, 30(2): 190-207.\nLofland, L. H. (1973). A World of Strangers: Order and Action in Urban Public Space. New York: Basic Books.\nMcLelland, M. (2005). Queer Japan from the Pacific War to the Internet Age. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.\nOlssen, M. (2009). Governmentality and subjectivity: Practices of self as arts of selfgovernment. In M. A. Peters, A. C. Besley, M. Olssen, S. Maurer & S. Weber (Eds.), Governmentality studies in education (pp. 77-93). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.\nOwen, S. (2014). Governing the Facebook Self: Social Network Sites and Neoliberal Subjects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Newcastle. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In: G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect (pp. 87-104). Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.\nPoster, M. (1999). Databases as discourse, or electronic interpellations, in K. Racevskis (Eds.), Critical Essays on Michel Foucault (pp. 271-285). New York: G.K. Hall & Co. Publishers.\nPresky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.\nRose, N., O`Malley, P. & Valverde, M. (2006) `Governmentality`, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1): 83-104.\nSimmel, G. (1971). The Metropolis and Mental Life. In G. Simmel, on Individuality and Social Forms. (pp.324-339). D. N. Levine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nStanfill, M. (2015). The interface as discourse: The production of norms through web design. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1059–1074.\nToma, C., Hancock, J., & Ellison, N. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023–1036. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程 107464047 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464047 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 404701.pdf | 3.78 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.