Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136041
題名: 澳門、香港旅遊宣傳廣告內容之比較分析:2007-2019
Macau and Hong Kong tourism advertising content Comparative analysis: 2007-2019
作者: 林詠儀
Lam, Weng-I
貢獻者: 鄭自隆
Cheng, Tzu-Leong
林詠儀
Lam, Weng-I
關鍵詞: 澳門
香港
內容分析
旅遊宣傳廣告
Macao
Hong Kong
Content Analysis
Tourism Advertising
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 1-七月-2021
摘要: 本研究採用內容分析法及文本結構的方式以了解香港及澳門兩地之廣告及文化差異,主要為分析香港、澳門兩地及不同年代之廣告訴求、廣告呈現及廣告內容的差異,欲了解兩地作為同是後殖民城市的文化認同及影響;研究資料橫跨2008-2019年,共11年期間,並以兩地在YouTube平台上官方的旅遊頻道進行樣本的蒐集,共計168則廣告。\n\n研究發現從廣告訴求的層面而言,香港著重廣告的效果,澳門以情感訴求為主;在廣告呈現上,香港廣告呈現較澳門的種類多元,同時影響力也較大;最後在品牌個性上,香港的廣告具活力及時髦,澳門的廣告則較溫柔及浪漫,在實務的建議上,本研究認為澳門的廣告需加強廣告訴求,而港澳兩地可加強與觀看者的互動性。最後從後殖民的角度出發,港澳在文化認同的複雜性主要體現在兩地都不是獨立的國家而是從殖民地重新回歸中國,因此兩地在文化上也需要作重新的定位;在回歸後,葡國在澳門的影響力逐漸縮少,同時是以中國的文化為主要的呈現。香港在回歸後,前殖民地的影響力仍然存在,同時這些前殖民地的象征是讓香港成為國際化的代表。
The main purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in advertising appeal, advertising presentation and advertising content between Hong Kong and Macao and in different eras, in order to understand the cultural identity and influence of the two places as the same post-colonial cities. The research data covers a period of 11 years from 2008 to 2019, and samples of 168 advertisements were collected from official travel channels on YouTube platform in two places.\n\nThe results show that in terms of advertising appeal, Hong Kong focuses on the effect of advertising, while Macao focuses on emotional appeal. In terms of advertising presentation, the types of Hong Kong`s advertising are more diversified than those of Macao, and their influence is also greater. Finally, in terms of brand personality, advertising in Hong Kong is dynamic and fashionable, while advertising in Macao is gentle and romantic. In terms of practical suggestions, this study suggests that advertising in Macao should strengthen advertising appeal, and Hong Kong and Macao can strengthen the interaction with viewers. Finally, from the perspective of post-colonialism, the complexity of Hong Kong and Macao`s cultural identity is mainly reflected in the fact that both of them are not independent countries but return to China from colonies, so they also need to make a new positioning in culture. After the return to China, the influence of portugal in Macao gradually dwindled, which was mainly manifested by Chinese culture. After the return of Hong Kong, the influence of the former colonies still exists, and the symbol of these former colonies is to make Hong Kong a representative of internationalization.
參考文獻: 一、中文部分\n方怡芬(2004)。新商品品牌管理與廣告策略研究─左岸咖啡館個案。中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n王寧(2002)。比較文學與當代文化批評:王寧文化學術批評文選之1。台北:洪葉文化 。\n史占霞(2005)。澳門旅遊形象的定位與推廣。華僑大學碩士學位論文。\n行政院經濟建設委員會(2010)。取自:https://www.ndc.gov.tw/\n李少冰(2009)。澳門旅遊業發展方向研究。華中科技大學碩士論文。\n吳志良(1998)。生存之道──論澳門政治制度與政治發展。澳門成人教育協會。\n呂百舟(2002)。廣告質量對新產品擴散影響之研究-以汽車市場為例。國立臺\n灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文。\n宋國誠(2003)。後殖民論述―從法農到薩依德。臺北:擎松。\n林美慧(2002)。消費者知識對手機購買決策之影響。國立東華大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文。\n法蘭茲·法農(2007)。黑皮膚,白面具。臺北:心靈工坊。\n祝鳳岡(1996)。廣告理性訴求策略之策略分析。廣告學研究,8。\n祝鳳岡(1998)。廣告策略之探研-系統建構觀點。廣告學研究,10,31-50。\n洪雪芬(2006)。後殖民香港的文化認同變遷(1997-2005)。淡江大學中國大陸研究所碩士班學位論文。\n施哲仁(2005)。台美汽車雜誌廣告品牌個性文化構面、廣告表現之差異比較研究。政治大學廣告學系研究所碩士論文。\n香港統計處(2019)。香港統計月刊2019。取自:https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/home.html\n張小虹(2007)。假全球化。台北:聯合文學出版社 。\n張玉佩(1999)。當認同遇到隱喻:談隱喻在認同塑造的運作。新聞學研究,64。\n婁勝華(2004)。轉型時期澳門社團研究——多元社會中法團主義體制解析。廣州:廣東人民出版社。\n婁勝華(2019)。回歸後澳門社團發展與社會角色的嬗變。二十一世紀,176,15-27。\n陳儒修(1997)。電影中的台灣意識:殖民論述與殖民記憶。台北:立緒文化。\n陳麗珠(1997)。台灣地區國民教育資源分配的現況與展望。教育學刊,13,117-148。\n曹勝雄、王志宏(2011)。後殖民論述及其對我國教育課程的啟示。花蓮師院學報,14。\n愛德華‧薩依德(1999)。東方主義。台北:立緒文化 。\n楊鳴宇(2014)。超越「碎片化威權主義」?──「評中國式共識型決策:開門與磨合」。山東行政學院學報,137(7),1-4。\n楊智穎(2002)。臺灣觀光、休閒與餐旅相關學術單位之著作表現與兩岸三地之比較。人文與社會科學簡訊,12(3),155-164。\n劉亮雅(2010)。遲來的後殖民:賴香吟解嚴小說中的知識菁英和底層人民。中外文學,39(4),7-43。\n黎熙元(2005)。難以表述的身分──澳門人的文化認同。二十一世紀,92,\n16-27。\n蕭志成(2008)。澳門制度變遷與經濟社會的演變—回顧與前瞻。行政,80\n(2),255-261\n趙子欽(2003)。廣告表現策略之跨文化研究—台灣與日本得獎廣告之比較。 中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n鄭向敏(2004)。旅遊安全學。北京:中國旅遊出版社。\n鄭自隆(2001)。台灣廣告50年:廣告學術的回顧與展望。中華民國廣告年\n鑑,13,122-128。台北:台北市廣告代理商業同業公會。\n鄭自隆(2015)。廣告策略與管理:理論與案例交鋒對話。台北:華泰。\n鄭自隆(2015)。廣告、媒體與社會。台北:華泰。\n鄭英輝(1998)。品牌人格與產品類別對品牌延伸評價的影響。中央大學企業\n管理研究所碩士論文。\n澳門特別行政區政府統計暨普查局(2009)。1999-2008年統計年鑑。取自:https://www.dsec.gov.mo/zh-MO/\n澳門特別行政區政府(2004)。施政報告2004。取自:https://www.gov.mo/zh-hant/content/policy-address/\n蕭湘文(2005)。廣告傳播。台北:威仕曼。\n顧相偉(2013)。港澳回歸後「一國兩制」理論的實踐、創新與發展,「一國兩制」研究,15(1),92-96。\n\n二、英文部分\nAaker, L. J. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347-356\nAlbers‐Miller, N. D., & Stafford, M. R. (1999). An international analysis of emotional and rational appeals in services vs goods advertising. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(1), 42-57.\nAlt, M. & Griggs, S. (1988). Can a brand be cheeky? Marketing Intelligence and planning, 6(4), 9-16.\nBatra, R., Lehmann, D. R., & Singh, D. (1993). The brand personality component of brand goodwill: some antecedents and conse-quences. Brand Equity and Advertising, 83-96.\nBeasley, R., & Danesi, M. (2002). persuasive signs: the semiotics of advertising.\nBerlin: Mouton de Gruyter.\nBelch, G. & Belch, M. (1998). Introduction to advertising and promotion: an integrated marketing communication perspective. (3rd ed.), Chicago: Irwin.\nBridge, H. p., & penrose, H. (1950). practical advertising: a comprehensive guide to the planning and preparation of modern advertising in all of its phase. New York: Rinehart.\nCarr, S. D. (1996). The cult of brand personality, Marketing news, 30(10), 4-5.\nFeatherstone, M. (2007). Consumer culture and postmodernism. Sage publications.\nHetsroni. A. (2000). The relationship between values and appeals in Israeli advertising: A smallest space analysis. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 55-68.\nHunt, S. D. (1976). Informational vs. persuasive advertising: an appraisal. Journal of Advertising, 5, 5-8.\nIeong. M. U. (2017). Macao and Hong Kong, convergence or divergence? the 2014 anti-retirement package bill protest and Macao`s governance crisis. Asian Survey, 57(3), 504-527.\nJohar, J. S., & Sirgy, M. J. (1991). Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: when and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 23-33.\nKathryn, W. (1997). Identity and difference. London: Sage.\nKotler, p. & Armstrong, G. (1991). principles of marketing. 5th edition, Englewood Cliffs, prentice-Hall, 426-427.\nKotler, p. (1991). Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation, and control (7th ed.), N. J. : prentice-Hall.\nMoore-Gilbert, B. (2004). Cultural revolution?. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.\nMoriarty, S., Mitchell, N. D., Wells, W. D., Crawford, R., Brennan, L., & Spence-Stone, R. (2014). Advertising: principles and practice. pearson Australia.\nMorris, p. (1998). Hong Kong school curriculum: development, issues and policies. Hong Kong University press.\nputo, C. p. & Wells, W. D. (1984). Informational and transformational advertising: the differential effects of time. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 638-643.\nResnik, A., & Stern, B. L. (1977), An analysis of information content in television advertising, Journal of Marketing, 41, 50-53.\nStewart, D.W. & Furse, D. H. (1984). Analysis of impact of executional factor on advertising performance. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 23-26.\nVaughn, R. (1980). How advertising works: a planning model revisited. Journal of Advertising Research, 26, 57-66\nWorld Tourism Organization. (2011). Retrieved April 2, 2020, from\nhttps://www.unwto.org/en
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
107464054
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107464054
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
405401.pdf187.72 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.