Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136261
題名: 尋夢者:語言教師在實踐社群之專業發展個案研究
Dream Seekers:A Qualitative Case Study on Language Teachers’ Professional Development in Communities of Practice
作者: 陳惠芬
Chen, Sino Hui-Fen
貢獻者: 黃怡萍
Yi-Ping Huang
陳惠芬
Sino Hui-Fen Chen
關鍵詞: 語言教師專業發展
自發性語言教師專業發展
實踐社群
Language teachers’ professional development
Self-initiated teacher development
communities of practice
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 4-八月-2021
摘要: 專業教師發展有助於老師的課堂實務,並強化老師的專業,讓老師有能力去面對教學上日新月異的挑戰。在過去幾十年當中,專業教師發展的趨勢,已經從規定義務性的參加發展成為自發性的學習,學習的方法,亦從正式的學習,發展成為非正式的學習,在台灣也不例外。由於108課綱的實施,台灣的語言教師們,被期待能參與學習社群,進行教學想法的探索以及交流,以期能夠精進他們的專業知識、技能,並且幫助學生的學習。然而,之前的研究,鮮少觸及教師語言教師在社群時間團體之中成長學習的不同成長軌跡,對於及其影響因素,亦甚少著墨。\n為了要填補相關文獻上的不足,本研究以Wenger(1998)的實踐社群之文獻理論,作為分析架構,針對兩位女性語言教師,在一個名為「尋夢者」的自發性的專業教師發展團體當中的學習經驗和學習的影響因素,進行相關研究。本研究中的兩位受訪者,皆為女性語言教師,兩位都在該自發性的專業教師發展團體中,成為成員,和其他的在職教師一起學習成長,之後這兩位受訪者,也都成為新進講師,並且在該社群中,和其他的在職老師,分享他們的學習經驗。\n本質性研究的研究資料,包含面談受訪者的半結構式訪談、受訪者自述書寫、受訪者工作坊的錄影帶,還有其他的書面資料,作為佐證。在第一階段的階段,研究者採用Charmaz(2006)的紮根理論,將資料做逐句的初步解碼,再根據他們的相關性,予以分類。所有的解碼,都被重覆仔細閱讀。在第二階段的焦點解碼階段,研究者將所有資料分段,一致性地將分段資料,賦予正確的標籤名稱,並且用分析性編碼的方式,發展成抽象的概念,來解讀每一個分段資料。所有的分析碼,都被重新定義,並且發展成一個更大的類屬,來回應本研究問題。\n本研究結果指出,這兩位語言教師在一個自發性的實踐社群當中的學習經驗,是透過跨越邊界、自我實現、並且和他人產生相關,和他人共好的集體學習經驗。而在他們的學習軌跡上,不同的教學場域、教師特質和教師角色,都會形塑教師的學習歷程。另外,當兩位語言教師的學習軌跡轉移時,他們在後設知識和人文知識方面,有較為明顯地的增進。至於影響語言教師專業發展的因素探討,本研究發現,雖然,個人的因素,在語言教師學習的成長軌跡當中相當重要,然而,外在的社會因素,更為重要。另外,教師的不同角色,使得教師能夠展現多重學習軌跡。本研究進一步指出,教師學習的自主權,在實踐社群的學習經驗裡面,扮演重要的角色。至於個人因素,則是決定教師在實踐社群去留的主因。本研究也針對一般的專業教師發展,還有本研究當中的自發性教師專業發展實踐社群,以及在職教師,都做出建議。本研究亦就本研究的限制,對未來類似的研究,提出相關建言。
Teachers’ professional development enhances teachers’ practice because they equip teachers with the needed competencies to cope with constant changes and challenges in their practice. In the past decades, the trend of teacher development has shifted from mandatory to self-initiated, from formal to informal. That is also the case in Taiwan. With the recently implemented Curriculum Guidelines of 12 Basic Education, language teachers in Taiwan are encouraged to attend learning communities to explore and exchange teaching ideas with the purpose to improve their professional knowledge, skills, and student learning. However, limited research has been done to explore how language teachers learn in different locations on their learning trajectories and the affecting factors for those trajectories in communities of practice.\nTo fill this research void, this case study explores two female language teachers’ learning experiences in a self-initiated professional development program named Dream Seekers and examines the factors affecting their learning trajectories, under the theoretical framework of communities of practice (Wenger, 1998). The participants were two in-service language teachers, who first attended this community as new members to learn from senior speakers, and then became novice speakers who shared their learning with other in-service teachers in the community.\nData collection of this qualitative study includes semi-structured interviews, participants’ narrative accounts, workshop video recordings, and artifacts. In the initial coding stage, the researcher employed Charmaz’s (2006) grounded theory practice to analyze the data, which line-by-line coding was utilized. The emerged codes were placed into categories based on their fit and relevance. Data was read and reread till the code emerged. In the focused coding stage, the researcher took the segments of data apart, named them in concise terms, and proposed an analytic handle to develop abstract ideas for interpreting each segment of data (Charmaz, 2006). The codes were refined and created broader categories related to the research questions.\nThe results of the study revealed that language teachers’ learning-to-teach experiences in communities of practice were essentially boundary-crossing, self-becoming, relational, reciprocal, and collective. In addition, different teaching contexts, teacher quality, and teacher’s roles were all significant impetus in their learning trajectories. Furthermore, a more conspicuous expansion of language teachers’ mega-knowledge base and humanistic knowledge base was found when language teachers’ learning trajectories shifted. As the affecting factors, the results of this case study revealed that even though personal factors were significant determiners on their learning trajectories, social factors played a more dominating role. In addition, language teachers who were endowed with different positions exhibited multiple learning trajectories. And personal factors were the main attributes to make language teachers stayers or leavers in communities of practice. The present study proposes some theoretical implications. Several suggestions for current teachers’ professional development, Dream Seekers, and in-service teachers were made. The limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are also addressed.
參考文獻: REFERENCES\nAnderson, M. J., & Freebody, K. (2012). Developing Communities of Praxis: Bridging the Theory Practice Divide in Teaching Education. McGill Journal of Education, 47(3), 359-377.\nAvalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20.\nBadri, M., Alnuaimi, A., Mohaidat, J., Yang, G., & Rashedi, A. A. (2016). Perception of Teachers’ Professional Development Needs, Impacts, and Barriers: The Abu Dhabi Case. SAGE, Open, 1-15.\nBayyurt, Y. (2006). Non-native English language teachers` perspectives on culture in English as a Foreign Language classrooms. Teacher Development, 10(2), 232-247.\nBell, B., & Gilbert, J. (1994). Teacher development as professional, personal, and social development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(5), 483-497.\nBianchini, J. A., & Cavazos, L. M. (2007). Learning from students, inquiry into practice, and participation in professional communities: Beginning teachers` uneven progress toward equitable science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 586-612.\nBorg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81-109.\nBraine, G. (1999). Non-native educators in English language teaching. Erlbaum.\nBrooks, C. F. (2010). Toward ‘hybridised’ faculty development for the twenty-first century: blending online communities of practice and face-to-facemeetings in instructional and professional support rogrammes. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(3), 261-270.\nBruns, A. (2015). Action Research. In B. Paltridge, & Phakiti, A. (Ed.), Research Methods in Applied Linguistics (pp. 187- 204). Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.\nBurns, M., & Lawrie, J. (2015). Where it matters most: Quality professional development for all teachers. InterAgency Network for Education in Emergences.\nCahyono, B. Y. (2008). The continuous improvement learning programme for English language teacher: An Indonesian experience. (pp. 61-78). Sasbadi Sdn. Bhd.\nCajkler, W., Wood, P., Norton, J., & Pedder, D. (2013). Lesson Study: towards a collaborative approach to learning in Initial Teacher Education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(4), 537-554.\nCanagarajah, A. S. (2012). Teacher Development in a Global Profession: An Autoethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 46(2), 258-279.\nCanh, L. V., & Chi, D. T. M. (2012). Teacher Preparation for Primary School English Education: A Case of Vietnam. In B. Spolsky, & Moon, Y. I. (Ed.), Primary School English-Language Education in Asia: From Policy to Practice (pp. 106-128). Routledge.\nChaney, K. (2010). An Exploratory Study of the Relationship between Online Instruction and Faculty Development among Teacher Education Faculty. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation) Southern Illinois University Carbondale. Retrieved from: https://login.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/login?url=https://www- proquest- com.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/dissertations-theses/exploratory-study- relationship-between-online/docview/763235718/se-2?accountid=10067\nChang, C. C. (2019). Examining Teacher Identity Development: Translation Teachers in the University Context. Compilation and Translation Review, 12(2), 127-172.\nChang, W. C. (2006). English language education in Taiwan: A comprehensive survey. Educational Resources and Research, 69, 129-144.\nChang, W. C., & Chen, C. L. (2012). The final report on the study of the effectiveness of Taiwan`s nine-year English curriculum guidelines implement. Taipei, Taiwan: National Academy for Educational Research.\nChao, C. C., Lo, Y. H., & Yeh, H. C. (2006). Thirty years of English teacher education in Taiwan: paradigm shifts in research as revealed by English teaching and learning English Teaching & Learning, 2, 111-132.\nChao, T. C. (2018). Becoming Intercultural Competence Teachers: A qualitative repertory grid interview study of English teachers` beliefs on culture teaching. Studies in International Culture, 14(2), 25-56.\nCharmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.\nChen, C. F. (2012). Planning and Implementation of Elementary School English Education in Taiwan. In B. Spolsky, & Moon, Y. I. (Ed.), Primary School English-Language Education in Asia: From Policy to Practice (pp. 129-143). Routledge.\nChen, L. (2020). A historical review of professional learning communities in China (1949-2019): some implications for collaborative teacher professional development. Asia Pacific Education Review, 40(3), 373-385.\nChen, L. M. (2002). Washback of a Public Exam on English Teaching. ERIC, ED472167, 1-22.\nChen, W. Y. (2006). Revisiting Proficiency: An Important Requirement for Elementary School English Teachers in Taiwan. Journal of Hualien University of Education, 23, 287-304.\nChen, Y. C., & Chang, K. P. (2019). A Case Study on an Inter-School Professional Learning Community of Elementary School English Teachers in New Taipei City. Journal of Teacher Education and Professional Development, 12(3), 29-52.\nChen, Y. T. (2011). The study of the effects and difficulties of mentor teacher program for elementary schools in Kaohsiung (Unpublished master`s thesis). National Pingtung University of Education, Taiwan.\nCheng, X., & Wu, L. Y. (2016). The affordances of teacher professional learning communities: A case study of a Chinese secondary school. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 54-67.\nChien, C. W. (2015). Pre-service English teachers` perceptions and practice of field experience and professional learning from expert teachers` mentoring. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 21(3), 328-345.\nChien, C. W. (2017). Elementary school English teachers` professional learning from teaching demonstrations as professional development. Cogent Education, 4, 1-20.\nChien, C. W. (2018a). Analysis of design and delivery of critical incident workshops for elementary school English as a foreign language teachers in community of practice Education, 3(13), 1-15.\nChien, C. W. (2018b). NESTs` identities in activity designs for intensive English camps at English Wonderland. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 26(2), 181-196.\nChien, C. W. (2019). Influence of training on Taiwanese elementary school English teachers` professional identity construction. Research Papers in Education, 34(4), 499-520.\nCho, H. (2014). "Go for Broke and Speak Your Mind!" Building a Community of Practice with Bilingual Pre-Service Teachers. The Qualitative Report, 19(48), 1-22.\nChoi, S. H. (2000). Teachers’ beliefs about communicative language teaching and their classroom teaching practice. English Teaching, 55(4), 3-32.\nChou, C. H. (2011). Teachers` professional development: Investigating teachers` learning to do action research in a professional learning community. The Asia-Pacific Educational Researcher, 20(3), 421-437.\nChou, C. I. (2009). A critical review on Taiwan teacher training policy and prospects. Journal of Secondary Education, 60(3), 8-20.\nCirocki, A., Farrell, Thomas, S. C. (2019). Professional development of secondary school EFL teachers: Voices from Indonesia. System, 85(1-14).\nClandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F.M. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.\nClandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F.M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. Jossey-Bass.\nClarke, A., Triggs, V., & Nielsen, W. (2014). Cooperating teacher participation in teacher education a review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 84(2), 163-202.\nClarke, M. (2008). Language teacher identities: Co-constructing discourse and community. Multilingual Matters.\nChen, C. F. (2012). Planning and Implementation of Elementary School English Education in Taiwan. In Spolsky, B., & Moon, Y. I. (Ed.), Primary School English-Language Education in Asia: From Policy to Practice (pp. 129-143). Routledge.\nCobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4-15.\nCompen, B., Witte, K. D., & Schelfhout, W. (2019). The role of teacher professional development in financial literacy education: A systematic literature review Education Research Review, 26, 16-31.\nConnelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1999). Shaping a professional identity: Stories of educational practice. Althouse Press.\nCook, V. (1999). Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 33, 413-431.\nDarling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604\nDarling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2011). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(6), 81-92.\nDarling-Hammond, L., & Richardson, N. (2009). Teacher Learning: What Matters? Educational Leadership, 66(5), 46-53.\nDelaney, Y. A. (2012). Research on Mentoring Language Teachers: Its Role in Language Education. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 184-202.\nDesimone, L., Garet, M. S., Birman, B. F., Porter, A., & Yoon, K. S. (2003). Improving Teachers` In-service Professional Development in Mathematics and Science: The Role of Postsecondary Institutions. Educational Policy, 17(5), 613-649.\nDesimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140\nDewey, J. (1933). How we think. Henry Regnery.\nDuff, P., & Uchida, Y. (1997). The negotiation of teachers` sociocultural identities and practices in postsecondary EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 451-486.\nDuff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. Routledge.\nDunkin, M., & Biddle, B. . (1974). The study of teaching. Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.\nEngeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R. (Ed.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge University Press.\nErling, E. J., Radinger, S., & Foltz, A. (2020). Understanding low outcomes in English language education in Austrian middle schools: The role of teachers` beliefs and practices. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. 1- 18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1829630\nEsch, V., K., & Oliver, St. J. (2004). New insights into foreign language learning and teaching. Frankfurt am Main.\nEvans, L. (2002). What is Teacher Development? Oxford Review of Education, 28(1), 123-137.\nEvers, A., Van der Heijden, B., & Kreijns, K. (2016). Organizational and task factors influencing teachers’ professional development at work. European Journal of Training and Development, 40, 36-55.\nFarrell, T. S. C. (2012). Reflecting on Reflective Practice: (Re)Visiting Dewey and Schӧn. TESOL Journal, 3(1), 7-16.\nFarrell, T. S. C. (2015). Promoting Teacher Reflection in Second Language Education: A Framework for TESOL Professionals. Routledge.\nFeiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141.\nFlowerdew, J. (2000). Discourse community, legitimate peripheral participation, and the nonnative-English-speaking scholar. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 127-150.\nFreeman, D. (1991, December). Three views of teachers` knowledge. IATEFL Teacher Development Newsletter. 1-4\nFreeman, D. (1991b). Learning Teaching: "Interteaching" and other views of the development of teachers` knowledge. Plenary given at the Washington area TESOL conference.\nFullan, M. (1994). Teacher Leadership: A failure to conceptualize. In D. R. Walling (Ed.), Teachers as leaders: Perspectives on the professional development of teachers (pp. 241-253). Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.\nFullan, M. (1995). Broadening the concept of teacher leadership. The National Staff Development Council, New Directions Conference.\nFullan, M. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). Routledge Falmer.\nFullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The New Meaning of Educational Changes. Teachers College Press.\nGarrett, N. (1991). Technology in the service of language learning: Trends and issues. Modern Language Journal, 75, 74-101.\nSheff, D., Lennon, J., Ono, Y., & Golson, B. (2000). All We Are Saying: The Last Major Interview with John Lennon and Yoko Ono. St. Martin`s Griffin\nGolombek, P. R., & Johnson, K.E. (2004). Narrative inquiry as a mediational space: examining emotional and cognitive dissonance in second-language teachers` development. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 10(3), 307-327.\nGovender, S. (2018). South African teachers` perspectives on support received in implementing curriculum changes. South African Journal of Education, 38(2), 1-12.\nGrassick, L. (2019). Supporting the development of primary in-service teacher educators. ELT Journal, 73(4), 428- 436.\nGu, Q. (2005). The perception gap in cross-cultural training: An investigation of British Council English language teaching projects in China. International Journal of Educational Development, 25(287-304).\nGuskey, T., & Yoon, K. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, 90, 495-500.\nGuskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 8(3), 381-391.\nHadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching language in context. Heinle & Heinle.\nHargreaves, A. (2000). Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning. Teachers and Teaching, 6(2), 151-182.\nHargreaves, A. (2019). Teacher collaboration: 30 years of research on its nature, forms, limitations and effects. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 25(5), 603-621.\nHargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.\nHargreaves, E., Berry, R., Lai, YC., Leung, P., Scott, D., & Stobart, G. (2013). Teachers` experiences of autonomy in Continuing Professional Development: Teacher Learning Communities in London and Hong Kong. Teacher Development, 17(1), 19-34.\nHarvey, M., & Fredericks. (2017). CoPs: Enhancing Quality Learning and Teaching with Sessional Staff. In J. McDonald, & Cater-Steel, A. (Ed.), Communities of Practice: Facilitating Social Learning in Higher Education. Springer.\nHenry, G. T., Bastian, K. C., & Fortner, K. (2011). Stayers and leavers: Early-Career Teacher Effectiveness and Attrition. Educational Researcher, 40(6), 271-280.\nHlas, A. C. (2018). Grant challenges and great potential in foreign language teaching and learning. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 46-54.\nHodson, P., & Jones, D. (2010). The Construction of Primary Teachers` Subject Knowledge in English: An Enquiry into Teaching Partnerships between Universities and Schools. The International Journal of Learning, 17(7), 59-70.\nHoyle, E. (1975). Professionality, professionalism and control in teaching. In Houghton, V et al. (Eds), Management in Education: the management of organisations and individuals. Ward Lock Educational in association with Open University Press.\nIngersoll, R., & Strong, M. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers: A critical review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 201- 233.\nJho, H. K. (2016). An analysis of STEM / STEAM teacher education in Korea with a case study of two schools from a community of practice perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), 1843-1862.\nJiang, Y. H. (2017). An Overview of Research Background of English Teachers` Professional Development in the Context of English Langauge Teaching Reform and Teaching Education Reform in China. In A Study on Professional Development of Teachers of English as a Foreign Language in Institutions of Higher Education in Western China. Springer-Verlag.\nJohnson, B., & Ridley, C. (2004). The elements of mentoring. Palgrave.\nJohnson, K. E. (2000). Innovations in TESOL Teacher Education: A Quiet Revolution In K. E. Johnson (Ed.), Teacher Education. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Language, Inc.\nJohnson, K. E. (2006). The Sociocultural Turn and Its Challenges for Second Language Teacher Education. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 235-257.\nJohnson, K. E. (2009). Shifting Epistemologies in Teacher Education. Routledge.\nJohnson, K. E., & Golombek, P.R. (2016). Mindful L2 Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective on Cultivating Teachers` Professional Development. Routledge.\nKamhi-Stein, L. D., & de Oliveira, L. C. (2008). Mentoring as a pathway to leadership: A focus on nonnative English-speaking professionals. In C. Coombe, McCloskey, M. L., Stephenson, N. L., & Anderson, N. J. (Eds.), Leadership in English language teaching and learning (pp. 38-49). University of Michigan Press.\nKang, H. D. (2012). Primary School English Education in Korea: From Policy to Practice. In B. Spolsky, & Moon, Y. I. (Ed.), Primary School English-Language Education in Asia: From Policy to Practice (pp. 59-82). Routledge.\nKanno, Y., & Norton, B. (2003). Imagined communities and educational possibilities: Introduction. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 2(4), 241-249.\nKeily, R., & Davis, M. (2010). From transmission to transformation: Teacher learning in English for speakers of other languages. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 277-295.\nKennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 20(10), 1-36.\nKereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What Knowledge Is of Most Worth: Teacher Knowledge for 21st Century Learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127-140.\nKormos, J., & Kiddle, T. (2018). The role of socio-economic factors in motivation to learn English as a foreign language: The case of Chile. System, 41(2), 399-412\nKwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0742-051X(02)00101-4\nKwon, O. R. (1997). Korea’s English teacher training and retraining: A new history in the making. English Teaching, 52(4), 155-183.\nLange, D. L. (1983). Teacher Development and Certification in Foreign Languages: Where Is the Future? The Modern Language Journal, 67(4), 374-381.\nLange, D. L. (1990). A blueprint for a teacher development program. In J. C. Richard, & Nunan, D. (Ed.), Second Language Teacher Education. Cambridge University Press.\nLantolf, J. P. (1994). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning: Introduction to the Special Issue The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 418-420.\nLantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2008). Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Equinox Pub.\nLarsen-Freeman. (2009). On the Changing Nature of English as Subject and Vehicle. A New Look at Language Teaching and Testing: English as Subject and Vehicle(Selected papers from the 2009 LTTC International Conference on English Language Teaching and Testing, March 6-7, Taipei), 3-14.\nLave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press.\nLee, H. (2007). What makes teachers learn together within the workplace?: Listening to Korean teachers of English in secondary schools. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy, 4(1), 59-78.\nLi, D., & Edwards, V. (2013). The impact of overseas training on curriculum innovation and change in English language education in Western China. Language Teaching Research, 17(4), 390-408.\nLi, J. (2010). Learning to Self-perfect: Chinese Beliefs about Learning. In C. K. K. Chan, & Rao, N. (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese Learner: Changing Contexts, Changing Education (pp. 35-69). Springer Netherlands.\nLiao, W., Yuan, R., & Zhang, H. (2017). Chinese Language Teachers` Challenges in Teaching in U.S. Public Schools: A Dynamic Portrayal. Asia Pacific Education Review, 26(6), 369-381.\nLiaw, E. C. (2017). Application of computer-mediated communication on teacher efficacy during school-based field experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 65, 81-90.\nLieberman, A., & Miller, L. (2004). Teacher Leaderships. Jossey-bass.\nLieberman, A., & Wood, D. R. (2003). Inside the National Writing Project: Connecting Network Learning and Classroom Teaching. Teachers College, Columbia University.\nLittle, J. W. (1982). Norms of Collegiality and Experimentation: Workplace Conditions of School Success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325-340.\nLittle, J. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers` professional relations. Teacher College Record, 91(4), 509-536.\nLiu, M. H., & Kleinsasser, R. C. (2014). Fostering Online Professional Development Between EFL Preservice and Inservice Teachers: Affordances and Challenges. English Teaching & Learning, 38(2), 29-64.\nLoughran, J., & Russell, T. (2002). Improving Teacher Education Practices Through Self-study. Routledge-Falmer.\nLumpe, A. T. (2007). Research-based professional development: Teachers engaged in professional learning communities. Journal of Teacher Education, 18(1), 125-128.\nLuo, W. H. (2014). An Exploration of Professional Development Programs for Teachers of Collaborative Teaching of EFL in Taiwan: A Case Study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 23(3), 403-412.\nMann, S. (2005). The language teacher’s development. Language Teaching, 38, 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444805002867\nMann, S., & Tang, H. H. Elaine. (2012). The Role of Mentoring in Supporting Novice English Language Teachers in Hong Kong. TESOL Quarterly, 46(3), 472-495.\nMcDonald, J. (2002). Teachers studying student work: Why and how? . Phi Delta Kappan, 84(2), 120-127.\nMerchie, E., Tuytens, M., Devos, G., & Vanderlinde, R. . (2016). Evaluating teachers` professional development initiatives: Towards an extended evaluative framework. Research Papers in Education, 143-168. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2016.1271003.\nMercieca, B. (2017). What is a Community of Practice? In J. McDonald, & Cater-Steel, A. (Eds.), Communities of Practice: Facilitating Social Learning in Higher Education. Springer.\nMerrill, M. (2016). Communities of Foreign Language Teachers as a Source of Professional Development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison.\nMinistry of Education. (2011, January). The Seventh Year of ‘The Power of Dream’ https://epaper.edu.tw/topical.aspx?topical_sn=1185&period_num=958\nMinister of Education, Taiwan. (2014). Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education. https://doi.org/https://www.naer.edu.tw/ezfiles/0/1000/img/52/129488083.pdf\nMinister of Education, Taiwan. (2019). Teachers Act. Retrieved March 15th, 2020 from https://law.moj.gov.tw/ENG/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=H0020040\nMirhosseini, S-A. (2020). Doing Qualitative Research in Language Education. Palgrave Macmillan.\nMohammadi, M., & Moradi, K. (2017). Exploring Change in EFL Teachers` Perceptions of Professional Development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 22-42.\nMohan, P. P., Lingam, G. I., & Chand, D. D. (2017). An investigation of teachers` professional development practices in a rural Fijian secondary school. Waikato Journal of Educational Leadership, 22(4), 89-97.\nMoller, G., & Pankake, A. (2006). Lean with me. A principal`s guide to teacher leadership. Eye on Education.\nMoon, Y. I. (2012). Introduction. In B. Spolsky, & Moon, Y. I. (Eds.), Primary School English-Language Education in Asia: From Policy to Practice. Routledge.\nMoran, P. R. (2001). Teaching Culture: Perspectives in Practice. Heinle & Heinle.\nMorita, N. (2004). Negotiating participation and identity in second language academic communities. TESOL Quarterly, 38, 573-603.\nMurphey, T. (2000). Becoming Contributing Professionals: Nonnative-English-Speaking Teachers in an EFL Environment In K. E. Johnson (Ed.), Teacher Education. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc.\nMurphy, J. M. (2014). Reflective teaching: Principles and practices. In M. M. Celce-Murcia, Brinton, D. M., & Snow, M. A. (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 613-629). National Geographic Learning/Cengage Learning.\nNational Development Council. (2018). Blueprint for Developing Taiwan into a Bilingual Nation also promotes teacher training and professional development for Teaching English in English. https://bilingual.ndc.gov.tw/sites/bl4/files/news_event_docs/blueprint_for_devel oping_taiwan_into_a_bilingual_nation_by_2030.pdf\nPadwad, A., & Dixit, K. (2011). Continuing professional development: An annotated bibliography. British Council.\nPaker, M. J., & Winne, P. H. (1995). The place of cognition in explanations of teaching: A dialog of interpretive and cognitive approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 1-21.\nPappa, S., Moate, J., Ruohotie-Lyhty, M., & Eteläpelto, A. (2019). Teacher agency within the Finnish CLIL context: tensions and resources. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 593-613.\nPeacock, M. (2009). The evaluation of foreign language teacher education programmes. Language Teaching Research, 13, 259-278.\nPennington, M. C. (1991). A professional development focus for the language teaching practicum. In J. C. Richards, & Nunan, D. (Ed.), Second language teacher education (pp. 132-151). Cambridge University Press.\nPiedrahita, A. M. S. (2011). Teacher learning within a learning community: A case study on EFL teachers in Colombia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin-Madison.\nPoehner, P. (2011). Teacher Learning through Critical Friends Groups: Recontextualizing Professional Development in a K-5 School. In K. E. Johnson, & Golombek, P. R. (Eds.), Research on Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 189-203). Routledge.\nRoulston, K. (Ed.). (2019). Interactional studies of qualitative research interviews.\nJohn Benjamins.\nPutnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001004.\nRavhuhali, F., Kutame, A. P., & Mutshaeni, H. N. (2015). Teachers` perceptions of the impact of continuing professional development on promoting quality teaching and learning International Journal of Education Sciences, 10(1), 1-7.\nReves, T. M., P. (1994). The non-native speaking EFL/ESL teacher’s self-image: an international survey. System, 22(1), 353-367.\nRichards, J. C. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.\nRichter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 116- 126.\nSahin, I., & Yildirim, A. (2015). Transforming professional learning into practice. ELT Journal, 70(3), 241-252.\nSamimy, K., Kim, S., Lee, J. A., & Kasai, M. (2011). A Participative Inquiry in a TESOL Program: Development of Three NNES Graduate Students` Legitimate Peripheral Participation to Fuller Participation. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 558-574.\nSaputra, E. R., Hamied, F. A., & Suherdi, D. (2020). The development of beliefs and practices of language assessment literacy: does a professional development community help? Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(3), 414-416.\nSchwille, S. A. (2008). The Professional Practice of Mentoring. American Journal of Education, 115(1), 139-167.\nSchon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Basic Books.\nScribner, J. P. (1999). Professional development: Untangling the influence of work context on teacher learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(2), 238-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X99352004\nShavelson, R., & Stern, P. (1981). Research on teachers` pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior. Review of Educational Research, 51, 455-498.\nShulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.\nSimone, T. (2016). CALL Teacher Education: Language Teachers and Technology. Brill.\nSmith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2007). Research on professional development and teacher change: Implications for adult basic education.\nSun, Y. C. (2017). Following the heart or the crowd: epistemological beliefs and actual practices of in-service language teachers in Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 14(1), 119-144.\nTalmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30(1), 128– 148.\nTao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346-355.\nThomson, M. M., Huggins, E., & Williams, W. (2019). Developmental science efficacy trajectories of novice teachers from a STEM-focused program: A longitudinal mix-methods investigation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77, 235-265.\nTour, E. (2017). Teachers` self-initiated professional learning through Personal Learning Networks, Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 179-192.\nThomson, M. M., Walkowiak, T. A., Whitehead, A. N., & Huggins, E. (2020). Mathematics teaching efficacy and developmental trajectories: A mixed-methods investigation of novice K-5 teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 1-14.\nTripp, D. ([1993]2012). Critical Incidents in Teaching: Developing Professional Judgment. Routledge.\nTrust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). "Together we are better": Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers and Education, 102, 15-34.\nTsai, T. J. S., Y. C. (2015). Teacher professional development: Remote podcasting and metacognitive strategies. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Professional development and workplace learning: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and application. IGI Global.\nTsui, B. M. (2007). Complexities of Identity Formation: A Narrative Inquiry of an EFL Teacher. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 657- 680.\nTsui, C. (2018). Teacher efficacy: A case study of faculty beliefs in an English-medium instruction teacher training program. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 15(1), 101-128. https://doi.org/10.30397/TJTESOL.201804_15(1).0004\nUtami, I. G. A. L. P. (2018). How English teachers learn in Indonesia: Tension between policy-driven and self-driven professional development. TEFLIN Journal, 29, 245-265.\nUtami, I. G. A. L. P., Saukah, A, Cahyono, B. Y., & Rachmajanti, S. (2017). Levels of involvement in the English teachers` CPD (Continuous Professional Development): The degree of professional enthusiasm. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(2), 336-345.\nVygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.\nWang, C. C. (2016, October 17). The Power of Dreams: Teaching for Taiwan. https://dream.k12cc.tw/modules/tadnews/index.php?nsn=62\nWang, F. Y. (2018). An expert EFL reading teacher`s readers club: reader identity and teacher professional development. European Journal of Education, 41(4), 517-528.\nWang, L. Y., & Lin, T. B. (2013). The representation of professionalism in native English-speaking teachers recruitment policies: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 12(3), 5-22. https://doi.org/http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2013v12n3art1.pdf\nWei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, D., & Adamson, F. (2010). Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges. National Staff Development Council.\nWenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.\nWenger, E. (2002). Communities of practice and social learning systems. In D. Nicolini, Gherardi, S., & Yanow, D. (Ed.), Knowing in organizations: A practice-based approach (pp. 76-99). M.E. Sharpe.\nWenger, E. (2010). Conceptual Tools for CoPs as Social Learning Systems: Boundaries, Identity, Trajectories, and Participation. In C. Blackmore (Ed.), Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice (pp. 125-143). Springer.\nWenger, E. (2014). Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability in practice-based learning. Routledge.\nWenger, E. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. Retrieved from https://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/\nWhitford, B. L. (1994). Permission, persistence, and resistance: linking high school restructuring with teacher education reform. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Professional Development Schools: schools for developing a profession (pp. 74-97). Teachers College Press.\nWong, Q. (2007). The national curriculum changes and their effects on English language teaching in the People`s Republic of China. In J. Cummins, Davison, C. (Ed.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 87-105). Springer.\nWu, C. H. (2020). Language Teacher Development in the English-in-the-Discipline Courses: Bridging Academic Literacy, Disciplinarity, and Interdisciplinarity. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Hong Kong. Retrieve from: https://julac.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/f/1daqlk7/HKU_IZ21617741310003414\nWu, X. (2012). Primary English Education in China: Review and Reflection. In B. Spolsky, & Moon, Y. I. (Eds.), Primary School English-Language Education in Asia: From Policy to Practice (pp. 1-22). Routledge.\nXu, H. (2012). Challenges native Chinese teachers face in teaching Chinese as a foreign language to non-native Chinese students in U.S. classrooms. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Retrieved from: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/teachlearnstudent/20/\nYang, S. C., & Chen, Y. J. . (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 860-879.\nYeh, H. C. (2007). Investigating elementary school English teachers` professional development avenues and their effectiveness. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 4(2), 1-23.\nYeh, H. C. (2011). EFL teachers` challenges and dilemmas in transferring theories and practices cross-culturally. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12, 97-104.\nYeh, H. C. (2019). Design and Use of English Textbooks for Twelve-year Basic Education. Education Research, 303, 52-65.\nYeh, H. C., & Hung, H. T. (2013). Forming a change environment to encourage professional development through a teacher study group. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 153-165.\nYin, R. K. (2009). Case Study: Design and methods (4th ed.). SAGE.\nYing, I. (2012). Exploring discursive practices of teacher learning in a crossinstitutional professional community in China. In M. Kooy, & Veen, V, K. (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters: International perspectives (pp. 176- 194). Routledge.\nYoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, W. Y., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & Answers (33), 1-62.\nZhao, G. Q., Yang, X. Y., Long, T. T., & Zhao, R, C. (2019). Teachers` perceived professional development in a multi-regional community of practice: Effects of beliefs and engagement. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 1-11.\nZhou, W., & Li, G. (2015). Chinese language teachers’ expectations and perceptions of American students’ behavior: Exploring the nexus of cultural differences and classroom management. System, 49, 17-27.\nZonoubi, R., Rasekh, A. E., & Tavakoli, M. (2017). EFL teacher self-efficacy development in professional learning communities. System, 66, 1-12.
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
英國語文學系
101551505
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101551505
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
150501.pdf1.09 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.