Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136330
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor岳夢蘭zh_TW
dc.contributor.author葉融zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYeh, Rongen_US
dc.creator葉融zh_TW
dc.creatorYeh, Rongen_US
dc.date2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T06:44:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-04T06:44:28Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-04T06:44:28Z-
dc.identifierG0108357016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136330-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description財務管理學系zh_TW
dc.description108357016zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本篇論文之研究主體為台灣權證市場之認購權證,選取近五年交易金額前10大個股權證,以及加權指數之指數權證等共11檔標的證券進行研究,主要探討權證所具備之各種特性,參考過往文獻所得之相關結論與券商所推薦之相關因素,研究涵蓋隱含波動溢價比率、溢價比率、當日成交量、到期天數、有效槓桿、價內外程度、流通在外比例和造市商發行量規模等考量因素,分析是否能藉由選取特定券商屬性以及具備相關特性之權證,以此獲得相對較好之報酬,以及研究不同造市商推薦之共同篩選條件,是否也能提供投資人相對較好之報酬。實證結果顯示,透過選取特定的權證特性,確實能獲取相對較好之報酬,並針對原始的造市商推薦條件進行改良,以此提升投資人之認購權證報酬。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe paper empirically examines the impact of selecting different warrant characteristics for the return of call warrants. For a sample of firms whose call warrants listed on TWSE had a host of volume from 2016 to 2020, the empirical evidence indicates that considering several factors such as premium volatility, premium, volume, maturity, leverage, moneyness, outstanding ratio, and maker size, it’s possible to obtain relatively better return by selecting specific warrant’s characteristics. Also, the findings show that the mutual selection criteria recommended by different market makers couldn’t effectively provide better return for investors. Therefore, the paper provides the revised version for recommended criteria for the investors to enhance their call warrant’s return, and serve as a guide for further research in this field.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 8\n第一節 研究背景與動機 8\n第二節 研究目的 12\n第二章 文獻探討 13\n第一節 權證相關市場實證特性 13\n第二節 可能影響權證報酬之因素 14\n第三章 研究方法 17\n第一節 研究議題探討 17\n第二節 資料來源與區間 17\n第三節 相關變數定義 18\n第四節 研究方法 21\n第五節 模型建構 22\n第四章 實證結果與分析 24\n第一節 相關統計與分析 24\n第二節 迴歸分析 31\n第三節 迴歸分析結果統整 38\n第五章 結論與建議 41\n第一節 研究結論 41\n第二節 後續研究建議 42\n參考文獻 43\n附錄 46zh_TW
dc.format.extent8187134 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108357016en_US
dc.subject認購權證zh_TW
dc.subject權證特性zh_TW
dc.subject券商推薦條件zh_TW
dc.subject特性篩選zh_TW
dc.subject權證報酬zh_TW
dc.subjectCall warranten_US
dc.subjectWarrant characteristicsen_US
dc.subjectWarrant returnen_US
dc.subjectSelection criteriaen_US
dc.title不同權證特性影響認購權證報酬之實證研究zh_TW
dc.titleAn Empirical Study on How Different Warrant Characteristics Affect the Return of Call Warrantsen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference一、 中文文獻\n王毓敏(2002),交易量及波動性之關聯性-台股認購權證與標的股票之探討,管理評論,第 21卷1期,pp.115 – 136\n方錫勇(2007),個股權證隱含波動率指標之投資決策-以台灣電子股認購權證為例,銘傳大學,資訊管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文\n李怡宗、劉玉珍與李健瑋(1999),Black-Scholes評價模式在台灣認購權證市場之實證,管理評論,第18卷3期,pp.83 - 104\n吳岳學(2009),發行券商差異對權證價值影響之探討,國立中正大學,財務金融所碩士論文\n林祈安(2014),權證篩選之實證研究-以指數標的及台灣50的權證為例,國立政治大學,金融研究所碩士論文\n徐清俊與廖哲毅(2005),證券自營商買賣超對認購權證隱含波動率及標的股票股價之影響,運籌研究集刊,8期,pp.19 – 41\n詹場、池祥麟(2014),台灣券商發行之權證市場品質及造市績效評比,台大管理論叢,第24卷S1期,pp.29-60\n詹場、陳業寧、柯文乾和黃尚傑(2020),臺灣權證市場的贏家與輸家,臺大管理論叢,第30卷1期,pp.163 – 200\n趙倫晤(2012),以權證溢價比與價內外程度檢測台灣權證市場之效率性,逢甲大學,統計與精算所碩士論文\n鄧佳青(2016),台灣權證市場及權證價格分析與探討,國立中央大學,財務金融學系碩士論文\n \n二、 英文文獻\nBarber, B. M., Lee, Y., Liu, Y., and Odean, T. (2009), “Just How Much Do Individual Investors Lose by Trading?” The Review of Financial Studies, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp. 609–632.\nBauer, R., Cosemans, M., and Eichholtz, P. (2009), “Option trading and individual investor performance.” Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 33, Issue 4, pp. 731-746.\nLi, G., and Zhang, C. (2011), “Why Are Derivative Warrants More Expensive Than Options? An Empirical Study.” The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 275-297.\nPoon, P. (1994), “An Empirical Examination of the Return Volatility-Volume Relation in Related Markets: The Case of Stock and Options.” The Financial Review, Vol. 29, pp. 473-496.\nPan, J., and Poteshman, A. M. (2006), “The Information in Option Volume for Future Stock Prices.” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 19, Issue 3, pp. 871–908.\nWong, K. M., and Chong, T. T. (2008), “A threshold model for the Hong Kong warrant prices.” Applied Financial Economics Letters, Vol. 4, Issue 5, pp. 337-339.zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU202101130en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
701601.pdf8 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.