Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136356| 題名: | ESG評級分數對日經225指數個別公司風險之研究 Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Nikkei 225 index |
作者: | 張誠允 Chang, Cheng-Yun |
貢獻者: | 楊曉文 Yang, Sheau-Wen 張誠允 Chang, Cheng-Yun |
關鍵詞: | ESG評分 公司市場風險 崩盤風險 財務限制風險 ESG Score Firm risk Crash risk Financial constraint risk |
日期: | 2021 | 上傳時間: | 4-Aug-2021 | 摘要: | 本研究主要希望能探討對於日本大型股的日經225指數成分股中，其個別公司的ESG 評分以及其底下的環境、社會與公司治理類別評分對於個別公司風險之影響效果，特別是下檔風險。在此研究中，我主要以市場風險(特質風險)、崩盤風險(負偏斜度NCSKEW、股票報酬漲跌波動率DUVOL)與財務限制指數(KZ指數、WW指數、SA 指數)作為風險變數，並以Refinitiv 資料庫中 2010-2018 年間的1,883筆日本日經225指數的成分股公司作為研究樣本進行回歸分析，希望能探究針對日本大型股(日經225)的ESG評分與其公司個別風險的關係。\n而實證結果顯示，在市場風險上，ESG總分底下的治理層面分數與未來公司個別的市場風險的具有明顯的負相關性。而治理分數中的細部項目CSR戰略與股東權益分數分數與公司的市場風險有顯著負相關。從崩盤風險來看，ESG與其底下其餘類別主要分數與崩盤風險的關聯性不明顯。最後從財務限制風險的角度來看，ESG 績效分數越高，未來一年公司的財務限制指數越低。而細觀環境、社會、治理的子項目中，可以發現在社會項目中的子項目人權、社會，以及治理子項目的CSR策略與股東權益在本研究樣本中對減緩財務限制風險的影響最大。 This study hopes to explore the impact of the ESG scores of individual companies and the environmental, social and governance category scores of individual companies in the components of large Japanese stocks Nikkei 225 Index on individual company risks. In this research, I mainly use market risk (idiosyncratic risk), crash risk (negative conditional skewness NCSKEW, down-to-up volatility DUVOL) and financial restriction index (KZ index, WW index , SA index) as the risk variable. And I use 1,883 pieces of esg score data in Refinitiv database from 2010 to 2018 as the research sample to perform regression analysis, hoping to explore the impact of large Japanese stocks (Nikkei 225) and the relationship between ESG scores and company`s risks.\nThe empirical results show that in terms of market risk, the governance score has a significant negative correlation with the one-year-ahead individual market risk. And the CSR strategy score and shareholders score in governance pillar score is significantly negatively correlated with the company`s market risk. For crash risk, the correlation between ESG score and crash risk is not obvious. Finally, for financial restriction risk, the higher the ESG performance score, the lower the company`s financial restriction index in the next year. In the components of environment, society and governance score, we can find that human rights score, community score, CSR strategies score and shareholders score have the greatest impact on mitigating financial constraint risks in the sample of this research. |
參考文獻: | Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., Walker, J. ,2010. The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting & Finance, 50:31-51.\nAuer, Schuhmacher, 2016. Do socially (ir)responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance vol. 59(C), pages 51-62.\nBaker, M., Stein J. C., and Wurgler, J., “When Does the Market Matter? Stock Prices and the Investment of Equity-Dependent Firms,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 118, No. 3, 2003, pp. 969-1006.\nBouslah K, Kryzanowski L, M’Zali B , 2013. The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. J Bank Finance 37:1258–1273\nCampello, M. and Chen, L., “Are Financial Constraints Priced? Evidence from Firm Fundamentals, Stocks, and Bonds,” Working Paper, University of Illinois, 2005.\nCarhart MM, 1997. On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 52:57–82\nChen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. , 2001. Forecasting crashes: trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61, 345–381.\nCheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. , 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.\nDhaliwal, Li, Tsang, Yang, 2011. Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review (2011) 86 (1): 59–100.\nEccles, Ioannou , Serafeim, 2012. The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance. Management Science, vol 60(11), pages 2835-2857.\nEl Ghoul, Guedhami, Kwok , Mishra. 2011. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 35, 2388-2406\nFama, E. F., and French, K. R., 1993. A five-factor asset pricing model. Journal of Financial Economics, 116: 1-22.\nGodfrey, Merrill, Hansen, 2009. The Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: An Empirical Test of the Risk Management Hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal 30(4):425 – 445\nGoss, Roberts, 2011. The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 35, 1794-1810\nHadlock, C. J., & Pierce, J.R., 2010. New evidence on measuring financial constraints: Moving beyond the KZ index. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1909–1940.\nHutton, A.P., A. J. Marcus, and H. Tehranian. 2009. Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics 94: 67-86.\nJin, Li, and S. C. Myers. 2006. R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics 79: 257-292.\nJo H, Na H , 2012. Does CSR reduce firm risk? Evidence from controversial industry sectors. J Bus Ethics 110:441–456\nKaplan, S., & Zingales, L., 1997. Do investment–cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169–215.\nKempf, Osthoff, 2007. The Effect of Socially Responsible Investing on Portfolio Performance. European Financial Management 13(5):908 – 922.\nKim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S., 2014. Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13.\nLins, Servaes, Tamayo, 2015. Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance: The Value of Corporate Social Responsibility during the Financial Crisis. Journal of Finance, vol. 72, issue 4, 1785-1824\nLins, Servaes, Tamayo, 2017. Social Capital, Trust, and Firm Performance:\nMcWilliams ,Siegel ,2000. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal 21(5):603 – 609\nMurata, Hamori, 2021. ESG Disclosures and Stock Price Crash Risk. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, vol. 14(2), pages 1-20\nSassen, Hinze ,Hardeck, 2016. Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics,86: 867-904.\nSharpe WF , 1964. Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance 19:425–442\nSubramanian, S.,2016. Esg: good companies can make good stocks. Technical report, Bank of America Merrill Lynch.\nTang, Zhong 2019. Mandatory sustainability disclosure and stock price crash risk.\nWhited, Wu, 2006. Financial constraints risk. Review of Financial Studies, 19, 531–559.\nZerbib, 2019. The effect of pro-environmental preferences on bond prices: Evidence from green bonds. Journal of Banking & Finance Volume 98, Pages 39-60\n\n田文婧，2017，企業社會責任是否可以緩解CEO過度自信對股市價格崩盤風險的影響，銘傳大學財務金融學系碩士班碩士論文。\n郭怡萱，2020，ESG績效對公司風險之影響，政治大學財務管理所碩士論文。\n楊舒婷，2019，ESG揭露程度對公司風險之影響，政治大學財務管理所碩士論文。\n詹家昌、吳懿成、許月瑜，2012，融資限制對公司盈餘管理影響之研究，管理與系統第十九卷，第三期，463-494。\n鄭佩菱，2014，從融資限制及財務靈敏度的角度探討股票購回及發放現金股利之關係，國立交通大學資訊管理與財務金融學系財務金融碩士班碩士論文。\n賴怡安，2014，財務限制與動能效果之關聯性，雲林科技大學財務金融所碩士論文。 | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 金融學系 108352014 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108352014 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 201401.pdf | 1.62 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.