Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136456
題名: 神化思想在中國本土基督教的再現:從西方個人靈修到召會的團體行動實踐
The Reappearance of The Idea of Theosis in Chinese Christianity: From Western Personal Spirituality to Corporate Action and Practice of the Local Church
作者: 張證豪
Chang, Cheng-Hao
貢獻者: 郭承天
Kuo, Cheng-Tian
張證豪
Chang, Cheng-Hao
關鍵詞: 中國基督教
神化
成神
基督化
李常受
召會
團體實踐
Chinese Christianity
Deification
Theosis
Christification
Witness Lee
Local Church
Corporate Practice
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 4-八月-2021
摘要: 神化思想在西方基督教中由來已久,並不是一個新的概念或論述。早自希臘教父時期起,神化思想即已有相當的發展;但在中世紀之後,神化思想逐漸歸於沉寂。宗教改革運動以來,神化思想在基督教中僅有零星的蹤跡。近代的西方學者對於神化的議題,也抱持著保留或懷疑的態度。然而,西方在本世紀初以來,卻重新掀起了對神化教義的研究熱潮。無獨有偶的是,神化思想也出現於上個世紀末的中國本土基督教。召會的神學家李常受,以「亞他那修」為起始發展出他的神化論述,並將其論述具體實踐於教會的團體行動中。由於以往神化思想的論述與實踐,大多是聚焦在神化個人層面,較少著墨於神化對於教會的意義與團體性的行動與實踐。因此,本文擬以神化分析理論架構分析的李常受的神化論述與召會在團體實踐上的內涵。
The idea of theosis has a long history in Western Christianity and it is not a new concept or discourse. The idea of theosis has developed considerably since the Greek Fathers, but it gradually declines after the Middle Ages. After the Reformation Movement, the idea of theosis has only sporadic traces in Christianity. Modern Western scholars have reservations or doubts about theosis. However, since the beginning of this century, there has been a resurgence of research on the doctrine of theosis in the West. Coincidentally, the idea of theosis also appeared in Chinese Christianity at the end of the last century. Witness Lee, the theologian of the Local Church, developed the discourse of theosis from Athanasius and put his own discourse into the corporate practice in the church. Because most of the discussion and practice of theosis focus on the individual aspect in the past but pay less attention to the meaning of theosis for the church and corporate action and Practice in the church. Therefore, this thesis will analyze Witness Lee`s deification discourse and the practical connotation of the Local Church according to the theoretical framework of the deification analysis.
參考文獻: 壹、外文書籍:\n1.Alford, Henry. (1976). Alford`s Greek Testament. Vol.2. Grand Rapids: Guardian Press.\n2.Anderson, Benedict Richard O`Gorman (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism Revised and Extended. London: Verso.\n3.Andreopoulos, Andreas (2012). My Beloved Son: The Transfiguration of Christ. Brewster: Paraclete Press.\n4.Anatolios, Khaled (2004).Athanasius. New York: Routledge.\n5.Azkoul, Michael (1995). St. Gregory of Nyssa and the tradition of the fathers. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.\n6.Bartos, Emil (2002). Deification in Eastern Orthodox Theology: An Evaluation and Critique of the Theology of Dumitru Staniloae. Buckinghamshire , England: Paternoster Press.\n7.Blackwell, Benjamin, Carey (2010). Christosis: Pauline Soteriology in Light of Deification in Irenaeus and Cyril of Alexandria. Durham, England: Durham University.\n8.Brakke, David (1998). Athanasius and Asceticism. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.\n9.Byers, Andrew Jason (2014). Johannine Theosis: The Fourth Gospel`s Narrative Ecclesiology of Participation and Deification. Durham, England: Durham University.\n10.Byers, Andrew Jason (2011). Ecclesiology and Theosis in the Gospel of John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n11.Campbell, Constantine R. (2012). Paul and Union with Christ: An Exegetical and Theological Study. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.\n12.Coates, Ruth (2019). Deification in Russian Religious Thought: Between the Revolutions, 1905–1917. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\n13.Collins, Paul M. (2010). Partaking in Divine Nature: Deification and Communion. NY: T&T Clark International.\n14.Enns, Paul I. (2014). The Moody Handbook of Theology. Chicago: Moody Publishers.\n15.Hamilton& Huntington Cairns (1961). The Collected Dialogues of Plato. New York:Pantheon Books.\n16.Kapsanis, George (2006). Theosis: The True Purpose of Human Life, 4th Edition. Karyes: Holy Monastery of Gregoriou.\n17.Kärkkäinen, Veli–Matti (2004). One with God: Salvation as Deification and Justification. Minnesota: Liturgical Press.\n18.Kärkkäinen, Veli–Matti, A Introduction to Ecclesiology: Ecumenical, Historical & Global Perspectives, Westmont: InterVarsity Press, 2002.\n19.Keating, Daniel A. (2007). Deification and Grace. Ave Maria, Florida: Sapientia Press Ave Maria Univ.\n20.Kharlamov, Vladimir (2009). The Beauty of the Unity and the Harmony of the Whole: The Concept of Theosis in the Theology of Pseudo–Dionysius the Areopagite. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock.\n21.Kuo, Cheng–tian (2018). Church, Capitalism, and Democracy in Post–Ecological Societies. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock.\n22.Ladd, George Eldon (1993). A Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids :Eerdmans.\n23.Lee, Michelle Vidle (2009). Paul, the Stoics, and the Body of Christ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\n24.Leithart, Peter J. (2011). Athanasius. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Academic.\n25.Loon, Hans Van (2008). The Dyophysite Christology of Cyril of Alexandria. Leiden: Koninklijke.\n26.Lossky, Vladimir (2003). The Vision of God. NY: St. Vladimir`s Seminary Press.\n27. Lossky, Vladimir, Erickson, John, Bird, Thomas(2001). In the Image and Likeness of God. NY: St. Vladimir`s Seminary Press.\n28.Mantzaridis, Georgios I. (2009). The Deification of Man: St. Gregory Palamas and the Orthodox Tradition. Crestwood, N.Y.: St. Vladimir`s Seminary Press.\n29.McGrath, A. E. (1994). Christian Theology—An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.\n30.Milne, Bruce (2014). Know the Truth: A Handbook of Christian Belief. London: Inter– Varsity Press.\n31.Moss, Vladimir (2009). The Book of The End: An Interpretation of the Apocalypse of St. John the Theologian. Vladimir Moss.\n32.Nellas, Panayiotis (1987). Deification in Christ: Orthodox Perspectives on the Nature of the Human Person. New York: St. Vladimir`s Seminary Press.\n33.Olson, Roger E. (1999). The Story of Christian Theology: Twenty Centuries of Tradition & Reform. Westmont: InterVarsity Press.\n34.Olson, Carl E.(2016). Called to Be the Children of God: The Catholic Theology of Human Deification. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.\n35.Ortiz, Jared (2019). Deification in the Latin Patristic Tradition. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.\n36.Popa, Irineu (2015). The Christian Paradigm of a United Europe: Theologie and Mystique in the Work of Saint Cyril of Alexandria. Craiova, Romania: Editura Mitropolia Olteniei.\n37.Pelikan, Jaroslav (1974). The Christian Tradition: A History of the Development of Doctrine, Volume 2. Chicago: The University of Chicago.\n38.Russell, Norman (2004). The Doctrine of Deification in the Greek Patristic Tradition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\n39.Russell, Norman (2009). Fellow workers with god: orthodox thinking on theosis. NY: St Vladimir`s Seminary Press.\n40.Schaff, Philip (1910). History of the Christian Church, 8 Vols. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.\n41.Swanson , Allen (1970). Taiwan: Mainline Vs Independent Church Growth. South Pasadena, California: William Carey Library.\n42.Swete,H. B. (1912). The Holy Spirit in the Ancient Church. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.\n43.Thomas, Stephen (2008).Deification in the Eastern Orthodox Tradition: A Biblical Perspective (Piscataway, New Jersey: Gorgias Press.\n44.Veniamin, Christopher. (2016). The Orthodox Understanding of Salvation: "Theosis" in Scripture and Tradition. Dalton, CA: Mount Thabor Publishing.\n45.Ware, Timothy (1997). The Orthodox Church. London: Penguin Books.\n46.Weinandy, Thomas G. (2007). Athanasius: A Theological Introduction. Great Theologians Series. Aldershot, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited.\n47.Winslow, Donald F. (1979). The Dynamic of Salvation. Cambridge: The Philadelphia Patristic Foundation.\n48.Zizioulas, John D. (2006). Communion and Otherness: Further Studies in Personhood and the Church. London: T&T Clark.\n\n貳、中文書籍\n1. Neil T. Duddy, Spiritual Counterfeits Project著,沈介山譯(1981),《神人:李常受思想之評析》,臺北:中華福音神學院。\n2.王明道(1998),《王明道文庫》第二冊,臺北:浸宣出版社。\n3.王明道(1998),《王明道文庫》第三冊,臺北:浸宣出版社。\n4.石素英、普愛民、蔣祖華、龐君華(2007),《成聖觀的對話–基督宗教對話學術研討會論文集》,新竹市:中華信義神學院出版社。\n5.任以撒(2000),《系統神學》,臺北市:基督教改革宗翻譯社。\n6.米勒艾略特(Elliot Miller)編(2009),《我們錯了:重新評估倪柝聲、李常受的「地方教會」運動》中文版,基督教研究院期刊第32卷第6期,加州:基督教研究院。\n7.呂亞力(1989),《政治學方法論》,臺北:三民書局。\n8.李常受(1990),《彼得前書生命讀經》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n9.李常受(1990),《彼得後書生命讀經》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n10.李常受(1994),《神經綸的總綱與神人該有的生活》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n11.李常受(1995),《聖經中管制並支配我們的異象》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n12.李常受(1995),《聖經中管制並支配我們的異象》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n13.李常受(1997),《主恢復中劃時代的帶領第一冊新路實行的異象與具體實行步驟》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n14.李常受(1998),《神命定實行新約經綸的路》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n15.李常受(1999),《新路生機的實行》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n16.李常受編譯(1999),《新約聖經恢復本》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n17.李常受(2002),《主恢復中劃時代的帶領第二冊帶領聖徒實行主所命定的新路》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n18.李常受(2002),《召會實際並生機的建造》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n19.李常受(2002),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第1冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n20.李常受(2002),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第2冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n21.李常受(2002),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第3冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n22.李常受(2002),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第4冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n23.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第5冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n24.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第6冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n25.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第7冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n26.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第8冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n27.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第9冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n28.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第10冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n29.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第11冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n30.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第12冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n31.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第13冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n32.李常受(2003),《神聖啟示的高峰》信息合輯第14冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n33.李常受(2004),《主恢復中劃時代的帶領第三冊主恢復的前景與生機事奉的建立》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n34.李常受(2005),《長老訓練第九冊長老職分與神命定之路(一)》新二版,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n35.李常受(2005),《主恢復中劃時代的帶領第四冊召會的擴增與開展》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n36.李常受(2005),《跟上時代重建聖殿》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n37.李常受(2005),《關於活力排之急切需要的交通》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n38.李常受(2005),《活力排的訓練與實行》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n39.李常受(2005),《主恢復中劃時代的帶領第五冊召會分項事奉的建立》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n40.李常受(2005),《歷史與啟示》上冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n41.李常受編譯(2007),《聖經恢復本》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n42.卓遵宏、周琇環、林秀華訪問(2010),《基督與召會:李常受先生行誼訪談錄》增訂一版,臺北:國史館。\n43.林榮洪(1982),《王明道與中國教會》,香港:中國神學研究院。\n44.林來慰、成曾淑儀編(1991),《生命的培育:信徒全面培育研究會彚報》,香港:世界華人福音事工聯絡中心。\n45.倪柝聲(2004),《工作的再思》,臺灣福音書房。,年11月\n46.倪柝聲(1992),《亞伯拉罕、以撒、雅各的神》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n47.倪柝聲(1992),《倪柝聲文集》第二輯七冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n48.倪柝聲(1991),《倪柝聲文集》第一輯十七冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n49.倪柝聲(1992),《倪柝聲文集》第三輯七冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n50.倪柝聲(1991),《倪柝聲文集》第三輯十六冊,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n51.章力生(1991),《系統神學卷七:教會論》,香港:宣道出版社。\n52.章力生(1991),《系統神學卷五:聖靈論》,香港:宣道。\n53.莊祖鯤 (2004),《宣教神學》,賓州:基督使者協會。\n54.郭承天(2012),《末世與啟示─啟示錄解析》,臺南:臺灣教會公報社。\n55.張西平、卓新平編(1999),《本色之探─二十世紀中國基督教文化學術論集》,北京:中國廣播電視出版社。\n56.張證豪、郭承天、周復初、劉偉倫(2020),《神約聖經希臘文輕鬆速成》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n57.陳吉松(2018),《巴西流聖靈論與華人教會的關係》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n58.莫里斯著、楊傳裕譯(1992),《丁道爾新約聖經詮釋:帖撒羅尼迦前後書》,臺北:校園書房。\n59.曹榮錦著,李彥儀、黃偉業譯(2015),《成神論與天人合一:漢語神學與中國第二次啟蒙》,香港:道風書社。\n60.馮蔭坤(1995),《天道聖經註釋:希伯來書》(卷上),香港:天道書樓。\n61.廖元威、呂沛淵著(2003),《屬靈實際的追尋》,臺北:中華福音神學院。\n62.康利絲著、王亞伯等譯(2020),《加爾文的梯子:升上和升天的靈修神學》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n63.賈玉銘,《完全救法》。\n64.堪格斯(RonKangas),馬克艾迪(EdMarks),盧必受(KerryS.Robichaux),余潔麟(1995),《關於神經綸終極目標的真理─對J.S.誹謗指控的駁正》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n65.彭順強(2005),《二千年靈修神學歷史》,香港:天道書樓。\n66.黃迦勒(2005),《羅馬書註解》,香港:天道書樓。\n67.漢尼葛夫(2007),《基督教在危機中》,加州:基督教研究院。\n68.慕安得烈(1990),《基督的靈》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n69.賴德著、馬可人等譯(1994),《賴氏新約神學》,臺北:中華福音神學院。\n70.賴德烈(2009),《基督教在華傳教史》,香港:道風書社。\n71.謝龍邑(2008),《基督人─賈玉銘的靈命神學》,臺北:華神出版社。\n72.臺灣福音書房編輯部(1994),《主後一九八九年至一九九四年五年福音化臺灣簡記》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。。\n73.臺灣福音書房編輯部(1996),《1996臺灣區眾教會聚會所相調大會專輯》,臺北:臺灣福音書房。\n\n參、英文期刊論文\n1.Anatolios, Khaled (1996). “The Soteriological Significance of Christ’s Humanity in St Athanasius,” in St. Vladimir`s theological quarterly. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir`s theological quarterly.\n2.Austin, Michael W. (2015). “The Doctrine of Theosis: A Transformational Union with Christ,” in Journal of Spiritual Formation & Soul Care, Vol. 8, No. 2., La Mirada, CA: Institute for Spiritual Formation.\n3.Betz, Nathan (2018). “The New Jerusalem as a Sign of Deification in the Apocalypse Commentaries of Oecumenius and Andrew of Caesarea.” A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Advanced Research Master in Theology and Religious Studies, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.\n4.Bloor, Joshua D. A. (2015). “New Directions in Western Soteriology,” in Theology, Vol 118, Issue 3. Dorchester, UK: SPCK.\n5.Breen, Gareth Paul.(2019). “Attuning to ‘the oneness’ in ‘the church in Taiwan’: An historical ethnography.” London: The London School of Economics and Political Science.\n6.Butterworth, George William (1916). “The Deification of man in Clement of Alexandria,” in Journal of Theological Studies Volume os–XVII, Issue 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\n7.Cho, Dongsun (2019). “Deification in the Baptist Tradition: Christification of the Human Nature Through Adopted and Participatory Sonship Without Becoming Another Christ,” in Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University, Vol.17.2. Oradea, Romania: Emanuel University Press.\n8.Christensen, Michael J. and Wittung, Jeffery A. (2008). “Introduction,” in Michael J. Christensen and Jeffery A. Wittung. Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n9.Clendenin, Daniel B. (1994). “Partakers Of Divinity: The Orthodox Doctrine of Theosis,” in Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society, Vol.37, No.3. Scottsdale, AZ: Evangelical Theological Society.\n10.Collins, Paul M. (2011). “Theosis, Texts and Identity: The Philokalia (1782)—a Case Study,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Vol.2. Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n11.Demacopoulos, George E. (2006). “Ambivalence in Athanasius’ Approach to Spiritual Direction,” in Studia Patristica: Papers Presented at the Fourteenth International Conference on Patristic Studies. Oxford: International Conference on Patristic Studies.\n12.Druzhinina, Olga Alexandrovna (2006). “Deification of Community: Life in the Christian Community as the Way of Salvation in 1 John.” A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the University of Manchester for the degree of Master of Arts in Theology. Manchester: Nazarene Theological College.\n13.Eastman, Susan (2014). “Oneself in Another: Participation and Spirit in Romans 8,” in In Christ` in Paul: Explorations in Paul`s Theology of Union and Participation. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.\n14.Edwards, Denis (2013). “The Attractor and the Energy of Love: Trinity in Evolutionary and Ecological Context,” in The Ecumenical Review 65,No. 1.\n15.Fairbairn, Donald (1998). “Salvation as Theosis: The Teaching of Eastern Orthodoxy,” in Themelios, Volume 23. Issue 3. Austin, TX: Gospel Coalition.\n16.Finlan, Stephen (2008). “Can We Speak of Theōsis in Paul? ,” in Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n17.Finlan, Stephen (2006). “The Comedy of Divinization in Soloviev,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n18.Finlan, Stephen (2006). “Second Peter’s Notion of Divine Participation,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n19.Finlan, Stephen and Kharlamov, Vladimir (2006). “Introduction,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications, 2006.\n20.Finlan, Stephen (2011). “Deification in Jesus` Teaching,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Vol.2, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n21.Finch, Jeffrey (2006). “Athanasius on the Deifying Work of the Redeemer,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n22.Gavrilyuk, Paul L. (2009). “The Retrieval of Deification: How a Once‐despised Archaism Became an Ecumenical Desideratum,” in Journal of Modern Theology Volume25, Issue4. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.\n23.Gorman, Michael J. (2011). “Romans: The First Christian Treatise on Theosis,” in Journal of Theological Interpretation, 5.1. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Eisenbrauns.\n24.Gorman, Michael J. (2014). “Paul`s Corporate, Cruciform, Missional Theosis in 2 Corinthian,” in In Christ` in Paul: Explorations in Paul`s Theology of Union and Participation. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.\n25.Habets, Myk (2006). “Reforming Theōsis,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n26.Hallonsten, Gösta (2008). “Theosis in Recent Research: A Renewal of Interest and a Need for Clarity,” in Michael J. Christensen and Jeffery A. Wittung (2008). Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n27.Houtman, Dick and Mascini, Peter (2002). “Why Do Churches Become Empty, while New Age Grows? Secularization and Religious Change in the Netherlands,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 41, No. 3. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.\n28.Jakim,Boris (2008). “Sergius Bulgakov: Russian Theosis,” in Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n29.Kangas,Ron (2001). “A Man of Prayer Praying to the Mysterious God in the Divine and Mystical Realm,” in The Ministry Magazine, vol.5, no.9. CA: AC &C press.\n30.Kevin Schular, B.A. (2007). “The Influence of Theosis on Early Evangelicalism.” A thesis submitted to the Faculty of McMaster Divinity College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Christian Studies. Hamilton, Ontario: McMaster Divinity College.\n31.Kharlamov, Vladimir (2008). “Rhetorical Application of Theosis in Greek Patristic Theology,” in Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n32.Kharlamov, Vladimir (2006). “Emergence of the Deification Theme in the Apostolic Fathers,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology. Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n33.Kharlamov, Vladimir (2011). “Introduction,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Vol.2. Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n34.Lechner,Frank J. (1989). “Catholicism and Social Change in the Netherlands: A Case of Radical Secularization? ,” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 28, No. 2. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.\n35.Leidenhag, Joanna (2020). “Demarcating Deification and the Indwelling of the Holy Spirit in Reformed Theology,” in Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University, Vol.18.1. Oradea, Romania: Emanuel University Press.\n36.Luther, Martin (2008). “Little Christs for the World; Faith and Sacraments as a Means to Theosis,” in Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n37.Lossky, Vladimir (1985). “Redemption and Deification,” in In the Image and Likeness of God. Crestwook, New York : St. Vladimir`s Seminary Press.\n38.Louth, Andrew (2008). “The Place of Theosis in Orthodox Theology,” in Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n39.Maddox, Randy L. (1990). “John Wesley and Eastern Orthodoxy: Influences, Convergences and Differences,” in Asbury Theological Journal, Vol.45 No.2, Wilmore, KY: Asbury Theological Seminary.\n40.Medley, Mark S.(2011). “Participation in God: The Appropriation of Theosis by Contemporary Baptist Theologians,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Vol.2, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n41.Medved, Goran (2019). “Theosis (Deification) as a Biblical and Historical Doctrine,” in Kairos Evangelical Journal of Theology, Vol. XIII, No. 1. Zagreb, Croatia: Biblijski institut.\n42.Medved, Goran (2019). “Theosis (Deification) as a New Testament and Evangelical Doctrine,” in KAIROS: Evangelical Journal of Theology, Vol. XIII, No. 2. Osijek : Evangelical Theological Seminary.\n43.Mosser, Carl (2015). “Deification: A Truly Ecumenical Concept,” in Journal of Reformed Thought, Issue 30, Vol.4. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Reformed Church Press.\n44.Mosser, Carl (2020). “Recovering the Reformation`s Ecumenical Vision of Redemption as Deification and Beatific Vision,” in Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University, Vol.18.1. Oradea, Romania: Emanuel University Press.\n45.Moraless, Isaac Augustine (2014). “Baptism and Union with Christ,” in `In Christ` in Paul: Explorations in Paul`s Theology of Union and Participation. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.\n46.O’Brien,Glen(2013). “John Wesley and Athanasius on Salvation in the Context of the Debate over Wesley’s Debt to Eastern Orthodoxy,” in Phronema Vol.28(2). Redfern, NSW : St Andrew`s Greek Orthodox Theological College.\n47.Olson, Roger E. (2007). “Deification in Contemporary Theology,” in Theology Today, Vol.64. Princeton, NJ.: Princeton Theological Seminary.\n48.Popov, Ivan V.(2011). “The Idea of Deification in the Early Eastern Church,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Vol.2, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n49.Puchniak, Robert (2006). “Augustine’s Conception of Deification, Revisited,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n50.Rackley, Bobby Lynn (2020). “Recovery of the Divine Nature: Wesleyan Soteriology and Theosis Calmly Considered.” Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Theology in the Divinity School of Duke University.\n51.Reynolds, Edwin (2000). “Ten Keys for Interpreting the Book of Revelation,” in Journal of the Adventist Theological Society, 11/1–2. Tennessee: Adventist Theological Society.\n52.Sánchez, Leopoldo A. (2013). “Life in the Spirit of Christ: Models of Sanctification as Sacramental Pneumatology,” Logia: A Journal of Lutheran Theology, Vol.22, No.3. Crestwood, MO: Luther Academy.\n53.Starr, James (2008). “Does 2 Peter 1:4 Speak of Deification?,” in Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n54.Vishnevskaya,Elena (2008). “Divinization as Perichoretic Embrace in Maximus the Confessor,” in Michael J. Christensen and Jeffery A. Wittung (2008). Partakers of the Divine Nature: The History and Development of Deification in the Christian Traditions. Mich.: Baker Academic.\n55.Varma, Ashish (2014). “Fitting Participation: Form the Holy Trinity to Christian Virtue,” in `In Christ` in Paul: Explorations in Paul`s Theology of Union and Participation. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.\n56.Vishnevskaya, Elena (2006). “Divinization and Spiritual Progress in Maximus the Confessor,” in Theōsis: Deification in Christian Theology, Eugene, Oregon: Pickwick Publications.\n57.Zaitsev, Eugene (1998). “Analysis and Evaluation of Vladimir Lossky`s Doctrine of Theosis.” A dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor o f Philosophy. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.\n58.Zaitsev, Eugene (1998). “Analysis and Evaluation of Vladimir Lossky`s Doctrine of Theosis.” Ann Arbor, MI: UMI.\n\n肆、中文期刊論文\n1.于中旻(1991),〈從聖經看福音預工〉,收錄於《金燈台活頁雙月刊》34 期,香港:金燈台。\n2.史文森(Swanson, Allen J.)(1977),〈臺灣獨立教會〉,收錄於《基督教入華百七十年紀念集》,臺北:宇宙光。\n3.李信毅、劉秋華(2014),〈從《人生的奧祕》談召會的救恩觀與宣教特色〉,收錄於《基督生命長成:現代中國本土基督教神學之發展》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n4.李銘倫(2013),〈臺灣「地方召會」之研究〉,國立中山大學中國與亞太區域研究所碩士論文。\n5.李永義(2016),〈以《早期基督教教義》初代教父教會論觀點評論《教會論:全球導覽》當代神學處境教會論之 Non–Church Movement〉,魏理神學研究院碩士論文。\n6.宋剛(2012),〈基要與本色之間:賈玉銘、王明道與倪柝聲思想比較芻議〉,收錄於《不死就不生:2011近現代中國基督教神學思想學術研討會論文集》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n7.徐弢,陶曉輝(2014),〈靈、魂、體三元論及其對華人教會的影響〉,收錄於《世界宗教研究》第4 期,北京:中國社會科學院世界宗教研究所。\n8.姚蘊慧(2012),〈親密交通與社會資本-以倪柝聲思想應用於臺灣地方召會為例〉,收錄於《不死就不生:2011近現代中國基督教神學思想學術研討會論文集》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n9.周復初(2014),〈結論:基督生命長成〉,收錄於《基督生命長成:現代中國本土基督教神學之發展》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n10.周復初(2019),〈「人語」譯「神的話」之挑戰與因應─以πνεῦμα為例〉,收錄於《追求更好:論聖經翻譯》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n11.周復初、謝仁壽(2019),〈聖經根本隱喻oikonomia的漢譯研究〉,收錄於《追求更好:論聖經翻譯》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n12.段 琦(1999),〈中國基督教神學的構建〉,收錄於《世界宗教研究》1999年第3期,北京:世界宗教研究所。\n13.郭承天(2012),〈民主的宗教基礎:新制度論的分析〉,收錄於《政治學報》第32期,臺北:中國政治學會。\n14.郭承天(2016),〈回到華人本土神學的起初:聖經希臘文的教育〉,收錄於《認識耶穌,贏得基督:中國基督教之本土與全球發展》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n15.郭榮剛(2012),〈倪柝聲中國「地方教會」運動的本土化實踐:「建制重構」到「內核回歸」〉,收錄於《不死就不生:2011近現代中國基督教神學思想學術研討會論文集》,新北市:華宣。\n16.郭韵璇、周復初(2019),〈修辭亦實際—聖經「身體」隱喻翻譯的重建〉,收錄於《追求更好:論聖經翻譯》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n17.張世忠(2013),〈中國本土神學對神化論之貢獻─聖靈同我們的靈〉,收錄於《「近現代基督教的中國化」國際學術研討會論文集》,福建:武夷學院。\n18.張證豪(2015),〈臺灣眾召會的變遷(1984–2015):神學與教會組織之因素〉,國立政治大學宗教研究所碩士學位論文。\n19.張證豪(2016),〈從全球化視野探討不同聖經譯本間的差異:以新約中的「ψυχή」為例〉,收錄於《認識耶穌,贏得基督:現代中國本土基督教神學之發展學術研討會論文集》,新北市 : 聖經資源中心。\n20.張證豪(2018),〈召會在異文化地區的宣教與運作:以荷蘭的地方召會為例〉,收錄於《改變形像:中國基督教本土與全球發展》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n21.莊祖鯤(2012),〈宣教使命之再思與實踐〉,收錄於《大使命》第九十七期,加州:大使命中心。\n22.許秀敏(2012),〈李常受教會觀之研究―「神的經營思想」之詮釋與實踐〉,中原大學宗教研究所碩士學位論文。\n23.許宏度(2003),〈從新約的觀點看倪柝聲的聖靈觀〉,收錄於《屬靈實際的追尋─從聖經、歷史、神學看倪柝聲的思想》,臺北:中華福音神學院。\n24.葉先秦、蔡彥仁(2020),〈移民與海外宣教:真耶穌教會近期的全球拓展〉,收錄於《中國基督教研究》第 14 期。洛杉磯:基督教與中國研究中心。\n25.陳亦蘭、周復初(2016),〈結論:中國基督教之本土與全球發展〉,收錄於《認識耶穌,贏得基督:中國基督教之本土與全球發展》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n26.詹勛軍(2017),〈李常受之基督論研究〉,中原大學宗教研究所碩士學位論文。\n27.蔡維民、吳銘達(2012),〈全球化思潮衝擊下倪柝聲教會觀的落實-以臺灣聚會所經驗為例〉,收錄於《不死就不生:2011近現代中國基督教神學思想學術研討會論文集》,新北市:聖經資源中心\n28.瞿海源、袁憶平(2006),〈人格、刻板印象與教會的復振過程〉,收錄於《宗教、術數與社會變遷第二冊》。苗栗:桂冠圖書有限公司。\n29.蘇遠泰(2005),〈人可以成神?──試論基督宗教意義下的成神觀〉,收錄於《道風:基督教文化評論》第二十二期。香港:漢語基督教文化研究所。\n30.劉遠城(2016),〈召會的教會觀點對其發展的影響〉,收錄於《認識耶穌,贏得基督:中國基督教之本土與全球發展》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n31.劉遠城(2018),〈召會的核心神學觀點基督與教會之演變與影響〉,收錄於《改變形像:中國基督教本土與全球發展》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n32.謝仁壽、周復初(2013),〈教父傳統與中國本土神學的對照─神的經綸、神化和人的靈〉,收錄於《近現代基督教的中國化國際學術研討會論文集》,福建:中國社科院近代史所與福建師大。\n33.謝仁壽、周復初(2014),〈經綸、神化、人的靈〉,收錄於《基督生命長成:現代中國本土基督教神學之發展》,新北市:聖經資源中心。\n34.謝仁壽、周復初(2020),〈論加爾文和李常受「呼求主名」的教訓與實踐:基督教「終極處境」與中國化〉,收錄於《華人宗教研究》第十六期,臺北市:華人宗教中心。\n35.譚光鼎、陳鸞鳳(2013),〈基督徒聚會處之本土化行動的解析—一個後現代觀點〉,收錄於《「近現代基督教的中國化」國際學術研討會論文集》,福建:武夷學院。\n\n伍、其他資料或網頁資訊\n1.Athanasius, ‘Defense of the Nicene Definition’, The Nicene and Post–Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Series II, Volume IV, Eerdmans Publishing Co, 1979.\n2.Athanasius, On the Incarnation.\n3.Basil (1979). “Letters” The Nicene and Post–Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Series II, Volume VIII, Eerdmans Publishing Co.\n4.Dan Towle,〈「神人」訴訟案「專家證詞」─介言〉,1995 年 10 月 26 日,網址:https://cftfc.com/%E3%80%8C%E7%A5%9E%E4%BA%BA%E3%80%8D%E8%A8%B4%E8%A8%9F%E6%A1%88%E3%80%8C%E5%B0%88%E5%AE%B6%E8%AD%89%E8%A9%9E%E3%80%8D%E2%94%80%E4%BB%8B%E8%A8%80/,2021年5月30日瀏覽。\n5.Fuller Theological Seminary,Fuller`s Statement, January 5, 2006,網址:https://www.localchurches.org/recognition/fullers-statement/,2021年5月30日瀏覽。\n6.Greek Orthodox Church, Community and Church of Canberra and District的〈Theosis〉,網址:https://www.saintnicholascanberra.org.au/orthodox-spirituality,2020年12月30日瀏覽。\n7.Jamieson, R., Fausset, A. R. and Brown, David, Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible, 1871, https://www.biblestudytools.com/commentaries/jamieson-fausset-brown/ephesians/ephesians-1.html, 2020/12/15.\n8.Melton, J. Gordon (1985), An Open Letter Concerning the Local Church, Witness Lee and “The God-Men” Controversy, The Institute for the Study of American Religion. 網址:https://contendingforthefaith.org/en/dr-j-gordon-melton-an-open-letter-concerning-the-local-church-witness-lee-and-the-god-men-controversy/,2021年5月30日瀏覽。\n9. Passantino, Gretchen (2007),〈真道實踐會聲明「護教結論的再思:引“地方召會與水流職事站”為例」〉,網址:https://cftfc.com/%E7%9C%9F%E9%81%93%E5%AF%A6%E8%B8%90%E6%9C%83%E8%81%B2%E6%98%8E/,2021年5月30日瀏覽。\n10.Philip and Henry Wace (eds), St. Cyril of Jerusalem and St. Gregory Nazianzen, The Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church, Series II, Volume IV, Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1979.\n11.Vincent, M. R., Vincent`s Word Studies, 1886, https://biblehub.com/commentaries/ephesians/1-23.htm,2020年12月15日瀏覽。\n12.〈主恢復中相調的同工們〉署名信件,2005年6月30日。\n13.王明道,《王明道文庫精選》,網址:http://www.cclw.net/other/wangmindao/wmd2/htm/chapter09.html,2019年12月3日瀏覽。\n14.朱三才(1991),《1990年臺灣基督教會教勢報告》,臺中:基督教資料中心。\n15.朱三才(2018),《2017年臺灣基督教會教勢報告》,臺中:基督教資料中心。\n16.李容珍(2012),《基督教論壇報第3356期》,臺北:財團法人基督教論壇基金會。\n17.李容珍、何毓芬(2013),〈領袖非強人,須一起配搭〉,《基督教論壇報》2013年4月,臺北:基督教論壇基金會。\n18.李常受(1997),《一封感激、交通的信》。\n19.吳佳玲(2013),〈針對異端 臺灣基督教界首度發表聯合聲明〉,《基督教今日報》2013年3月1日。參閱網址:https://www.cdn-news.org/news/3308,瀏覽日期:2021年5月30日。\n20.唐崇榮,〈唐牧師歸正查經講座-希伯來書第二十九講〉,網址: http://www.cclw.net/other/tcr/xblscj/index.html,2020年1月18日瀏覽。\n21.瑟瑞尼(Leon Seyranian),〈「神人」訴訟案判決書〉中文翻譯,參閱網址:http://mandel.synology.me/%E6%9B%B8%E5%A0%B1%E5%90%88%E8%BC%AF/gracefinder.com/folder/books/index372.html,2021年5月30日瀏覽。\n22.簡汎佐(2009),〈海外來鴻〉,《竹訊》第248期2009年12月,新竹:新竹市召會。\n23.臺灣福音書房編輯部(2004),〈2004全球華語新春特會現場報導〉,《臺北市召會週訊》第284期2004年2月,臺北:臺北市召會。\n24.〈「彎曲心思者」出版商─湯瑪斯.尼爾森公司的撤銷聲明〉,參閱網址:https://cftfc.com/%E3%80%8C%E5%BD%8E%E6%9B%B2%E5%BF%83%E6%80%9D%E8%80%85%E3%80%8D%E5%87%BA%E7%89%88%E5%95%86%E2%94%80%E6%B9%AF%E7%91%AA%E6%96%AF-%E5%B0%BC%E7%88%BE%E6%A3%AE%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8%E7%9A%84%E6%92%A4%E9%8A%B7/,2021年5月30日瀏覽。
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
宗教研究所
104156504
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104156504
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.