Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136551| 題名: | R&D經濟成長與政府最適政策的三個議題 Three essays on R&D-driven endogenous growth and optimal policy |
作者: | 余博揚 Yu, Po-Yang |
貢獻者: | 賴景昌 Lai, Ching-Chong 余博揚 Yu, Po-Yang |
關鍵詞: | 經濟成長 智慧財產權 民營化 貿易自由化 貨幣政策 Economic growth Intellectual property rights Privatization Trade liberalization Monetary policy |
日期: | 2021 | 上傳時間: | 4-八月-2021 | 摘要: | 鑒於近期經濟成長的研究大多認為一國研究發展的投入對於該國的經濟成長有著關鍵的影響，因此何種政府政策能有效的調整該國研究發展的投入達到最佳的社會福利，即成為近年熱門的研究議題。本論文嘗試建立一系列品質階梯式提升的R&D成長模型，用以探討過去鮮少於R&D經濟成長領域中被提及的政府政策，重新審視其政策於經濟體運行的機制與經濟邏輯，並提供政府不同於過去研究面向的政策建議。博士論文中的第二章節，我們建立一個具R&D驅動成長特性的動態一般均衡經濟模型進行民營化政策的分析，並提出合理的經濟邏輯解釋為何國營企業的生產力低於民營企業。我們發現部分民營化政策可以是政府最適的民營化政策，且國營企業的生產力低於民營企業為廠商決策行為的結果。第三章節則是建構一個開放的南北國R&D驅動成長特性的成長模型，並討論貿易自由化後進口關稅的降低如何影響兩國的經濟變數。有別於過去文獻的設計，政府可將進口關稅收入投入於有利於廠商生產力的基礎建設之中，我們發現北國降低進口關稅會使得兩國的相對工資惡化。接續我們使用數值模擬的方式發現兩國的最適進口關稅取決於基礎建設的外部性大小而定，且加強智慧財產權保護政策不一定會傷害發展中國家的社會福利。第四章節我們拓展貨幣型的R&D經濟成長模型，藉由R&D廠商可自由選擇研發規模下，內生化廠商加成訂價比例，重新審視智慧財產權保護政策與貨幣政策於經濟體系所扮演的角色。在此模型下，提高智慧財產權保護程度對於經濟成長率的影響是不確定的。當政府考量社會福利下，制定的最適名目利率不會趨近於零，因此傅利曼法則不會成立。 This dissertation constructs three distinct models of R&D-driven endogenous growth and employs them to analyze the effects of government policies on economic growth and social welfare. Chapter 2 builds up an R&D-driven endogenous growth model featuring state-owned enterprises in R&D sectors. We find that privatization is favorable to economic growth while the effect of privatization on social welfare is ambiguous. As a result, a partial privatization could be an optimal policy in our analysis. Moreover, we clearly interpret why private enterprises have higher productivity than state-owned enterprises. Chapter 3 sets up an R&D-driven endogenous growth model featuring North-South trade and technology transfer that is able to examine how the trade liberalization policy affects relative wage and social welfare between two countries. We show that the trade liberalization policy of the north country will lead to a decrease in relative wages, and that optimal tariffs imposed two countries are crucially related to public spending externalities. In addition, we show that the effect of expansion of patent protection on social welfare of the south country is ambiguous. Chapter 4 constructs a monetary R&D-driven endogenous growth model featuring endogenous innovation scales and the price-marginal cost markup. Under this model, an increase in the nominal interest rate decreases economic growth and the effect of expansion of patent protection on economic growth is ambiguous. Our analysis reveals that the Friedman rule fails to be optimal in view of the social welfare maximum. Moreover, we also discuss that how the optimal monetary policy is related to endogenous innovation scales and the price-marginal cost markup. |
參考文獻: | Adams, S. (2006), “The Impact of Privatization on Economic Growth and Income Inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa,” The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies 31: 295-320.\nAghion, P., Askenazy, P., Berman, N., Cette, G. and Eymard, L. (2012), “Credit Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from France,” Journal of the European Economic Association 10: 1001-24.\nAghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1992), “Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica 60: 323-51.\nAghion, P. and Howitt, P. (2009), The Economics of Growth. Mass., Cambridge: MIT Press.\nAmiti, M. and Konings, J. (2007), “Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evidence from Indonesia,” American Economic Review 97: 1611-38.\nBach, C. F., Martin, W. and Stevens, J. A. (1996), “China and the WTO: Tariff Offers, Exemptions and Welfare Implications,” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 132: 409-31.\nBackus, D. K., Kehoe, P. J. and Kehoe, T. J. (1992), “In Search of Scale Effects in Trade and Growth,” Journal of Economic Theory 58: 377-409.\nBai, C., Lu, J. and Tao, Z. (2009), “How Does Privatization Work in China?” Journal of Comparative Economics 37: 453-70.\nBaldwin, J. R. and Gu, W. (2004), “Trade Liberalisation: Export-Market Participation, Productivity Growth and Innovation,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 20: 372-92.\nBarnett, S. (2000), “Evidence on the Fiscal and Macroeconomic Impact of Privatization,” IMF Working Paper No.130.\nBarro, R. J. (1990), “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Political Economy 98: 103-25.\nBarro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (2004), Economic Growth, Second Edition. Mass., Cambridge: MIT Press.\nBeladi, H., Chen P., Chu H., Lai C. and Lai T. (2021), “Optimal Tariffs in a Two-country R&D-based Growth Model,” Macroeconomic Dynamics, forthcoming.\nBoardman, A. and Vining, A. R. (1989), “Ownership and Performance in Competitive Environments: A Comparison of the Performance of Private, Mixed, and State-Owned Enterprises,” Journal of Law and Economics 32: 1-33.\nBoubakri, N., Smaoui, H. and Zammiti, M. (2009), “Privatization Dynamics and Economic Growth,” Journal of Business & Policy Research 4: 16-44.\nBrown, J. D., Earle, J. S. and Telegdy, A. (2006), “The Productivity Effects of Privatization: Longitudinal Estimates from Hungary, Romania, Russia, and Ukraine,” Journal of Political Economy 114: 61-99.\nChang, W. W. and Ryu, H. E. (2015), “Vertically Related Markets, Foreign Competition, and Optimal Privatization Policy,” Review of International Economics 23: 303-19.\nChu, A. and Cozzi, G. (2014), “R&D and Economic Growth in a Cash-in-Advance Economy,” International Economic Review 55: 507-24.\nChu, A., Cozzi, G., Furuakwa, Y. and Liao, C. H. (2019), “Inflation and Innovation in a Schumpterian Economy with North-South Technology Transfer,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 51: 683-719.\nChu, A., Cozzi, G. and Galli, S. (2012), “Does Intellectual Monopoly Stimulate or Stifle Innovation?” European Economic Review 56: 727-46.\nChu, A., Cozzi, G., Lai, C. and Liao, C. H. (2015), “Inflation, R&D and Growth in an Open Economy,” Journal of International Economics 96: 360-74.\nChu, A. and Lai, C. (2013), “Money and the Welfare Cost of Inflation in an R&D Growth Model,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 45: 233-49\nChu, A. and Pan, S. (2013), “The Escape-Infringement Effect of Blocking Patents on Innovation and Economic Growth,” Macroeconomic Dynamics 17: 955-69.\nCook, D. (2002), “Market Entry and International Propagation of Business Cycles,” Journal of International Economics 56: 155-75.\nCook, P. and Uchida, Y. (2003), “Privatization and Economic Growth in Developing Countries,” Journal of Development Studies 39: 121-54.\nDavis, J. S. (1992), “Cross-Country Patterns of Changes in Relative Wages” NBER Macroeconomic Annual 1992, ed. by O. J. Blanchard and S. Fischer. Mass., Cambridge: MIT Press.\nDavis, J. S. and Huang, K. X. (2011), “International Real Business Cycles with Endogenous Markup Variability,” Journal of International Economics 85: 302-16.\nDeFraja, G. and Delbono, F. (1989), “Alternative Strategies of a Public Enterprise in Oligopoly,” Oxford Economic Papers 41: 302-11.\nDeFraja, G. and Delbono, F. (1990), “Game Theoretic Models of Mixed Oligopoly,” Journal of Economic Surveys 4: 1-17.\nDinopoulos, E. and Segerstrom, P. (1999), “The Dynamic Effects of Contingent Tariffs,” Journal of International Economics 47: 191-222.\nDinopoulos, E. and Segerstrom, P. (2006), “North–South Trade and Economic Growth,” Stockholm School of Economics, mimeo.\nDinopoulos, E. and Segerstrom, P. (2010), “Intellectual Property Rights, Multinational Firmsand Economic Growth,” Journal of Development Economics 92: 13-27.\nErcolani, V. and Valle e Azevedo, J. (2014), “The Effects of Public Spending Externalities.” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 46: 173-99.\nFalato, A. and Sim, J. (2014), “Why do innovative firms hold so much cash? Evidence from changes in state R&D tax credits,” FEDS Working Paper No.2014-72.\nFelbermayr, G. J., Jung, B. and Larch, M. (2013), “Optimal Tariffs, Retaliation and the Welfare Loss from Tariff Wars in the Melitz Model,” Journal of Intermational Economics 89: 13-25.\nFerguson, S. M. (2015), “Endogenous product differentiation, market size and prices,” Review of International Economics 23: 45-61.\nFilipovic, A. (2005), ‘‘Impact of Privatization on Economic Growth,’’ Issues in Political Economy 14: 1-22.\nFjell K. and Pal, D. (1996), “A Mixed Oligopoly in the Presence of Foreign Private Firms,” Canadian Journal of Economics 29: 737-74.\nFlam, H. and Helpman, E. (1987), “Vertical Product Differentiation and North–South Trade,” American Economic Review 77: 810-22.\nFrankel, J. A. and Romer, D. (1999), “Does Trade Cause Growth?” American Economic Review 89: 379-99.\nFriedman, M. (1969), The Optimum Quantity of Money and Other Essays, London: Macmillan.\nGarnaut, R., L. Song, S. Tenev and Yao Y. (2005), China’s Ownership Transformation: Process, Outcomes, Prospects., Washington, D.C.: The International Finance Corporation (IFC) and the World Bank.\nGros, D. (1987), “A Note on the Optimal Tariff, Retaliation and the Welfare Loss from Tariff Wars in a Framework with Intra-Industry Trade,” Journal of Intermational Economics 23: 357-67.\nGrossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. (1991), “Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth,” Review of Economic Studies 58: 43-61.\nGupta, N. (2005), “Partial Privatization and Firm Performance,” Journal of Finance 60: 987-1015.\nGustafsson P. and Segerstrom, P. (2010), “North–South Trade with Increasing Product Variety,” Journal of Development Economics 92: 97-106.\nHall, B. (1992), “Investment and R&D at the firm level: does the source of financing matter?” NBER Working Paper No. 4096.\nHanson, G. and Harrison, A. (1999), “Trade Liberalization and Wage Inequality in Mexico,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 52: 271-88.\nHarrison, A. (1996), “Openness and Growth: A Time Series, Cross-Country Analysis for Developing Countries,” Journal of Development Economics 48: 419-47.\nHeston, A., R. and Aten, B. (2009), Penn World Table Version 6.3, Center for 21 International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.\nHimmelberg, C. and Petersen, B. (1994), “R&D and Internal Finance: A Panel Study of Small Firms in High-Tech Industries,” Review of Economics and Statistics 76: 38-51.\nHowitt, P. (1999), “Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing,” Journal of Political Economy 107: 715-30.\nIshibashi, I. and Matsumura, T. (2006), “R&D Competition Between Public and Private Sectors,” European Economic Review 50: 1347-66.\nJones, R. W. (1969), “Tariffs and Trade in General Equilibrium: Comment,” American Economic Review 59: 418-24.\nJones, C. I. (1995), “Time Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 495-525.\nJones, C. I. (2005), “Growth and Ideas,” in Handbook of Economic Growth, Volume 1, ed. by P. Aghion and S. N. Durlauf. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1063-111.\nJones, S. L., Megginson, W. L., Nash, R. C. and Netter, J. M. (1999), “Share Issue Privatizations as Financial Means to Political and Economic Ends,” Journal of Financial Economics 53: 217-53.\nJones, C. I. and Williams, J. C. (1998), “Measuring the Social Return to R&D,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113: 1119-35.\nJones, C. I. and Williams, J. C. (2000), “Too Much of a Good Thing? The Economics of Investment in R&D,” Journal of Economic Growth 5: 65-85.\nJorgenson, D. W. and Fraumeni, B. M. (1992), “Investment in Education and U.S. Economic Growth,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 94: 51-70.\nKaldor, N. (1940), “A Model of the Trade Cycle,” Economic Journal 50: 78-92.\nLaurin, C. and Bozec, Y. (2001), “Privatization and Productivity Improvement: The Case of Canadian National,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 37: 355-74\nLi, C. (2001), “On the Policy Implications of Endogenous Technological Progress,” Economic Journal 111: C164-79.\nLiu, X. and Buck, T. (2007), “Innovation Performance and Channels for International Technology Spillovers: Evidence from Chinese High-Tech Industries,” Research Policy 36: 355-66\nMatsumura, T. (1998), “Partial Privatization in Mixed Oligopoly,” Journal of Public Economics 70: 473–83.\nMatsumura, T. and Kanda, O. (2005), “Mixed Oligopoly at Free Entry Markets,” Journal of Economics 84: 27-48.\nMatsumura, T. and Matsushima, N. (2004), “Endogenous Cost Differentials Between Public and Private Enterprises: A Mixed Duopoly Approach,” Economica 71: 671-88.\nMayer W. (1984), “Endogenous Tariff Formation,” American Economic Review 74: 970-85.\nMegginson, W. L. and Netter, J. M. (2001), “From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization,” Journal of Economic Literature 39: 321-89.\nMelitz, M. J., and Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2008), “Market Size, Trade, and Productivity,” Review of Economic Studies 75: 295-316.\nMerrill, W. C. and Schneider, N. (1966), “Government Firms in Oligopoly Industries: A Short-Run Analysis,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 80: 400-12.\nMinniti, A., Parello, C. P. and Segerstrom, P. S. (2013), “A Schumpeterian Growth Model with Random Quality Improvements,” Economic Theory 52: 755-91.\nMunari, F. (2002), “The Effects of Privatization on Corporate R&D Units: Evidence from Italy and France,” R&D Management 32: 223-32\nMunari, F. and Oriani, R. (2002), “Privatization and R&D Performance: An Empirical Analysis Based on Tobin`s q,” FEEM Working Paper 63: 1-34.\nNicita, A. (2009), “The Price Effect of Tariff Liberalization: Measuring the Impact on Household Welfare,” Journal of Development Economics 89: 19-27.\nO’Donoghue, T. (1998), “A Patentability Requirement for Sequential Innovation,” RAND Journal of Economics 29: 654-79.\nO’Donoghue, T. and J. (2004), “Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth, ” Journal of Economic Growth 9: 81-123.\nOpler, T., Pinkowitz, L., Stulz, R. and Williamson, R. (1999), “The Determinants and Implications of Corporate Cash Holdings,” Journal of Finance Economics 52: 3-46.\nPavcnik, N. (2002), “Trade Liberalization, Exit, and Productivity Improvements: Evidence from Chilean Plants,” Review of Economic Studies 69: 245-76.\nPlane, P. (1997), “Privatisation and Economic Growth: An Empirical Investigation from a Sample of Developing Market Economies,” Applied Economics 29: 161-178.\nPoyago-Theotoky, J. (1998), “R&D Competition in a Mixed Duopoly under Uncertainty and Easy Imitation,” Journal of Comparative Economics 26: 415-28.\nRamsey, F. P. (1928), “A Mathematical Theory of Saving,” Economic Journal 38: 54-9.\nRivera-Batiz, L. A. and Romer, P. M. (1991), “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106: 531-55.\nRobertson, R. (2004), “Relative Prices and Wage Inequality: Evidence from Mexico,” Journal of International Economics 64: 387-409.\nRobertson, T. S. and Gatignon, H. (1998), “Technology Development Mode: A Transaction Cost Conceptualization,” Strategic Management Journal 19: 515-31.\nRomer, P. M. (1990), “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy 98: S71-S102.\nSegerstrom, P. (1998), “Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects.” American Economic Review 88: 1290-310.\nSegerstrom, P. (2000), “The Long-Run Growth Effects of R&D Subsidies,” Journal of Economic Growth 5: 277-305.\nShenhar, A. J. (1993), “From Low to High-Tech Project Management,” R&D Management 23: 199-214.\nSödersten, B. and Vind, K. (1968), “Tariffs and Trade in General Equilibrium,” American Economic Review 58: 394-408.\nSolow, R. M. (1956), “A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 70: 65-94.\nWen, J. and Yuan, L. (2010), “Optimal Privatization of Vertical Public Utilities,” Canadian Journal of Economics 43: 816-31.\nWhite, M. D. (1996), “Mixed Oligopoly, Privatization and Subsidization,” Economics Letter 53: 189-95.\nWu, S. J., Change, Y. M. and Chen, H. Y. (2016), “Imported Inputs and Privatization in Downstream Mixed Oligopoly with Foreign Ownership,” Canadian Journal of Economics 49: 1179-207.\nYang, Y. (2018), “On the Optimality of IPR Protection with Blocking Patents,” Review of Economic Dynamics 27: 205-30.\nYu, P. and Lai C. (2020), “Optimal Privatization and Economic Growth in a Schumpeterian Economy,” Journal of Macroeconomics 64: Article 103205. | 描述: | 博士 國立政治大學 經濟學系 104258501 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0104258501 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 850101.pdf | 4.29 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.