Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136698
題名: 川普與習近平政權下之美中戰略競爭新紀元
A New Era of U.S.-China Strategic Competition Under Presidents Trump and Xi
作者: 馬靜瑜
Ma Shum, Alicia
貢獻者: 李明
Ming Lee
馬靜瑜
Ma Shum, Alicia
關鍵詞: 戰略競爭
美中關係
Strategic Competition
US-China Relations
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 4-Aug-2021
摘要: 美國是民主國家,中國是專制國家,每個人都專注於自己的願景目標。普普政府領導下的雙邊關係中,戰略上的不甘心急於求援。政府對中國在新疆、香港和台灣的行為以及美國的網絡壓力,表示嚴重和美國的經濟壓力。在過去。七年中,隨著經濟和技術進步、影響力和軍事能力的擴大,中國已將重點轉向美國。繼 2008 年全球危機和習主席於 2012 年上台後,美國政府的報告將中國督導描述為在追求目標時“逐漸獨立”。 因此,中國願意接受中國共產黨(中共)的一黨制政府制度,並以此作為全球領導權的備選方案。 “與中國與美國的戰爭有關,美國的戰爭戰略是基於發展的安全挑戰。這標誌著政府文件中使用的措辭辯證中國共產黨(CCP)是對自由民主和美國利益的共同威脅”。 ,而則是中國共產黨利益的威脅儘管是對美國的利益的威脅,但和中國由於其防禦行動必須要共同努力,就什麼是可以接受的維護中共統治的美國的努力,或者至少,我們可以沒有什麼,以及什麼是對內政的不可干預,中國實現更符合的安排。
The United States and China are the world’s two most powerful countries, and their ideals of how the world should function are vastly different. The United States is a democracy and China is an authoritarian, both aim to promote their own political visions. It is clear that there is rising strategic mistrust in the bilateral relationship under the Trump administration. There have been serious concerns raised by the Trump administration about China`s behavior in Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and Taiwan, as well as cyber-attacks on the US and economic pressure of US allies. China has shifted its focus toward the United States during the past decades as its economic and technological advances, diplomatic influence, and military capabilities have expanded. Following the global crisis of 2008 and President Xi’s rise to power in 2012, the United States government report portrayed Chinese officials as “increasingly assertive” in their pursuit of their goal. As a result, Chinese leaders have grown more active in presenting the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) one-party, authoritarian government system, and principles as a viable alternative to the US global leadership. This “new era of competition” is linked to China’s competitiveness strategy with the United States, which is predicated on the developing security challenge. This means that the wording used in government documents indicates that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is a threat to liberal democracy and American interests, while the US is a threat to the Chinese Communist Party`s interests (although not necessarily those of the Chinese people), but as a result of its defensive actions. The United States and China must work together to get a more common view of what constitutes acceptable efforts to safeguard CCP rule, or at the very least, what we can tolerate, and what constitutes intolerable intervention in China’s domestic affairs. The two sides` exchanges are a vital step toward a more stable US-China relationship.
參考文獻: Government Documents\n\nAnnual Report to Congress. Department of Defense. 2020. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2020.\n\nReport to Congress. 2019. The U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.\n\nThe Strategic Competition Act of 2021 Bill. 2021. United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations.\n\nThe US Department of State. 2019. A Free and Open Indo-Pacific Advancing a Shared Vision.\n\nThe White House Office of Trade and Manufacturing Policy. 2018. How China’s Economic Aggression Threatens the Technologies and Intellectual Property of the United States and the World.\n\nThe White House. 2017. National Security Strategy of the United States of America.\n\nU.S. Department of Defense. 2019. White House Report to Congress: United States Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China.\n\nU.S. Department of Defense. 2019. DOD Releases Indo-Pacific Strategy Report.\nU.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission. Executive Summary and Recommendations.\n\nUnited States National Security Council. 2020. United States Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic China.\n\nUS Office of the Secretary of Defense. 2020. Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China.\n\nWashington, DC: The White House. 2017. National Security Strategy of the United States.\n\nWhite House. 2017. National Security Strategy of the United States of America.\n\nBooks\n\nAllison, Graham. 2017. Destined for war: Can America and China escape Thucydides’ Trap? Harcourt Press.\n\nBrazinsky, Gregg. A. 2017. Winning the Third World: Sino-American Rivalry during the Cold War. University of North Carolina Press.\n\nBush, Richard C. 2004. At Cross Purposes: U.S.-Taiwan Relations Since 1942.Routledge; 1st edition.\n\nBush, Richard. C. 2013. Uncharted Strait: The Future of China-Taiwan Relations (1st ed). Brookings Institution Press.\n\nCarpenter, Ted Galen. 2006. America’s Coming War with China: A Collision Course Over Taiwan. St. Martin`s Press; 1st edition.\n\nKan, Shirley A., and Morrison, Wayne M. 2015. U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.\n\nOlson, James M. 2019. To Catch a Spy: The Art of Counterintelligence. Georgetown University Press.\n\nShapiro, Jeremy, and Lynn E. Davis, editors. 2003. The U.S. Army and the New National Security Strategy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Cooperation.\n\nSutter, Robert. G. 2018. US-China Relations: Perilous Past, Uncertain Present (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.\n\nTellis, Ashley. J., Szalwinski, Alison, and Wills, Michael. 2020. Strategic Asia 2020: U.S.-China Competition for Global Influence. National Bureau of Asian Research.\n\nWoodward, Jude. 2017. The US VS. China: Asia`s New Cold War? (1st ed.). Manchester University Press.\nZelikow, P. D., & Blackwill, R. (n.d.). 2021. The United States, China, and Taiwan: A Strategy to Prevent War. Council on Foreign Relations.\n\nJournal Articles\n\nBrooks, Stephen. G., & Wohlforth, William. C. 2016. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-first Century: China`s Rise and the Fate of America`s Global Position. International Security.\n\nFriedberg, Aaron. L. 2005. The Future of U.S.-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable? The MIT Press.\n\nGlaser, Bonnie.S., Bush, Richard, C., Green, Michael.J. 2020. A report of the CSIS Task Force on U.S. Policy Toward Taiwan. Center for Strategic & International Studies.\n\nGrosse, R., Gamso, J., & Nelson, R. C. 2021. China’s Rise, World Order, and the Implications for International Business. Management International Review.\n\nHeath, Timothy.R., & Thompson, William.R. 2018. Avoiding U.S.-China Competition Is Futile: Why the Best Option Is to Manage Strategic Rivalry. Asia Policy,\n\nIkenberry, John. G. 2008. The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive? Foreign Affairs.\n\nJalil, Ghazala Yasmin. 2019. China’s Rise: Offensive or Defensive Realism. Strategic Studies.\n\nMuhammad Ali Baig. 2019. “Conventional Military Doctrines and U.S.-China Military Engagement in the West Pacific.” China Quarterly of international Strategic Studies.\n\nShambaugh, David. 2018. US-China Rivalry in Southeast Asia: Power Shift or Competitive Coexistence? International Security.\n\nSnyder, Glenn H. 2002. Mearsheimer`s World-Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security: A Review Essay. International Security.\n\nWu, Mark. 2016. The `China, Inc.` Challenge to Global Trade Governance. Harvard International Law Journal.\n\nWu, Xinbo. 2000. U.S. Security Policy in Asia: Implications for China—U.S. Relations. Contemporary Southeast Asia.\n\nZha, Daojiong. 2017. China-US Relations Under Trump: More Continuity Than Change. Asian Perspective, John Hopkins University Presse.\n\nZhao, Suisheng. 2017 American Reflections on the Engagement with China and Responses to President Xi’s New Model of Major Power Relations. Journal of Contemporary China.\n\nWebsites\n\nAmiti, Mary, Kong, Sang Hoon, and Weinstein, David. E. 2020. “The Investment Cost of the U.S.-China Trade War.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York.\n\nBacchus, James., Lester, Simon., & Zhu, Huan. 2018. “Disciplining China’s Trade Practices at the WTO: How WTO Complaints Can Help Make China More Market- Oriented.” CATO Institute.\n\nBader, Jeffrey. A. 2018. “U.S.-China Relations: Is It Time to End the Engagement?” Brooking Institution.\n\nBlatt, Mitchell. 2018. “America and China: Destined for Conflict or Cooperation? We Asked 14 of the World’s Most Renowned Experts.” The National Interest.\n\nBloomberg News. 2021.“How China Won Trump’s Trade War and Got Americans to Foot the Bill.” Bloomberg News.\n\nBryon, Ramirez. 2020. “Is Conflict Between the United States and China Inevitable? International Policy Digest.\n\nBush, Richard C. 2019. “The Trump Administration’s Policies Toward Taiwan.” Brookings Institution.\n\nCapri, Alex. 2020. “Strategic US-China decoupling in the tech sector.” Hinrich Foundation.\n\nClay, Marcus. 2020. “The PLA’s New Push for Military Technology Innovation.” The Diplomat.\n\nCentral News Agency. (2021). “U.S. opposes unilateral changes to cross-strait status quo: Sullivan.” Taiwan News.\n\nConrad, Justin. 2020. “US Public Opinion Is Changing the Relationship with China.” The Diplomat.\n\nCulver, John and Hass, Ryan. 2021. “Understanding Beijing’s motives regarding Taiwan, and America’s role.” Brookings Institution.\n\nDeAeth, Duncan. 2019. “US under Trump takes step towards recognizing Taiwan as a country.” Taiwan News.\n\nDing, Jeffrey. 2020. “Balancing Standards: U.S. and Chinese Strategies for Developing Technical Standards in AI.” The National Bureau of Asian Research.\n\nDonnan, Shawn and Pickert, Reade. 2019. “Trump’s China Buying Spree Unlikely to Cover Trade War’s Costs.” Bloomberg.\n\nDoshi, Rush. 2020. “The United States, China, and the contest for the Fourth Industry Revolution.” Brookings Institution.\n\nEY Greater China. 2020. “How is China approaching SOE reform.” EY.\n\nFitch, Asa and Woo, Stu. 2020. “The U.S. vs. China: Who is winning the key technology battles?” The Wall Street Journal.\n\nFong, Leslie. 2020. “Could US, China rivalry lead to war? History shows it might.” SCMP.\nGiglio, Mike. 2019. “China’s Spies are on the Offensive.” The Atlantic.\n\nHass, Ryan and Denmark, Abraham. 2020. “More pain than gain: How the US-China trade war hurt America.” Brookings Institution.\n\nHu, Xijin. 2021. “Taiwan’s DPP should draw lessons from HK extreme opposition forces’ ending.” Global Times.\n\nJones, Marc. 2021. “Analysis: The trillion-dollar weapons in the U.S.-China tech stock war.” Reuters.\n\nKahata, Akinori. 2020. “Assessing the Impact of U.S.-China Technology Competition and Decoupling: Focusing on 5G.” Center for Strategic & International Studies.\n\nKennedy, Scott. 2015. “Made in China 2025.” Centre for Strategic & International Studies.\nKharpal, Arjun. 2020. “Why new U.S. rules on selling chips to Huawei could be a ‘big blow’ for the Chinese tech giant,” CNBC.\n\nKo, Sydney and Hsieh, Milo. 2019. “US Arms Sales to Taiwan Indicate Tougher Attitude Towards China.” The News Lens.\n\nLeonard, Jenny and Donnan, Shawn. 2019. “Trump Blacklists More China Tech Companies Days before Xi Summit.” Bloomberg News.\n\nLin, Tai-Ho. 2020. “Clarity in the US’ Taiwan Strategy.” Taipei Times.\n\nMastro, Oriana Skylar. 2019. “Hearing on “A New Approach for an Era of US-China Competition.” AEI Paper & Studies.\nMayeda, Andrew and Mohsin, Saleha. 2017. “U.S. Rebukes China for Backing Off Market Embrace.” Bloomberg.\n\nMearsheimer, John. J. 2014. “Can China Rise Peacefully?” The National Interest.\n\nMorrissey, William and Givens, John. 2020. “The measure of a country: America’s wonkiest competition with China.” Warontherocks.\n\nPaletta, Damian, Nakashima, Ellen, and Lynch, David.J. 2019. “Trump Administration Cracks Down on Giant Chinese Tech Firm, Escalating Clash with Beijing.” The Washington Post.\n\nRachman, Gideon. 2020. “A new cold war: Trump, Xi and the escalating US-China confrontation,” Financial Times.\n\nRapp-Hooper, Mira. 2020. “China. America, and the International Order After the Pandemic.” War on the Rocks.\n\nRedden, Elizabeth. 2020. “Trump Proclamation Bars Entry of Certain Chinese Students.” Inside Higher Ed.\n\nReport by The China Senior Analyst Group. 2020. “A New Great Game-China, the U.S. and Technology.” S&P Global.\n\nRyan, Missy. 2021. “The U.S. system created the world’s most advanced military. Can it maintain an edge?” The Washington Post.\n\nSheng, Yang and Keyue, Xu. 2021. “Two sessions release clearer signals for promoting reunification with Taiwan.” Global Times.\n\nSpujibroek, Marlous. 2020. “China Standards 2035: A Global Standard for Emerging Technologies.” Datenna.\n\nStilwell, David. 2020. “Advancing U.S. Engagement and Countering China in the Indo-Pacific and Beyond.” The U.S. Department of State.\n\nSun, Haiyong. 2019. “The U.S.-China Tech War: Impacts and Prospects.” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies.\n\nSwanson, Ana and McCabe, David. 2020. “Trump Effort to Keep U.S. Tech Out of China Alarms American Firms.” The New York Times.\n\nSwanson, Ana, Stevenson, Alexandra, Smialek, Jeanna. 2019. “China’s Currency Moves Escalate Trade War, Rattling Markets.” The New York Times.\n\nThe Infographics Show. 2020. “China VS United States (USA)-Who would win? 2020 Military/Army Comparison.” The Infographics Show.\n\nThomas, Christopher. A., and Wu, Xander. 2021. “How Global Tech Executives View U.S.-China Tech Competition.” Brookings Institution.\n\nVox. 2020. “How American Could Lose its Allies: 2020 election.” Vox.\n\nWang, Yuan-Kang. 2018. “The Realist Case for the US to Keep Supporting Taiwan.” The News Lens.\n\nZhou, Cissy. 2020. “US-China tech war: can Washington take a leaf out of Beijing’s plan on strategic technologies? South China Morning Post.\n\nWilson Naomi. 2020. “China Standards 2035 and the Plan for World Domination-Don’t Believe China’s Hype.” Council on Foreign Relations.\n\nZivitski, Liane Maj. 2020. “China wants to dominate space, and the US must take countermeasures.” DefenseNews.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
國際研究英語碩士學位學程(IMPIS)
108862019
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108862019
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
201901.pdf2.08 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.