Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136748
題名: 接軌國際的幻象:藉布赫迪厄共謀觀點探討貸款赴外交換學生的「動機」
The Cosmopolitan Illusio; or, Why Are We Having an Exchange Study Through a Loan?
作者: 傅威
Fu, Wei
貢獻者: 劉慧雯
Liu, Hui-Wen
傅威
Fu, Wei
關鍵詞: 文化資本
世界主義
交換學生
社會軌跡
結構與能動性
Cosmopolitanism
Cultural capital
Exchange study
Social trajectory
Structure and agency
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 4-Aug-2021
摘要:   全球化發展令人們越來越重視參與國際事務的視野與能力,起碼對國人來說,「跟國際接軌」是一種無所不在的想望與焦慮。本研究關注的便是這樣一種現象——或曰,這樣一種對「接軌國際」的趨之若鶩——從何而來,目的又在於將人們帶往何處(是帶領個體走向成功的投資,社會責任對個體的勒索,或純粹是個體的自我實現)。本研究選擇關注其中一種相對特定的實踐形式:貸款出國當交換學生。這樣的手段同時帶有經濟上的投資期待,卻又在缺乏穩定人力資本回報上,帶有純粹追求自我實現的意義。\n\n  透過深度訪談法,本研究訪問八名貸款赴外交換學生,探究形塑其等赴外理想的過往背景,以及遠赴他國的實際心路歷程。藉由布赫迪厄的生成性結構主義思維,及其場域—資本—慣習三位一體的解析方式,本研究欲理解實踐方式如何萌生於生命歷程,並瞭解這實際為他們帶來什麼樣的社會意義。\n\n  研究發現,自幼浸淫於文化場域內無所不在的世界主義思維,實為「接軌國際」信念普遍存在於大眾心中的主要原因。其次,作為一種世界主義素養的追求,「接軌國際」實為一種文化資本的追求,故非傳統意義上的經濟投資。然而,正因世界主義素養是為一種文化資本,並在社會上廣泛受到接納,這種特殊資本實有點石成金,換取經濟資本的能力。
As globalization continues, the importance of having the ability to interact with foreign others and navigate through transnational environments is now without a doubt. And, the desire and anxiety of “becoming cosmopolitan” are – here in Taiwan at least – all-pervasive in everyday life. This very phenomenon is the major concern of this thesis in which we explore what it brings on to us – be it an investment that leads to social success, a social responsibility, or just an actualization of one’s aspiration to become a better self? We pay attention to a specific kind of cosmopolitan practice, “having an exchange study through a loan,” as it signifies an economic expect of return – which is the nature of loaning – and the pure pursuit of self-actualization – as it lacks a stable human capital return rate - at the same time.\n\nTo this end, we conducted an in-depth interview with 8 then-students having their exchange study through a loan. We focus on the life experiences that drove each of their decision to go abroad and the stories of what was happening during their times away. Drawing on the theoretical framework of Pierre Bourdieu, we examine how their aspiration of cosmopolitanism has been shaped through each of their social trajectories, and what are the social effects on them of what they have done.\n\nIn lieu of a conclusion, we pointed out that the omnipresent nature of cosmopolitanism within cultural fields is the reason why “becoming cosmopolitan” a desirable goal for the majority. And, we found that venturing on cosmopolitanism disposition is itself economical of a certain kind of cultural logic – rather than a traditional logic of economics kind. Nevertheless, due to the fact that cosmopolitanism disposition as cultural capital is widely recognized locally and globally, we believe the acquisition of it does make some hard money afterwards.
參考文獻: 中文部分\nClayton, Rebekah(無日期)。〈為什麼要出國留學?〉。取自英莩留學服務股份有限公司EF Academy Blog網頁https://www.ef.com.tw/blog/efacademyblog/為什麼要出國留學?\n王志弘譯(2003)。〈地租的藝術:全球化、壟斷與文化的商品化〉。《城市與設計學報》,15、16:1-19。(原文 Harvey, D. [2002]. ‘The Art of Rent: Globalization, Monopoly and the Commodification of Culture’, In Panitch, L and Leys, C. [Eds.], A World of Contradictions. New York, NY: NYU Press.)\n外交部(2012年9月15日)。〈外交部關心國人赴國外打工度假的安全,並盼國人瞭解打工度假措施的積極意義〉【公告】。台北市:外交部。取自 https://www.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=8742DCE7A2A28761&sms=491D0E5BF5F4BC36&s=88272FBDFF101A20\n甘芝萁(2015年11月2日)。〈日客來台零成長 國人赴日破紀錄〉,《自由時報》。取自https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/928715\n石武耕、李沅洳、陳羚芝譯(2016)。《藝術的法則——文學場域的生成與結構》,台北:典藏藝術家。(原書 Bourdieu, P. [1992]. Les règles de l’art: Genèse et structure du champ. Paris, France: Éditions du Seuil.)\n吳嘉苓(2012)。〈訪談法〉,瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞編《社會及行為科學研究法(二):質性研究法》,頁33-60。台北市:臺灣東華書局。\n李沅珈譯(2019)。《學術人》,台北:時報。(原書 Bourdieu, P. [1984] Homo Academicus. Paris, France: Les Éditions de Minuit.)\n李易駿、古允文(2007)。〈機會開放或結構限制?台灣青年從學校到職場轉銜過程中的Yo-Yo現象〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》,67:105-152。\n李猛、李康譯(2008)。《布赫迪厄社會學面面觀》,台北:麥田。(原書 Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L. [1992] An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.)\n阮靖權(2015)。《「壯遊」的建構、挑戰與現實-以台灣赴澳打工旅遊青年為例》。國立政治大學社會學系碩士論文,台北市。\n周何、邱德修編(2015)。《五南國語活用辭典》(第3版)。臺北:五南。\n林文瑛、王震武(1995)。〈中國父母的教養觀:嚴教觀或打罵觀〉。《本土心理學研究》,3:2-92。\n林佳賢(2016年5月5日)。〈交換學生男性女性偏好大不同?3張圖表帶你看台灣大學生交換出國選擇〉,《The News Lens 關鍵評論》。取自https://www.thenewslens.com/article/28822。\n林健生、彭煥群(2019年5月10日)。〈大學生赴東南亞當交換生 大幅成長近1倍〉,《公視新聞網》。取自https://news.pts.org.tw/article/431361。\n夏鑄九、王志弘等譯(2000)。《網絡社會之崛起》。台北:唐山。(原書 Castells, M. [2000]. The Rise of the Network Society. (2nd). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.)\n孫文彬(2020年4月16日)。〈個人化推薦如何每月吸睛15億次,先得撐過3千次午夜爆量挑戰〉,《iThome》。取自 https://www.ithome.com.tw/people/136905\n翁康容、謝雨生(2018)。〈台灣民眾轉至成人發展歷程之類型與變遷〉。《台灣社會學》,36:111-166。\n財團法人台灣網路資訊中心(2020)。《2019台灣網路報告》。取自https://report.twnic.tw/2019\n張立蓁(2016年3月28日)。〈交換生在美國:先別一頭熱,文化交流沒有想像中這麼容易〉,《換日線》。取自 https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/6265\n張君玫譯(2001)。《全球化:對人類的深遠影響》。台北:群學。(原書 Bauman, Z. [1998]. Globalization: The Human Consequence. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.)\n張君玫(2006)。〈「世界」的翻譯興建構-中國西化論述中的幾種「世界主義」〉。《東吳社會學報》,20:59-108。\n張恩源(2016)。〈為甚麼理論解釋不了生活?布迪厄告訴你的實踐、場域與慣習〉,《01哲學》。取自https://www.hk01.com/哲學/59829\n張慧慈(2014)。當打工變成體驗西方:台灣青年赴澳洲打工度假的研究。國立臺灣大學社會學研究所碩士論文,台北市。\n教育部(2011)。《中小學國際教育白皮書》。台北市:教育部。\n教育部(2016)。《提升青年學生全球移動力計畫》。台北市:教育部。\n章凱閎(2020年9月17日)。〈國際教育2.0推中小學認證 教團提醒別淪表面化〉,《聯合報》。取自 https://udn.com/news/story/6885/4866154\n莊春暖(2013)。《臺灣的大學生出國研修一年的經驗及其影響之研究——以淡江大學為例》。淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士論文。\n陳亭羽(2015年11月5日)。〈20歲的我們,為什麼要出走?〉,《換日線》。取自 https://crossing.cw.com.tw/article/5734\n陳建州、劉正(2004)。〈論多元入學方案之教育機會均等性〉。《教育研究集刊》,50(4):115-146。\n陳麗安(2019)。《大專生參與交換學生計畫與就業能力關係之研究》。成功大學經營管理碩士學位學程碩士論文。\n傅仰止(2019)。〈台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2018第七期第四次:全球與文化組(D00170_2)〉。取自 中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。\n游琁如(2013年12月19日)。〈阿拉伯籍航空2月進入台灣 飛歐洲中轉杜拜2萬6含稅〉,《ETtoday新聞雲》。取自https://travel.ettoday.net/article/308567.htm\n馮靖惠(2019年3月20日)。〈私中生出國留學最多〉,《聯合晚報》。取自 https://udn.com/news/story/6925/3708246\n黃文定(2018)。〈論國際教育中愛國主義與世界主義的矛盾與出路〉。《教育研究集刊》,64(3):41-78。\n廖育正(2019)。〈「幻化遊戲」與「懸置遊玩」:論洪席耶對布爾迪厄的批評〉。《中外文學》,48(1):127-162。\n劉若蘭、林大森(2012)。〈家中第一代大學生的就學經驗、學習成果與畢業流向:與非第一代相比〉。《教育實踐與研究》,25(2):97-130。\n劉駿州(1994)。〈實證、批判、詮釋——三大方法典範之初探〉。《新聞學研究》,48:153-167。\n賴曉黎(2013)。〈幻象與共謀:布赫迪厄論秩序的自我持存〉。《台灣社會學》,26:1-36。\n藍佩嘉(2014)。〈做父母、做階級:親職敘事、教養實作與階級不平等〉。《台灣社會學》,27:97-140。\n鄺郁庭(2020年3月4日)。〈「暫停申請新帳號」時隔一年半!PTT站方終於公告:開放NTU信箱註冊〉,《ETtoday新聞雲》。取自 https://www.ettoday.net/news/20200304/1659455.htm\n魏家良、王煌忠(2019年10月26日)。〈韓國瑜喊「國外遊學1年做交換學生」 代辦業者:每人至少100萬〉,《蘋果日報》。取自 https://tw.appledaily.com/politics/20191026/TUP47BPTM76A7PYUBJYSQH5GIU\n魏家良、唐鎮宇(2019年10月25日)。〈韓國瑜開支票!大學與研究生國外遊學1年 「費用我想辦法」〉,《蘋果日報》。取自 https://tw.appledaily.com/politics/20191025/VG42ONXFU24U64ZTNUVCFLGYHE\n譚心莛(2014)。《旅行的意義:打工度假與自我認同的形塑》。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文,新竹市。\n\n英文部分\nAng, I. (1982). Watching Dallas: Soap Opera and the Melodramatic Imagination. New York, NY: Routledge.\nBaumbach,N., Young, D. R. & Yue, G. (2016). Revisiting Postmodernism: An Interview with Fredric Jameson. Social Text 34(2): 143–160.\nBeck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, UK: Sage Publications\nBeck, U. (2000). The cosmopolitan perspective: sociology of the second age of modernity. The British Journal of Sociology, 51: 79-105.\nBeck, U. (2002). The Cosmopolitan Society and Its Enemies. Theory, Culture & Society, 19:17–44.\nBeck, U. (2003) ‘Rooted Cosmopolitanism’, In Beck, U., Sznaider, N., & Winter, R. (Eds.), Global America?: The cultural consequences of globalization. Liverpool, UK: Liverpool University Press.\nBeck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan Vision. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press\nBeck, U., & Lau, C. (2005). Second modernity as a research agenda: theoretical and empirical explorations in the “meta-change” of modern society. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 525–557.\nBlok, A. and Selchow, S. (2017). Risk Society. In B.S. Turner (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory.\nBörjesson, M. and Broady, D. (2016). "Elite Strategies in a Unified System of Higher Education. The Case of Sweden." L`Année sociologique 66(1): 115-146.\nBourdieu, P. (1970/1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. (R. Nice, Trans.). London, UK: Sage Publications\nBourdieu, P. (1972/1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press\nBourdieu, P. (1979/1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nBourdieu, P. (1980/1990). The Logic of Practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press\nBourdieu, P. (1981). Men and Machines. In K. Knorr-Cetina and A. V. Cicourel. (Eds.), Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies (pp. 304-317). London, UK: Routledge.\nBourdieu, P. (1982/1991). Language and Symbolic Power. (M, Adamson and G. Raymond, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.\nBourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: the economic world reversed. Poetics, 12: 311-356.\nBourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richarson (Eds.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.\nBourdieu, P. (1992/1993). Sociology in Question. (R. Nice, Trans.). London, UK: Sage Publications.\nBourdieu, P. (1997/2000). Pascalian Meditations. (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.\nBourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.\nBourdieu, P. and Lamaison, P. (1986). From Rules to Strategies: An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Cultural Anthropology, 1(1): 110-120.\nBourdieu, P. and Eagleton, T. (1992). Doxa and common life. New Left Review, 191: 111–121\nCalhoun, C. (2008). Cosmopolitanism in the modern social imaginary. Daedalus, 137(3), 105-114.\nCalhoun, C. (2010). Beck, Asia and second modernity. The British Journal of Sociology, 61: 597-619.\nChaney, E. (1982). Richard Lassels and the establishment of the Grand Tour: Catholic cosmopolitans and royalists in exile, 1630-1660. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London, London, UK.\nChang, K-S. (2010). The second modern condition? Compressed modernity as internalized reflexive cosmopolitization. The British Journal of Sociology, 61: 444-464.\nCheng, Y. (2018) Educated non-elites’ pathways to cosmopolitanism: the case of private degree students in Singapore. Social & Cultural Geography, 19(2): 151-170.\nDelanty, G. (2012). Introduction. In G. Delanty (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Cosmopolitanism Studies (pp. 1-8). New York, NY: Routledge.\nDingwall, R. (1999). “Risk Society”: The Cult of Theory and the Millennium?. Social Policy & Administration, 33: 474-491.\nFeldstein, R., Fink, B., & Jaanus, M. (1995). Reading Seminar XI: Lacan’s Four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.\nGiddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.\nHeath, S. (2007). Widening the gap: Pre‐university gap years and the ‘economy of experience’. British Journal of Sociology of Education 28(1): 89-103.\nIgarashi, H. and Saito, H. (2014). Cosmopolitanism as Cultural Capital: Exploring the Intersection of Globalization, Education and Stratification. Cultural Sociology, 8(3): 222–239.\nIgnatow, G. and Robinson, L. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu: theorizing the digital. Information, Communication & Society 20(7): 950-966.\nJames, P. (2006). Globalism, nationalism, tribalism: Bringing theory back in. London, UK: Sage Publications\nJarvis, D. S. L. (2008). Ulrich Beck, globalization and the rise of the risk society: A critical exegetic analysis. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Research Paper No. LKYSPP08-003.\nKim, J. (2011). Aspiration for global cultural capital in the stratified realm of global higher education: Why do Korean students go to US graduate schools? The British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(1): 109-126.\nLacan, J. (1966/1977). Écrits: A Selection. (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London, UK: Tavistock Publications.\nLassels, R. (2016). An Italian Voyage, or, a complete journey through Italy in two parts : With the Characters of the People and the Description of the Chief Towns, Churches, Monasteries, Tombs, Libraries, Pallaces, Villa`s, Gardens, Pictures, Statues and Antiquities. Norderstedt, Germany: Hansebooks.\nLindell, J. and Danielsson, M. (2017). Moulding Cultural Capital into Cosmopolitan Capital. Nordicom Review, 38(2): 51.\nLopes, P. (2000). Pierre Bourdieu`s Fields of Cultural Production: A Case Study of Modern Jazz. In N. Brown; I. Lanham (Eds.), Pierre Bourdieu: Fieldwork in Culture (pp. 165-185). Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.\nRadway, J. (1991). Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Literature. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.\nSaito, H. (2011). An actor-network-theory of cosmopolitanism. Sociological Theory 29(2): 124–149.\nSzerszynski, B. and Urry, J. (2006). Visuality, mobility and the cosmopolitan: Inhabiting the world from afar. The British Journal of Sociology 57(1): 113–131.\nThreadgold, S. (2018). Bourdieu is not a determinist: Illusio, aspiration, reflexivity and affect. In C. Burke, G. Stahi, S. Threadgold, and D. Wallance. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Theorizing Aspirations: Applying Bourdieu’s Tools (pp. 36-50). London, UK: Bloomsbury.\nWeenink, D. (2007). Cosmopolitan and Established Resources of Power in the Education Arena. International Sociology, 22(4): 492-516.\nWeenink, D. (2008). Cosmopolitanism as a form of capital: Parents preparing their children for a globalized world. Sociology, 42(6): 1089-1106.\nWeiss, A. (2005). The Transnationalization of Social Inequality: Conceptualizing Social Positions on a World Scale. Current Sociology, 53(4): 707-728.\nWitz, A. (2004). Anamnesis and Amnesis in Bourdieu’s Work: The Case for a Feminist Anamnesis. Sociological Review 52: 211–223.\nŽižek, S. (2008). The Sublime Object of Ideology. London, UK: Verso.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
105464040
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0105464040
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
404001.pdf2.67 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.