Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136915| 題名: | 高達美論存有與語言之關係： 對柏拉圖理型論之詮釋 Gadamer on the Relation of Being and Language: the Interpretation of Plato`s Theory of Ideas |
作者: | 謝宛汝 Shie, Wan-Zu |
貢獻者: | 羅麗君 Lo, Lee-Chun 謝宛汝 Shie, Wan-Zu |
關鍵詞: | 一與多 語言 對話 邏各斯 哲學詮釋學 One and many Language Dialogue Logos Philosophical hermeneutics |
日期: | 2021 | 上傳時間: | 2-Sep-2021 | 摘要: | 高達美曾主張聯繫著存有與人類的語言，可以在柏拉圖思想中的兩個部分獲得進一步的說明：一個是邏各斯，另一個則是美學。然而，理型論本身具有的超越的特質，與哲學詮釋學的實踐色彩相違。柏拉圖對藝術與文字的批判，也與高達美主張在語言與藝術中得以揭曉真理也明顯相異。\n因此，本文將嘗試論證，正是因為高達美看出了海德格的此在存有論分析在朝向晚期詩的語言之過程中，未能更好地說明人與存有之間，如何透過語言的中介被聯繫起來。因此，高達美藉由「道成肉身」與「遁入邏各斯」兩大概念，去說明語言辯證法的結構。另一方面，也將海德格的思想融入他對柏拉圖的詮釋當中，以解構傳統柏拉圖詮釋中「原型與摹本」的對立，使柏拉圖的形象從遺忘存有的起點，翻轉成（帶有現象學色彩的）追問存有的哲學家。且這套柏拉圖的詮釋也成為高達美的哲學詮釋學背後隱藏的根基。\n最後，本文將說明高達美的語言觀旨在確定與不確定的動態循環中，試圖保存作為理性與和諧的尺度，並且兼顧一切創意與生命力自由發展的空間。所以，他的思想既不只是跟隨海德格，也並非只是一名柏拉圖主義者，他對這些思想的研究都指向他對於言與行 (logos and deed) 的終極關懷。 Gadamer claims we can expalin how language connects Being and human by two elements in Plato`s theory of ideas: logos and beauty. However, as we know, the theory of ideas itself has characteristics of transcendent, which is contrary to the practice characteristics of philosophical hermeneutics. In addition, Plato strongly criticized language, poetry, and painting, this argument obviously opposites to Gadamer’s claim that language and art reveals truth.\nThis dissertation will demonstrate that it is because Gadamer perceived Heiddegger`s ontological analysis and poetic language fail to explain how people and beings are connected through the medium of language. Therefore, Gadamer expounds the structure of language dialectics by two concepts: “incarnation” and “flight into logos”. On the other side, Gadamer incorporates Heidegger’s analysis of Dasein into his interpretation of Plato, deconstructing opposition of “prototype and copy” in traditional interpretation of Plato, turning Plato`s portrait from the beginning of forgetfulness of Being to a philosopher who inquires Being. And this Plato interpretation also becomes a hidden basic in Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics.\nFinally, this dissertation will explain Gadamer’s view of language aims to make the space for the free development of all creativity and vitality in the dynamic cycle of determination and uncertainty. Therefore, his thoughts are neither just following Heidegger nor just a Platonist. His research on these thoughts all point to his ultimate concern for words and deeds (logos and deed). |
參考文獻: | Aristotle. 2012. Aristotle`s Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. by\nRobert C. Bartlett and Susan D. Collins. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.\nBernasconi, Robert. 1989. “Heidegger’s Destruction of Phronēsis”. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 18：127-147.\nBrickhouse, Thomas and Smith, Nicholas D., “Plato (427—347 B.C.E.),” The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161-0002, https://www.iep.utm.edu/, 20210225.\nFerber, Rafael and Damschen, Gregor. 2015. “Is the Idea of the Good Beyond Being? Plato’s epekeina tēs ousias Revisited (Republic 6,509b8–10)”. ed. by Debra Nails and Harold Tarrant. Second sailing: alternative perspectives on Plato. 197-203. Espoo: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.\nFerber, Rafael. 2019. “Deuteros Plous, the immortality of the soul and the ontological argument for the existence of God”. ed. by Francisco Bravo, Gabriele Cornelli, Thomas M. Robinson. Plato`s Phaedo: Selected Papers from the Eleventh Symposium Platonicum. 221-230. Baden-Baden: Academia Verlag.\nCales, Kevin Ray. 2017. Founder Metaphysics or ontological Dialectician: Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer on Plato. Carbondale: M. A. Southern Illinois University.\nColtman, Rodney Read. 1998. The Language of Hermeneutics: Gadamer and Heidegger in Dialogue. New York: State University of New York.\nDancy, R. M., 2004. Plato’s Introduction of Forms, New York: Cambridge University Prss.\nDavey, Nicholas, “Gadamer`s Aesthetics”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/gadamer-aesthetics/>.\nDavidson, Donald. 1997. Truth, Language and History, New York: Oxford University Press.\nDostal, Robert J. ed., 2002. The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer, London: Cambridge University Press.\nDottori, Riccardo. 2009. “The Concept of Phronēsis by Aristotle and the Beginning of Heremeneutics Philosophy”. Ethics & Politics. 11：301-310.\nFortin, Ernest L. 1984 “Gadamer on Strauss”. Interpretation. USA: Interpretation. 12: 10.\nFuyarchuk, Andrew. 2010. Gadamer’s path to Plato. Eugene: Wipf & Stock.\nGadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Trans. by David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press.\n──. 1980. Dialogue and Dialectic: Eight Hermeneutical Studies on Plato. Trans. by P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press.\n──. 1983. “Plato`s Parmenides and its Influence“. Dionysius. Halifax: Dalhousie University. 7: 3-16.\n──. 1985. “Religion and Religiosity in Socrates”. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy. 1: 53-75.\n──. 1986. The Idea of The Good in Platonic-Aristotelian Philosophy. Trans. by P. Christopher Smith. New Haven: Yale University Press.\n──. 1987. Philosophical Apprenticeships. Trans. by Robert R. Sullivan. Cambridge: The MIT Press.\n──. 1991. Plato`s dialectical ethics: phenomenological interpretations relating to the Philebus. Trans. by Robert M. Wallace. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.\n──. 1993. Hermeneutik II : Wahrheit und Methode. Tübingen: J. c. B. Mohr.\n──. 1993. Gesammelte Werke Band 8: Ästhetik und Poetik I : Kunst als Aussage. Tübingen: J. c. B. Mohr.\n──. 1994. Heidegger`s Ways. Trans. by John W. Stanley. New York: State University of New York Press.\n──. 1996. “Reflections on My Philosophical Journey”. The Philosophy of Hans-Georg Gadamer. ed. by Lewis Edwin Hahn. 3-63. Chicago: Open Court .\n──. 1998. The Beginning of philosophy. New York: Continuum.\n──. 2001. Gadamer in Conversation: Reflections and Commentary. ed., And Trans. by Richard E. Palmer. New Haven: Yale University Press.\n──. 2002. The Beginning of Knowledge. New York: Continuum.\n──. 2004. Truth and Method. Trans. by Joel Weinsheimaer and Donald G. Marshall .Now York: Continuum.\n──. 2007. The Gadamer Reader: A Bougnet of the later writings. ed., by Richard E. Palmer. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.\nGill, Christopher and Renaud, Francois ed., 2010. Hermeneutic philosophy and Plato : Gadamer`s response to the Philebus. Germany: Academia Verlag.\nGrondin, Jean. 1995. University of Hermeneutics. New York: State University of New York Press.\n──. 2003. Hans-Georg Gadamer: A Biography. New Haven Conn. : Yale University Press.\n──. Trans. by Kathryn Plant. 2003. The Philosophy of Gadamer. Chesham : Acumen.\nHabermas, Jürgen. 1985. Philosophical-political Profiles. Cambridge: The MIT Press.\nHeidegger, Martin. 1971. Poetry, Language, Thought. Trans. by Albert Hofsmdter. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.\n──. 1971. On the Way To Language. Trans. by Peter D. Hertz. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.\n──. 1991. Nietzsche: Vols. 3 and 4. Trans. by David Farrell Krell. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.\n──. 1996. Being and Time. Trans. by Joan Stambaugh. New York: State University of New York.\n──. 1998. Pathmarks. ed. by William McNeill. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nHillar, Marian. 2012. From Logos to Trinity: The Evolution of Religious Beliefs from Pythagoras to Tertullian. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nHogan, P. 2002. “Learning as Leavetaking and Homecoming”. ed. by Peters, M. Heidegger, Education and Modernity. Oxford: Rowrnan & Littlefield. 211-228.\nHussey, Edward. “Epistemology and meaning in Heraclitus”. 1982. Language and Logos: Studies in ancient Greek philosophy presented to G. E. L. Owen. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nLammi, Walter. 1991. “Hans-Georg Gadamer`s “Correction" of Heidegger”. Journal of the History of Ideas. 52: 487-507.\n──. 1997. “Hans-Georg Gadamer’s Platonic Destruktion of The Later Heidegger”. Philosophy Today. 41: 394-404.\nLiu, Chunge and Sui, Xiaodi. 2014. “Understanding the Platonic Dialogue from the Perspective of Gadamer’s Hermeneutics”. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 4: 758-765.\nMendell, Henry, "Aristotle and Mathematics", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/aristotle-mathematics/>.\nPalmer, Richard E. 1969. Hermeneutics. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.\n──. 2000. Gadamer’s recent work on language and philophy: On “Zur Phänomenologie von Ritual und Sprache”. Continental Philosophy Review. 33: 381-393.\nPeters, Francis Edward. 1967. Greek Philosophical Terms: A Historical Lexicon. New York: New York University Press.\nPlato. 1997. Plato: Complete Works. ed. by John M. Cooper. Indiana: Hackett Publishing Company.\nSchmidt, Lawrence K. ed., 2000. Language and Linguisticality in Gadamer`s Hermeneutics. Lanham: Lexington Books.\nScheinler, H. Ingrid. 2000. Gadamer: Between Heidegger and Habermas. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.\nSilverman, Hugh J. ed., 1991. Gadamer and Hermeneutics. New York: Routledge.\nSmith, P. Christopher. 1981. “Gadamer`s Heideggerian interpretation“. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology. 12: 211-230.\nTrelawny-Cassity, Lewis, “Plato: The Academy”, The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ISSN 2161-0002, https://www.iep.utm.edu/, 20201205.\nハンス－ガオルク‧ガダマー，2011，斎藤 博、玉井 治、近藤 重明訳，『哲学‧芸術‧言語―真理と方法のための小論集』，東京：未来社。\nマルティン・ハイデガー，2011，桑木 務訳，『存在と時間』（全三冊），東京：岩波書店。\n汪文聖、洪世謙編，2011，《詮釋與實踐》，台北：政大出版社。\n──，2016，〈從「源初理性」生成「源初語言」來談文化的再造——從海德格早期的討論出發來看〉，《哲學與文化》，43：5-25。\n──，2019，《現象學作為一種實踐哲學：胡塞爾‧海德格‧鄂蘭的倫理、政治與宗教哲學》，台北：聯經出版社。\n洪漢鼎，2017，〈伽達默爾論柏拉圖—一篇關於經典詮釋學的講演〉，《讀書》，2：71-81。\n陳榮華，2001，〈海德格和高達美：對話與獨白〉，《台大哲學評論》，24：119-125。\n陳榮華，2003，〈海德格與高達美哲學的提問（Fragen）與思考（Denken）〉《臺大文史哲學報》，58：183-209。\n──，2007，〈從語言的中介性談高達美的意義理論〉，《臺大文史哲學報》，66：153-178。\n張鼎國，1997，〈海德格、高達美與希臘人〉，《哲學雜誌》，21：98-125。\n──，2006，〈歷史、歷史意識與實效歷史〉，《揭諦》，11：185-216。\n黃文宏，2001，〈海德格「轉向」(Kehre) 的一個詮釋 ──以真理問題為線索〉，《歐美研究》，31: 287-323.\n漢斯－格奧爾格．伽達默爾，洪漢鼎譯，2010，《真理與方法II》，北京：商務印書館。\n蔡偉鼎，1998，〈論圖畫的存有〉，《哲學與文化》，25：147-172。\n──，1999，〈論高達美對語言問題之探討－從《克拉底魯斯》談現代語言概念〉，《現代哲學：理論與批判》， 207-243。\n──，2009，〈詮釋學之存有學轉向—海德格與高達美〉，《東吳哲學學報》20：51-89。 | 描述: | 博士 國立政治大學 哲學系 99154505 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099154505 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 450501.pdf | 2.43 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.