Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/136921| 題名: | 具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板對於提升討論成效的影響研究 The Effects of an Online Discussion Board with a Gamified Instant Perspective Comparison on Discussion Effectiveness |
作者: | 陳姵淳 Chen, Pei-Chun |
貢獻者: | 陳志銘 Chen, Chih-Ming 陳姵淳 Chen, Pei-Chun |
關鍵詞: | 線上討論 社會性科學議題 電腦中介溝通 學習成效 討論動機 討論參與度 遊戲化激勵機制 Online discussion Socio-scientific issues Computer-mediated communication Discussion effectiveness Discussion participation Discussion motivation Gamified incentive mechanism |
日期: | 2021 | 上傳時間: | 2-Sep-2021 | 摘要: | 線上討論是數位學習過程中經常採用的學習活動之一，學習者可以透過線上討論與同儕進行意見的交流，激盪其對於討論議題的不同觀點與看法，提升數位學習成效。本研究基於Chen及Tsao (2021)所發展之「即時觀點比較系統(Instant Perspective Comparison System, 以下簡稱IPCS)」，進一步發展為「具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」，希望透過遊戲激勵機制更進一步的促進學習者的議題認知及討論意願，進而有效提升討論成效、討論參與度與動機。\n本研究採用真實驗研究法，以線上方式招募各大專院校大學生及碩士級研究生共38名學生為研究對象，對於「藻礁」主題進行線上討論。其中19名學生被隨機分派為採用「具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」的實驗組，另外19名學生則被隨機分派為採用「不具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」的控制組，以探討兩組學習者在學習成效、討論參與度及討論動機是否具有顯著差異。此外，亦以先備知識、電腦中介溝通(Computer-Mediated Communication, CMC)能力作為背景變項，探討不同背景變項之兩組學習者，在學習成效、討論參與度及討論動機是否具有顯著差異。\n研究結果發現，相較於使用「不具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」，採用「具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」對於整體學習者及低先備知識學習者在整體及複雜、多元觀點面向上的學習成效具有顯著的助益。在討論參與度方面，使用「具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」學習者總行為操作次數皆顯著優於使用「不具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」。在討論動機方面，使用「具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」整體學習者及高先備知識學習者的整體討論動機，以及價值與期望面向上皆顯著優於使用「不具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」。此外，本研究之質性資料分析顯示，稱號等級挑戰及儀表板能有效地促進學習者查閱IPCS圖形及外部檢索功能，進一步提升討論內容的理解及觀點異同的比較，「具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板」將能有效地促進學習者進行線上討論時的學習表現。\n最後基於研究結果，本研究提出遊戲激勵機制教學建議和討論區改善建議，以及未來可以繼續發展的研究方向。整體而言，本研究將討論區學習、即時觀點比較系統、遊戲化激勵機制等技術進行結合，發展具遊戲激勵機制之即時觀點比較線上討論板，提供一個科技輔助線上討論之學習工具，對於促進數位學習之線上討論具有貢獻。 Online discussion is one of the learning activities widely used in the digital learning process. Through online discussion, learners can exchange opinions and thoughts with their peers, stimulate their different perspectives on the discussion topics, and enhance the performance of digital learning in a convenient way. This research develops Instant Perspective Comparison system with Gamified Insentive Mechanism (IPCS-GIM) based on the Instant Perspective Comparison System (IPCS) originally developed by Chen and Tsao (2021) to further promote learners’ awareness of discussion topics and willingness, thereby effectively enhancing discussion effectiveness, discussion participation, and discussion motivation.\nA true-experimental research was used in this research to collect the needed research data. A total of 38 college and graduate students were recruited from E- recruitment as the research subjects of this study for online discussions with the social scientific issue of “algae reefs.” Among them, 19 students were randomly assigned to the experimental group with the IPCS-GIM-assisted online discussion, and 19 students were randomly assigned to the control group with IPCS-assisted online discussion. Furthermore, learners’ prior knowledge levels and computer-mediated communication (CMC) abilities were regarded as the background variables to examine the difference in discussion effectiveness, discussion participation, and discussion motivation between the learners of two groups.\nThe research result shows that, in comparison with IPCS-assisted online discussion, the IPCS-GIM could significantly facilitate overall learners and learners with low prior knowledge level on overall discussion effectiveness, complexity, and multiple perspectives. The learners who used the IPCS-GIM-assisted online discussion had significantly better number of total learning actions than learners who used IPCS-assisted online discussion. In terms of discuss motivation, value and expectancy components, and the overall motivation of the overall learners and the learners with high prior knowledge who used the IPCS-GIM-assisted online discussion had significantly better than those who used the IPCS-assisted online discussion. Furthermore, the qualitative data analysis in this study reveals that level challenges and leaderboard could effectively promote learners to use IPCS graphics and external search functions, and further enhance the understanding of the discussion contents and the comparison of perspective. The IPCS-GIM would effectively facilitate learners’ discussion effectiveness during online discussion processes.\nBased on the research result, several suggestions for improvement of gamified incentive mechanism as well as further research directions are proposed in this study. Overall speaking, discussion learning, IPCS, and gamification incentive mechanism were combined in this study to develop the IPCS-GIM for effective learning of technology assisted online discussion. It would contribute to facilitating online discussion in e-learning field. |
參考文獻: | 中文文獻\n王敬詠(2012)。應用電腦冒險遊戲式學習於專業英文課程對提升學習成效、學習動機與態度之影響。新北市：淡江大學。\n周郁凱(2017)。遊戲化實戰全書：遊戲化大師教你把工作、教學、健身、行銷、產品設計……變遊戲，愈好玩尌愈有吸引力！。台北市：城邦商業周刊。\n溫如梅(2019)。遊戲化華語教學之研究—以創意思考螺旋融入教育桌遊為例。桃園縣：中央大學。\n \n英文文獻\nAbramovich, S., Schunn, C., & Higashi, R. M. (2013). Are badges useful in education?: it depends upon the type of badge and expertise of learner. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(2), 217-232. doi:10.1007/s11423-013-9289-2\nAlthaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom an experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46(3), 158. doi:10.1080/03634529709379088\nAnderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11. doi:10.3102/0013189X025004005\nAparicio, M., Oliveira, T., Bacao, F., & Painho, M. (2019). Gamification: A key determinant of massive open online course (MOOC) success. Information & Management, 56(1), 39–54. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.06.003\nBakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997）. Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511527685\nBarata, G., Gama, S., Jorge, J., & Gonçalves, D. (2013). Improving participation and learning with gamification. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Gameful Design, Research, and Applications (pp. 10-17). Toronto Ontario Canada: ACM. doi:10.1145/2583008.2583010\nBlei, D. M. (2003.). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3 , 993-1022.\nBovermann, K., Weidlich, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2018). Online learning readiness and attitudes towards gaming in gamified online learning – a mixed methods case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 27. doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0107-0\nBranon, R. F., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education. TechTrends, 45(1), 36-36. doi:10.1007/BF02763377\nBuder, J., Schwind, C., Rudat, A., & Bodemer, D. (2015). Selective reading of large online forum discussions: The impact of rating visualizations on navigation and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 44, 191–201. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.043\nBull, S., Greer, J., Mccalla, G., & Kettel, L. (2001). Help-seeking in an asynchronous help forum, 12.\nChang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2016). Exploring engaging gamification mechanics in massive online open courses. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 177–203.\nChen, C. M., & Tsao, H. W. (2021). An instant perspective comparison system to facilitate learners’ discussion effectiveness in an online discussion process. Computers & Education, 164, 104037. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104037\nChen, C. M., Li, M. C., & Chen, T. C. (2020). A web-based collaborative reading annotation system with gamification mechanisms to improve reading performance. Computers & Education, 144, 103697. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103697\nChen, C. M., Li, M. C., & Huang, Y. L. (2020). Developing an instant semantic analysis and feedback system to facilitate learning performance of online discussion. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-19. doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1839505\nChen, C. M., Li, M. C., Chang, W. C., & Chen, X. X. (2021). Developing a topic analysis instant feedback system to facilitate asynchronous online discussion effectiveness. Computers & Education, 163, 104095. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104095\nChen, M.-P., Wong, Y.-T., & Wang, L.-C. (2014). Effects of type of exploratory strategy and prior knowledge on middle school students’ learning of chemical formulas from a 3D role-playing game. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9324-3\nCole, J., & Foster, H. (2007). Using Moodle: Teaching with the popular open source course management system. (2nd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.\nDarabi, A., & Jin, L. (2013). Improving the quality of online discussion: the effects of strategies designed based on cognitive load theory principles. Distance Education, 34(1), 21–36. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770429\nDe Sousa Borges, S., Durelli, V. H. S., Reis, H. M., & Isotani, S. (2014). A systematic mapping on gamification applied to education. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 216-222). Gyeongju Republic of Korea: ACM. doi:10.1145/2554850.2554956\nDe-Marcos, L.,García-Cabot, A ., García-López, E.(2017).Towards the social gamification of e-learning: a practical experiment. International Journal of Engineering Educadion, 33, 66-73\nDennen, V. P. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1624-1633. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.003\nDeterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining “gamification.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/2181037.2181040\nDias, J. (2017). Teaching operations research to undergraduate management students: The role of gamification. The International Journal of Management Education, 15(1), 98-111. doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2017.01.002\nDichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: what is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: a critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1),1-36. doi:10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5\nDicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mApping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75-88.\nDindar, M., Ren, L., & Järvenoja, H. (2021). An experimental study on the effects of gamified cooperation and competition on English vocabulary learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(1), 142–159. Doi:10.1111/bjet.12977\nDing, L., Er, E., & Orey, M. (2018). An exploratory study of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 120, 213-226. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.007\nDing, L., Kim, C., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 115, 126-142. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.016\nDolmans, D. H. J. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2006). What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of small group tutorials in problem-based learning? Health Sciences Education, 11(4), 321-336. doi:10.1007/s10459-006-9012-8\nDomínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380-392. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020\nFeiz, P., Hooman, H. A., & kooshki, S. (2013). Assessing the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) in Iranian students: Construct Validity and Reliability. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84, 1820-1825.\nGao, F., Zhang, T., & Franklin, T. (2013). Designing asynchronous online discussion environments: Recent progress and possible future directions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 469–483. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01330.x\nGarcia‐Cabot, A., Garcia‐Lopez, E., Caro‐Alvaro, S., Gutierrez‐Martinez, J., & de‐Marcos, L. (2020). Measuring the effects on learning performance and engagement with a gamified social platform in an MSc program. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(1), 207–223. doi:10.1002/cae.22186\nGe, Z. G. (2018). The impact of a forfeit-or-prize gamified teaching on e-learners’ learning performance. Computers & Education, 126, 143-152. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.009\nGerosa, M. A., Filippo, D., Pimentel, M., Fuks, H., & Lucena, C. J. P. (2010). Is the unfolding of the group discussion off-pattern? Improving coordination support in educational forums using mobile devices. Computers & Education, 54(2), 528–544. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.004\nGlover, I. (2013). Play As You Learn: Gamification as a Technique for Motivating Learners (pp. 1999-2008). Presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (2013).\nGordon, N., Brayshaw, M., & Grey, S. (2013). Maximising gain for minimal pain: utilising natural game mechanics. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 12(1), 27-38. doi:10.11120/ital.2013.00004\nHamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? -- A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025-3034). Waikoloa, HI: IEEE. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2014.377\nHara, N., Bonk, C. J., & Angeli, C. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28(2), 115–52. doi:10.1023/A:1003764722829\nHasan, H. F., Nat, M., & Vanduhe, V. Z. (2019). Gamified collaborative environment in Moodle. IEEE Access, 7, 89833-89844. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2926622\nHawkes, M. (2006). Linguistic discourse variables as indicators of reflective online interaction. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(4), 231-244. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde2004\nHew, K. F., Cheung, W. S., & Ng, C. S. L. (2010). Student contribution in asynchronous online discussion: A review of the research and empirical exploration. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 38(6), 571–606. doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9087-0\nHew, K. F., Huang, B., Chu, K. W. S., & Chiu, D. K. W. (2016). Engaging Asian students through game mechanics: Findings from two experiment studies. Computers & Education, 92-93, 221-236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.010\nHuang, B., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Implementing a theory-driven gamification model in higher education flipped courses: Effects on out-of-class activity completion and quality of artifacts. Computers & Education, 125, 254-272. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.018\nHuang, B., Hwang G.J., Hew, K.F., & Warning, P.(2019). Effects of gamification on students’ online interactive patterns and peer-feedback. Distance Education,350-379.doi: 10.1080/01587919.2019.1632168\nHung, M.-L., & Chou, C. (2014). The development, validity, and reliability of communication satisfaction in an online asynchronous discussion scale. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 165–177. doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0094-9\nHwang, G.-H., Lee, C.-Y., & Tseng, W.-F. (2012). Development and evaluation of an educational computer game for a certification examination. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.0502.03\nIbanez, M. B., Di-Serio, A., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(3), 291-301. doi:10.1109/TLT.2014.2329293\nKalelioğlu, F., & Gülbahar, Y. (2014). The effects of teaching programming via scratch on problem solving skills: A discussion from learners’ perspective, 19.\nKallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. doi:10.1111/jan.13031\nKarpudewan, M., & Roth, W.-M. (2016). Changes in primary students’ informal reasoning during an environment-related curriculum on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 401–419. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9787-x\nKim, J., Jo, I.-H., & Park, Y. (2016). Effects of learning analytics dashboard: analyzing the relations among dashboard utilization, satisfaction, and learning achievement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(1), 13–24. doi:10.1007/s12564-015-9403-8\nKnutas, A., Ikonen, J., Nikula, U., & Porras, J. (2014). Increasing collaborative communications in a programming course with gamification: a case study. International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies - CompSysTech ’14,370-377. doi:10.1145/2659532.2659620\nKopcha, T. J., Ding, L., Neumann, K. L., & Choi, I. (2016). Teaching technology integration to K-12 educators: A “gamified” approach. TechTrends. 60(1), 62-69. doi:10.1007/s11528-015-0018-z\nLarson, B. E., & Keiper, T. A. (2002). Classroom discussion and threaded electronic discussion: Learning in two arenas. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2, 1, 45–62.\nLeong, B., & Luo, Y. (2011).Application of game mechanics to improve student engagement, 5.\nLevinson, S. (2006). Cognition at the heart of human interaction. Discourse Studies - DISCOURSE STUD, 8, 85-93. doi:10.1177/1461445606059557\nLi, L.-Y. (2019). Effect of prior knowledge on attitudes, behavior, and learning performance in video lecture viewing. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 415–426. doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1543086\nLicorish, S. A., Owen, H. E., Daniel, B., & George, J. L. (2018). Students’ perception of Kahoot!’s influence on teaching and learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 13(1), 9. doi:10.1186/s41039-018-0078-8\nLim, C. P., & Chai, C. S. (2004). An activity-theoretical approach to research of ICT integration in Singapore schools: Orienting activities and learner autonomy. Computers & Education, 43(3), 215-236. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2003.10.005\nLo, H.-C. (2009). Utilizing computer-mediated communication tools for problem-based learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 205–213.\nLopez, C. E., & Tucker, C. S. (2019). The effects of player type on performance: A gamification case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 333-345. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.005\nMarbouti, F., & Wise, A. F. (2016). Starburst: a new graphical interface to support purposeful attention to others’ posts in online discussions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(1), 87–113. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9400-y\nMarei, H. F., & Al-Khalifa, K. S. (2015). Pattern of online communication in teaching a blended oral surgery course. European Journal of Dental Education, 20(4), 213–217. doi:10.1111/eje.12163\nMikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., and Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space, In Proceedings of Workshop at ICLR.\nMollick, E., & Rothbard, N. (2013). Mandatory fun: consent, gamification and the impact of games at work, SSRN Electronic Journal,54.1-68. doi:http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2277103\nNam, Y. (2017). Promoting argumentative practice in Socio-Scientific Issues through a science inquiry activity. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00737a\nNg, C. S. L., Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2012). Interaction in asynchronous discussion forums: Peer facilitation techniques. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 280–294. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00454.x\nNicholson, S. (2015). A RECIPE for meaningful gamification. In T. Reiners & L. C. Wood (Eds.), Gamification in Education and Business (pp. 1-20). Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_1\nOrhan Göksün, D., & Gürsoy, G. (2019). Comparing success and engagement in gamified learning experiences via Kahoot and Quizizz. Computers & Education, 135, 15-29. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.015\nOuyang, F., & Scharber, C. (2017). The influences of an experienced instructor’s discussion design and facilitation on an online learning community development: A social network analysis study. The Internet and Higher Education, 35, 34–47. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.07.002\nPark, S., & Kim, C. (2015). Boosting learning-by-teaching in virtual tutoring. Computers & Education, 82, 129-140. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.006\nPintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to ImprovePost secondary Teaching.\nRoschelle, j., & teasley, s. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’malley (Ed.), computer supported collaborative learning (Pp. 69–97). Berlin, heidelberg: Springer berlin heidelberg. Doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85098-1_5\nSadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371–391. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9\nSadler,T,D.(2011) Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom - Teaching, Learning and Research.\nSailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371-380. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033\nSeaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006\nSeethamraju, R. (2014). Effectiveness of using online discussion forum for case study analysis. Education Research International, 2014, 1-10. doi:10.1155/2014/589860\nSmith, E., Herbert, J., Kavanagh, L., & Reidsema, C. (2013). The effects of gamification on student learning through the use of reputation and rewards within community moderated discussion boards, 9.\nSo, H. J. (2009). When groups decide to use asynchronous online discussions: collaborative learning and social presence under a voluntary participation structure: Asynchronous online discussion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(2), 143–160. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00293.x\nSolli, A., Hillman, T., & Mäkitalo, Å. (2017). Navigating the complexity of socio-scientific controversies—How students make multiple voices present in discourse. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-017-9668-5\nSpitzberg, B. H. (2006). Preliminary development of a model and measure of Computer-Mediated Communication (CMC) competence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,11(2), 629–666. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00030.x\nStolz, M., Witteck, T., & Marks, R. (2013). Reflecting socio-scientific issues for science education coming from the case of curriculum development on doping in chemistry education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(4), 361–370. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.945a\nStrmečki, D., Bernik, A., & Radošević, D. (2015). Gamification in E-Learning: Introducing gamified design elements into E-Learning systems. Journal of Computer Science, 11(12), 1108-1117. doi:10.3844/jcssp.2015.1108.1117\nSu, C. H., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). A mobile gamification learning system for improving the learning motivation and achievements: A mobile gamification learning system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(3), 268-286. doi:10.1111/jcal.12088\nTiene, D. (2000). Online discussions: A survey of advantages and disadvantages compared to face-to-face discussions. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 371-384.\nTodor,V., Piticǎ,D. (2013).The gamification of the study of electronics in dedicated e-learning platforms. International spring seminar on electronics technology, 428-431.doi:http://doi.org/10.1109/ISSE.2013.6648287\nTuran, Z., & Meral, E. (2018). Game-based versus to non-game-based: The impact of student response systems on students’achievements, engagements and test anxieties. Informatics in Education, 17(1), 105-116. doi:10.15388/infedu.2018.07\nVan Blankenstein, F. M., Dolmans, D. H. J. M., Van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2013). Relevant prior knowledge moderates the effect of elaboration during small group discussion on academic achievement. Instructional Science, 41(4), 729–744. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9252-3\nWetzels, S. A. J., Kester, L., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). Adapting prior knowledge activation: Mobilisation, perspective taking, and learners’ prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 16–21.\nWetzels, S. A. J., Kester, L., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2011). Adapting prior knowledge activation: Mobilisation, perspective taking, and learners’ prior knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(1), 16–21.\nWise, A. F., Zhao, Y., & Hausknecht, S. N. (2014). Learning analytics for online discussions: Embedded and extracted approaches. Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 48–71. doi: 10.18608/jla.2014.12.4\nXie, K., Debacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67-89. doi:10.2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6\nZainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729\nZeidler, D., & Nichols, B. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. doi:10.1007/BF03173684 | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 圖書資訊與檔案學研究所 108155004 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108155004 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500401.pdf | 7.63 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.