Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137022
題名: 我國中高齡勞工續留職場政策之探討
A Study on the Policy of Retaining Senior and Middle-Aged Workers in Taiwan
作者: 林宇綺
Lin, Yu-Chi
貢獻者: 成之約
林宇綺
Lin, Yu-Chi
關鍵詞: 中高齡
中高齡者與高齡者就業促進法
穩定續留
Senior and Middle-Aged Workers
Retain older workers
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 2-九月-2021
摘要: 我國人口正逐漸減少與老化,中高齡將成為重要勞動力。然我國勞動力具晚進早退之特徵,又早退現象比起他國更是嚴重,55歲以上之勞動力參與率明顯落後;而根據政府統計資料與文獻回顧可以得知,部分中高齡乃因企業逼退與資遣,而無法穩定續留於主要職場,然我國政策多著重於中高齡失業再就業或是退休後再就業之議題,較少有針對在職中高齡穩定續留職場之政策。\n\n故而本文以此為研究主題,透過文獻回顧與訪談分析,結論與建議如下:\n一、中高齡續留困境:中高齡遭逼退或資遣之因素可歸咎於「企業永續經營之成本考量」,即中高齡之生產效能無法與其薪資水準成正比,而使雇主產生此想法之原因,包含雇主對中高齡之「歧視與偏見」、中高齡之「生心理層面之退化」、「專業技能之缺乏」,及「家庭照料面」議題。其中以專業技能為主要困境;另外,中高齡是否具持續學習之心態亦為重要關鍵因素。\n二、勞資政學對中高齡者與高齡者就業促進專法中第三章穩定就業措施之看法有以下五點:(一)在職訓練補助方案與過往推行之相關計畫相互重疊;(二)職務再設計過度聚焦於就業輔具之提供;(三)繼續僱用補助為治標不治本之方式,且條件過於嚴苛;(四)世代合作方案較為抽象,且中小企業未必具充分資源執行之;(五)年齡歧視需待時間改善。\n三、我國現行政策缺乏之處:我國目前中高齡續留困境之大部分面向皆有相對應之政策方案,然而中高齡卻仍遭資遣與逼退,落入再就業困境,問題癥結點便在於「企業成本考量」未能有效解決,故而參考日韓新之作法,提出以下政策建議:(一)宜先以計畫之方式推行階段性退休方案;(二)搭配繼續僱用補助漸進提升強制退休年齡與勞保、就保之投保年齡上限;(三)將世代合作併入職務再設計;(四)我國宜視改善年資敘薪制度為中長期目標;(五)於各地方政府設立中高齡續航中心;(六)現行法令增修建議。
The population of Taiwan is gradually decreasing and aging, and senior and middle-aged workers has become an important labor force. However, senior and middle-aged workers in Taiwan quit the workplace earlier than other countries. The labor force participation rate over 55 years old is significantly lower than that of others.\n\nAccording to government statistics and literature review, some senior and middle-aged workers are unable to stay in the main workplace steadily due to the forced retirement and dismissal of the company. However, our policies mostly focus on the issue of reemployment or re-employment after retirement for senior and middle-aged workers, and there are fewer policies for them to retain in the workplace.Therefore, this article takes this as the research topic. The conclusions and recommendations are as follows.\nFirst, the factors of forced retirement or severance of senior and middle-aged workers can be attributed to the " Personnel costs". In other words, there is a perceived or actual gap between the cost of employing older workers and their productivity. The reason why employers have this idea include employers’ "age discrimination", and “deterioration of body functions”, "lack of professional skills", and the issues of "family care" of senior and middle-aged workers. Among them, lack of professional skills is the main problem; in addition, whether the middle-aged and the elderly have the mentality of continuous learning is also an important key factor.\nSecond, there are five points in the Chapter 3 Measures for Employment Stability of Middle-aged and Elderly Employment Promotion Act that need to be improved: 1-The subsidy program of vocational trainings overlaps with previous related programs; 2-The program of job accommodation only focuses on providing assistive occupational devices; 3-The subsidy programs that encourage employer continues to employ 65 and above workers only have a short-term effect, and the application conditions are too strict; 4-The program to encourage cooperation between generations is relatively abstract, and SMEs may not have sufficient resources to execute; 5- Age discrimination needs time to improve.\nThird, the lack of current policies in Taiwan is the unresolved problem of personnel costs. Therefore, with reference to the practices of Japan, South Korea, and Singapore, the following policy recommendations are put forward: 1- Implement a phased retirement plan; 2-Gradually increase the mandatory retirement age until 70 with continued employment subsidies; 3- Incorporate generational cooperation into job accommodation; 4-Set the improvement of the seniority-based pay schemes as a long-term goal.; 5- Establish institutions in municipalities to help workers retain stably; 6- Suggestions for amendments to existing laws.
參考文獻: 中文文獻\n內政部統計處(2017)。《內政統計通報 106年第10週》。\n行政院公報(2020),協助在職中高齡者及高齡者穩定就業實施辦法草案總說明,第026卷第047期。\n行政院主計總處(2014)。《103年中高齡工作歷程調查統計結果綜合分析》。\n行政院主計總處(2019)。《108年中高齡及高齡(45歲以上)勞動參與狀況》。\n行政院主計總處(2020a)。《人力資源調查統計年報》。\n行政院主計總處(2020b)。《人力運用調查報告》。\n行政院主計總處(2020c)。《事業人力僱用狀況調查(員工報酬及進退等概況)報告》。\n國家發展委員會(2018)。《中華民國人口推估(2018至2065 年)》。\n勞勞動部(2020)。《108年職業訓練概況調查報告》。\n勞動部統計處(2019)。《108年勞工生活及就業狀況調查報告》\n勞動部勞動力發展署(2018)。《產業人才投資計畫作業手冊》。\n衛生福利部(2018)。《中華民國106年老人狀況調查報告》。\n動部勞動力發展署(2016)。《中高齡者職務再設計作業手冊》。\n吳惠林, 杜英儀, 彭素玲, & 王怡修. (2014). 改善我國中高齡與高齡者勞動參與之因應對策. 勞動部委託研究計畫 PG10401-0347.\n林國榮、成之約、馬財專、蕭晴惠(2017),106年雲嘉南中高齡就業調查計畫,勞動部勞動力發展署雲嘉南分屬。\n邱汝娜、劉梅君、吳秀照(2013),102年度中高齡就業狀況與需求調查研究計畫,台中市勞工局委託研究報告\n施淑惠、柯秀燕、孫凡茹、徐誠佑、許金滿(2019),日本職涯諮詢服務暨中高齡及高齡者就業促進政策,行政院所屬各機關因公出國人員報告書。\n郭振昌,穆盈秀(2014),銀髮勞動力發展政策與現況研析─以英國、韓國、新加坡等國為例,勞動部勞動力發展署北基宜花金馬分署銀髮人才發展與就業服務整合計畫業務委外計畫。\n郭振昌、林良榮(2016),「訂定中高齡者就業促進專法可行性及應包括之内容委託計畫」結案報告,勞動部勞動力發展署北基宜花金馬分署 「銀髮人才發展與就業服務整合計畫」業務委外計畫。\n黃春長、王維旎(2016),臺灣中高齡勞動力分析之研究,勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所。\n新北市就業服務處(2017),106 年度新北市政府就業服務處中高齡者職場續航輔導計畫問卷報告分析與研究。\n詹火生、辛炳隆、黃麗璇、黃玟娟(2015),延後退休可行性方案之研究,勞動部委託研究計畫PG10409-0042。\n鄭津津(2007),就業年齡歧視之判定指標與評議流程政策建議書計畫報告,行政院勞工委員會職訓局委託研究。\n謝曼麗、蔡瀚輝(2015),中高齡勞工友善健康職場促進研究,勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所。\n王國珍(2007),中高齡退休專業人力再運用─ 供給面之探討,政治大學勞工研究所學位論文,1-113.\n吳志剛(2016),日本退休者就業與年金給付法制之研究,政治大學法律學研究所學位論文,1-81.\n李宜靜(2019),老化社會的工作永續性與職場健康不平等:臺灣工作者調查,臺灣大學健康政策與管理研究所學位論文, 1-114.\n沈坤勳(2020),高齡勞工就業權益與保障之研究,中正大學法律學系學位論文,1-172.\n林佳玟(2008),我國中高齡勞工失業問題及輔導政策之研析,成功大學政治經濟研究所碩士在職專班學位論文,1-146.\n高昱喆(2013),我國中高齡勞工工作平等法律問題,中正大學勞工關係學研究所學位論文,1-169.\n梁鍾廷(2009),臺灣中高齡者勞動市場參與及退休後再就業意願影響因素之探討 (未出版碩士論文),國立中正大學,嘉義縣.\n莊婉君(2013),臺灣中高齡勞工漸進式退休問題之探討,成功大學老年學研究所學位論文,1-80\n黃怡箏(2015),臺灣漸進式退休可行性評估與設計,中正大學社會福利學系學位論文,1-131.\n黃治綜(2019),中高齡就業人員工作動機之研究. 義守大學管理碩博士班學位論文,1-183.\n葉詩穎(2020),中高齡勞動參與及漸進式退休之決策因素分析,東海大學經濟系學位論文,1-102\n劉達源(2013),我國就業年齡歧視禁止法制之研究,中正大學法律學系學位論文, 1-71.\n鄭美玲(2007),我國就業年齡歧視與制定特別法保護之必要性,國立中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。\n成之約(2018),法定退休年齡對中高齡勞動參與的影響,2015 年兩岸社會福利論壇:[劇變時代的社會福利政策] 研討會.\n李源萍(2020),從前瞻因應理論觀點探討民營企業中高齡經理人之退休準備,華醫學報,(52),69-98.\n林沛瑾(2012),日本與英國的中高齡就業政策,臺灣老年學論壇,第13期。\n林良榮(2020),「中高齡者及高齡者就業促進法」之立法政策評議─兼論日本高齡勞工僱用安定之實踐經驗,月旦法學雜誌,No.301,188-207。\n林宗弘, & 林文正(2020),臺灣邁向超高齡社會的 [世代公平] 與 [樂齡就業],國土及公共治理季刊,8(1),8-19.\n侯岳宏(2020),年齡歧視與中高齡就業-以臺北高等行政法院民國100 年簡字第159 號行政判決為例,臺灣勞工季刊,(61),第4-11頁。\n馬財專, & 林淑慧(2016),促進中高齡勞動參與及就業整備之整合性服務,國土及公共治理季刊,4(1) ,53-62.\n馬財專, 藍科正, 吳啟新, 林淑慧, 林晉勗, 黃春長, ... & 陳威穎. (2019),中高齡及高齡者重返職場之探索,勞動及職業安全衛生研究季刊,27(2),133-148.\n馬財專(2010),臺灣中高齡勞工失業問題之檢視及政策思考,臺灣社會福利學刊,9(1),45-95.\n高雅玲(2014),全球高齡化商機與挑戰,經濟前瞻,(155),8-13.\n張靜怡, & 陳黛芬(2016),中高齡者退休再就業之探究,福祉科技與服務管理學刊,4(2),241-242.\n郭振昌(2015),南韓中高齡者勞動力發展政策重點與對臺灣的啟發,社區發展季刊150期,289-303.\n郭振昌(2017a),跨世代間工作分享的可能模式與展望,新社會政策(50),26-31.\n陳寬政, 莊婉君, & 楊靜利(2015),臺灣中高齡勞工漸進式退休的影響因素,人力資源管理學報,15(1),87-108.\n劉佳鈞(2016),中高齡及高齡者人力的運用與開發,國土及公共治理季刊,4(1),100-105\n鄭津津(2010),勞動法專題研究系列之二:就業上年齡歧視之探討,月旦法學雜誌(184),177-206.\n謝依純(2012),影響臺灣中高齡者退休年齡之因素,臺灣老年學論壇(14)\n羅鈺珊(2014),新加坡因應高齡化趨勢之政策,經濟前瞻(155),26-31.\n行政院主計總處,薪情平台,取自:https://earnings.dgbas.gov.tw/replies.aspx,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n行政院主計總處薪情平台,勞動報酬概況,取自:https://earnings.dgbas.gov.tw/template.html?selectid=2,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n李慧筠(2016),新加坡:SkillsFuture-未來技能計畫,經濟部人才快訊電子報,取自:http://itriexpress.blogspot.com/2016/04/skillsfuture.html,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n取自:https://ilabor.ntpc.gov.tw/page/employment-service-forelder,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n易起宇(2020),鼓勵延後退休 日本修法可最晚75歲再領退休金,聯合新聞網,取自:https://udn.com/news/story/6809/4600245,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n厚生労働省,高年齢者雇用安定法の改正~70歳までの就業機会確保~,取自https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/koyou_roudou/koyou/koureisha/topics/tp120903-1_00001.html\n郭振昌(2017b),新北領航,中高齡職場續航, 新北市婦女及中高齡職場續航中心\n郭振昌(2017c), 日本與南韓中高齡者定額僱用率制度評估與啟示,臺灣新社會智庫,取自:http://www.taiwansig.tw/index.php/%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A/%E7%A4%BE%E6%9C%83%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8/7784-%E6%97%A5%E6%9C%AC%E8%88%87%E5%8D%97%E9%9F%93%E4%B8%AD%E9%AB%98%E9%BD%A1%E8%80%85%E5%AE%9A%E9%A1%8D%E5%83%B1%E7%94%A8%E7%8E%87%E5%88%B6%E5%BA%A6%E8%A9%95%E4%BC%B0%E8%88%87%E5%95%9F%E7%A4%BA,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n勞動部(2016),中高齡勞動力就業現況~七成中高齡就業者每週平均工時超過40小時、二成有失業危機, 勞動部呼籲打造「老有所用」的友善職場環境,取自:https://www.mol.gov.tw/announcement/2099/23954/,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n勞動部,108年國際勞動統計,2011~2016年主要國家平均退離勞動市場年齡和官方退休年齡,取自:https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/nat/%e8%a1%a810-3.pdf,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n勞動部,108年國際勞動統計,2013~2018年主要國家平均退離勞動市場年齡和官方退休年齡,取自:https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/nat/108/108010%E8%A1%A810-3.pdf,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n勞動部,108年國際勞動統計,2019年勞動力參與率-按年齡分,取自:https://www.mol.gov.tw/statistics/2452/2457/,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n新北勞動雲,中高齡者及高齡者職務再設計,取自:https://ilabor.ntpc.gov.tw/page/job-accommodation-for-elder,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n新北勞動雲,婦女及中高齡職場續航專區,取自:https://ilabor.ntpc.gov.tw/page/employment-service-forelder,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n經濟部工業-產業人才發展資訊網,產業人才投資方案,取自:https://www.italent.org.tw/Resource/Plan/59/GP20190100001,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n鍾文雄(2019),如何任用中高齡人才,創造組織價值,取自:https://recruit.104.com.tw/employ-middle-aged-talents/,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n韓仕賢(2020),《中高齡者及高齡者就業促進法》應儘速施行,金融業工會聯合會訊,第238期,取自:http://www.bankunions.org.tw/?q=node/2696,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n蘇怡文(2017), 韓國高齡人力資源政策(上),產業人才發展資訊網,取自:https://www.italent.org.tw/ePaperD/7/ePaper20170900003,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n蘇怡文(2017), 韓國高齡人力資源政策(下),產業人才發展資訊網,取自:https://www.italent.org.tw/ePaperD/7/ePaper20171200003,最後瀏覽日期:2021年04月17日。\n\n外文文獻\nACT ON PROHIBITION OF AGE DISCRIMINATION IN EMPLOYMENT AND ELDERLY EMPLOYMENT PROMOTION, Korea Law Translation Center, KLRI, https://elaw.klri.re.kr/eng_service/lawView.do?hseq=37583&lang=ENG\nAct on Stabilization of Employment of Elderly Persons,Japan Law Translation,from:http://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/law/detail/?id=2621&vm=04&re=02\nBaker & McKenzie(2013). Amendments to the Act for Stabilization of Employment of Older Persons: Mandated Employment until Age 65.\nCentral Provident Fund Board (2021), CPF Schemes,from:https://www.cpf.gov.sg/Members/Schemes\nClark, R. L., & Morrill, M. S. (2016). Extending work life: Employer interests and concerns. WE Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.\nHeikki, R., & Haruhiko, H. (2008). Employment Policies in Two Ageing Societies: Japan and Finland Compared.\nHirokuni Ikezoe (2018). Termination of Employment Relationships in Japan (Part III): Mandatory Retirement Age System. Japan Labor Issues, vol.2, no.9.17-20.\nJapan: Supreme Court rules on Mandatory Retirement, Ogletree Deakins, from:https://ogletree.com/international-employment-update/articles/june-2019/japan/2019-06-04/japan-supreme-court-rules-on-mandatory-retirement/\nMermin, G. (2007). Are Employers Willing to Hire and Retain Older Workers?.\nMinistry of Employment and Labor (2015), Employment and Labor Policy in Korea.\nMinistry of Employment and Labor (2017), Employment and Labor Policy in Korea.\nMinistry of Employment and Labor (2018), Employment and Labor Policy in Korea.\nMINISTRY OF MANPOWER, How can an employer tell if an employee is medically fit to keep working? https://www.mom.gov.sg/faq/re-employment/how-can-an-employer-tell-if-an-employee-is-medically-fit-to-keep-working\nMINISTRY OF MANPOWER, How can I tell if my employee`s work performance is satisfactory? https://www.mom.gov.sg/faq/re-employment/how-can-i-tell-if-my-employees-work-performance-is-satisfactory\nMINISTRY OF MANPOWER, Responsible re-employment, from:https://www.mom.gov.sg/employment-practices/re-employment\nMOM,TRIPARTITE GUIDELINES ON THE RE-EMPLOYMENT OF OLDER EMPLOYEES, from:https://www.mom.gov.sg/-/media/mom/documents/employment-practices/guidelines/tripartite-guidelines-on-re-employment-of-older-employees.pdf\nMOM,Tripartite Workgroup on Older Workers. (2019). Strengthening support for older workers: report of the Tripartite Workgroup on Older Workers.\nMunnell, A., & Sass, S. (2008). Working Longer: The Solution to the Retirement Income Challenge. Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved July 21, 2021, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctt6wph6r\nOECD (2018), Working Better with Age: Japan, Ageing and Employment Policies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201996-en.\nOECD (2019), Working Better with Age, Ageing and Employment Policies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/c4d4f66a-en.\nOECD (2020), Promoting an Age-Inclusive Workforce: Living, Learning and Earning Longer, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/59752153-en.\nRetirement Income Challenge.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.\nRETIREMENT AND RE-EMPLOYMENT ACT (CHAPTER 274A), Singapore Statutes Online, from:https://sso.agc.gov.sg/Act/RRA1993\nSenior Worker Support Package, from:https://www.mom.gov.sg/-/media/mom/documents/budget2020/factsheet-senior-worker-support-package.pdf\nWinter-Ebmer, R., Horvath, G. T., Frimmel, W., & Schnalzenberger, M. (2015). Seniority Wages and the Role of Firms in Retirement.\nThe Japan Institute for Labour Policy and Training(2020), Obligating Efforts Concerning Measures to Secure Employment Opportunities up to the Age of 70: Revision of the Act on Stabilization of Employment of Elderly Persons, etc., Japan Labor Issues, vol.4, no.25, August-September 2020\n平成24年11月9日厚生労働省告示第559号,高年齢者等職業安定対策基本方針。取自:https://www.mhlw.go.jp/seisakunitsuite/bunya/koyou_roudou/koyou/koureisha/topics/dl/tp0903-559.pdf
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
勞工研究所
108262020
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108262020
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
202001.pdf4.45 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.