Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137052| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 楊婉瑩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 荊治瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | 荊治瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.date | 2021 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-02T09:38:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-02T09:38:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-09-02T09:38:15Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0107252003 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137052 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 政治學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 107252003 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究聚焦於研究台灣地方選舉中女性參政的弱勢情形，統整過去研究中，影響女性參政弱勢的三種因素：現代化因素、制度因素與文化因素，對當前台灣地方女性參政進行分析。本研究認為，制度提供的效果對於低度現代化發展的地區提供矯正效果，當一地存在弱勢的社經結構，若能有性別保障名額提供的矯正效果，則對女性的參政有更為正向的效果，性別保障制度並非一種逆向歧視制度，反而是地方女性參政弱勢的重要解方。\n依據實證結果，第一、「選區農牧業人口比例」與「有無性別保障名額」是對女性參政程度產生顯著影響的兩個因素；第二、性別保障名額制度確實對低度現代化的區域提供女性參政上的矯正效果，當選區農牧業人口比例愈低，其女性參政程度會更高，且有無性別保障名額的選區，其女性參政程度之間的差異會受到現代化程度影響。\n當前台灣各地的選區中，小規模而沒有性別保障名額的選區約佔三成，這類型的小規模選區與低度現代化發展的地區重疊，因為低度的人口聚集程度與弱勢的社經發展，使得其在選區劃分時依舊是小選區，又選區規模小的狀況下，更導致性別保障名額所提供的矯正效果無法在這類型的選區中發揮，女性參政程度依舊低落。欲改善此種情形，提升性別保障名額比例從四分之一至三分之一是可能選項，又或者在劃分選區時，改善其選區劃分的標準，使低社經發展地區是有性別保障名額的選區。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機 1\n第二節 研究目的與問題 2\n第三節 研究貢獻與價值 4\n第二章 文獻檢閱 6\n第一節 現代化理論 6\n第二節 文化論 9\n第三節 制度論 11\n第四節 地方的女性參政 16\n第三章 研究設計 19\n第一節 理論架構 19\n第二節 待驗假設 26\n第三節 變數測量與操作化 28\n第四節 資料來源 33\n第五節 資料分析方法 34\n第四章 地方女性參政的實證分析 35\n第一節 描述性統計分析 35\n第二節 不同理論下影響女性參政程度的多元線性回歸模型 44\n第三節 影響女性參政因素的多元線性迴歸模型 50\n第四節 納入交互作用的選區女性參政程度線性迴歸模型 52\n第五章 結論與研究限制 61\n第一節 結論 61\n第二節 研究限制 62\n參考文獻 64\n一、中文 64\n二、英文 65 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 2549502 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107252003 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 性別保障名額 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 性別政治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 地方女性參政 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | 地方選舉中的性別席次落差 —— 以 2018年議員選舉為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Gender Gaps in the Local Election : An Example of Council Election in 2018 | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | 一、中文\nIris M. Young. 2017，《正義與差異政治》，陳雅馨譯，台北：商周。\n中華民國總統府，2020，〈總統與副總統〉，https://web.archive.org/web/20180830174136/https://www.president.gov.tw/Page/40，查閱時間：2020/05/14。\n傅仰止(2019)。台灣社會變遷基本調查計畫2018第七期第四次：全球化與文化組(D00170_2)【原始數據】取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-D00170_2-1。\n姜貞吟，2009，〈女性作為政治行動者：台灣女性參政圖像的反思〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，76：277-316。\n楊婉瑩，2000，〈婦女的政治機會結構析論〉，《國立中山大學社會科學季刊》，2(4)：65-95。\n楊婉瑩，2014，〈鑿洞取光或是拆除高牆？〉，陳瑤華主編，《台灣婦女處境白皮書：2014》：117-169，台北：女書文化。\n楊婉瑩，2019，〈沒有選擇的選擇——女性從政者的雙重束縛〉，王曉丹主編，《這是愛女也是厭女：如何看穿這世界拉攏與懲戒女人的兩手策略？》：172-193，台北：大家。\n法務部全球法規資料庫，2016，〈地方制度法〉，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawSingle.aspx?pcode=A0040003&flno=33#:~:text=%EF%BC%88%E4%B8%80%EF%BC%89%E9%84%89%EF%BC%88%E9%8E%AE%E3%80%81,%E3%80%81%E5%B8%82%EF%BC%89%E6%B0%91%E4%BB%A3%E8%A1%A8%E5%90%8D%E9%A1%8D%E3%80%82，查閱時間：2021/03/06。\n法務部全球法規資料庫，2020，〈公職人員選舉罷免法〉，https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?pcode=d0020010，查閱時間：2021/03/06。\n莊文忠、林瓊珠、鄭夙芬、張鐙文，2018，〈婦女保障名額制度與選舉競爭對女性參政的影響：以2000年至2010年縣市議員選舉為例〉，《台灣政治學刊》，22(2)\n莊文忠、鄭夙芬與林瓊珠，2011，〈我國選舉制度婦女保障名額之研究〉，行政院研考會委託研究計劃，計畫編號：RDEC-RES-100-008，台北：行政院研考會。\n鮑彤、莊文忠、林瓊珠，2014，〈從四分之一到三分之一？婦女保障席次的選舉效應評估〉，《東吳政治學報》，32(1)：99-141。\n黃長玲，2001，〈從女性保障名額到性別比例原則——兩性共治的理論與實踐〉，《問題與研究》，40(3)：69-82。\n黃長玲，2012，〈差異政治的形成：1946年婦女保障名額制定的歷史過程〉，《政治科學論叢》，52：89-116。\n\n二、英文\nArceneaux, Kevin. 2001. “The “Gender Gap” in State Legislative Representation: New Data to Tackle an Old Question” Political Research Quarterly 54(1):143-160.\nBaldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2): 231-258.\nBatto, Nathan F. 2014. “Was Taiwan’s Electoral Reform Good for Women? SNTV, MMM, Gender Quotas, and Female Representation.” Issues & Studies 50(2):39-76.\nBatto, Nathan F. 2018. “Gender Quotas and Upward Mobility in Elections in Taiwan.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 39(4):451-466.\nDahlerup, Drude. 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43(2):73-92.\nDahlerup, Durde and Anja Taarup Nordlund. 2004. “Gender quotas: A key to equality? A case study of Iraq and Afghanistan.” European Political Science 3(3):91-98.\nDahlerup, Durde and Lenita Freidenvall. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘fast track’ to equal representation for women: why Scandinavia is no longer the model.” International Feminist Journal Politics 7(1):26-48.\nDahlerup, Durde. 2006. “Introduction” In Women, quotas and politics, ed. Durde Dahlerup. London: Routledge.\nDavidson-Schmich, Louise K. 2006. “Implementation of Political Party Gender Quotas: Evidence from the German Lander 1990-2000.” Party Politics 12(2):211-232.\nDeb, Johnson, Hope Kabuchu and Santa Vusiya Kayonga. 2003. “Women in Ugandan local government: the impact of affirmative action.” Gender and Development 11(3):8-18.\nEagly, Alice H, Mona G. Makhijani and Bruce G. Klonsky. 1992. “Gender and the evaluation of leader: a meta-analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 111(1):3-22.\nEder, Christina, Jessica Fortin-Rittberger and Corinna Koreber. 2015. “The Higher the Fewer? Patterns of Female Representation Across Levels of Government in Germany.” Parliamentary Affairs 69(2): 1-21.\nEngstorm, Richard. 1987. “District Magnitude and the Election of Women to the Irish Dail.” Electoral Studies 6:123-132.\nGorecki, Maciej A and Paula Kukolowicz. 2014. “Gender quotas, candidate background and the election of women: A paradox of gender quotas in open-list proportional representation systems.” Electoral Studies 36:65-80.\nHickman, John C. 1997. “The Candidacy and Election of Women in Japanese SNTV Electoral Systems.” Women & Politics 18(2):1-26.\nHill, David. B. 1981. “Political Culture and Female Political Representation.” The Journal of Politics. 43(1):159-168.\nHuang, Chang Ling. 2016. “Reserved for Whom? The Electoral Impact of Gender Quotas in Taiwan.” Pacific Affairs. 89(2):325-343.\nInglehart, Ronald and Pippa Norris. 2003. Rising tide: gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nInter-Parliamentary Union，2020，https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/infographics/2020-03/women-in-politics-2020，查閱時間：2020/06\nIversen, Torben and Frances Rosenbluth. 2010. Women, Work, and politics : the political economy of gender inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.\nJamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1995. Beyond the Double Bind: Women and Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nJones, Mark P. 1998. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and The Election of women: Lessons From the Argentine Provinces.” Comparative Political Studies 31(1):3-21.\nKam, Cindy D. and Robert J. Franzese. 2007. Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.\nKenworthy, Lane and Melissa Malami. 1999. “Gender Inequality in Political Representation: A World wide Comparative Analysis” Social Forces 78(1):235-268.\nKrook, Mona Iena. 2004. “Gender quotas as a global phenomenon: actors and strategies in quota adoption.” European Political Science 3(3):59-65.\nKunovich, Sheri and Pamela Paxton. 2005. “Pathways to Power: The Role of Political Parties in Women’s National Political Representation.” American Journal of Sociology 111(2):505-552.\nLuhiste, Maarja. 2015. “Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR-List Systems.” Politics & Gender 11:89-116.\nMancrief, Gary F., and Joel a. Thompson. 1991. “Urban and Rural Ridings and women in Provincial Politics: A Research Note on Female MLAs.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24:831-837.\nManne, Kate. 2017. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nMatland, Richard E. 1993. “Institutional Variables Affection Female Representation in National Legislatures: The Case of Norway.” The Journal of Politics 55(3): 737-755.\nMatland, Richard E. 2006. “Electoral Quotas: Frequency and Effectiveness” In Women, quotas and politics, ed. Durde Dahlerup. London: Routledge.\nMatland, Richard E. and Deborah Dwight Brown. 1992. “District Magnitude’s effect on Female Representation in U.S. State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17(4):469-492.\nMatland, Richard E. and Donley T. Studlar. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Electoral Systems: Canada and Norway” The Journal of Politics 58(3):707-733.\nMeyer, Katherine, Helen Rizzo and Yousef Ali. 1998. “Islam and the extension of citizenship rights to women in Kuwait.” Journal for Scientific Study of Religion 37(1):131-144.\nNorrander, Barbara, and Clyde Wilcox. 2005. “Trends in the Geography of Women in the U.S. State Legislatures.” In Women and elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, ed. Sue Tomas and Clyde Wilcox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nOxley, Zoe M and Richard L. Fox. 2004. “Women in Executive Office: Variation Across American States.” Political Research Quarterly 57(1):113-120.\nPalmer, Barbara and Dennis Simon. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections. New York: Taylor & Francis.\nPaxton, Pamela and Sheri Kunovich. 2003. “Women’s Political Representation: The Importance of Ideology.” Social Forces 82(1):87-114.\nPaxton, Pamela, Melanie M. Hughes and Jennifer L. Green. 2007. “The International Women’s Movement and Women’s Political Representation, 1893-2003” American Sociological Review 71: 898-920.\nPaxton, Pamela. 1997. “Women in National Legislatures: A Cross-National Analysis.” Social Science Research 26:442-464.\nPutnam, Robert. 1976. The Comparative Studies of Elites. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.\nRule, Wilma. 1987. “Electoral systems, Contextual Factors and Women’s Opportunity for Election to Parliament in Twenty-Three Democracies.” Western Political Quarterly 40:477-498.\nSchmidt, Gregory D. 2008. “The election of women in PR systems: Testing the conventional wisdom.” Electoral Studies 28:190-203.\nSchwartz, David S. 2009. “The Case of Vanishing Protected Class: Reflections on Reverse Discrimination, Affirmative Action, and Radical Balancing.” Wisconsin Law Review 2:657-689.\nSchwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. ,Michael Malecki and Brian F. Crisp. 2010. “Gender and Electoral Success in Single Transferable Vote Systems.” British Journal of Political Science 40(3):693-709.\nSchwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. and William Mishler. 2005. “An Integrated Model of Women’s Representation.” The Journal of Politics 67(2):407-428.\nTan, Netina. 2015. “Introduction: Quotas and Non-Quota Strategies in East Asia.” Politics & Gender 11:171-217.\nTolly, Erin. 2011. “Do Women “Do Better” in Municipal Politics? Electoral Representation across Three Levels of Government.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 44(3): 573-594.\nTripp, Aili Mari and Alice Kang. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 41(3):338-361.\nWelch, Susan and Donley T. Studlar. 1996. “The Opportunity Structure for Women’s Candidacies and Electability in Britain and the United States.” Political Research Quarterly 49(4): 861-874.\nYang, Wan-Ying and Joyce Gelb. 2019. “Is democratic nomination good for women’s candidacy? Examining the case of Taiwan.” Asian Journal of Women’s Studies 25(1):2-29. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6814/NCCU202101362 | en_US |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 200301.pdf | 2.49 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.