Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137053| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳建綱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | 李璿 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Lee, Hsuan | en_US |
| dc.creator | 李璿 | zh_TW |
| dc.creator | Lee, Hsuan | en_US |
| dc.date | 2021 | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-02T09:38:29Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-09-02T09:38:29Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-09-02T09:38:29Z | - |
| dc.identifier | G0107252021 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137053 | - |
| dc.description | 碩士 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 國立政治大學 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 政治學系 | zh_TW |
| dc.description | 107252021 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | 本文為約翰‧彌爾的政治思想提供了全面性的解析與討論。在自由主義與效益主義傳統的調和上，筆者從完善論的角度切入，提供了高貴情操與同情共感的理論線索，以此兼顧彌爾快樂主義與完善論的思想二元性；並從完善論的基礎出發，論證了個體性的欲求與達成即為最大幸福。這樣的關懷源於彌爾對於社會專政壓迫個體性的擔憂，尤其考量到商業文明與公共輿論對邪惡利益的助長；保障個體性進而確保最大幸福的達成也反映在他對政治制度的設計中。另一方面，彌爾長久以來被學界忽略的階段性史觀也深刻影響他對政治的想法；透過政治制度排除邪惡利益，並為人民提供道德教育，文明發展得以擺脫遲滯問題，邁向下一階段的進程。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This article offers a comprehensive interpretation and discussion of John Mill’s political philosophy. On the reconciliation of utilitarianism and liberalism tradition, I take a perfectionist point of view, offer the account of nobleness and sympathy to balance the binary of Mill’s hedonism and perfectionism; and from the perfectionist foundation, I argue that the desiring and achievement of individuality is maximizing happiness. The concern of individuality stems from Mill’s worry about social tyranny and the oppression it caused, especially the aggravation of sinister interest by commercial society and public opinion; securing individuality to achieve the maximum of happiness also reflects in his plans of political institution. On the other hand, Mill’s conception of history contains the idea of phases, which is long-neglected by the academic community, also deeply affects his thoughts on politics; excluding sinister interest and providing moral education for people via political institution, civilization would be able to cast off the stagnation, moving on to the next stage of development. | en_US |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第壹章 緒論 3\n第一節 研究動機與問題意識 3\n第二節 文獻回顧 7\n第三節 研究架構與章節安排 17\n第貳章 效益與完善 19\n第一節 同情共感與高貴情操 20\n第二節 高貴情操的具體內涵 29\n第三節 快樂主義與完善論的調和 35\n第參章 昂揚的個體與壓迫的社會 43\n第一節 文明與商業社會的病徵 43\n第二節 個體與自由社會的調和 49\n第三節 責任與道德義務 56\n第肆章 政治制度的雙元面向：教育及保障 64\n第一節 代議政府的職責 65\n第二節 政治菁英的審議 72\n第三節 公民道德的養成 80\n第伍章 文明帝國 89\n第一節 世界的邊陲與角落 89\n第二節 文明的遲滯與落後 94\n第三節 帝國的輝煌與榮光 98\n第陸章 結論 106\n參考文獻 110 | zh_TW |
| dc.format.extent | 3475359 bytes | - |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
| dc.source.uri | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107252021 | en_US |
| dc.subject | 約翰．彌爾 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 效益主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 個體性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 完善論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 文明 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | J. S. Mill | en_US |
| dc.subject | Utilitarianism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Individuality | en_US |
| dc.subject | Perfectionism | en_US |
| dc.subject | Civilization | en_US |
| dc.title | 從制度邁向文明：約翰彌爾的完善效益論 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | From Institution to Civilization: J. S. Mill`s Perfectionist Utilitarianism | en_US |
| dc.type | thesis | en_US |
| dc.relation.reference | Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, ed. J.M. Robson (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963-1991), 33 vols.\n\n中文部分\n專書\n江宜樺，2001，《自由民主的理路》，新北市：聯經。\n林火旺，2017，〈導讀：穆勒及其效益主義〉，載於邱振訓(譯)，《效益主義》(頁14-38)，新北市：暖暖書屋。\n蕭高彥，2020，《探索政治現代性：從馬基維利到嚴復》，新北市：聯經。\n\n期刊論文\n李酉潭，2000，〈約翰彌勒論民主的問題及其解決〉，《中山人文社會科學期刊》，第八卷第1期，頁142-164。\n李酉潭，2005，〈約翰彌勒自由觀之分析〉，《國立政治大學學報》，第71期，頁35-67。\n張福建，2005，〈參與和公民精神的養成：彌爾 (J. S. Mill)《代議政府論》的一種解讀〉。《東吳政治學報》，第21期，頁41-61。\n陳建綱，2017，〈效益主義的發軔：初探邊沁的政治思想〉。《人文及社會科學集刊》，第二十九卷第4期，頁527-562。\n黃俊龍，2003，〈民主社會的菁英統治：對密爾《論代議政府》的一個詮釋〉，《政治科學論叢》，第21期，頁217-239。\n\n學位論文\n馬仲民，（2000），《約翰．密爾論民主公民的品質及其條件》，國立政治大學政治學系碩士論文，台北市。\n黃培維，（2011），《個人、國家與世界：論約翰彌爾的公眾參與理論》，國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文，台北市。\n廖斌洲，（2007），《菁英、教育與代議政府：詹姆士彌爾政治思想之研究》，國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文，台北市。\n\n \n英文部分\n專書\nBentham, Jeremy. & Schofield, Philip. 1989. First Principles Preparatory to Constitutional Code ed. Philip Schofield. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\nBerger, Fred. 1984. Happiness, Justice, and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Berkley: University of California Press.\nBerlin, Isiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press.\nBrink, David. 2013. Mill’s Progressive Principles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nCavell, Stanley. 2004. Cities of Words: Pedagogical Letters on a Register of the Moral Life. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.\nD. D. Raphael., & A. L. Macfie. 1982. Adam Smith: The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nDonner, Wendy. 1991. The Liberal Self: John Stuart Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press.\nFerguson, Adam. 1995. An Essay on the History of Civil Society. ed. F. Oz-Salzberger. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press\nGray, John. 1996. Mill on Liberty: A Defence. (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.\nHabibi, Don. A. 2001. John Stuart Mill and the Ethic of Human Growth. Dordrecht, The Netherlands; Boston, Mass: Kluwer Academic\nHimmelfarb, Gertrude. 1990. On Liberty and Liberalism: The Case of John Stuart Mill. San Francisco: ICS Press.\nHume, David. 2000. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. ed. T. Beauchamp. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\nHurka, Thomas. 1993. Perfectionism. New York: Oxford University Press.\nKymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\nLocke, John. 1980. Second Treatise of Government. ed. C. B. Macpherson. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.\nLyons, David. 1965. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.\nLyons, David. 1994. Rights, Welfare, and Mill’s Moral Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.\nMill, John Stuart. & Crisp, Roger. 1998. Utilitarianism / J.S. Mill. ed. Roger Crisp. New York: Oxford University Press.\nNussbaum, Martha. 2013. Political Emotions. Cambridge, Mass: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.\nPitts, Jennifer. 2005. A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France. Princeton: Princeton University Press.\nRosen, Frederick. 2013. Mill. Oxford: Oxford University Press.\nRyan, Alan. 1987. The Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. (2nd ed.). Hong Kong: The Macmillan Press Ltd.\nSemmel, Bernard. 1984. John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. New Haven: Yale University Press.\nSher, George., ed. 2002. Utilitarianism: And the 1868 Speech on Capital Punishment. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.\nSmart, J. J. C., & Williams, Bernard. 1973. Utilitarianism: For and against. New York: Cambridge University Press.\nSkorupski, John. 1999. John Stuart Mill: The Arguments of the Philosophers. ed. T. Honderich. London; New York: Routledge.\nSkorupski, John. 2006. Why Read Mill Today?. New York: Routledge.\nTen, C. L. 1980. Mill on Liberty. New York: Clarendon Press.\nThompson, Dennis F. 1976. John Stuart Mill and Representative Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.\nUrbinati, Nadia. 2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.\nVarouxakis, Georgios. 2002. Mill on Nationality. London: New York: Routledge.\n\n期刊與專書論文\nArneil, Barbara. 2012. “Liberal Colonialism, Domestic Colonies and Citizenship,” History of Political Thought, 33(3): 491-523.\nArneson, Richard J. 2000. “Perfectionism and Politics,” Ethics, 111(1): 37-63.\nBell, Duncan. 2010. “John Stuart Mill on Colonies”. Political theory, 38(1): 34-64.\nBeaumont, Tim. 2018. “J. S. Mill’s Hedonism: Activism, Experientialism, and Eudaimonism,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 26(3):452-474.\nBeaumont, Tim. 2019. “J. S. Mill on Calliclean Hedonism and the Value of Pleasure,” Dialogue, 58, 553-578\nBlack, R. C. Collison. 1968. “Economic Policy in Ireland and India in the Time of J. S. Mill,” Economic History Review, 321-336.\nBrink, David. 1992. “Mill`s Deliberative Utilitarianism,” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 67-103.\nBrink, David. 2007. “Mill’s Moral and Political Philosophy”.\nBrudney, Daniel. 2008. “Grand Ideals: Mill’s Two Perfectionisms,” History of Political Thought, 29(3): 485-515.\nClor, Harry. 1985. “Mill and Millians on Liberty and Moral Character,” The Review of politics, 3-26.\nDevigne, Robert. 2006. “Cultivating the Individual and Society: J. S. Mill`s Use of Ancient and Romantic Dialectics,” History of Political Thought, 27(1): 91-121.\nDonner, Wendy. 2007. “John Stuart Mill on Education and Democracy,” in J. S. Mill’s Political Thought, eds. N. Urbinati & A. Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 250-274.\nHimma, Kenneth. 1998. “The Interpretation of Mill`s Utilitarianism,” History of Philosophy Quarterly, 15(4): 455-473.\nHoag, Robert. 1986. “Happiness and Freedom: Recent Work on John Stuart Mill,” Philosophy & public affairs, 188-199.\nInlgehart, Ronald& Norris, Pippa. 2016. “Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-nots and Cultural Backlash,” HKS Working Paper No. RWP16-026, 1-53.\nKinzer, Bruce. 1984. “J. S. Mill and Irish Land: A Reassessment,” The Historical Journal, 27(1): 111-127.\nKlausen, Jimmy. 2016. “Violence and Epistemology: J. S. Mill`s Indians after the ‘Mutiny’,” Political Research Quarterly, 69(1): 96-107.\nLyons, David. 1976. “Mill`s Theory of Morality,” Nous, 101-120.\nNewsinger, John. 1992. “Fenianism revisited: pastime or revolutionary movement?,” Saothar, 17: 46-52.\nNorris, Pippa., & Inglehart, Ronald. 2016. “Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-nots and Cultural Backlash,” Harvard JFK School of Government Faculty Working Papers Series, 1-52.\nNussbaum, Martha. 2004. “Mill Between Aristotle & Bentham,” Daedalus, 133(2): 60-68.\nPitts, Jennifer. 2003. “Legislator of the World? A Rereading of Bentham on Colonies,” Political theory, 31(2): 200-234.\nPorter, Roger, 1977. “John Stuart Mill and Federalism,” Publius, 7(2): 101-124.\nRiley, Jonathan. 2006. “Utilitarian Liberalism: Between Gray and Mill,” Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 9(02): 117-135.\nRiley, Jonathan. 2015. “Is Mill an Illiberal Utilitarian?,” Ethics, 125(3): 781-796.\nRyan, Alan. 2011. J, S. Mill on Education,” Oxford Review of Education, 37(5): 653-667.\nSchmidt–Petri, Christoph. 2003. “Mill on Quality and Quantity,” The Philosophical Quarterly, 53(210): 102-104.\nSteele, E. D. 1970. “J. S. Mill and the Irish Question: Reform, and the Integrity of the Empire, 1865-1870,” The Historical Journal, 13(3): 419-450.\nSullivan, Eileen. 1983. “Liberalism and Imperialism: J. S. Mill`s Defense of the British Empire,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 599-617.\nTen, C. L. 1969. “Mill and Liberty,” Journal of the History of Ideas, 47-68.\nUrmson, J. O. 1953. “The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill,” The Philosophical Quarterly (1950-), 3(10), 33-39.\nWaarden, Betto van. 2015. “John Stuart Mill on Civil Service Recruitment and the Relation between Bureaucracy and Democracy,” Canadian Journal of Political Science / Revue canadienne de science politique, 48(3): 625-645.\nYeh, Hao. 2014. “Experiments in Living and Liberal Imperialism: A Reinterpretation of J. S. Mill’s International Political Thought,” 台灣政治學刊, 18(1): 227-266.\nZakaras, Alex. “John Stuart Mill, Individuality, and Participatory Democracy,” in J. S. Mill’s Political Thought, eds. N. Urbinati & A. Zakaras. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 200-220.\nZastoupil, Lynn. 1983. “Moral Government: J. S. Mill on Ireland,” The Historical Journal, 26(3): 707-717.\nZastoupil, Lynn. 1988. “J.S. Mill and India,” Victorian Studies, 32(1): 31-54. | zh_TW |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6814/NCCU202101384 | en_US |
| item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
| item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec | - |
| item.grantfulltext | open | - |
| item.openairetype | thesis | - |
| item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 202101.pdf | 3.39 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.