Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137058
題名: 青年行動不便者與手足的連結、照顧關係與離家考量
Sibling relationship, caregiving, and home-leaving for siblings with and without disabilities in young adulthood
作者: 陳昱維
Chen, Yu-Wei
貢獻者: 張恒豪<br>胡力中
Chang, Heng-Hao
陳昱維
Chen, Yu-Wei
關鍵詞: 手足關係
障礙手足
生命歷程
離家
成年萌發期
sibling relationship
siblings of people with disability
life span
leaving home
emerging adulthood
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 2-Sep-2021
摘要: 青年離家是人生的重要歷程,除能夠更自由地探索人生,也有助於培養成年責任與能力。然而障礙手足雙方若欲離家獨立,則易因照顧需求而有不同的選擇考量。本研究探討行動不便者的手足如何權衡手足關係與離返家的選擇。研究方法以訪談八位成年學生受訪者,分別為四位肢體障礙者手足(非障礙者),以及四位肢體障礙者。\n研究發現當手足障礙程度越高,彼此生活及情感的連結越是強烈,也就對自己或手足的離家選擇焦慮。例如非障礙受訪者因長時間陪伴手足,又自視為未來照顧者,因此覺得生活自由受限而渴望逃離;相反的,緊密的情感使障礙者希望手足不離家、能共同生活,卻不影響他們自立生活的嘗試及追求。受訪的障礙手足對因學業、工作及婚姻而離家有不同看法,就學與婚姻被視作離家的正當理由,然而多數婚前工作階段並不特別追求離家,這與家庭責任、生活品質及經濟能力有關。\n多數受訪者雖於就學期間嘗試離家自主生活,然而缺乏無障礙環境及服務時,為了未來協助手足或顧及自身生活品質,不離家成為唯一選項,且必須連帶捨棄需要離家的夢想。可見社會環境是障礙手足離家的門檻,促進無障礙環境的落實,不僅有利於障礙者自立生活,手足也能夠追求理想生活,不再因為障礙而落入「奢望卻無法離家」的窘境。透過本研究可以認識障礙手足對彼此的情感,更進一步理解這段關係對生涯規劃的影響,補足了過往研究僅止於情感及量化方式的探討,且同時讓障礙手足雙方針對相同議題發聲。
Moving out of the parental home is a crucial phase for young adults, which allows them to not only explore their lives independently, but also promotes responsibility and ability. However, people with disabilities and their non-disabled siblings may face barriers driven by caring issues, which could make them hesitant to leave their parental home. This study explores how siblings with and without mobility disabilities in young adulthood evaluate their relationships, and this study conducted eight interviews, four interviewees with, and without disability.\nIt was found that, first, the more severe the extent of disability, the tighter the bond between siblings, and the greater the level of anxiety regarding independent living arrangements. For example, those who spend considerable time taking care of their siblings with disabilities, or consider themselves as future caregivers, may want to move out of their homes because they find care-giving a burden. Conversely, a loving personal relationship makes interviewees with disabilities prefer to live with their siblings. Second, interviewees consider study and marriage as legitimate excuses for moving out of their parental homes. However, when considering family responsibility, living quality and financial ability ,they prefer to live with their family after graduation and before marriage.\nAlthough most of the interviewees had left their home to study and lived in the dormitory, they had decided to continue living in their parental homes in the future. Owing to the lack of accessible social environment, many interviewees are forced to quit pursuing their achievement goals. Specifically, it is imperative to build an accessible social environment, that allows both siblings with and without disabilities to live independently and pursue their goals.\nMost of the studies on sibling relationships of people with disabilities in Taiwan have focused on people with mental disabilities. This study involves siblings with and without mobility disabilities, and employs the qualitative method, highlights the affection that interviewees have toward their siblings and the perception of an ideal life, as well as the influence on long-term planning of living arrangement. Furthermore, it demonstrates the importance of an accessible society. Those interviewees who have experienced caring issues have a stronger affection toward their siblings, and may not be able to move out of their parents’ home in the future.
參考文獻: 丁偉杰,2018,〈收掉餐廳重回校園 暖心哥陪讀 肌萎弟圓大學夢〉。自由時報,6月10日。https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/paper/1207644,取用日期:2019年6月17日。\n平山亮、古川雅子著、王麗芳譯,2018,《手足風險》。新北市:聯經。\n中平卓馬、篠山紀信著、黃亞紀譯,2013,《決鬥寫真論》。台北市:臉譜。\n全國法規資料庫,2019,《民法》第1114條。https://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawSingle.aspx?pcode=B0000001&flno=1114,取用日期:2019年7月7日。\n吳心越,2018,〈「脆弱」的照顧:中國養老院中的身體、情感與倫理困境〉。《台灣社會研究季刊》110:1-36。\n吳欣宜,2019,〈法定成年年齡之檢討〉。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=6590&pid=188513,取用日期:2021年6月17日。\n吳碧芳,1999,〈憾福聯誼會 開創手足「心」天地〉。生命力新聞,6月9日。https://vita.tw/憾福聯誼會-開創手足-心-天地-1dd4a85fae26,取用日期:2019年7月2日。\n吳瓊洳,2017,〈家庭的變與不變 談多樣化的家庭與教育〉。《台灣教育》705:2-10。\n宋博鳳,2002,《成年前期手足關係之研究》。台北:國立台灣師範大學人類發展與家庭學系碩士論文。\n李俊穎,2018,《旅蛙的憂鬱:探討轉大人時期離家與心理健康的關係—親子關係與性別的差異》。台北:國立臺北大學社會學系碩士論文。\n李雲婷,2003,《應用「華人家庭動態資料庫」探討台灣地區新家戶形成之研究》。台南:國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文。\n周月清、李婉萍、張意才,2007,〈住民社區居住與生活參與、選擇與自主: 以台灣六個團體家庭成年智障者為例〉。《東吳社會工作學報》16:37-78。\n周玉婷,2016,〈他/她是家庭的一份子—非障礙手足對障礙手足之照顧經驗〉。《社區發展季刊》154:292-306。\n邱珍琬,2011,〈首次離家大學女生對家的觀感─初探研究〉。《彰化師大教育學報》19:31-58。\n姜郁阡,2013,《手足情深?成年初期的手足關係》。台北:國立臺灣大學生物資源暨農學院產業傳播暨發展學系碩士論文。\n范家源,2018,《手足無措?成年智障者手足角色及照顧協商經驗之探討》。台北:中國文化大學社會福利學系碩士論文。\n高正德、高淑芬、朱龍祥、朱啟丹、溫振源,2004,〈大學身體障礙生之心理及家庭適應〉。《台灣精神醫學》18(4):261-272。\n張秋珍,1993,《視覺障礙兒童家庭動力之研究》。彰化:國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。\n張聖年,2017,《有肢體障礙手足之大學生其手足關係與壓力研究》。台北:國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系碩士論文。\n教育部統計處,2019a,107學年度各級學校概況。http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/main_statistics/u.xls ,取用日期:2019年7月11日。\n——,2019b,大專校院學生宿舍概況。http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/main_statistics/u8.ods,取用日期:2019年7月11日。\n畢恆達,1993,〈物的意義——一個交互論的觀點〉。《國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究學報》7:97-110。\n畢恆達,2001,《空間就是權力》。台北市:心靈工坊文化。\n莊舒婷,2008,《智能障礙者手足之手足關係與壓力之研究》。屏東:國立屏東教育大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。\n陳佩妏,2002,《[自閉症兒童之手足]手足關係之探討》。台北:國立台北師範學院教育心理與輔導學系碩士論文。\n陳易甫,2014,〈社會學如何觀看生命歷程:年齡、歷史與世代〉。巷仔口社會學,https://twstreetcorner.org/2014/11/11/chenyifu/,取用日期:2019年7月5日。\n陳俐穎,《手足競爭經驗者的人際衝突因應研究》。彰化:國立彰化師範大學婚姻與家族治療研究所。\n陳姿廷、吳慧菁、鄭懿之,2015,〈臺灣精神障礙者手足照顧經驗之初探:以父母照顧經驗做對照〉。《臺大社會工作學刊》31:55-103。\n陳昭儀,1995,〈身心障礙兒童與家庭〉。《師大學報》40:187-212。\n陳鈺馥,2018,〈國人愈來愈長壽 平均壽命80.4歲〉。自由時報,https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/1234048,取用日期:2019年7月5日。\n勞動部,2019,108年01月底大專畢業生就業流向分析儀表板。https://yoursalary.taiwanjobs.gov.tw/salary/cgi-bin/cognosisapi.dll,取用日期:2019年8月17日。\n黃芳誼,2016,〈從生命歷程觀點評析健康研究〉。台灣新社會智庫,http://www.taiwansig.tw/index.php/政策報告/社會安全/7221-從生命歷程觀點評析健康研究,取用日期:2019年7月5日。\n黃朗文,2018,〈成年初期的離巢與歸巢〉。台灣青少年成長歷程研究,http://www.typ.sinica.edu.tw/upfiles/成年初期的離巢與歸巢_TYP資料分析.pdf,取用日期:2019年8月10日。\n黃秀梨、戴玉慈、張媚、翁麗雀,2007,〈家庭研究相關議題探討〉。《護理雜誌》54(3):69-76。\n黃應貴編,1992,《見證與詮釋 : 當代人類學家》。台北:正中書局。\n楊宗斌,2018,六都勞工離家與返鄉就業調查。Yes123求職網,https://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/article.asp?id=20181123193256,取用日期:2019年8月19日。\n楊宗斌,2019,畢業生職涯規劃與企業招募新人調查。Yes123求職網,https://www.yes123.com.tw/admin/white_paper/article.asp?id=20190320100139,取用日期:2019年8月15日。\n楊麗惠,2013,〈談家庭發展與家庭發展理論〉。《家庭教育雙月刊》43:31-39。\n詹珮宜,2000,《智障學生之國小正常手足的親子互動關係、手足關係、社會支持與生活適應之相關研究》。新竹:國立新竹師範學院國民教育研究所碩士論文。\n趙淑珠、蔡素妙,2002,〈家庭的意義:大學生的家庭概念調查研究〉。《中華輔導學報》11:167-188。\n衛生福利部,2002,民國91年台灣地區第八次家庭與生育調查報告。https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=370&pid=1289,取用日期:2019年8月19日。\n——,2018a,105年身心障礙者生活狀況及需求調查報告。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-15903-559e7d0b-5b5a-4178-9128-a9045f078654.html,取用日期:2019年8月1日。\n——,2018b,105年身心障礙者生活狀況及需求調查主要家庭照顧者問卷調查報告。https://www.mohw.gov.tw/dl-44917-d8ff1cde-de0b-4b52-9cf9-39eea48200fe.html,取用日期:2019年8月1日。\n鄭雅薇,2002,《智障者之正常青少年手足壓力及因應方式之研究》。高雄:國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所碩士論文。\n盧依欣,2006,《有智障手足之國小學童生活壓力與因應策略之研究》。台北:國立台北教育大學教育心理與諮商學系碩士論文。\n賴孟足,2003,《有智障手足之國小學童其家庭互動對學校表現之影響》。台中:台中師範學院特殊教育與輔助科技研究所碩士論文。\n賴美秀,2007,《智能障礙者手足共依附特質與依賴型生涯抉擇關係之研究》。嘉義:嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文。\n謝孟娟,2007,《手足支持形式之研究》。台北:東吳大學社會學系碩士論文。\n蘇秀慧,2018,〈國人平均壽命80.4歲 創高〉。經濟日報,https://money.udn.com/money/story/5648/3381338,取用日期:2019年7月5日。\n蘇麗瓊,2014,〈獨居未婚高齡女性老年準備之探索研究〉。《社區發展季刊》148:209-228。\n龔宜君,2014,〈內捲化的跨國移動:來台印尼爪哇女性移工的道德經濟學〉。《台灣社會學刊》55:75-126。\nCalver, Tom and Nassos Stylianou,2018,〈你能活多久?全球壽命排行榜中九大事實〉。BBC中文網,https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/science-44145450,取用日期:2019年7月5日。\nGoffman, Erving著、曾凡慈譯,2010,《污名:管理受損身分筆記》。台北:群學。\nRitzer, George著、楊淑嬌譯,2003,《當代社會學理論:精簡本》。台北:巨流。\nArnett, Jeffrey J., 2000, “Emerging Adulthood: A Theory of Development from the Late Teens through the Twenties.” American Psychologist 55: 469–480.\nBurke, Meghan M., Chung Eun Lee, Catherine K. Arnold and Aleksa Owen, 2016, “Correlates of Siblings Relationship Quality and Caregiving Reception of Adults with Disabilities.” Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 28(5):735-750.\nBurke, Meghan M., Thomas Fish, and Kathy Lawton, 2015, “A comparative Analysis of Adult Siblings’ Perceptions Toward Caregiving.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 53(2):143-157.\nBorch, Rosslyn, 2008, “Straddling Worlds: Indonesian Migrant Domestic Workers in Singapore.” Pp.195-214 in Women and work in Indonesia, edited by Michele Ford and Lyn Parker. London, New York: Routledge.\nChang, Heng-Hao, 2009, “From Housewives to Activists: Lived Experiences of Mothers for Disability Rights in Taiwan.” Asian Journal of Women`s Studies 15(3): 34-59.\nChiu, Chun-Yu, 2021, “Bamboo Sibs: Experiences of Taiwanese Non-disabled Siblings of Adults with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities across Caregiver Lifestages.” Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-021-09797-7 (Date visited: April 21, 2021).\nChou, Yueh-Ching, Toshiko Nakano, Heng-Hao Chang and Li-Fang Liang, 2013, “Parent-carers in Taiwan and Japan: lifelong caring responsibilities within a familistic welfare system.” Pp. 143-159 in Combining paid work and family care: Policies and experiences in international perspective, edited by Teppo Kröger and Sue Yeandle. UK: Policy Press.\nCicirelli, Victor G.,1995, Sibling relationships across the life span. New York, NY: Plenum Press.\nConnidis, Ingrid Arnet and Julie Ann McMullin, 2002, “ Sociological Ambivalence and Family Ties: A Critical Perspective.” Journal of Marriage and Family 64(3): 558-567.\nConstable, Nicole, 2004, “Changing Filipina Identities and Ambivalent Returns.” Pp.104-124 in Coming Home? Coming home?: refugees, migrants, and those who stayed behind, edited by Lynellyn Long & Ellen Oxfeld. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.\nCoyle, E. Caitlin, John Kramer, and Jan E. Mutchler, 2014, “Aging Together: Sibling Carers of Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 11(4): 302-312.\nElder, Glen H. Jr., 1998, “The Life Course as Developmental Theory.” Child Development 69(1): 1-12.\nFinch, Janet and Jennifer Mason, 1993, Negotiating family responsibilities. London; New York: Tavistock/Toutledge.\nFreedman, Ruth I., Marty Wyngaarden Krauss and Marsha Mailick Seltzer, 1997, “Aging parents’ residential plans for adult children with mental retardation.” Mental Retardation 35(2): 114-123.\nGerstel, Naomi and Dan Clawson, 2018, “Control over Time: Employers, Workers, and Families Shaping Work Schedules.” Annual Review of Sociology 44: 77-97.\nGoetting, A.,1986, “The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 48: 703-714.\nHall, Sarah A. and Zach Rossetti, “The roles of adult siblings in the lives of people with severe intellectual and developmental disabilities.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 31(3):423-434.\nHames, Annette, 2008, “Siblings’ Understaning of Learning Disability: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 21: 491-501.\nHeller, Tamar and Alan Factor, 1991, “Permanency planning for adults with mental retardation living with family care givers.” American Journal on Mental Retardation 96(2): 163-176.\nHeller Tamar and Alan Factor, 1993, “Aging family caregivers: Support resources and changes in burden and placement desire.” American Journal on Mental Retardation 98(3): 417-426.\nHeller, Tamar, Alison B. Miller, Kelly Hsieh and Harvey Sterns, 2000, “Later-life planning: Promoting knowledge of options and choice-making.” Mental Retardation 38(5): 395-406.\nHuang, Lang-Wen, 2013, “When Young Adults Leave home: Dependency or Autonomy?” 223-242 in: The psychological well-being of East Asian youth, edited by Chin-Chun Yi. Dordrecht: Springer.\nKins, Evie and Wim Beyers, 2010, “Failure to Launch, Failure to Achieve Criteria for Adulthood?” Journal of Adolescent Research 25(5):743-777.\nKramer, John, Allison Hall and Tamar Heller, 2013, “Reciprocity and Social Capital in Sibling Relationships of People With Disabilities.” Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 51(6): 482-495.\nLi, William D. and Chia-Yu Hung, 2017, “Parental support and living arrangements among young adults in Taiwan.” Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 34: 219-233.\nMeltzer, Ariella and John Kramer, 2016, “Siblinghood through disability studies perspectives: diversifying discourse and knowledge about siblings with and without disabilities.” Disability & Society 31(1): 17-32.\nMoore, DeWayne, 1987, “Parent-adolescent Separation: The Construction of Adulthood by Late adolescents.” Developmental Psychology 23(2): 298-307.\nMoore, DeWayne and Deborah F. Hotch, 1981, “Late Adolescents` Conceptualizations of Home-Leaving.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 10(1): 1-10.\nNauck, Bernhard, Nicolai Gröpler and Chin-Chun Yi, 2017, “How Kinship Systems and Welfare Regimes Shape Leaving Home: A Comparative Study of the United States, Germany, Taiwan, and China.” Demographic Research 36: 1109-1148.\nPit-ten Cate, Ineke M. and G. M. P. Loots, 2000, “Experiences of siblings of children with physical disabilities: an empirical investigation.” Disability and Rehabilitation 22(9): 399-408.\nSibling Support Project, 2018, “How To Let Young Siblings Know You Care.” Https://www.siblingsupport.org/documents-for-site/how-to-let-young-siblings-know-you-care/view (Date visited: July 8, 2019).\nStoneman, Zolinda, 2005, “Siblings of Children With Disabilities: Research Themes.” Mental Retardation 43(5): 339-350.\nTai, Tsui-O, 2017, “Decomposing Youth Poverty in 22 Countries—Contributions of Household Composition, Social Welfare, and the Market to Cross-national Variations in Youth Poverty.” EURAMERICA 47(3): 299-343.\nYeung, Wei-Jun Jean and Cheryll Alipio, 2013, “Introduction: Transitioning to Adulthood in Asia: School, Work, and Family Life.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 646: 6-27.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學系
106254009
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106254009
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
400901.pdf2.15 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.