Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137059
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor莊奕琦zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChuang, Yih-Chyien_US
dc.contributor.author李鴻明zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hong-Mingen_US
dc.creator李鴻明zh_TW
dc.creatorLi, Hong-Mingen_US
dc.date2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T09:40:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-02T09:40:17Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-02T09:40:17Z-
dc.identifierG0106258025en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137059-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經濟學系zh_TW
dc.description106258025zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究定義了人際關係能力的內涵和面向,並採用台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫及其後續調查資料,探討台灣初入職場青年之人際關係能力對於薪資的影響以及人際關係能力與認知能力的在薪資上的互補關係。實證操作上,以探索性因素分析法將非認知能力變數分為人際關係能力變數與其他非認知能力變數,並以樣本高中之綜合測驗成績做為認知能力的替代變數,三者合稱為個人能力變數。人際關係能力對於樣本的薪資有正向影響,而此影響主要來自從事中技能職業的群體,該群體中以大專畢業生和女性居多,而人際關係能力在高技能職業和低技能職業群體中對於薪資則沒有顯著影響,可能原因是中技能職業主要以服務業、商業、餐飲業組成,工作情境中人際交流十分頻繁,故中技能勞動市場中更需要擁有良好人際關係能力的青年人。此外,本研究中並未觀察到人際關係能力與認知能力存在明顯的互補關係,推測原因是樣本工作經驗和年資尚淺,大多從事基層工作,待資歷與專業提升後,兩者的互補性有可能會產生,特別是需要管理和溝通交流的高技能職業。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study first defines the components of interpersonal ability, then incorporates Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) and TEPS-B data to investigate the impacts of interpersonal ability and the complementarity between interpersonal ability and cognitive ability on the wages of young workers in Taiwan. We use the exploratory factor analysis to divide non-cognitive ability into interpersonal ability and other noncognitive abilities; cognitive ability is proxied by the examination scores of various subjects in their high school years. We define an individual`s ability as interpersonal ability, non-cognitive ability, and cognitive ability. Empirical results show that\ninterpersonal ability has a significant and positive effect on wages, especially for females and middle-skilled occupations, like service workers, trade workers, and food service workers, whose skills require a better interpersonal ability to fulfill the tasks.\nHowever, different from existing literature, we find no significant complementarity between interpersonal ability and cognitive ability. The possible reason may be most young workers remain either in the lower ranking job or with limited experience. As their careers move to higher or more sophisticated positions, which require management and communication skills, the significant complementarity relationship between interpersonal ability and cognitive ability may likely exist.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 人際關係能力與勞動市場 1\n第二節 研究目的與問題 3\n第二章 文獻探討與回顧 4\n第一節 個人能力與人際交往的關聯性 4\n第二節 人際關係能力之意涵 8\n一 、處理人際關係的非認知能力 8\n二 、人際關係能力的子面向 10\n第三節 人際關係能力的資料取得與變數設定 14\n一 、資料取得管道與測量干擾因素 14\n二 、變項在實際估計中的設定 16\n第四節 人際關係能力與職場的連結 17\n第三章 研究方法與變數設定 19\n第一節 資料來源說明 19\n第二節 研究模型 22\n一 、進入勞動市場意願估計模型 22\n二 、薪資方程式 23\n第三節 變數設定 23\n一 、薪資 23\n二 、人際關係能力 24\n三 、其他非認知能力 25\n四 、認知能力 28\n五 、其他控制變數 29\n第四節 敘述統計量 30\n第四章 估計結果與討論 32\n第一節 全職工作樣本估計結果 32\n第二節 不同分類下之青年薪資估計結果 39\n一 、對於不同性別群體,人際關係效果是否不同? 52\n二 、對於擁有不同最終學歷群體,人際關係效果是否不同? 53\n三 、對於不同認知能力群體,人際關係效果是否不同? 53\n四 、對於不同職業技能等級群體,人際關係效果是否不同? 54\n第五章 結論與建議 55\n附錄 58\n參考文獻 70\n中文部分 70\n英文部分 71zh_TW
dc.format.extent2421604 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0106258025en_US
dc.subject非認知能力zh_TW
dc.subject人際關係能力zh_TW
dc.subject社交能力zh_TW
dc.subject台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫zh_TW
dc.subjectNon-cognitive abilityen_US
dc.subjectInterpersonal abilityen_US
dc.subjectSocial abilityen_US
dc.subjectTaiwan Education Panel Survey(TEPS)en_US
dc.title人際關係能力對初入職場青年薪資之影響:台灣實證zh_TW
dc.titleThe Effect of Interpersonal Ability on Wage : Evidence from Taiwanese Young Workersen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference中文部分\n洪兆樂(2013),「非認知技能內涵對國中生學習成就之影響」。國立臺灣師範大學,未出版,臺北市。\n\n張宜君. (2016). 臺灣產業轉型下的工作機會分布變遷: 1978-2012. 臺灣社會學刊, (60), 135-187.\n\n張苙雲(2003a)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:資料使用手冊(2011.12.01版)。臺北市:中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫(管理、釋出單位)。\n\n張苙雲(2005)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第一波(2001)高中職五專學生問卷資料(會員版)(C00124_A)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。\n\n張苙雲(2005)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第二波(2003)高中職五專學生表現評量資料(會員版)(C00137_E)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫\n\n張苙雲(2005)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第一波(2001)高中職五專家長問卷資料(會員版)(C00124_G)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。\n\n張苙雲(2005)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第一波(2001)國中家長問卷資料(會員版)(C00124_H)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。\n\n張苙雲(2005)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第二波(2003)高中職五專學生問卷資料(會員版)(C00137_A)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。\n\n張苙雲(2008)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第三波(2005)高中職五專學生問卷資料(會員版)(C00175_A)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。\n\n張苙雲(2008)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第三波(2005)高中職五專學生表現評量資料(會員版)(C00175_C)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。\n\n張苙雲(2008)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第四波(2007)高中職五專學生問卷資料(會員版)(C00189_A)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。\n\n張苙雲(2008)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:第四波(2007)高中職五專學生表現評量資料(會員版)(C00189_C)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫https://srda.sinica.edu.tw。\n\n關秉寅(2016)。「『台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫』後續調查:教育與勞力市場的連結」-2001/2003年高中職五專學生樣本2010年調查(C00303_3)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫\n\n關秉寅(2017)。「『台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫』後續調查:教育與勞力市場的連結」-2001/2003年國中學生樣本2014年調查(公共版) (E10259_3)【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫\n\n楊孟麗、譚康榮、黃敏雄(2003)。台灣教育長期追蹤資料庫:心理計量報告TEPS2001 分析能力測驗(第一版)。臺北市:中央研究院調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫(管理、釋出單位)。\n\n黃毅志. (2003). [臺灣地區新職業聲望與社經地位量表] 之建構與評估: 社會科學與教育社會學研究本土化. 教育研究集刊, (49: 4), 1-31.\n\n譚克平. (2008). 極端值判斷方法簡介. 臺東大學教育學報, 19(1).\n\n英文部分\n\nAlmlund, M., A. L., Duckworth, J. J., Heckman, & T., Kautz (2011). Personality psychology and economics. In Handbook of the Economics of Education (Vol. 4, pp. 1-181). Elsevier.\n\nArgyle, M., & A., Kendon (1967). The experimental analysis of social performance. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 55-98). Academic Press.\n\nArgyle, M., M., Henderson, & A., Furnham (1985). The rules of social relationships. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24(2), 125-139.\n\nAutor, D. H., D., Dorn, & G. H., Hanson (2015). Untangling trade and technology: Evidence from local labour markets. The Economic Journal, 125(584), 621-646.\n\nBarron, J. M., B. T., Ewing, & G. R., Waddell (2000). The effects of high school athletic participation on education and labor market outcomes. Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 409-421.\n\nBiddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual review of sociology, 12(1), 67-92.\n\nBloom, N., & J., Van Reenen (2011). Human resource management and productivity. In Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4, pp. 1697-1767). Elsevier.\n\nBound, J., C., Brown, & N., Mathiowetz (2001). Measurement error in survey data. In Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 5, pp. 3705-3843). Elsevier.\n\nBorghans, L., , A. L.,Duckworth, J. J., Heckman, & B., Ter Weel (2008). The economics and psychology of personality traits. Journal of human Resources, 43(4), 972-1059.\n\nBorghans, L., B., Ter Weel, & B. A., Weinberg (2014). People skills and the labor-market outcomes of underrepresented groups. ILR Review, 67(2), 287-334.\n\nBrackett, M. A., S. E., Rivers, S., Shiffman, N., Lerner, & P., Salovey (2006). Relating emotional abilities to social functioning: a comparison of self-report and performance measures of emotional intelligence. Journal of personality and social psychology, 91(4), 780.\n\nBrackett, M. A., S. E., Rivers, & P., Salovey (2011). Emotional intelligence: Implications for personal, social, academic, and workplace success. Social and personality psychology compass, 5(1), 88-103.\n\nBrackett, M. A., R. M., Warner, & J. S., Bosco (2005). Emotional intelligence and relationship quality among couples. Personal relationships, 12(2), 197-212.\n\nBresnahan, T. F. (1999). Computerisation and wage dispersion: an analytical reinterpretation. The Economic Journal, 109(456), 390-415.\n\nBurgoon, J. K., & A. E., Bacue (2003). Nonverbal communication skills.\n\nCampion, M. A., G. J., Medsker, & A. C., Higgs (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel psychology, 46(4), 823-847.\n\nCaroli, E., & J., Van Reenen (2001). Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1449-1492.\n\nCattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of educational psychology, 54(1), 1.\n\nDeming, D. J. (2017). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1593-1640.\n\nDíaz, J. J., O., Arias, & D. V., Tudela (2012). Does perseverance pay as much as being smart? The returns to cognitive and non-cognitive skills in urban Peru. Unpublished paper, World Bank, Washington, DC.\n\nFerris, G. R., D. C., Treadway, P. L., R. L., Perrewé, Brouer, C., Douglas, & S., Lux (2007). Political skill in organizations. Journal of management, 33(3), 290-320.\n\nFletcher, J. M. (2013). The effects of personality traits on adult labor market outcomes: Evidence from siblings. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 89, 122-135.\n\nGabe, T. (2011). The value of creativity. Handbook of creative cities, 128-145.\n\nGangestad, S. W., & M.,Snyder (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological bulletin, 126(4), 530.\n\nGardner, D. P. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education. The Commission.\n\nGilbert, B. O., & D. G., Gilbert (1991). Personality, Social Skills, and Disturbed Behavior Patterns. In Personality, Social Skills, and Psychopathology (pp. 1-15). Springer, Boston, MA.\n\nGoleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books, Inc.\n\nGoleman, D. (2006). The socially intelligent. Educational leadership, 64(1), 76-81.\n\nGoldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative" description of personality": the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59(6), 1216.\n\nHeckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society, 153-161.\n\nHeckman, J. J., S. H., Moon, R., Pinto, P. A., Savelyev, & A., Yavitz (2010). The rate of return to the HighScope Perry Preschool Program. Journal of public Economic-s, 94(1-2), 114-128.\n\nHeckman, J. J., & T., Kautz (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour economics, 19(4), 451-464.\n\nHeckman, J. J., & Y., Rubinstein (2001). The importance of noncognitive skills: Lessons from the GED testing program. American Economic Review, 91(2), 145-149.\n\nHochwarter, W. A., C., Kiewitz, M. J., Gundlach, & J.,Stoner (2004). The impact of vocational and social efficacy on job performance and career satisfaction. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 10(3), 27-40.\n\nInternational Standard Classification of Occupations: ISCO-08 / International Labour Office, - Geneva: ILO, 2012 ISBN 978-92-2-125952-7\n\nKosmitzki, C., & O. P., John (1993). The implicit use of explicit conceptions of social intelligence. Personality and individual differences, 15(1), 11-23.\n\nKomarraju, M., S. J., Karau, R. R.,Schmeck, & A.,Avdic (2011). The Big Five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and individual differences, 51(4), 472-477.\n\nKuhn, P., & C.,Weinberger (2005). Leadership skills and wages. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(3), 395-436.\n\nLawler, E. E., & D., Finegold (2000). Individualizing the organization: Past, present, and future. Organizational dynamics, 29(1), 1-15.\n\nLindbeck, A., & D. J., Snower (2000). Multitask learning and the reorganization of work: From tayloristic to holistic organization. Journal of labor economics, 18(3), 353-376.\n\nLindqvist, E., & R., Vestman (2011). The labor market returns to cognitive and noncognitive ability: Evidence from the Swedish enlistment. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 3(1), 101-28.\n\nLopes, P. N., P., Salovey, S., Côté, M., Beers, & R. E., Petty (2005). Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion, 5(1), 113.\n\nLopes, P. N., P., Salovey, & R. , Straus (2003). Emotional intelligence, personality, and the perceived quality of social relationships. Personality and individual Differences, 35(3), 641-658.\n\nMarlowe, H. A. (1986). Social intelligence: Evidence for multidimensionality and construct independence. Journal of educational psychology, 78(1), 52.\n\nMayer, J. D., J., Ciarrochi, & J. P., Forgas (2001). Emotional intelligence and everyday life: An introduction.\n\nMayer, J. D., & P., Salovey (1997). What is emotional intelligence. Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications, 3, 31.\n\nMayer, J. D., P., Salovey, D. R., Caruso, & G., Sitarenios (2001). Emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence.\n\nMohrman, S. A., S. G., Cohen, & A. M., Morhman Jr (1995). Designing team-based organizations: New forms for knowledge work. Jossey-Bass.\n\nNational Association of Colleges and Employers, NACE,2019. Job Outlook 2019. National Association of Colleges and Employers, NACE\n\nOudeyer, P. Y., & F., Kaplan (2009). What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of computational approaches. Frontiers in neurorobotics, 1, 6.\n\nPaternoster, R., R., Brame, P.,Mazerolle, & A., Piquero (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859-866.\n\nRiggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 51(3), 649.\n\nRiggio, R. E. (1992). Social interaction skills and nonverbal behavior. Applications of nonverbal behavioral theories and research, 3-30.\n\nRiggio, R. E., & D. R., Carney (2003). Social skills inventory manual. Mind Garden.\n\nRiggio, R. E., & J., Zimmerman (1991). Social skills and interpersonal relationships: Influences on social support and support seeking. Advances in personal relationships, 2, 133-155.\n\nRoberts, B.W.(2009). Back to the future: Personality and assessment and personality development. Journal of Research in Personality 43 (2), 137–145.\n\nRoberts, K., E., Granum, R. C., Leegood, & J. A., Raven (2007). C3 and C4 pathways of photosynthetic carbon assimilation in marine diatoms are under genetic, not environmental, control. Plant physiology, 145(1), 230-235.\n\nRosen, J. A., E. J., Glennie, B. W., Dalton, J. M., Lennon, & R. N., Bozick (2010). Noncognitive Skills in the Classroom: New Perspectives on Educational Research. RTI International. PO Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194.\n\nSalovey, P., & J. D., Mayer (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, cognition and personality, 9(3), 185-211.\n\nSegal, C. (2008). Motivation, test scores, and economic success. Economics Working Papers. Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.(October).\n\nSegrin, C., & M., Givertz (2003). Methods of social skills training and development.\n\nShiv, B., G., Loewenstein, A., Bechara, H., Damasio, & A. R., Damasio (2005). Investment behavior and the negative side of emotion. Psychological science, 16(6), 435-439.\n\nSnyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of personality and social psychology, 30(4), 526.\n\nSpitzberg, B. H. (2003). Methods of interpersonal skills assessment.\n\nThorndike, E. L. (1920). Intelligence and its uses. Harper`s magazine.\n\nTrower, P., B., Bryant, & M., Argyle (1978). Social skills and mental health. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.\n\nWeinberger, C. J. (2014). The increasing complementarity between cognitive and social skills. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4), 849-861.\n\nWu, Y. (2008). Social skill in the workplace: what is social skill and how does it matter? (Doctoral dissertation, University of Missouri--Columbia)zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU202101160en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
802501.pdf2.36 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.