Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137089
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor洪福聲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHung, Fu-Shengen_US
dc.contributor.author陳彥君zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChen, Yen-Chunen_US
dc.creator陳彥君zh_TW
dc.creatorChen, Yen-Chunen_US
dc.date2021en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-02T09:53:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-02T09:53:04Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-02T09:53:04Z-
dc.identifierG0108921052en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137089-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description108921052zh_TW
dc.description.abstract  過去的文獻對於經濟成長、所得分配與金融發展三者的互動關係,有很多探討,也都發現三者存在密不可分的關係。此外,也有許多文獻發現地下經濟分別對於經濟成長、所得分配與金融發展有顯著的影響,但並未有文獻同時探討此四種變數之間的互動關係。由於地下經濟在不同區域以不同形式呈現及扮演著不同角色,且在台灣佔國內GDP比例高達二成以上,因此將地下經濟之變數納入考量,進而探討台灣地下經濟、經濟成長、所得分配與金融發展彼此之間可能的互動關係。\n\n  本文透過蒐集台灣1981年第一季至2019年第四季的資料加以分析,利用共整合VAR模型及VECM向量誤差修正模型之研究方法探究四個變數的互動關係。透過Johansen共整合實證結果,發現地下經濟、經濟成長、所得分配與金融發展四個變數具有一個共整合關係,顯示各模型變數間存在著長期均衡關係,共整合向量係數顯示各變數間均有正向之關係。在長期均衡關係中,本文發現所得分配對於經濟成長的影響程度最大;透過VECM短期Granger因果關係顯示,金融發展與經濟成長皆會單向的影響地下經濟、所得分配與地下經濟短期間互不影響、所得分配與經濟成長則互為因果關係。由以上實證結果發現,地下經濟在我國總體經濟發展中扮演著重要的角色,政府在做金融或是經濟決策時,應將地下經濟納入考量,才能真實的探討所得分配、經濟成長與金融發展的關係,制定出更加精準的決策。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn the past literature, there have been many discussions on the interaction among economic growth, income distribution and financial development, and they have also found that the three are inseparable. In addition, there are also many literatures that find that the underground economy has a significant impact on economic growth, income distribution, and financial development. However, there is no literature that discusses the interaction between these four variables at the same time. Since the underground economy presents in different forms and plays different roles in different regions, and accounts for more than 20% of domestic GDP in Taiwan. Therefore, the underground economy is taken into consideration to discuss the possible interactions among Taiwan`s underground economy, economic growth, income distribution and finance development.\n\nThis article analyzes the data collected in Taiwan from the first quarter of 1981 to the fourth quarter of 2019, and uses the research method of the VAR and the VECM to explore the interaction of these four variables. Through Johansen`s cointegration verification results, it is found that there is cointegration relationship among underground economy, economic growth, income distribution and financial development , which shows that there is a long-term equilibrium relationship among the model variables. The coefficient of cointegration vector shows that each variable has a positive relationship. In the long-term equilibrium relationship, this article finds that income distribution has the greatest impact on economic growth. The short-term Granger causality test of VECM shows that both financial development and economic growth will unilaterally affect the underground economy, income distribution and underground economy will not affect each other in a short period of time, income distribution and economic growth are mutually causal. From the above results, it is found that the underground economy plays an important role in the overall economic development of our country. The government should take the underground economy into consideration when making financial or economic decisions, so as to truly discuss the relationship among income distribution, economic growth and financial development to make more precise decisions.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究背景與動機 1\n第二節 研究架構與流程 3\n第二章 文獻回顧 5\n第一節 經濟成長與所得分配關聯 5\n第二節 經濟成長與金融發展關聯 8\n第三節 所得分配與金融發展關聯 10\n第四節 地下經濟之定義與估算方法 12\n第三章 研究方法與實證模型 16\n第一節 分析方法與實證模型 16\n第二節 資料來源與變數說明 22\n第四章 實證結果與分析 28\n第一節 實證變數基本統計量及相關係數分析 28\n第二節 各變數之實證結果分析 31\n第五章 研究結論與建議 41\n參考文獻 43\n附錄一 48\n附錄二 49zh_TW
dc.format.extent2581094 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108921052en_US
dc.subject經濟成長zh_TW
dc.subject地下經濟zh_TW
dc.subject所得分配zh_TW
dc.subject金融發展zh_TW
dc.subject共整合檢定zh_TW
dc.subjectEconomic growthen_US
dc.subjectUnderground economyen_US
dc.subjectIncome distributionen_US
dc.subjectFinancial developmenten_US
dc.subjectCointegration verificationen_US
dc.title地下經濟、經濟成長、所得分配與金融發展的互動關係-台灣的實證分析zh_TW
dc.titleThe Interactions among Underground Economy, Economic Growth, Income Distribution, and Financial Development- Empirical Analysis of Taiwanen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference中文部分\n李建強(2006)。金融發展、經濟成長與通貨膨脹的門檻效果。臺灣經濟預測與政策,36(2),79-107。\n李建強、洪福聲、黃柏農(2005)。金融發展與經濟成長的關係會消失嗎?-門檻迴歸之應用。經濟研究,41(1),45-74。\n沈中華、林昌平(2009)。金融發展對經濟成長的影響-動態追蹤資料門檻模型。經濟研究,45(2),179-182。\n林朕陞(2019)。臺灣地下經濟的三個議題。政治大學經濟研究所博士論文,未出版,台北。\n林朕陞、洪福聲(2019)。臺灣的金融發展和經濟成長:地下經濟的角色。臺灣經濟預測與政策,55(1),71-114。\n林朕陞、洪福聲、朱美麗(2020)。租稅負擔與地下經濟的門檻效果─台灣的實證研究。經濟論文,48(4),511-555。\n彭思遠(2007)。台灣所得分配總體計量研究。臺灣大學經濟學研究所學位論文,未出版,台北。\n傅敬堯、林雪瑜、楊淑珺(2018)。稅制調整與地下經濟—臺灣動態隨機一般均衡模型分析。臺灣經濟預測與政策。49(1),1-45。\n詹文碩、陳以禮(譯)(2014)。二十一世紀資本論 (Thomas Piketty原著)。台北:衛城出版。\n陳于婷(2020)。通貨膨脹對金融發展與經濟成長的影響-時變門檻模型分析。中山大學經濟學研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄。\n陳希臻(2019)。金融發展與所得不均的關係-台灣實證研究。政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n戴韻珊、孫佳宏(2004年6月),臺灣地下經濟之探討-MIMIC模型之應用。第五屆全國實證經濟學論文研討會,台中。\n\n英文部分\nAlesina, A. and D. Rodrik (1994). Distributive Politics and Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economic, 109(2), 465-490.\nBarro, R. J. (1990). Government Spending in a Simple-Model of Endogenous Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 103-126.\nBlackburn, K., N. Bose and S. Capasso (2012). Tax Evasion, the Underground Economy and Financial Development. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(2), 243-253.\nCapasso, S. and T. Jappelli (2013). Financial Development and the Underground Economy. Journal of Development Economics, 101, 167-178.\nClaessens, S. and E. Perotti (2007). Finance and Inequality: Channels and Evidence. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(4), 748-773.\nDe Gregorio, J. and P. Guidotti (1995). Financial Development and Economic Growth. World Development, 23(3), 433-448.\nDin, B. H. (2017). Estimating the Determinants of Shadow Economy in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(5), 191-201.\nDiamond, D. W. and P. H. Dybvig (1983). Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401-419.\nElliott, G., T. J. Rothenberg and J. H. Stock (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root. Econometrica, 64(4), 813-836.\nEngle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger (1987). Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.\nFeige, E. L. (1979). How Big Is the Irregular Economy? Challenge, 22(1), 5-13.\nGalor, O. (2000). Income Distribution and Process of Development. European Economic Review, 44, 706-712.\nGimet, C. and T. Lagoarde-Segot (2011). A Closer Look at Financial Development and Income Distribution. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1698-1713.\nGreenwood, J., and B. Jovanovic (1990). Financial Development, Growth, and the Distribution of Income. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1076-1107.\nGranger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-spectral Methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.\nGoldsmith, R. W. (1969). Financial Structure and Development, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.\nGutmann, P. M. (1977). The Subterranean Economy. Financial Analysts Journal, 33(6), 26-34.\nHung, F. S. (2015). Tax Evasion, Financial Dualism, and Economic Growth. Academia Economic Papers, 43(2), 175-213.\nIradian, G. (2005). Inequality, Poverty, and Growth: Cross-Country Evidence. IMF Working Paper.\nIbrahim, S. S. and H. M. Aliero (2020). Testing the Impact of Financial Inclusion on Income Convergence: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. African Development Review, African Development Bank, 32(1), 42-54.\nJohansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.\nJohansen, S. and K. Juselius (1992). Testing Structural Hypotheses in a Multivariate Cointegration Analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK. Journal of Econometrics, 53(1-3), 211-244.\nKuznets, S. (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality, American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.\nKing, R. G. and R. Levine (1993), Finance and Growth: Schumpeter Might be Right. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 717-737.\nLi, H., L. Squire, and H. F. Zou (1998). Explaining International and Intertemporal Variations in Income Inequality. The Economic Journal, 108(446), 26-43.\nLoayza, N. V. (1996). The Economics of the Informal Sector: A Simple Model and Some Empirical Evidence from Latin America. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 45(1), 129-162.\nLucas Jr., R. E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3-42.\nMedina, L. and F. Schneider (2017). Shadow Economies around the World: New Results for 158 Countries over 1991-2015. CESifo Working Paper No. 6430.\nNieh, C. C. and C. F. Lee (2001). Dynamic Relationship between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates for G-7 Countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 41(4), 477-490.\nNelson, C. R. and C. I. Plosser(1982). Trend and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series. Journal of Macroeconomic,10 ,139-162.\nPatrick, H. T. (1966). Financial Development and Economic Growth in Underdeveloped Countries. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 14(2), 174-189.\nPagano, M. (1993). Financial Markets and Growth: An Overview. European Economic Review, 37, 613-622.\nPhillips, P. C., and P. Perron (1988). Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.\nRisso, W. A., L. F. Punzo and E.J.S. Carrea (2013). Economic Growth and Income Distribution in Mexico: A Cointegration Exercise. Economic Modelling, Elsevier, 35, 708-714.\nRajan, R. G. and L. Zingales (2003). The Great Reversals: the Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1), 5-50.\nSchumpeter, J. A. (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.\nSchneider, F. and D. H. Enste (2002). The Shadow Economy: Theoretical Approaches, Empirical Studies, and Political Implications. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.\nShen, C. H. and C. C. Lee (2006). Same Financial Development yet Different Economic Growth-Why? Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 38(7), 1907-1944.\nSims, Christopher A. (1980). Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica, January, 48(1), 1-48.\nStern, N. (1989). The Economics of Development: A Survey. Economic Journal, 99, 597-685.\nTanzi, V. (1980). The Underground Economy in the United States: Estimates and Implications. Banco Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 135(7), 427-453.\nTsintzos, P. and T. Efthimiadis (2011). The Internal External Debt Ratio and Economic Growth. Economics Bulletin, 32(1), 941-951.\n\n網路等電子化資料\n許振明(2004)。台灣金融發展歷程,2004年4月7日,取自:網址:https://view.officeapps.live.com/op/view.aspx?src=http%3A%2F%2Fhomepage.ntu.edu.tw%2F~chenmin%2Fmoneybanking%2Fmoneybanking6.ppt。zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU202101218en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextembargo_20260803-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
105201.pdf2.52 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.