Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137691
題名: 數位匯流下不實訊息之管制規範研究
A Study on the Regulation of disinformation in the Era of Digital Convergence
作者: 朱其慧
Chu, Chi-Hui
貢獻者: 陳起行<br>劉定基
Chen, Chi-Shing<br>Liu, Ting-Chi
朱其慧
Chu, Chi-Hui
關鍵詞: 假新聞
不實訊息
言論自由
網路平臺
Fake news
Disinformation
Freedom of speech
Internet Platform
日期: 2019
上傳時間: 1-Nov-2021
摘要: 科技的迅速發展,使得資訊藉由網路散布,所乘載的資訊量、傳播速度及影響力已非傳統媒體可比擬,同時也隱藏諸多問題,如當前廣受各界討論的不實訊息(Disinformation),由於引發的問題層出不窮,輕則影響個人生活,重則危害國家安全,面對不實訊息產生的影響與威脅,各國多已提出諸多探討與行動,期遏止不實訊息的危害。\n\n本研究以國內外因不實訊息引發的相關事件為起源,蒐整國外對不實訊息的討論與管制相關資料,以監理角度觀察各國作為,同時檢視台灣對不實訊息的處理模式與規範,並試圖釐清不實訊息管制與言論自由保障之衡平,以及不同媒體或訊息類型的管制差異及限制,進一步探討法律規範外之其他可行方案及措施,提出相關建議。\n\n不實訊息為科技發展所衍生的新興議題,面對此一複雜難解的課題,本研究建議,政府以保障言論自由為前提,透過修法強化法律規範外,宜納入生態系概念,透過多方利害關係人共同協力,媒體及網路平臺業者的參與,並與第三方組織合作,及培養大眾正確的素養與思辨能力,期有效防制與降低不實訊息散布所造成的傷害。
With rapid advances in technology, information distribution via the Internet, which carries overloaded data and speedy propaganda, has unprecedentedly caused more impact than traditional media did. In the meantime, it also exposes many problems, such as one of widely discussed issues, Disinformation. Disinformation has brought about a series of problems; some might hinder personal life, while, for the worst scenario, some might endanger national security. When confronted with influence and threat brought by Disinformation, many countries have discussed and taken action toward the issue in the hope of stopping the threat of disinofrmation.\nThe initiation of the research is based on the relevant incidents caused by disinformation, to collect relevant overseas data of discussion and regulation toward disinformation, and to observe how different overseas countries deal with disinformation. Meanwhile, the research also inspects the patterns and regulations that Taiwan deals with disinformation, trying to strike the balance between message control of disinformation and freedom of speech, as well as to compare the differences of regulation and limitation of various media platforms and message types. Moreover, the research is to explore beyond regulations to find possible proposals and measures, and to propose practical suggestions.\nDisinformation has been widely-debated derived from technological advances. Nowadays, we are faced with this complicated and perplexed issue, the research suggests that the government should act on the protection for freedom of speech, enforce the law through legal amendment, and include the idea of social ecology. The research expects to effectively prevent and limit the damage from the spread disinformation by the means of collaboration from different stakeholders, participation of different media and internet owners, and cooperation of the third party in order to cultivate the public with correct media literacy as well as the ability of critical thinking.
參考文獻: 參考文獻\n壹、 中文文獻\n一、書籍\n林子儀,(1999)。言論自由與新聞自由。台北:元照出版社。\n林以庭(譯),(2019)。流言效應:沒有謠言、八卦、小道消息,我們不會有朋友、人脈,甚至活不下去。台北:一起來出版。\n林鈺雄,(2014)。新刑法總則。台北:元照出版社。\n林錫堯,(1999)。行政法要義。台北:三民書局。\n黃銘輝,(2018)。從言論自由的觀點初論網路假新聞的管制,「匯流、治理、通傳會」論文集。台北:風雲論壇。\n劉定基,(2018)。試評「數位通訊傳播法草案」,「匯流、治理、通傳會」論文集,台北:風雲論壇。\n羅世宏(譯),(1992)。傳播理論:起源、應用與方法。台北:五南。\n\n二、期刊\n林承宇,(2002)。網際網路有害內容管制之研究。廣播與電視,第18 期,頁95-96。\n吳秦雯(譯),Jean-Marie Pontier著,(2019)。假新聞之控制。月旦法學雜誌,第292期,頁30-41。\n李治安,(2014)。網路服務者提供民事免責事由之要件分析,國際比較下我國著作權法之總檢討。中央研究院法學研究所,頁451-490。\n李建良,(1999)。基本權利理論體系之構成及其思考層次。人文及社會科學集刊,第9卷第1期,第39-83頁。\n何吉森,(2018)。假新聞之監理與治理探討。傳播研究與實踐,第8卷,第2期,頁4-9。\n胡元輝,(2020)。事實是正確報導的礎石:台灣事實查核中心的經驗與反思。NCC NEWS 第14卷第4期。\n許恆達,(2020)。論假訊息的刑法規制。月旦法學雜誌,第303期,頁P226-246。\n許家馨,(2013)。民刑誹謗二元體系之形成與分析:以「故意過失」為中心的實證研究。張永健編,2011司法制度實證研究,中央研究院法律學研究所,頁147-220。\n郭戎晉,(2011)。網路言論傳播中介者責任與其免責規範之研究。科技法律透析,23卷4期,頁20-44。\n楊智傑,(2020)。網路平臺業者之責任與消費者保護之落實。台灣法學雜誌,387期,頁89-123。\n楊智傑,(2019)。歐盟與德法網路平台假訊息責任立法比較與表意自由之保護-借鏡歐洲法院網路平台誹謗責任之判決。憲政時代季刊,第45卷第1期,頁43-105。\n黃銘輝,(2019)。假新聞、社群媒體與網路時代的言論自由。月旦法學雜誌,頁5-29。\n葉志良,(2012)。著作權法三振條款制度對著作權平衡保護的影響。資訊社會研究,第22期,頁79-115。\n劉靜怡,(2004)。言論自由:第一講「言論自由」導讀。月旦法學教室,第26期,頁73-81。\n羅世宏,(2018)。關於「假新聞」的批辦思考:老問題、新挑戰與可能的多重解方。資訊社會研究,第35期,頁53。\n羅秉成,(2019)。因應假訊息的修法策略與作為。月旦法學雜誌,第292 期,頁67。\n蘇慧婕,(2020)。正當平台程序作為網路中介者的免責條件:德國網路執行法的合憲性評析。台大法學論叢,第49卷第4期,頁1915-1977。\n\n三、論文\n吳宜璇(2018)。網路跟追騷擾行為之管制及其憲法界限。國立政治大學法律研究所論文,台北。\n黃淋君(2009)。通訊傳播規範於數位匯流下之困境與變革:以多合一服務(Triple-Play Service)為中心。國立交通大學科技法律研究所碩士論文,新竹。\n陳琮翰(2021)。假新聞管制體制之研究。國立中興大學法律學系碩士在職專班,台中。\n鍾禎(2018)。論國家對於假消息之管制模式及其規範分析-國際宣言與比較法的觀點。國立交通大學科技法律研究所,新竹。\n\n四、網路資料\n孔德廉等,打不死的內容農場─揭開「密訊」背後操盤手和中國因素,https://www.twreporter.org/a/information-warfare-business-content-farm-mission (最後讀取日:2020/03/20)\n孔德廉、劉致昕,手帶風向不稀奇:AI產文、侵入私人LINE群,輿論軍火商已全面升級,報導者,https://www.twreporter.org/a/information-warfare-business-weapons (最後讀取日:2021/10/11)\n朱冠諭,提案散播「假新聞」關3天綠委喊冤:僅讓現行法條更明確化。風傳媒, https://www.storm.mg/article/447666(最後讀取日2021/10/11)。\n吳家豪,臉書防止假新聞影響選舉 設跨部門專案小組,中央社,2018年10 月25日,https://newtalk.tw/news/view/2018-10-25/157854 (最後讀取日2021/10/11)。\n呂晏慈,防紅色滲透 媒體電信擋中資,蘋果新聞網:https://tw.appledaily.com/headLINE/20200930/6SSLHAT2SFDTHG635QE3EYT5HA (最後讀取日2021/10/11)。\n李秉芳,選前三讀通過《反滲透法》:接受滲透競選,最重關5年、罰千萬,關鍵評論網,https://www.thenewslens.com/article/129483 (最後讀取日2021/10/11)。\n周思宇,假新聞爭議-立法管制假新聞?學者胡元輝提出三大原則,風傳媒,https://www.storm.mg/article/517487 (最後讀取日2021/10/11)\n張浩甯,AI對抗假新聞之創新應用發展分析,財團法人資訊工業策進會,2020年6月1日,https://mic.iii.org.tw/AISP/ReportS.aspx?id=PPT1090611-6 (最後讀取日2021/03/15) 。\n曾依璇,〈法國國會辯論反假新聞法 必要性引質疑〉,CAN中央通訊社,2018年6月11日,http://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/201806110294-1.aspx (最後讀取日:2021/10/11)。\n楊凱翔,規範中共代理人 民進黨團提修兩岸人民關係條例,中央社:https://www.cna.com.tw/news/firstnews/201907050179.aspx(最後讀取日:2021/01/23)。\n劉致昕,深入全球假新聞之都,看「境外網軍」是如何煉成的?,報導者,https://www.twreporter.org/a/cyberwarfare-units-disinformation-fake-news-north-macedonia (最後讀取日2021/10/11)。\n羅世宏,防制假新聞不能走修國安法路徑 德法兩國經驗值得台灣借鏡,信傳媒https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/12950(最後讀取日:2021/10/11)。\n羅世宏,強化社群媒體平台責任立法 德國給全世界上了一課,信傳媒 https://www.cmmedia.com.tw/home/articles/13341 (最後讀取日:2021/10/11)\n\n五、其他\n監察院調查報告,109內調0078號,公布日期2021年5月27日。\n馮建三、翁秀琪、羅世宏等,2008年。《數位匯流後之傳播內容監理政策研析》。台北:國家通訊傳播委員會。\n周慶祥等,2011年。《新聞事實查證製播規範與標準委託研究》。台北:國家通訊傳播委員會。\n羅慧雯等,2019年。《新聞公平原則參考準據、處理程序與資訊揭露委託研究》。台北:國家通訊傳播委員會。\n曾筱媛等,2020年。《數位匯流時代電視新聞頻道之現況與監理政策委託研究》。台北:國家通訊傳播委員會。\n假新聞、國家安全與言論自由會議論文集,社團法人中華民國憲法學會,2019年12月21日,地點:國立臺灣大學社會科學院。\n國際通傳產業動態觀測暨我國通傳市場調查成果分享與座談會,財團法人台灣經濟研究院,2020年12月3日,地點:集思交通部國際會議中心國際會議廳。\n「台灣如何對抗不實資訊- 跨部門合作模式分析」報告發表會,洪貞玲、羅世宏、胡元輝等,優質新聞發展協會,2021年5月6日,地點:臺北文創。\n\n貳、外文文獻\n一、法規\nCommunications Decency Act,ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION,https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230 、https://www.eff.org/issues/cda230/legal (last visited:2021/04/14)\nCountering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act ,https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/3274 ( last visited:2019/03/10)\nHonest Ads Act, https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate- bill/1989/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22Honest+Ads+act%22%5D%7D&r=1 (last visited:2021/10/11)\nNetwork Enforcement Law, https://germanlawarchive.iuscomp.org/?p=1245 (last visited:2021/10/11)\nThe Digital Services Act:ensuring a safe and accountable online environment , https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/digital-services-act-ensuring-safe-and-accountable-onLINE-environment_en (last visited:2021/5/15)\n二、網路資料\nA short guide to the history of ’fake news’and disinformation,https://www.icfj.org/sites/default/files/2018-07/A%20Short%20Guide%20to%20History%20of%20Fake%20News%20and%20Disinformation_ICFJ%20Final.pdf (last visited:2021/10/11)\nDavid Buckingham,Fake news:is media literacy the answer? https://davidbuckingham.net/2017/01/12/fake-news-is-media-literacy-the-answer/ (last visited:2021/10/11)European Commission, Code of Practice on Disinformation, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/code-practice-disinformation (last visited:2021/10/11)\nEuropean Commission, A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation:Report of the High-Level Expert Group on Fake news and Disinformation, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/final-report-high-level-expert-group-fake-news-and-onLINE-disinformation (last visited:2021/10/11)\nEuropean Commission, Action Plan against Disinformation, https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/action_plan_against_disinformation.pdf (last visited:2021/10/11)\nEuropean Commission, Code of Practice on Disinformation, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/code-practice-disinformation (last visited:2021/10/11)\nEuropean Commission, Public Consultation on Fake News and Online Disinformation, https://ec.europa.eu/info/consultations/public-consultation-fake-news-and-online-disinformation_en (last visited:2021/10/11)\nEdson C.Tandoc Jr.,Zheng Wei Lin & Richarde Ling,Defining “Fake News”, digital journalism, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143?scroll=top&needAccess=true (last visited:2021/10/11)\nHouse of Commons, Digital,Culture,Media & Sport Committee,Disinformation and ‘fake news’: Final Report,Eighth Report of Session 2017–19 https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/1791.pdf (visited:2021/10/11)\nJournalism, `Fake News` and Disinformation: A Handbook for Journalism Education and Training ,UNESCO Series on Journalism Education,https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/journalism_fake_news_disinformation_print_friendly_0_0.pdf (last visited:2021/10/11)\nMelissa Zimdars¸False, Misleading, Clickbait-y, and Satirical “News” Sources ,https://docs.google.com/document/d/10eA5-mCZLSS4MQY5QGb5ewC3VAL6pLkT53V_81ZyitM/preview (last visited:2021/10/11)\nUN/OSCE (2017). Joint Declaration on Freedom of Expression and “Fake News”, Disinformation, Propaganda . https://www.osce.org/fom/302796?download=true (last visited:2021/10/11)\nU.S.Department of State,Engagement Center,https://www.state.gov/r/gec/ (last visited:2021/10/11)
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
法學院碩士在職專班
103961014
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103961014
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
101401.pdf2.75 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.