Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137723
題名: 美中於東南亞的競逐戰略:權力轉移重現或反轉
Strategizing US-China Competition in Southeast Asia: Power Transition Revisited or Reversed?
作者: 張喁
Chang, Yu
貢獻者: 楊昊
Yang, Hao
張喁
Chang, Yu
關鍵詞: 權力轉移
重返亞洲
印太戰略
一帶一路
Power transition
Pivot to Asia
Indo-Pacific Strategy
BRI
日期: 2021
上傳時間: 1-Nov-2021
摘要: 冷戰結束以來,世界形成單一超強的穩定階層體系。然而美國的相對衰退以及中國崛起成為其主要挑戰者,帶來另一個冷戰的隱憂。隨著川普上任後對中貿易戰如火如荼的開展,全球不再平靜,二戰後未見的衝突規模隱然若現。就權力平衡的觀點,強權間的均勢帶來國際體系的穩定,然而權力轉移論卻認為此刻若一國對另一國或現狀不滿意,發動戰爭的可能性便會遽增。於此美中對立節節升高之際,本文分析二國於東南亞的戰略、實際作為、與各國的反應,研究權力轉移是否已然重現,或是原有霸權得以反轉該趨勢。
For the past three decades, the world is dominated by a stable hierarchy with only one superpower, i.e., the US. However, the relative decline of the US and the rise of China as America’s leading competitor, however, appear to shadow globe with the concern of another cold war. The trade war given rise to by the Trump government against China is now going on like a raging fire. As the Khmer proverb goes, “When elephants fight, the ants perish.” The whole world is unrestful with the two major powers “communicating” violently. At the beginning of year 2018, The Economist published a cover story titled, “The Next War: The Growing Danger of Great Power Conflict”, which detailed how shifts in technology and geopolitics are bringing the threat of great-power conflict back. In this view, “conflict on a scale and intensity not seen since the Second World War is once again plausible.”\n\nOf the scope of Balance of Power, the international system leans to peace when the power of major players converges to equivalence. While borrowing the lens of Power Transition Theory to look into the competition between the two great powers, China and the US, when one state’s power approaches that of another state and dissatisfaction level is high, the risk of initiating a war soars. As the confrontation between is escalating, the paper is to look into primary official documents as well as secondary data supplemented with the study of the practice of both sides in Southeast Asia and analyze whether power transition has revisited this era or the current dominant power can reverse the shift of power.
參考文獻: [Book / Journal]\n"Peace and Development Are the Two Outstanding Issues in the World Today", Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping (1982–1992), vol. 3 (Beijing: Renmin Press, )2001, pp. 105, 127, 344, 383.\nAllison, Graham. “Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides`s Trap?”. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2017.\nBenvenuti, Andrea. "The International Relations of East Asia from a Historical Perspective." Security and Conflict in East Asia, (2015), 15-23. p.16.\nCastro, Renato Cruz De. "The Obama Administrations Strategic Rebalancing to Asia:Quo Vadisin 2017?" Pacific Focus 33, no. 2 (2018): 179-208.\nChan, Steve. "Exploring Puzzles in Power-Transition Theory: Implications for Sino-American Relations," Security Studies 13, No. 3, (2004): 103-141.\nChan, Steve. China, the US, and the Power-Transition Theory: A Critique, (London: Routledge):2008.\nCook, Alistair D. B. "Globalization and East and South-East Asia." East and South-East Asia, (2013), 181-90., pp.181-184.\nDanilovic, Vesna. "Balance of Power and Power Shifts: Global Interests at Stake, in When the Stakes Are High: Deterrence and Conflict among Major Powers" (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor): 2003.\nDe Soysa, I., J. R. O’Neal and D. Lalman. "Testing Power Transition Theory Using Alternative Measures of National Capabilities, "The Journal of Conflict Resolution 41, No. 4, (1997): 509-528.\nFriedberg, Aaron L. "The Future of US-China Relations: Is Conflict Inevitable? "International Security 30, 2, 2005: 7-45.\nFriedman, Edward. "How Economic Superpower China Could Transform Africa, " Journal of Chinese Political Science 14, No. 1, (2008): 1-20.\nFrom Political/Security Concerns to Regional Economic Integration." The 3rd ASEAN Reader, (2015), 17-22.\nGilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.\nGlaser, Bonnie S and Medeiros Evan S. "The Changing Ecology of Foreign Policy-Making in China: The Ascension and Demise of the Theory of ‘Peaceful Rise, " The China Quarterly 190, 2007: 291-310.\nGlaser, Charles. "Will China`s Rise Lead to War? Why Realism Does Not Mean Pessimism? " Foreign Affairs, 2011\nGoldstein, Avery. "Power Transitions, Institutions, and China’s Rise in East Asia: Theoretical Expectations and Evidence, " The Journal of Strategic Studies 30, No. 4-5, (October 2007): 639-682.\nGross, Donald. The China Fallacy: How the U.S. Can Benefit from Chinas Rise and Avoid Another Cold War. New York: Bloomsbury, 2013.\nHanre, John. "Tail of the Ox or Head of the Rooster" Chinese Security 4, No. 2, 2008.\nHanif, Sobia, and Muhammad Khan. "US Security Strategy for Asia Pacific and India’s Role." Strategic Studies 38, no. 1 (2018): 1-20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48539119.\nHong, Zhao. "China–Myanmar Energy Cooperation and Its Regional Implications." Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 30, no. 4 (2011): 89-109.\nHsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael, and L.c. Russell Hsiao. "After the Strongmen." Democracy or Alternative Political Systems in Asia, (2014): 3-17.\nKugler, Jacek, and Douglas Lemke. Parity and War: Evaluations and Extensions of The War Ledger. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2011.\nKugler, Jacek, and Kenneth Organski. The Power Transition: A Retrospective and Prospective Evaluation, in Handbook of War Studies I, ed. Manus Midlarsky, (Routledge: New York): 1989.\nLebow, Richard Ned and Benjamin Valentino. "Lost in Transition: A Critical Analysis of Power Transition Theory, " International Relations 23, (2009): 389-410.\nLegro, Jeffrey W. "What China will Want: The Future Intentions of a Rising Power, " Perspectives on Politics 53, (2007): 515-534.\nLemke, Douglas. "Regions of War and Peace". Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2002.\nLemke, Douglas. "The Continuation of History: Power Transition Theory and the End of the Cold War, " Journal of Peace Research 34, No. 1 (February, 1997): 23-36.\nLi, Mingjiang. Chinas Economic Statecraft: Co-optation, Cooperation and Coercion. New Jersey: World Scientific (2017): 139-166;\nMa, Lirong. "China’s Cultural and Public Diplomacy to Countries in the Middle East, "Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies 4, No. 2, (2010): 32-43.\nMearsheimer, John. "China’s Unpeaceful Rise, " Current History 105, 2006.\nMedeiros, Evan S. "Reluctant Restraint: The Evolution of China’s Nonproliferation Policies and Practices, 1980-2004", (Stanford University Press): 2007.\nMesquita, Bruce Bueno De. "Pride of Place: The Origins of German Hegemony." World Politics 43, no. 1 1990: 28-52.\nModelski, George. "Long Cycles in World Politics", (Seattle: University of Washington Press): 1987.\nMorgenthau, Hans. "Politics among Nations". New York, NY: Knopf, 1948.\nNeuman, W. Lawrence. “Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches”, Fifth edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2003.\nOlimat, Muhamad S. "The Political Economy of the Sino-Middle Eastern Relations, " Journal of Chinese Political Science/Association of Chinese Political Studies 15, (2008): 307–335.\nOrganski, Kenneth and Jacek Kugler. "The War Ledger". (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago): 1980.\nOrganski, Kenneth. "World Politics", (Alfred A. Knopf, New York): 1958.\nShao, Binhong. The World in 2020 According to China: Chinese Foreign Policy Elites Discuss Emerging Trends in International Politics. Leiden: Brill, 2014., pp.129-136.\nSheehan, Michael. "Balance of Power: History and theory". New York, NY: Routledge, 1996.\nTammen, Ronald, L. et all. "Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century" (NY: Chatham House Publishers of Seven Bridges Press):2000.\nWaldron, Arthur. "The rise of China: Military and Political Implications, " Review of International Studies 31, 2005: 715-733.\nWallerstein, Immanuel. "The Modern World System: Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World Economy, " (Now York: Academic Press): 1980.\nWaltz, Kenneth N. "Man, State, and War. " New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 1954.\nWendt, Alexander. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: University Press, 1999.\nXia, Liping. "China: A Responsible Great Power, " Journal of Contemporary China 10, No. 26, (2001): 17-25.\nYan Xuetong, "From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving for Achievement, " The Chinese Journal of International Politics, Volume 7, Issue 2, 2014:153-184.\nYee, Herbert S. Chinas Rise Threat or Opportunity? London: Routledge, 2011.\nZhu, Zhiqun. US-China Relations in the 21st Century: Power Transition and Peace. Routledge, London, 2006.\n杜哲元,徐進,反思中國外交政策研究中的思維定勢,國際政治科學,2014(3)。https://e.jd.com/30522648.html\n張蘊嶺,“中國的周邊區域觀回歸與新秩序構建” ,世界經濟與政治,2015(1)。\n\n\n \n[Newspaper / Report / Online Resource / Other ]\n"Barack Obama Says Asia-Pacific Is `top US Priority`." BBC News. November 17, 2011. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-15715446.\n"China, Russia Block UN Security Council Condemnation of ..." https://www.france24.com/en/americas/20210203-china-russia-block-un-security-council-condemnation-of-myanmar-coup.\n"Engaging Southeast Asia: Economic Recommendations for the New Administration.", Center for Strategic and International Studies. July 31, 2020. https://www.csis.org/analysis/engaging-southeast-asia-economic-recommendations-new-administration.\n"Is Chinas Non-interference Policy Sustainable? - BBC News." https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-24100629.\n"Joint China-Myanmar Statement”, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, 18 January 2020. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/web/zyxw/t1733683.shtml\n"Myanmar Coup: China Blocks UN Condemnation as Protest Grows." BBC News. February 03, 2021. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-55913947.\n"Myanmar to Receive Revenues from China-Myanmar Crude Oil Pipeline." The Myanmar Times. July 27, 2017. https://www.mmtimes.com/business/26982-myanmar-to-receive-revenues-from-china-myanmar-crude-oil-pipeline.html\n"The Elements of the China Challenge - State." https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/20-02832-Elements-of-China-Challenge-508.pdf.\n"The Growing Danger of Great-power Conflict." The Economist. https://www.economist.com/leaders/2018/01/25/the-growing-danger-of-great-power-conflict.\n"The next War: The Growing Danger of Great-power Conflict. Jan 27th 2018." The Economist. https://www.economist.com/weeklyedition/2018-01-27.\n"Trump denounces Korea-US FTA as `job-killing` deal". Korea Times. July 22, 2016. http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2016/07/120_210039.html\n"TWQ: Shaping the Choices of a Rising China: Recent Lessons for the Obama Administration - Summer 2009." Center for Strategic and International Studies.\n"US, South Korea Sign Sweeping Free-trade Agreement." Taipei Times. December 04, 2010.\nhttp://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2010/12/05/2003490144.\n“ Malaysia in China’s Belt and Road” , The Diplomat, November 23, 2020, https://thediplomat.com/2020/11/malaysia-in-chinas-belt-and-road/\n“China, Malaysia restart massive `Belt and Road` project after hiccups”, Reuters, July 25, 2019, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-silkroad-malaysia-idUSKCN1UK0DG\n“East Coast Rail Link (ECRL) Project, Malaysia”, Railway Technology, https://www.railway-technology.com/projects/east-coast-rail-link-ecrl-project/\n“ECRL completes 871m tunnel breakthrough in Dungun Terengganu”, NEW STRAITS TIMES, June 2, 2021, https://www.nst.com.my/business/2021/06/695286/ecrl-completes-871m-tunnel-breakthrough-dungun%C2%A0terengganu\n“ECRL facing new risk from Thai landbridge plan”, The Star, Jun 13, 2021, httns://www.thestar.com.mv/news/focus/2021 /0611/ecrl-facin-new-risk-from-thai -landhrid"\n“ECRL goes back to original alignment, will now cost RM50b” , The Edge Markets, April 05, 2021, https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/ecrl-reverts-original-alignment-cost-rm50b-says-transport-ministry\n“Malaysia in China’s Belt and Road”,, THE DIPLOMAT, November 23, 2020, https://thediplomat.com/2020/11/malaysia-in-chinas-belt-and-road/\n“Malaysia, China Restart OBOR-linked Railway Project after Yearlong Suspension” , Radio Free Asia, July 25, 2019, https://www.rfa.org/english/news/china/malaysia-obor-07252019152243.html\n“Malaysia’s East Coast Rail Link” , The Borgen Project, January 5, 2021, https://borgenproject.org/east-coast-rail-link/\n“Mitigating the Environmental Impacts of the East Coast Rail Link” , Clean Malaysia, March 2, 2018, https://cleanmalaysia.com/2018/03/02/mitigating-environmental-impacts-east-coast-rail-link/\n“Thailand Mulls Replacing $28bn Kra Canal Idea with a Railway”, https://www.globalconstructionreview.com/news/thailand-mulls-replacing-28bn- kra-canal-idea-railw/\nAmerican Department of Defense. Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense, 2012.\nAnkit, Panda. “U.S. Japan, India, and Australia Hold Working—Level Quadrilateral Meeting on Regional Cooperation”. The Diplomat, 13 November 2017.\nAsian Trade Center 2017, `One Belt, One Road: Opportunities And Risks For Singapore (Part 1)`, Asian Trade Center, blog post, 2 October, viewed 13 June 2021, http://asiantradecentre.org/talkingtrade//one-belt-one-road-opportunities-and-risks-fo r-singapore-part-1\nBa, A.D. 2019, `China`s "Belt and Road" in Southeast Asia: Constructing the Strategic Narrative in Singapore`, Asian Perspective, March, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 249-272.\nBangkok Post, “Controversial Thai Canal Back in Spotlight”, https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/2001843/controversial-thai-canal-back- in-spotlight\nBertil Lintner, “Myanmar a perfect fit on China’s Belt and Road”, ASIA TIMES, https://asiatimes.com/2020/01/myanmar-a-perfect-fit-on-chinas-belt-and-road/\nBethany Allen-Ebrahimian, Zach Dorfman of the Aspen Institute. "Newly Declassified Report Lays out U.S. Strategy in Asia." Axios. January 12, 2021. https://www.axios.com/indo-pacific-strategy-trump-administration-china-377b965c-6cf8-4299-a230-c0e869bb4d73.html.\nBishop, Hon Julie. “Minister for Foreign Affairs, ASEAN: The Nexus of the Indo-Pacific”. Asia Society Speech, New York, 8 March 2018. https://foreignminister.gov.au/speeches/Pages/2018/jb_sp_180308.aspx.\nBush, Richard C. "The Response of China`s Neighbors to the U.S. "Pivot" to Asia." Brookings. July 29, 2016. https://www.brookings.edu/on-the-record/the-response-of-chinas-neighbors-to-the-u-s-pivot-to-asia/.\nBush, Richard C. "The Response of China`s Neighbors to the U.S. "Pivot" to Asia." Brookings. July 29, 2016.\nCanal", https://pugnatorius.com/thailand-canal/\nChan, I 2019, `Reversing China’s Belt-and-Road Initiative—Singapore’s Response to the BRI and Its Quest for Relevance`, East Asia : An International Quarterly, September, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 185-204.\nChang, Frank. "Who Defines the International Community? " The Diplomat, (2012).\nChen, Dingding. "Chinese Foreign Policy Needs Major Reform." – The Diplomat. August 21, 2014. https://thediplomat.com/2014/08/chinese-foreign-policy-needs-major-reform/.\nChen, Yali. The “Rebalancing” Strategy of the United States: A Realistic Assessment and China’s Response. World Economics and Politics 11: 68–69, 2012.\nChris Devonshire-Ellis, “Belt And Road Projects In Myanmar Likely To Progress In Light Of Military Coup”, SILK ROD BRIEFING, (accessed 14 June 2021). https://www.silkroadbriefing.com/news/2021/02/02/belt-and-road-projects-in- myanmar-likely-to-progress-in-light-of-military-coup/\nClinton, Hillary. "America`s Pacific Century." Foreign Policy. January 01, 4983. https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/.\nClinton, Hillary. "America`s Pacific Century." Foreign Policy. October 11, 2011.\nhttps://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/\nDavis, Julie Hirschfeld. "Obama Pledges to Lift All Sanctions Against Myanmar." The New York Times. September 14, 2016.\nhttps://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/15/world/asia/myanmar-obama.html\nElliot Silverberg and Matthew Sullivan for The Diplomat. "Assessing Trump`s Indo-Pacific Strategy, 2 Years In." – The Diplomat. October 02, 2019.\nhttps://thediplomat.com/2019/10/assessing-trumps-indo-pacific-strategy-2-years-in/.\nEmont, Jon, and Myo Myo. "Chinese-Funded Port Gives Myanmar a Sinking Feeling." The Wall Street Journal. August 15, 2018. https://www.wsj.com/articles/chinese-funded-port-gives-myanmar-a-sinking-feeling-1534325404\nEvan, Laksmana. “An Indo-Pacific Construct with ‘Indonesian Characteristics’”, 6 February 2018.\nhttps://www.aspistrategist.org.au/indo-pacific-construct-indonesian-characteristics/.\nGao, Charlotte. "`A Community of Shared Future`: One Short Phrase for UN, One Big Victory for China?" The Diplomat. November 06, 2017. https://thediplomat.com/2017/11/a-community-of-shared-future-one-short-phrase-for-un-one-big-victory-for-china/\nGene Ryack, “A Hitch in the Belt and Road in Myanmar”, THE DIPLOMAT https://thediplomat.com/2020/12/a-hitch-in-the-belt-and-road-in-myanmar/\nGeopolitical Monitor, "From Bangkok to Nong Khai: China`s Thai Railway Vision Edges Forward", https://www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/from-bangkok-to-nong-khai-chinas-thai- railway-vision-edges-forward/\nGlobal Times, "China, Thailand Sign Agreement on High-speed Rail Line, Set to Open in 2026”, https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202103/1219753.shtml\nHang-Sun, Choe; Perlez, Jane. "North Korea Tests a Nuclear Device, South Says". The New York Times. September 8, 2016\nHillary, Clinton. “Remarks on Regional Architecture in Asia: Principles and Priorities”. Hawaii, 12 January 2010.\nhttp://www.state.gov/secretary/20092013clinton/rm/2010/01/135090.htm.\nHuisken, Ron. Civilizing the Anarchical Society: Multilateral Security Processes in the Asia-Pacific. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 24(2), 187–202, 2002.\nJenn-Jaw Soong, and Khac Nghia Nguyen, “China’s OBOR Initiative and Vietnam’s Political Economy: Economic Integration with Political Conflict”, The Chinese Economy, vol51, 2018, pp342-355.\nJin, Canrong. The Concept of “Indo-Pacific” Is Like a Bubble, Gone with the Sun. Global Times, November 22, 2017.\nJoseph S. Nye. "The Kindleberger Trap." Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/kindleberger-trap.\nKit, ST 2019, `Singapore, China sign 5 deals to boost cooperation in economy, customs operations`, CNA Insider , 29 April, viewed 9 June 2021, https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/singapore-china-sign-5-deals-to-b oost-cooperation-in-economy-11487764\nKotra 2017, ‘Singapore-China strengthens OBOR and RCEP cooperation’, Kotra, viewed 13 June 2017, https://news.kotra.or.kr/user/globalAllBbs/kotranews/album/2/globalBbsDataAllVie w.do?dataIdx=159282&searchNationCd=101081\nKrishnan, R 2017, `One Belt One Road – Opportunities and Risks for Singapore`, Linkedin, blog post, 19 September, viewed 11 June 2021, https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/one-belt-road-opportunities-risks-singapore-raymon-krishnan\nKyaw Ye Lynn, “Myanmar wary of China`s Belt and Road investments”, Anadolu Agency, (accessed 14 June 2021). https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/myanmar-wary-of-chinas-belt-and-road- investments/1950686\nLe Hong Hiep, “The Belt and Road Initiative in Vietnam: Challenges and Prospects”, ISEAS Perspective, vol18, 2018, pp1-7.\nLeow, E 2017, `Singapore set to benefit from China’s One Belt One Road`, NexiaInternational , viewed 9 June 2021, https://nexia.com/insights/global-insight/singapore-set-to-benefit-from-china-s-one- belt-one-road/\nLi Anfang: From “Asia-Pacific” to “Indo-Pacific”, Which Four Sticker Does the United States Lack of for Its “Strategic Flickering?\nhttp://www.shobserver.com/news/detail?id=71243.\nLieberthal, Kenneth G. "The American Pivot to Asia." Brookings. July 28, 2016. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-american-pivot-to-asia/.\nLim, J n.d, `The canal that will sink S`pore`s maritime-trade dominance is one step closer to fruition`, mothership, 18 May, viewed 20 June 2021, https://mothership.sg/2015/05/the-canal-that-will-sink-spores-maritime-trade-domin ance-is-one-step-closer-to-fruition/\nLin, Minwang. The Construction of “Indo-Pacific” and the Tension of Asian Geopolitics. Diplomatic Review 1:18, 2018.\nLinda Calabrese and Yue Cao, “Managing the Belt and Road: Agency and development in Cambodia and Myanmar”, World Development, Volume 141, May 2021\nMakinen, Julie. "Obama hosts ASEAN summit, a first in the U.S." LA Times. February 15, 2016.\nMedcalf, Rory. Unselfish Giants? Understanding China and India as Security Providers. Australian Journal of International Affairs 66 (1): 1–13, 2012.\nMinistry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. “Japan-ASEAN Friendship and Cooperation: Shared Vision, Shared Identity, Shared Future”, p. 5, 2 April 2015.\nhttp://www.asean.emb-japan.go.jp/documents/20150402%20pamphlet.pdf.\nMohan, C. Raja. "Samudra Manthan: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Indo-Pacific." Contemporary Southeast Asia 36, no. 1 (2014): 165.\nNakamura, David, and Dan Lamothe. "China Testing Obama as It Expands Its Influence in Southeast Asia." The Washington Post. March 01, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/china-testing-obama-as-it-expands-its-influence-in-southeast-asia/2016/03/01/d60e1248-dbdf-11e5-891a-4ed04f4213e8_story.html.\nNakamura, David. "An incomplete victory lap for Obama on his final presidential trip to Asia". The Washington Post. September 8, 2016.\nNews – GCR, "China-Thailand High-speed Railway Sees Entire Phase One Contract Signed", https://www.globalconstructionreview.com/news/china-thailand-high-speed- railway-sees-entire-phas/\nParameswaran, Prashanth. "ASEAN`s Role in Japan`s Indo-Pacific Strategy." The Diplomat. February 13, 2018.\nhttps://thediplomat.com/2018/02/aseans-role-in-japans-indo-pacific-strategy/.\nPrakash, Panneerselvam. 2016. “Advancing India’s Relationship with Japan and South Korea: Quest for Middle Power Cooperation”. IPCS Issue Brief 262, August 2016.\nPUGNATORIUS Ltd. | International Lawyers, "Seven Advantages of the Thai\nQi, Huaigao. “Some Ideas about the Leadership Model for Regional Cooperation in the East Asia: The Leadership Model of the China-US-Japan Cooperation under the ASEAN Mechanism”. Southeast Asian Studies (4):55–59, 2011.\nSeth, S 2020, `One Belt One Road (OBOR)`, Investopedia, viewed 9 June 2021, https://www.investopedia.com/terms/o/one-belt-one-road-obor.asp\nShi, Tianyi. “Regional Risks and the Offsetting Strategy of ASEAN Countries”, World Economics and Politics (5), 2016.\nSouth China Morning Post, "How a Thai Railway Could Fast-track China`s Interests in Southeast Asia", https://www.scmp.com/news/china/diplomacy/article/3105375/how-thai-railway- could-fast-track-chinas-interests-southeast.\nStephen Chin, “BRI debt trap: An unintended consequence?”, THE ASEAN POST https://theaseanpost.com/article/bri-debt-trap-unintended-consequence\nStorey, Ian, and Malcolm Cook. “The Trump Administration and Southeast Asia: Enhanced Engagement”. Yusof Ishak Institute, No. 87, 2017.\nTaylor, Melissa Conley. “Differences between Australia and India on the Understanding of Indo-Pacific”. Indian Ocean Economies Research 1: 138. 2014.\nTeon, Aris. "Chinese Diplomat Gives Middle Finger to China`s "Enemies"." The Greater China Journal. June 25, 2021. https://china-journal.org/2021/06/25/chinese-diplomat-gives-middle-finger-to-chinas-enemies/.\nThe ASEAN Post Team, “Is The BRI A Corruption Magnet?”, The ASEAN Post, https://theaseanpost.com/article/bri-corruption-magnet\nTrump Has Issued Three Hit Reports and Stepped up the Implementation of the “Indo-Pacific” Strategy, China Youth Daily, February 24, 2018\nhttp://news.ifeng.com/a/20180224/56231054_0.shtml.\nWallis, Joanne, Sujan R. Chinoy, Natalie Sambhi, and Jeffrey Reeves. "A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Strengths, Weaknesses, and Opportunities for Engagement." Asia Policy 27, no. 4 (2020): 1-6.\nWalt, Stephen. "China’s New Strategy, " Foreign Policy Magazine, April 2010.\nWang, Mingguo. “Validity Assessment of the Governance Mechanism in East Asia Region and Future Development”, The Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies (4), 2014.\nWang,Yuzhu. “The RCEP Initiative and ASEAN’s ‘Central Position”. International Studies (5):53, 2013.\nWei, DT 2019, `Singapore, China ink deals on trade, Belt and Road projects`, The Straits Times, 30 April, viewed 8 June 2021, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/singapore-china-ink-deals-on-trade-belt- and-road-projects\nWei, Zongyou. Strategic Adjustment of the US in India and the Influence of Geostrategy. World Economics and Politics 10, 2013.\nWheeler, A 2019, `Belt & Road`s threat to Singapore`, JOC.com, 13 May, viewed 11June 2021, https://www.joc.com/port-news/asian-ports/port-singapore/belt-roads-threat-singapor e_20190513.html\nWu, Zhaoli. “Origin of the Indo-Pacific Strategy and Multi-nation Strategic Playing”. Pacific Journal (1), 2014.\nXia, Liping. The US “Indo-Pacific” Strategy from the Perspective of Geopolitics and Geo-Economics. American Studies 2, 2015.\nYap, S 2018, `Risk & Opportunities: Singapore’s role in China’s Belt & Road`, Medium, blog post, 27 June, viewed 11 June 2021, https://medium.com/venture-views/risk-opportunities-singapores-role-in-china-s-bri- ff6377d035b7\nZhao,Minghao. The United States “Indo-Pacific” Strategy: Old Wine in Old Bottles? Beijing News, November 20, 2017.\n張雅君,「中國東協自由貿易區對中越關係的影響」,遠景基金會季刊第十八卷,第二期,2017,頁 45-96。
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
亞太研究英語博士學位學程(IDAS)
992655051
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0992655051
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
505101.pdf5.44 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.