桃園市國民中學校長空間領導、學校組織健康與教師幸福感關係之研究

Abstract

本研究旨在瞭解桃園市國民中學校長空間領導、學校組織健康與教師幸福感之現況，分析不同背景變項之教師在校長空間領導、學校組織健康與教師幸福感之差異與相關情形，探究校長空間領導與學校組織健康對教師幸福感之預測力，並建構此三者之結構方程模式及驗證學校組織健康之中介效果。研究採用問卷調查法，抽樣桃園市30所國民中學，共700位教師進行問卷調查，回收621份問卷，有效問卷569份，可用率為81.3%。資料處理以描述性統計、t檢定、變異數分析、相關分析、多元迴歸分析以及結構方程模式進行統計與分析，本研究獲致結論如下：\n一、國中教師知覺校長空間領導、學校組織健康與教師幸福感各層面皆達中上程度，以「融入課程教學」、「教師凝聚力」以及「正向情緒」層\n面的表現最突出。\n二、教師知覺校長空間領導的程度因「性別」、「服務年資」、「擔任職\n務」、「學校規模」、「學校地區」以及「校長到校年資」之不同而\n有顯著差異。\n三、教師知覺學校組織健康的程度因「性別」、「服務年資」、「擔任職\n務」、「學校規模」及「校長性別」之不同而有顯著差異。\n四、教師知覺幸福感程度因「性別」、「服務年資」、「擔任職務」及「校長性別」之不同而有顯著差異。\n五、校長空間領導、學校組織健康與教師幸福感三者間具有正相關。\n六、校長空間領導及學校組織健康對教師幸福感具有正向預測力。\n七、校長空間領導、學校組織健康與教師幸福感結構方程模式之適配度良\n好，可詮釋各變項間之關係。\n八、校長空間領導經由學校組織健康的中介效果，正向影響教師幸福感。\n最後，依據研究結論提出相關建言，提供實務應用與未來研究之參考。

This study aims to investigate the current conditions of principals’ space leadership, school health, and teachers’ well-being of public junior high schools in Taoyuan city, and analyzes the different background variable of principals’ space leadership, school health, and teachers’ well-being. The study included the difference analysis, correlation analysis, regression analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). Further verify the mediating effect of school health.\nThis study conducted a questionnaire survey on 700 teachers from 30 public junior high schools in Taoyuan city, and 621 questionnaires were collected. After eliminating the invalid questionnaire, the total number of valid questionnaire was 569, and the effective questionnaire recovery rate was 81.3%. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, multiple regression analysis, and structural equation modeling (SEM). The conclusions are as follows：\n1. Taoyuan city junior school`s principal space leadership,\nschool health, and teachers’ well-being to reach the\nupper-middle level, and the performance is most prominent\non the levels of “integration into curriculum teaching”,\n“teacher cohesion” and “positive emotions”.\n2. The junior high school teachers of different in “sex”,\n“total service years”, “positions”, “scale of the\nschool”, “location of the school”, and “principals`\nservice years of the school” show significant differences\nin teachers’ perception of principals` space leadership.\n3. The junior high school teachers of different in “sex”,\n“total service years”, “positions”, “scale of the\nschool”, and “principal`s sex” show significant\ndifferences in teachers’ perception of school health.\n4. The junior high school teachers of different in “sex”,\n“total service years”, “positions”, and “principal`s sex”\nshow significant differences in teachers’ perception of\nwell-being.\n5. There are positive correlation among the principal’s\nspace leadership, school health, and teachers’ well-\nbeing.\n6. Principals` space leadership and school health have a\npositive predictive power for teachers’ well-being.\n7. The principals’ space leadership, school health and\nteachers’ well-being model fit well in SEM, which can\ninterpret the relationship between various variables.\n8. The principals’ space leadership has positive effect on\nteachers’ well-being through the mediation effect of\nschool health.\nAccording to the findings and conclusions given above,\nsome suggestions are provided for practical applications\nand future research.