Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137855
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor政治大學哲學學報
dc.creator李國揚
dc.creatorLee, Kok Yong
dc.date2021-01
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-17T08:18:18Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-17T08:18:18Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-17T08:18:18Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/137855-
dc.description.abstract筆者在〈論Gettier式思想實驗的兩難〉一文中主張,對Gettier式思想實驗持傳統觀點的哲學家,會面臨一個兩難。本文的目的在於解消這個兩難。更精確地說,這個兩難的一個核心主張是,Gettier式思想實驗可以作為知識理論的反例,只有當「必然論」(necessitism)是不成立的。本文提出一個嶄新的論證,替必然論回應上述的批評。
dc.description.abstractIn "On a Dilemma of the Gettier-style thought experiments", I argue that the traditional view on the Gettier-style thought experiments will give rise to a dilemma. This paper aims at dissolving this dilemma. More exactly, the crux of a horn of the dilemma consists in denying a view called "necessitism". In this paper, I offer a novel argument defending necessitism.
dc.format.extent669381 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.relation政治大學哲學學報, 45, 163-193
dc.subject思想實驗  ;  Gettier問題  ;  Gettier式思想實驗的兩難  ;  兩難 
dc.subject thought experiment  ;  Gettier problem  ;  dilemma of the Gettier-style thought experiment  ;  dilemma
dc.titleGettier式思想實驗兩難之解消方案
dc.titleResolving the Dilemma of the Gettier-Style Thought Experiments
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doi10.30393/TNCUP.202101_(45).0005
dc.doi.urihttps://doi.org/10.30393/TNCUP.202101_(45).0005
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
164.pdf653.69 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.