Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138381


Title: 我國大學臺灣史研究所博碩士論文引用檔案之研究
A Study of Archives Cited on the Dissertations and Thesis of Graduate Institute of Taiwan History in Taiwan
Authors: 廖本新
Liao, Ben-Hsin
Contributors: 薛理桂
Hsueh, Li-Kuei
廖本新
Liao, Ben-Hsin
Keywords: 臺灣史
博碩士論文
引用文獻分析
引用檔案分析
Taiwan History
Dissertations and Thesis
Citation Analysis
Cited Archives Analysis
Date: 2021
Issue Date: 2022-01-03 16:09:11 (UTC+8)
Abstract:   本研究旨在分析我國大學臺灣史研究所於成立至今所產出之博碩士論文,針對其引用文獻進行研究。樣本數共計有15篇博士論文以及236篇碩士論文,合計38,140筆引用文獻。以檢視其書目資料概況、分析其引用文獻特性,並著重於觀察其引用檔案之特性,期待能協助檔案典藏機構進行徵集、參考服務、擬定館藏政策等工作。

  本研究之主要貢獻為,以量化方式回顧臺灣史論文引用檔案的趨勢,並將檔案類型予以區分觀察;更將論文之研究斷代與研究主題分門別類,並分別觀察其引用檔案之特色;亦檢視引用檔案之語文類型以及館藏來源。同時,本研究利用統計檢定的方式,確保研究結果具備推論統計上的嚴謹性。此外,本研究回顧了國內外對於引用檔案之相關研究,與本研究之研究成果進行比較與討論。

  具體之研究結果簡短摘錄如下:(一)43.8%的博碩士論文有引用檔案;56.2%的博碩士論文未引用檔案;(二)總體博碩士論文所引用檔案的平均筆數,沒有顯著地逐漸增加或減少;(三)有引用檔案之博碩士論文,所引用檔案的平均筆數有逐漸減少的趨勢;(四)以戰後史為研究時期的論文引用較多檔案;(五)以政治史、經濟史為研究主題的論文引用較多檔案;(六)論文之引用檔案類型以官方檔案為主;(七)研究戰後史之論文相對常引用民間檔案;研究清代史與日治史之論文相對常引用個人與家族檔案;(八)經濟、政治、社會史相關主題以引用官方檔案為主;文化史則偏重民間與個人家族檔案;(九)引用檔案之語言以中文為主,但日文也佔相當比例;(十)引用檔案較多來自於國內檔案館,並以國史館臺灣文獻館、中央研究院近代史研究所、國家發展委員會檔案管理局最多。並依據研究結果提出六項建議。
  The purpose of this study is to analyze the dissertations and thesis for doctoral and master’s degrees produced by the Institute of Taiwan History in our university since its establishment and research their cited documents. There are a total of 15 doctoral dissertations and 236 master's theses in the sample, with a total of 38,140 citations. In order to review the overview of its bibliographic materials, analyze the characteristics of its cited documents, and focus on observing the characteristics of its cited archives, it is expected to assist the archival collection agency in soliciting, reference services, and drawing up collection policies.

  The main contribution of this research is to review the trend of citing archives in Taiwan history thesis in a quantitative way, and to distinguish and observe the types of archives; also to classify the chronology and research topics of the thesis, and observe the characteristics of cited archives respectively; also review the language type of cited archives and the source of the collection. At the same time, this study uses statistical verification methods to ensure that the results of the study are statistically rigorous in inference. In addition, this paper reviews domestic and foreign-related research on cited archives and compares it with the results of this study.
Reference: 參考文獻

王泰升(2011)。數位化歷史資料庫與歷史研究,以明清檔案、淡新檔案、日治法院檔案等資料庫為例。在項潔(編),從保存到創造:開啟數位人文研究(頁31-50)。台北市:臺大出版中心。
王晴佳(1999)。臺灣史學的“變”與“不變”:1949~1999年。臺大歷史學報,(24),329-374。
王麗蕉(2014)。檔案館使用者資訊行為及其情境脈絡之探索(博士論文)。檢自華藝線上圖書館。
王麗蕉(2015)。數位人文系統的建置與加值應用:以臺灣日記知識庫為探討中心。漢學研究通訊,34(4),30-39。
吳明德(1989)。我國公立大學圖書館支援研究所學術研究之檢討。在沈寶環教授七秩華誕籌備委員會(編),沈寶環教授七秩榮慶祝賀論文集(頁160-175)。台北市:臺灣學生書局。
吳俊瑩(2011)。政府資訊公開法制的誕生與臺灣史研究脈動(2000-2008)。史原,(23),83-144。
杜正勝(2002)。新史學之路-兼論臺灣五十年來的史學發展。新史學,13(3),21-42。
林巧敏(2010a)。歷史論文引用檔案文獻之特性分析。2010年海峽兩岸檔案暨微縮學術交流會論文集。臺北市:中華檔案暨資訊微縮管理學會編印,頁 41-50。
林巧敏(2010b)。歷史學者使用檔案資訊需求及其引用文獻之研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告(計畫編號:NSC 100-2410-H-004-171)。檢自https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/item?item_id=59363
林巧敏(2015)。檔案使用案例調查分析。台北市:五南。
林巧敏(2017)。檔案應用與推廣研究回顧。在薛理桂、王麗蕉(編),臺灣檔案學研究回顧暨書目彙編(1946-2016)(頁145-158)。台北市:中央研究院臺灣史研究所。
林巧敏、許蓀咪(2015)。歷史期刊文獻引用偏好與引用檔案分析:2006-2014年變化。圖資與檔案學刊,(86),25-46。
林珊如、李郁雅(1999)。從使用者觀點探討古文書及檔案之使用:以平埔研究人員為例。大學圖書館,3(3),65-80。
林珊如、許禎芸(2008)。從國內碩士論文探討資訊行爲相關研究。圖書資訊學研究,3(1),51-74。
林滿紅(2011)。數位化:史學與社會結合的一大契機。在項潔(編),數位人文在歷史學研究的應用(頁45-72)。台北市:臺大出版中心。
邱銘心(2012)。資訊需求。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。檢自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1679179/
姚榮松(2005)。我國大學台灣人文學門四類系所現況發展。在國立台灣師範大學台灣文化及語言文學研究所(編),我國台灣人文學門系所之現況與展望研討會論文集(頁15-30),台北市:萬卷樓。
施佩宜(2011)。民國史博士學位論文之引用文獻分析(2001-2010)(碩士論文)。檢自國立政治大學博碩士論文全文影像系統。
洪一梅(2017)。檔案史料出版回顧與芻議。在薛理桂、王麗蕉(編),臺灣檔案學研究回顧暨書目彙編(1946-2016)(頁159-196)。台北市:中央研究院臺灣史研究所。
耿立群(2011)。《漢學研究》歷史類論著引用文獻計量分析(2004-2009)。國家圖書館館刊,100(2),99-125。
高瑄鴻、林雯瑤(2015)。台灣圖書資訊學期刊論文之文內引用錯誤研究。教育資料與圖書館學,52(2),127-156。
國立臺灣師範大學臺灣史研究所(n.d.)。本所簡介。檢自http://www.taih.ntnu.edu.tw/intro/super_pages.php?ID=intro1
崔燕慧(1997)。台灣地區近五年文史哲期刊論文引用文獻分析(未出版之碩士論文)。天主教輔仁大學,新北市。
莊萬壽(2005)。台灣人文學門系所發展的理念與策略。在國立台灣師範大學台灣文化及語言文學研究所(編),我國台灣人文學門系所之現況與展望研討會論文集(頁5-14),台北市:萬卷樓。
陳光華(2006)。引文索引之建置與應用。台北市:文華。
陳舒棠(2004年9月24日)。杜正勝:教育政策著重建立台灣主體性。大紀元,檢自https://www.epochtimes.com/b5/ncid1184623.htm
陳碧珠(2002)。檔案館使用者之資訊行為研究:以中研院近史所檔案館為例(碩士論文)。檢自國立政治大學博碩士論文全文影像系統。
彭明輝(2007)。台灣地區歷史學的研究趨勢:以歷史學期刊為分析對象(1945-2000)。國立政治大學歷史學報,(27),99-140。
黃慕萱(2001)。成人讀者之資訊尋求行為。臺北市立圖書館館訊,19(2),8-23。
劉吉軒、陳碧珠、陳靜宜、張淑芬、劉麗珍、林維儀(2008)。國立政治大學商學院學位論文引用文獻分析與館藏支援之研究。圖書與資訊學刊,(64),1-30。
蔡明月(2003)。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北市:國立編譯館。
蔡明月(2004)。引文分析與學術評鑑。在國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所(編),引文分析與學術評鑑研討會會議論文集(頁1-14)。台北市:國家圖書館。
蔡明月、邱琦茹(2013)。人文學引用文獻分析研究。國家圖書館館刊,102(2),111-138。
薛理桂(2017)。臺灣檔案學教育回顧與前瞻。在薛理桂、王麗蕉(編),臺灣檔案學研究回顧暨書目彙編(1946-2016)(頁1-12)。台北市:中央研究院臺灣史研究所。
薛理桂、王麗蕉(2010)。檔案編排與描述:理論與實務。台北市:文華。
羅思嘉(2001)。引用文獻分析與學術傳播研究。中國圖書館學會會報,(66),73-85。檢自https://scholars.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/123456789/406115
Anderson, I. (2004). Are you being served? Historians and the search for primary sources. Archivaria, 58, 81-129.
Baker, D. (1978). Characteristics of the literature used by english musicologists. Journal of Librarianship, 10(3), 182-209.
Bawden, D. (2006). Users, user studies and human information behaviour. Journal of Documentation, 62(6), 671-679.
Beattie, D. (1989). An archival user study: Researchers in the field of women's history. Archivaria, 29, 33-50.
Blouin, F. X. (1984). An Agenda for the Appraisal of Business Records. Archival Choices: Managing the Historical Record in an Age of Abundance, 61-80.
Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual review of information science and technology, 36(1), 1-53.
Bronstad, K. (2018). References to Archival Materials in Scholarly History Monographs. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage, 19(1), 28-40.
Bronstad, K. (2019). References to Archival Materials in Scholarly History Monographs. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries, 6(2), 247-254.
Brooks, T. A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 36(4), 223-229.
Brooks, T. A. (1986). Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 37(1), 34-36.
Brubaker, J. (2005). Primary materials used by Illinois state history researchers. Illinois Libraries, 85(3), 4-8.
Budd, J. (1986). A citation study of American literature: implications for collection management. Collection management, 8(2), 49-62.
Burns, C. (2012, August). Use of Manuscripts and Archives by Historians: A Citation Analysis of Four History Journals for the Period 2006–2010. Poster session presented at the research forum poster, Society of American Archivists Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.
Cano, V. (1989). Citation behavior: Classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 40(4), 284-290.
Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social studies of science, 5(4), 423-441.
Cullars, J. (1989). Citation characteristics of French and German literary monographs. The Library Quarterly, 59(4), 305-325.
Cullars, J. (1990). Citation characteristics of Italian and Spanish literary monographs. The Library Quarterly, 60(4), 337-356.
Cullars, J. (1992). Citation characteristics of monographs in the fine arts. The Library Quarterly, 62(3), 325-342.
Cullars, J. M. (1996). Citation characteristics of French and German fine arts monographs. The Library Quarterly, 66(2), 138-160.
Cullars, J. M. (1998). Citation characteristics of English-language monographs in philosophy. Library & information science research, 20(1), 41-68.
Dalton, M. S., & Charnigo, L. (2004). Historians and their information sources. College & Research Libraries, 65(5), 400-425.
Delgadillo, R., & Lynch, B. P. (1999). Future historians: Their quest for information. College & Research Libraries, 60(3), 245-259.
Duff, W. M., & Johnson, C. A. (2002). Accidentally found on purpose: Information-seeking behavior of historians in archives. The Library Quarterly, 72(4), 472-496.
Duff, W., & Johnson, C. (2003). Where is the list with all the names? Information-seeking behavior of genealogists. The American Archivist, 66(1), 79-95.
Duff, W., Craig, B. L., & Cherry, J. M. (2004). Finding and using archival resources: A cross-Canada survey of historians studying Canadian history. Archivaria, 58, 51-80.
Elliott, C. (1981). Citation patterns and documentation for the history of science: some methodological considerations. The American Archivist, 44(2), 131-142.
Ewalt, J. (2016). Image as Evidence: A Citation Analysis of Visual Resources in American History Scholarship, 2010–2014. Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America, 35(2), 206-217.
Freeman, E. (1984). In the eye of the beholder: Archives administration from the user's point of view. The American Archivist, 47(2), 111-123.
Garfield, E. (1996). When to cite. The Library Quarterly, 66(4), 449-458.
Goggin, J. (1986). The indirect approach: a study of scholarly users of black and women's organizational records in the Library of Congress manuscript division. The Midwestern Archivist, 11(1), 57-67.
Heinzkill, R. (1980). Characteristics of references in selected scholarly English literary journals. The Library Quarterly, 50(3), 352-365.
Herubel, J. -P. V. M. (1994). Citation studies in the humanities and social sciences: A selective and annotated bibliography. Collection Management, 18(3-4), 89-137.
Hitchcock, E. R. (1990). Materials used in the research of state history: A citation analysis of the 1986 Tennessee Historical Quarterly. Collection Building, 10(1/2), 52-54.
Hurt, J. A. (1975), Characteristics of Kansas History Sources: A Citation Analysis of The Kansas Historical Quarterly (Unpublished Master’s Dissertations). Emporia State College, Kansas.
Jones, C., Chapman, M., & Woods, P. C. (1972). The Characteristics of the Literature Used by Historians. Journal of Librarianship, 4, 137-156.
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
Lawani, S. M. (1982). On the heterogeneity and classification of author self‐citations. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 33(5), 281-284.
Lowe, M. S. (2003). Reference Analysis of the American Historical Review. Collection Building, 22(1), 13-20.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1986). Quantitative measures of communication in science: A study of the formal level. Social Studies of Science, 16(1), 151-172.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
Mahowald, T. T. (1995). The Research Needs of Historians in Russian and Slavic History; A Citation Analysis of" The Russian Review," 1991-1994 (Unpublished Master’s Dissertations). Kent State University, Ohio.
Martyn, J. (1975). Citation analysis. Journal of Documentation, 31(4), 290-297.
McAnally, A. M. (1951). Characteristics of materials used in research in united states history (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Illinois.
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
Miller, F. (1986). Use, appraisal, and research: A case study of social history. The American Archivist, 49(4), 371-392.
Moed, H. F., & Vriens, M. (1989). Possible inaccuracies occurring in citation analysis. Journal of Information Science, 15(2), 95-107.
Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social studies of science, 5(1), 86-92.
Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual review of information science and technology, 41(1), 609-641.
Orr, R.H., Pings, V. M., Pizer, I. H., Olsen, E. E., & Spencer, C. C. (1968). Development of Methodological Tools for Planning and Managing Library Services, II. Measuring a Library’s Capability for Providing Documents. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 56(3), 241-267.
Shadish, W. R., Tolliver, D., Gray, M., & Sen Gupta, S. K. (1995). Author judgements about works they cite: Three studies from psychology journals. Social studies of Science, 25(3), 477-498.
Slater, J. M., & Hoelscher, C. M. (2014). Use of Archives by Catholic Historians, 2010–2012: A Citation Study. Archival Issues, 36(4), 43-56.
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation Analysis. Library Trends, 30(summer), 83-106.
Stieg, M. F. (1981). The information of needs of historians. College and Research Libraries, 42(6), 549-560.
Stone, S. (1982). Humanities scholars: Information needs and uses. Journal of Documentation, 38(4), 292-313.
Taylor, R. S. (1968). Question-negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29(3), 178-194.
Wilson, T. D. (1981). On User Studies and Information Needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
Yakel, E. (2004). Seeking Information, Seeking Connections, Seeking Meaning: Genealogists and Family Historians. Information Research: an international electronic journal, 10(1), n1.
Yakel, E., & Torres, D. (2007). Genealogists as a" Community of Records". The American Archivist, 70(1), 93-113.
Zunde, P. (1971). Structural models of complex information sources. Information Storage and Retrieval, 7(1), 1-18.
Description: 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
107155020
Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107155020
Data Type: thesis
Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
502001.pdf4395KbAdobe PDF0View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing