Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138966
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor董祥開zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorDong, Hsiang-Kaien_US
dc.contributor.author張瑜倫zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChang, Yu-Lunen_US
dc.creator張瑜倫zh_TW
dc.creatorChang, Yu-Lunen_US
dc.date2022en_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-10T05:13:02Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-10T05:13:02Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-10T05:13:02Z-
dc.identifierG0108921084en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/138966-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description行政管理碩士學程zh_TW
dc.description108921084zh_TW
dc.description.abstract行政院公共工程委員會自民國104年推動「公開取得電子報價單」政策,本研究聚焦在臺北市政府的執行情形,並引用Edwards Ⅲ(1980)提出之「行政影響模式」做為資料蒐集分析的理論架構,並運用訪談技術,從溝通、資源、人員態度傾向及官僚結構等四個構面間的互動、變化或作用,了解在相同管制情形下,造成各個機關不同執行結果的原因和條件,以及在各個機關內部行政運作的差異性。\n經研究發現,在資源和官僚結構構面上,有一致性的優勢和劣勢,在優勢方面,可以提供其他機關執行參考,包括了具完整採購資訊網及諮詢專線、設統籌市府採購政策專責單位、以及標準作業程序資料庫內容豐富;在劣勢部分,則可作為提升執行率的思考方向,包括了網路偶不穩定,系統連動不足、訓練課程未按新政策需求設計、標準作業流程缺少新政策指引。對於溝通和人員態度傾向構面上,各機關有相當的差異,如果可以提供明確的命令指示、善用內部水平溝通,由採購人員主動引導需求單位,將能提升政策執行力。基此,文末提出五項政策建議,作為「公開取得電子報價單」政策執行之參考。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe Public Construction Commission has promoted the policy of "Public Access to Electronic Quotation" since 2015. This research mainly focuses on the implementation of the Taipei City Government, and cites the "Implementing Public Policy" published by Edwards III (1980) as a theoretical framework for data collection analysis. By implementing interview techniques, it can help to understand the reasons and conditions that lead to different implementing results of various agencies under the same regulations, as well as the differences from internal administrative operations in each agency respectively from interactions or variations in between communication, resources, dispositions and bureaucratic structure.\nIt has been found that there are consistent advantages and disadvantages from research in terms of resources and bureaucratic structure. In terms of advantages, it can provide implementing reference for other agencies, including complete procurement information network and consultation hotline, establishment of a designated procurement unit for the city government, and enrichment for database of standard operating procedures. For the disadvantages, it can be used for increasing efficiency of execution, including occasional instability of the network, insufficient system interaction, training courses are not designed based on the new policy requirements, and lack of new policy guidelines for standard operating procedures. There are considerable differences between agencies in terms of communication and dispositions. If specific orders or instructions can be provided and make good use of internal communication, and let procurement personnel to guide required units initiatively, it will improve policy execution. Based on the aforementioned information, five policy recommendations are proposed as a reference for policy implementation at the end of thesis.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\n第一節 研究動機 1\n第二節 研究背景 4\n第三節 執行概況 10\n第四節 研究目的、問題與流程 16\n第二章 文獻探討 19\n第一節 政策執行理論 19\n第二節 行政影響模式 30\n第三節 電子化政府(e-Government) 37\n第四節 政府採購電子化(e-GP) 39\n第三章 研究設計與實施 45\n第一節 研究方法 45\n第二節 研究參與者 46\n第三節 研究工具 48\n第四節 資料分析 52\n第四章 政策執行力分析 57\n第一節 溝通構面 57\n第二節 資源構面 64\n第三節 人員態度傾向構面 74\n第四節 官僚結構構面 80\n第五章 結論 87\n第一節 研究發現 87\n第二節 執行力之提升對策 96\n第三節 政策建議 98\n第四節 研究限制及未來建議 100\n參考書目 102\n壹、中文文獻 102\n貳、英文文獻 103\n附錄 106\n附錄一 民國107年至109年達成率差異性區分表 106\n附錄二 研究同意書 109\n附錄三 研究參與者基本資料表 111zh_TW
dc.format.extent2502407 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108921084en_US
dc.subject公開取得電子報價單zh_TW
dc.subject執行力zh_TW
dc.subject行政影響模式zh_TW
dc.subjectPublic access to electronic quotationen_US
dc.subjectPolicy implementationen_US
dc.subjectImplementing public policyen_US
dc.title公開取得電子報價單政策之執行力研究—以臺北市政府為例zh_TW
dc.titlePolicy Implementation of Public Access to Electronic Quotation: The Case of Taipei City Governmenten_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.relation.reference中文文獻\n王百合、王謙(2008)。行政機關推行電子化政府政策之研究-以海巡署為例。政策研究學報,8期,頁147-178。DOI:10.7070/PR.200806.0147\n丘昌泰(2018)。公共政策基礎篇(第五版)。高雄:巨流圖書股份有限公司。\n朱斌妤、蕭乃沂、楊禮榮,2013。電子治理中政府對企業計畫(G2B)評估架構。行政暨政策學報,562期,頁1~41。\n朱斌妤、黃東益、蕭乃沂(2009)。電子治理成效指標與評估:G2C 與G2B期末報告。行政院研考會委託研究報告,台北市:行政院研考會。\n行政院研究發展考核委員會(編)(2013)。第四階段電子化政府計畫(101年至105年)(核定本)。台北,行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n吳定(2003)。政策管理(初版)。台北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。\n吳定(2006)。公共政策辭典(第三版)。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。\n吳定(2009)。公共政策(第九版)。台北:國立空中大學。\n吳定、張潤書、陳德禹、賴維堯(2003)。行政學(一)(第四版)。台北:國立空中大學。\n吳春光(2007)。俄羅斯科技產業政策分析-從戈巴契夫到普京。遠景基金會季刊,8卷3期,頁P127 – 170。DOI:10.7063/PQ.200707.0127\n李允傑、丘昌泰(2002)。政策執行與評估。台北:國立空中大學。\n李仲彬(2006)。電子化政府的公民使用行為:數位資訊能力與資訊素養之影響分析。資訊社會研究,11期,頁177-218。\n李洛維(2006)。電子採購影響評估因果模型之建構與驗證。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士學位論文,未出版,台北。\n邱吉鶴、莊麗蘭(2005)。施政計畫執行力之探討。研考雙月刊,29卷(2期),頁50~60。\n林水波(1992)。政策本身與政策執行力的關聯。政治科學論叢,第4期,頁225~266。\n林水波、施能傑(1993)。強化政策執行能力之理論建構。台北市:行政院研考會。\n林照元(2019)。以科技接受模式探討電子報價系統使用意願之研究。世新大學資訊管理研究所(含碩專班)碩士學位論文,未出版,台北。\n林鍾沂(2004)。行政學(初版)。台北:三民書局股份有限公司。\n施能傑(1998)。政府的績效管理改革。人事月刊,26卷(5期),頁35-53。\n洪聖斐、郭寶蓮、陳孟豪(譯)(2008)。行政學–公部門之管理(初版)( Grover Starling原著。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。\n陳向明(2009)。社會科學質的研究。台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。\n曹俊漢(1990)。公共政策(初版)。台北:三民書局股份有限公司。\n黃桂鳳(2013)。從內部顧客觀點看G2E計畫成效─以政府電子採購網為例。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士學位論文,未出版,台北。\n鈕文英(2021)。質性研究方法與論文寫作(第三版)。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。\n蕭銘雄、史麗伶(2015)。國立大學導入電子化採購之使用行為研究:以共同供應契約電子採購平台系統為例。組織與管理,8卷(1期),頁1-40。\n貳、英文文獻\nAnderson, D., Wu, R., Cho, J. S. & Schroeder, K. (2016). Introduction: Global Challenges in Turbulent Times: Road to Sustainable E-government. E-Government Strategy, ICT and Innovation for Citizen Engagement. Publisher: Springer, New York, NY, 1-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3350-1_1\nAllen, R., Hemming, R. & Potter, B. H. (2013). The International Handbook of Public Financial Management. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. 1-12.\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137315304\nAngeles, M. O. G., Mario, C. V., Julio, G. D. J. & Adriana R. M. (2014) Organizational Learning Capacity and Its Impact on the Results in a Government Agency in Chile. International Public Management Journal, 2014-01, Vol.17,74-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.874263\nBarzelay, M. & Shvets, E. (2006). Innovating Government-Wide Public Management Practices to Implement Development Policy: The Case of “Brazil in Action” Published online: 02 Sep 2006 ,47-74, https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490600625431\nBaviskar, S. & Winter, S. C. (2017). Street-Level Bureaucrats as Individual Policymakers: The Relationship between Attitudes and Coping Behavior toward Vulnerable Children and Youth, International public management journal, 2017-04-03, Vol.20 (2), 316-353, DOI: https://10.1080/10967494.2016.1235641\nBoyne, G. A., & Meier , K. J. (2013). Burdened by Bureaucracy? Determinants of Administrative Intensity in Public Organisations, International Public Management Journal, 16:2, 307-327, DOI: https://10.1080/10967494.2013.817261\nBoon, J. & Verhoest, K. (2018). On the Dynamics of Reform Resistance: Why and How Bureaucratic Organizations Resist Shared Service Center Reforms, International Public Management Journal, 21:4, 533-557, DOI:https://10.1080/10967494.2016.1276494\nBullock, J. B., Wenger, J. B. & Wilkins, V.M. (2014). Attitudes About Hard Work: A Global Perspective on the Beliefs of Government Employees, International Public Management Journal, 17:1, 5-44, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.874255\nEdward Ⅲ, G. C. (1980). Implementing Public Policy . Washington, D.C. 20037 Congressional Quarterly Press.\nFarazmand, A. (2018). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer Nature,Switzerland AG, 13-49. DOI: https://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1007/978-3-319-20928-9\nFerreira, V. D. R. S., Medeiros, J. J., Bright, C.Y., & Crumpton, C. D. (2018). Implementing social policy in Brazil: an inter-contextual exploration of the exercise of discretion by street-level bureaucrats. Taylor & Francis Online Received 04 Jan 2018, Accepted 20 Dec 2019, Published online: 13 Jan 2020 https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1711474\nMuttoo S.K. (2019). E-Governance in India. In: E-Governance in India. ,Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. 13-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8852-1_2\nSvärd, P. (2017). Enterprise Content Management, Records Management and Information Culture Amidst e-Government Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts : Chandos Publishing, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100874-4.00014-4\nSangeeta, K., Kirsten, F. B. & William A. K. (2015). Governance Issues in the EU`s e-Procurement Framework. Journal of Common Market Studies, 2015-03, Vol.53 (2), 292-310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12179zh_TW
dc.identifier.doi10.6814/NCCU202200140en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
108401.pdf2.44 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.