Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139020
題名: 新冠肺炎疫情下媒體如何再現移工樣貌
The Media Representation of The Migrant Workers’ Image during the COVID-19
作者: 吳玟誼
Wu, Wen-Yi
貢獻者: 黃葳威
Huang, Wei-Wei
吳玟誼
Wu, Wen-Yi
關鍵詞: 移工
新聞報導
新冠肺炎
批判論述分析
媒體再現
Migrant workers
News report
COVID-19
Critical discourse analysis
Media representation
日期: 2022
上傳時間: 10-Feb-2022
摘要: 2019年年底爆發新冠肺炎(COVID-19),對全世界影響甚鉅,臺灣也不例外。在如此重大事件發生之時,新聞媒體傳遞的疫情資訊尤為重要。本文試圖探討新冠肺炎疫情下,新聞媒體所建構出的移工樣貌,從文本的論述層面看到背後的意識型態及整體社會脈絡。本研究採用「批判論述分析法」,分析對象為「商業媒體(蘋果日報、中國時報、自由時報、聯合報)」和「獨立媒體(報導者、苦勞網、四方報、關鍵評論網)」,並採用Fairclough的論述分析架構,分別是社會事件(social events)、社會實踐(social practices)、社會結構(social structures),以此來進行分析,理蘊出移工樣貌如何被建構,及背後依循的整體脈絡。\n\n本研究針對2021年臺灣本土疫情中,與移工有關的最大規模群聚感染事件–「苗栗電子廠群聚案」進行分析。研究結果發現,這場疫情之下,移工在新聞報導中的樣貌,從原本「負面」的形象,逐漸轉為「中立」的形象;從原本被刻意劃分為「次等的他者」,到最後「他者」與「我者」之間的界線逐漸被模糊化。本研究結果亦發現,不同時期、不同媒體的論述也各有其特色,分別是前期的(一)防疫優先論述和(二)潛藏歧視論述,以及後期的(三)多元文化主義論述。
The outbreak of COVID-19 at the end of 2019 has had a dramatic impact on the world, and Taiwan is no exception. When a major incident occurs, the epidemic information delivered by news media is particularly important. The purpose of this study was to explore the image of migrant workers constructed by the news media during the COVID-19 and to realize the ideology and social context behind the discourse in the text. The research method of this study is critical discourse analysis, and this study analyzes media reporting of the "Commercial media (Apple Daily, China Times, Liberty Times, United Daily News)" and "Independent media (Reporter, Coolloud, 4-Way News, The News Lens)". This study adopts Fairclough`s discourse framework, which is social events, social practices, and social structures, to analyze how the image of migrant workers is constructed and the contextualization behind it.\n\nThis study analyzes the case-"Electronics Factory cluster case in the Miaoli county", the largest cluster infection event related to migrant workers in the local epidemic in Taiwan in 2021. The results show that the image of migrant workers in news reports gradually changed from "negative" to "neutral", and from the original intentionally classified as "inferior other", to the boundary between "the Other" and "We" was gradually blurred. In addition, this study results show that the discourse of different periods and different media also had their characteristics, which were (1) priority of epidemic prevention (2) latent discrimination in the early discourse, and (3) multiculturalism in the late discourse.
參考文獻: 中文部分\n王泰俐(2004a)。〈電視新聞節目「感官主義」之初探研究〉,《新聞學研究》,81:1-41。\n王泰俐(2004b)。《電視新聞「感官主義」之初探研究》。(國科會專題研究計畫成果報告,NSC 92-2412-H-004-024)。臺北:政治大學新聞系。\n王泰俐(2005)。〈電視新聞「感官主義」對閱聽人接收新聞的影響〉,《新聞學研究》,86:91-133。\n王泰俐(2015)。《電視新聞感官主義》,臺北:五南。\n王泰俐(2017)。《電視新聞「感官主義」閱聽感受的調查研究(E94036)【原始數據】》,取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學術調查研究資料庫。\n王緁妶(2015)。〈國際上外籍勞工政策與最低(基本)工資制度之關連性〉。勞動部研究報告。\n成露茜(2008)。〈移民/工發聲與媒體〉,夏曉、陳信行、黃德北(編),《跨界流離:全球化下的移民與移工》(下冊),129-158。臺北:臺灣社會研究雜誌社。\n江靜之(2009)。《從論述角度探析廣電新聞訪問者的現實與理想》。臺北:秀威。\n江靜之(2011)。〈舊聞中找新聞:從訪問者角度看廣電新聞訪問互文性〉,《傳播與管理研究》,10(2):3-36。\n吳芳如(2002)。《消息來源、新聞框架與媒介真實之建構:以政黨輪替後之核四爭議案為例》。私立世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n吳挺鋒(1997)。《「外勞」休閒生活的文化鬥爭》。私立東海大學社會學研究所碩士論文。\n李紋霞(2015)。〈媒體報導所忽略的國際移工〉。臺大開放式課程。\n李紋霞(2015)。〈媒體刻板印象的建構〉。臺大開放式課程。\n林子深(2016)。《媒體再現研究:以狂犬病新聞為例》,國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所碩士論文。\n林東泰(2019)。《批判話語分析總論:理論架構、研究設計與實例解析》。高雄:巨流圖書。\n林芊貝(2006)。《台灣人力仲介行業的商業倫理之探討-以外籍勞工、外籍新娘、外籍看護工為例》。國立中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文。\n林冠群(2008)。〈「我族中心主義」與「文化相對論」-現代大學生應有的素養〉,《止善》,4:3-21。\n倪炎元(1999)。〈再現的政治:解讀媒介對他者負面建構的策略〉,《新聞學研究》,58:85-111。\n倪炎元(2003)。《再現的政治:台灣報紙媒體對「他者」建構的論述分析》。台北:韋伯文化。\n倪炎元(2011)。〈批判論述分析的脈絡建構策略:Teun A.van Dijk與Norman Fairclough的比較傳播研究與實踐〉,1(2):83-87。\n倪炎元(2018)。《論述研究與傳播議題分析》。臺北:五南。\n翁秀琪、許傅陽、蘇湘琦、楊韶彧、葉瓊瑜(1997)。《新聞與社會真實建構–大眾媒體、官方訊息來源與社會運動的三角關係》。臺北:三民書局。\n翁秀琪(1998)。《大眾傳播理論與實證》。臺北:三民書局。\n翁秀琪(1998)。〈批判語言學、在地權力觀和新聞文本分析:宋楚瑜辭官事件中李宋會的新聞分析〉,《新聞學研究》,57:91-126。\n翁秀琪、鍾蔚文、簡妙如、邱承君(1999)。〈似假還真的新聞文本世界:新聞如何呈現超經驗事件〉,《新聞學研究》,58:59-83。\n高崇耀(2001)。《勞工問題》。臺北:新文京開發。\n國家發展委員會(2020)。〈移工人數-按國籍別分〉。勞動部勞動力發展署統計資料庫,國發會整理。取自:https://reurl.cc/GoXXOW。\n陳順孝(2017)。〈網路原生媒體 勇闖新聞新路〉,王怡蓁、李子瑋、張錦華、陳順孝、葉大瑋、鄭人豪合著(2017),《媒觀析:2016年台灣媒體觀察報告》,36–55。臺北:臺灣媒體觀察教育基金會。\n陳春富(2012)。〈國際移工/民傳播權的在地思考〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,2(1):55-84。\n陳宗韓(1999)。《台灣外籍勞工政策的政治經濟分析》,國立台灣大學三民主義研究所博士論文。\n張錦華(1994)。《傳播批判理論》。臺北:黎明文化。\n張錦華(2010)。《傳播批判理論:從解構到主體》。臺北:黎明文化。\n勞動部(2021)。〈產業與社福移工人數〉。勞動統計查詢網。取自:https://statfy.mol.gov.tw/index12.aspx。\n馮建三譯(1995)。《電視、觀眾與文化研究》。臺北:遠流。(原著:Morley,David(1992). Television, Audience & Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge.)\n彭宣維、趙秀鳳、張征譯(2000)。《功能語法導論》。北京:外語教學與研究。(原著:Halliday,M.A.K.(1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.)\n曾惟農(2009)。《跨國移工傳播權初探-以台灣東南亞籍移工為例》。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。\n曾嬿芬(2004)。〈引進外籍勞工的國族政治〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,32:1-58。\n賀政(2008)。《從優生保健法爭議看墮胎新聞的再現》。國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n游美惠(2000)。〈內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用〉,《調查研究》,8:5-42。\n黃文村(2005)。〈外勞管理問題研析〉。行政院及所屬各機關出國報告。\n黃葳威(2016)。〈第十三章 文化間與跨文化傳播〉,《傳播理論》,501-550。新北:揚智文化。\n謝君蔚、徐美苓(2011)。媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變:以基因改造食品新聞為例〉,《中華傳播學刊》,2:143-179。\n藍佩嘉(2005)。〈階層化的他者:家務移工的招募、訓練與種族化〉,《臺灣社會學刊》,34:1-57。\n楊堯茹(2017)。《台灣女性政治人物媒體再現的批判論述分析–以2012年及2016年總統大選報導為例》。私立世新大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n臧國仁(1998)。〈新聞報導與真實建構:新聞框架理論的觀點〉,《傳播研究集刊》,3:1-103。\n臧國仁、鍾蔚文(2000)。〈災難事件與媒體報導:相關研究簡述〉,《新聞學研究》,62:143-151。\n蔡宏進(1992)。《我國外籍勞工可能引發的社會問題及其因應對策》。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。\n蔡崇隆(2017)。〈移工人權是台灣文明的真實指標〉。取自:https://reurl.cc/j87XML。\n蔡博鈞(2017)。《2015年登革熱新聞之媒體再現-主流媒體與獨立媒體比較研究》,私立天主教輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。\n葉韋君(2010)。〈媒體再現:真實建構與認同塑造〉,《媒體素養教育教師參考手冊》,53-69。\n簡曉娟(2019)。《暴動?抗暴?論移工團體與新聞媒體對「高捷泰勞事件」的意義建構與互動分析》。國立臺灣大學社會科學院國家發展研究所碩士論文。\n簡郁紋(2018)。〈【東南亞移工 101】從零接觸移工議題的你,一定要看!〉。取自:https://reurl.cc/DggM7E\n蘇蘅(2019)。《傳播研究方法新論》。臺北:雙葉書廊。\n\n英文部分\nAhmed, S., & Matthes, J.(2017). Media representation of Muslims and Islam from 2000 to 2015: A meta-analysis. International Communication Gazette, 79(3), 219-244.\nAkhtar, R.(2021). Coronavirus (COVID-19) Outbreaks, Environment and Human Behaviour : International Case Studies. Cham: Springer International Publishing.\nBeaudoin C.E.(2017). SARS News Coverage and Its Determinants in China and the US. International Communication Gazette, 69(6), 509-524.\nBell, A.(1991). The language of news media. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.\nBlommaert, J.(2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.\nCatalano, T., & Linda R, W.(2020). Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond. Cham: Springer International Publishing.\nCheng, H.(2016). On migrant workers’ social status in Taiwan: A critical analysis of mainstream news discourse. International Journal of Communication, 10(20), 2509-2528.\nCohen, B. C.(1963). The press and foreign policy. NJ: Princeton University Press.\nLiu, Eric (Yin), & Janny H.C Leung.(2020).Corpus insights into the harmonization of commercial media in China: News coverage of migrant worker issues as a case study. Discourse, Context & Media, 41.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100482.\nEntman, R.(1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.\nEntman, R.(1994). African-Americans according to TV news. Media Studies Journal, 9, 29-38.\nFairclough, N.(1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.\nFairclough, N.(1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.\nFairclough, N.(1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman Publishing.\nFairclough, N.(1998). Political discourse in the media: An analysis framework.\nIn A. Bell and P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse(pp.142-162). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.\nFairclough, N.(2006). Language and globalization. London: Routledge.\nFairclough, N.(2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. (2nd ed). London, UK: Longman.\nFoucault, M.(1984). The Regard for Truth: An Interview Between Foucault and Francois Ewald. Art and Text,16, 20-31.\nFreire, P.(1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.\nGoffman, E.(1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.\nGitlin, T.(1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.\nGentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J.(2006). Media Bias and Reputation. Journal of Political Economy, 114(2), 280-316.\nHall, S.(1977). Culture, the Media and the Ideological Effect. In C.J., Mass\nCommunication and Society(pp.315-318). London: Arnold.\nHall, S.(1994). Some `Politically Incorrect` Pathways Through PC. In S. Dunant, The War of the Words: The Political Correctness Debate(pp.164-84). London: Virago Press.\nHalliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R.(1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.\nHalliday, M. A. K.(2004). The language of science. London and New York: Continuum.\nKoh, D.(2020). Migrant workers and COVID‐19. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 77, 634‐636.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106626.\nMcQuail, D.(1987). Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction(3rd ed). London: SAGE.\nReid, A., Ronda‐Perez, E.,& Schenker, MB.(2021). Migrant workers, essential work, and COVID‐19. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 64, 73‐77. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23209.\nReisigl, M., & Wodak, R.(2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R.Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis(pp. 87-121). London: SAGE.\nTaylor, S.(2001). Locating and constructing discourse analytic research. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis(pp. 5-48). London: SAGE.\nTian, L., & Modality, B.(2021). Critical Discourse Analysis of Political Discourse - a Case Study of Trump’s TV Speech. Theory and practice in language studies, 11(5), 516-520.\nhttps://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1105.08.\nTuchman, G.(1988). Mass media institutions. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.). Handbook of Sociology. Newbury Park: Sage.\nTuchman, G.(1991). Media institutions: Qualitative methods in the study of news. In K. B. Jensen & N. W. Jankowski (Eds.). A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge.\nSandra, T., & Lindblom, J.(2020). Migrant Care Workers in Elderly Care: What a Study of Media Representations Suggests About Sweden as a Caring Democracy. International journal of ageing and later life, 14(2):61-87.\nhttps://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3103.\nPremji, S.(2019). Discourse on culture in research on immigrant and migrant workers’ health. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 62(6):460-470.\nhttps://doi-org.autorpa.lib.nccu.edu.tw/10.1002/ajim.22987.\nVan Dijk, T. A.(1988). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.\nVan Dijk, T. A.(1988). News Analysis: Case Studies of International and National News in the Press. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.\nVan Dijk, T. A.(1992). Racism and argumentation: “Race riot” rhetoric in tabloid editorials. In F. H.van Eemeren (Ed.), Argumentation Illuminated(pp. 242-259). Dordrecht: Foris.\nVan Dijk, T. A.(2003). The discourse-knowledge interface. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity(pp. 85-109). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.\nVan Dijk, T. A.(2003). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis(pp. 352-371). Malden, MA: Blackwell.\nVan Dijk, T. A.(2004). From text grammar to critical discourse analysis: A brief academic autobiography. Version 2.0. Barcelona, Spain: Pompeu Fabra University.\nVan Dijk, T. A.(2008). Discourse and context: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.\nSimon, A. F., & Jerit J.(2007). Toward a theory relating political discourse, media, and public opinion. Journal of Communication, 57(2), 254-271.\nWeaver, D. H., Beam, R. A., Brownlee, B. J., Voakes, P. S., & Wilhoit, G. C.(2007). The American journalist in the 21st century: U.S. news people at the dawn of a new millennium. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.\nWodak, R., & Krzyzanowski, M. (Eds.)(2008). Qualitative discourse analysis in\nthe social sciences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.\nWodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.).(2009). Methods of critical discourse analysis.London: SAGE.\nZhang, J., & Liu, X.(2021). Media Representation of Older People’s Vulnerability During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. European journal of ageing, 18(2), 149-158.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00613-x.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
傳播學院傳播碩士學位學程
108464001
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108464001
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
400101.pdf3.4 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.