Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139062
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor | 傳播學院 | |
dc.creator | 陳聖智 | |
dc.creator | Chen, Sheng-Chih | |
dc.creator | Duong, Tuyen Van | |
dc.creator | Lin, Cheng-Yu | |
dc.creator | Huang, Yung-Kai | |
dc.creator | Okan, Orkan | |
dc.creator | Dadaczynski, Kevin | |
dc.creator | Lai, Chih-Feng | |
dc.date | 2021-09 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-11T06:56:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-11T06:56:46Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-02-11T06:56:46Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139062 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purposes: To explore the associated factors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and examine psychometric properties of the coronavirus-related health literacy questionnaire (HLS-COVID-Q22) and Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy questionnaire. Methods: An online survey was conducted from 23 June to 16 July 2021 on 387 school principals across Taiwan. Data collection included socio-demographic characteristics, information related to work, physical and mental health, COVID-19 related perceptions, sense of coherence, coronavirus-related health literacy, and vaccine hesitancy. Principal component analysis, correlation analysis, linear regression models were used for validating HLS-COVID-Q22, Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, and examining the associations. Results: HLS-COVID-Q22 and Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy were found with satisfactory construct validity (items loaded on one component with factor loading values range 0.57 to 0.81, and 0.51 to 0.78), satisfactory convergent validity (item-scale correlations range 0.60 to 0.79, and 0.65 to 0.74), high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96 and 0.90), and without floor or ceiling effects (percentages of possibly lowest score and highest score <15%), respectively. Low scores of vaccine hesitancy were found in male principals (regression coefficient, B, −0.69; 95% confidence interval, 95%CI, −1.29, −0.10; p = 0.023), principals with better well-being (B, −0.25; 95%CI, −0.47, −0.03; p = 0.029), and higher HLS-COVID-Q22 (B, −1.22; 95%CI, −1.89, −0.54; p < 0.001). Conclusions: HLS-COVID-Q22 and Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy were valid and reliable tools. Male principals and those with better well-being, and higher health literacy had a lower level of vaccine hesitancy. Improving principals’ health literacy and well-being is suggested to be a strategic approach to increase vaccine acceptance for themselves, their staff, and students. | |
dc.format.extent | 318463 bytes | - |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | - |
dc.relation | Vaccines, Vol.9, No.9, pp.985 | |
dc.subject | COVID-19; coronavirus-related health literacy; Oxford COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy; gender; well-being; depression; school principal; employer; Taiwan | |
dc.title | Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in School Principals: Impacts of Gender, Well-Being, and Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/vaccines9090985 | |
dc.doi.uri | https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9090985 | |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.grantfulltext | open | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.fulltext | With Fulltext | - |
Appears in Collections: | 期刊論文 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.