Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139062
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor傳播學院
dc.creator陳聖智
dc.creatorChen, Sheng-Chih
dc.creatorDuong, Tuyen Van
dc.creatorLin, Cheng-Yu
dc.creatorHuang, Yung-Kai
dc.creatorOkan, Orkan
dc.creatorDadaczynski, Kevin
dc.creatorLai, Chih-Feng
dc.date2021-09
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T06:56:46Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-11T06:56:46Z-
dc.date.issued2022-02-11T06:56:46Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139062-
dc.description.abstractPurposes: To explore the associated factors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and examine psychometric properties of the coronavirus-related health literacy questionnaire (HLS-COVID-Q22) and Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy questionnaire. Methods: An online survey was conducted from 23 June to 16 July 2021 on 387 school principals across Taiwan. Data collection included socio-demographic characteristics, information related to work, physical and mental health, COVID-19 related perceptions, sense of coherence, coronavirus-related health literacy, and vaccine hesitancy. Principal component analysis, correlation analysis, linear regression models were used for validating HLS-COVID-Q22, Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy, and examining the associations. Results: HLS-COVID-Q22 and Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy were found with satisfactory construct validity (items loaded on one component with factor loading values range 0.57 to 0.81, and 0.51 to 0.78), satisfactory convergent validity (item-scale correlations range 0.60 to 0.79, and 0.65 to 0.74), high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96 and 0.90), and without floor or ceiling effects (percentages of possibly lowest score and highest score <15%), respectively. Low scores of vaccine hesitancy were found in male principals (regression coefficient, B, −0.69; 95% confidence interval, 95%CI, −1.29, −0.10; p = 0.023), principals with better well-being (B, −0.25; 95%CI, −0.47, −0.03; p = 0.029), and higher HLS-COVID-Q22 (B, −1.22; 95%CI, −1.89, −0.54; p < 0.001). Conclusions: HLS-COVID-Q22 and Oxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy were valid and reliable tools. Male principals and those with better well-being, and higher health literacy had a lower level of vaccine hesitancy. Improving principals’ health literacy and well-being is suggested to be a strategic approach to increase vaccine acceptance for themselves, their staff, and students.
dc.format.extent318463 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.relationVaccines, Vol.9, No.9, pp.985
dc.subject COVID-19; coronavirus-related health literacy; Oxford COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy; gender; well-being; depression; school principal; employer; Taiwan
dc.titleOxford COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in School Principals: Impacts of Gender, Well-Being, and Coronavirus-Related Health Literacy
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/vaccines9090985
dc.doi.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9090985
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
38.pdf311 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.