Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139136| 題名: | 網路交友的欺瞞與互動策略 Deception and Interaction Strategies in Online Dating |
作者: | 黃子毓 Huang, Tzu-Yu |
貢獻者: | 蘇蘅 Su, Herng 黃子毓 Huang, Tzu-Yu |
關鍵詞: | 網路交友 交友軟體 欺瞞 印象管理 能供性 Online dating Dating apps Deception Impression management Affordances |
日期: | 2022 | 上傳時間: | 1-三月-2022 | 摘要: | 近年來網路交友已成為社會現象之一，其中欺瞞（deception）更是網路交友過程中逐漸被重視的議題。過去研究分析欺瞞的類型主要係以修飾個人外貌，包含身高、體重、照片等敘事內容為主，惟如將網路交友的情境納入考量，網路交友的參與者在何種情境下採取欺瞞？參與者又是如何與交友軟體協作，生產欺瞞敘事？遂引起本研究動機。\n本研究以印象管理、欺瞞敘事（deception），以及能供性 affordance）理論為核心，將網路交友參與者採取欺瞞的動機，以「不同的互動階段」與「感知」加以分類，並總結交友軟體的能供性，歸納為「社會線索面」與「互動面」。\n本研究採取質性研究中之深度訪談法以及三角檢核法，訪談曾經使用Tinder或Pikabu，使用經驗持續1週以上，且曾經因此與其他參與者建立互動關係者，共訪問10人。\n研究發現，欺瞞敘事不僅係參與者基於提升自我吸引力與印象管理的策略，欺瞞敘事亦具備社交管理功能，參與者以之促進彼此互動，亦可用以保護自我隱私與安全。在參與者採取欺瞞的過程中，因為面臨被線下檢驗的壓力，而須在真實與理想、本真與欺瞞間，不斷地進行動態調節。\n此外，本研究亦分析，欺瞞敘事產生的情境，與參與者感知以及交友軟體能供性對應結果密切相關；能供性與參與者感知不論係相互對應或因能供性侷限而無法對應，皆是欺瞞敘事被產製的情境。此外，交友軟體的能供性也影響了參與者的展演策略，交友軟體的結構規則，限制了 男性參與者的能供性對應，形成了不同群體間的權力落差；同時，權力的落差也改變了個體的使用位置，男性參與者必須藉由採取協商式的使用位置，調整自我揭露的策略。 In recent years, online dating has become one of the social phenomena, among which deception has become a common strategy for online dating. This study explores that deceptive self-presentation including underreport weight, exaggerate height, or use attractive photograph, based on the deception theory. But considering the context of online dating, what do people exaggerate or fabricate their characteristics in an attempt to create their desired impression? How they use dating apps engage in deceptive self-presentation?\nThis study focuses on impression management, deception and affordance theory, and categorizes online dating participants` motivations of deception by "different interaction stages" and "perceptions. The author wants to sum up the affordances of dating apps as "social cues" and "interactions" at the same time.\nThis study adopted qualitative research of the in-depth interview method. The interviews were conducted with 10 interviewers who had used Tinder or Pikabu for more than 1 week, and had established an interactive relationship with other participants.\nThis study finds that deception is not only a strategy for participants to enhance self-attraction and impression management, but also as a social management tool for increasing interaction, protecting privacy and safety in online dating. Participants must adjust their interaction strategies from time to time between the virtual and reality.\nThe findings also demonstrate that affordances and participants’ perception correspond to each other due to its design priority with the affordance preset by online dating apps. This indicates that the affordances of dating apps affect the participants’ performance strategies. The dating apps interface design not only limit of affordances for male participants, but also the power divide between different gender groups and also use apps. As a result, male participants have to adjust their self-disclosure strategy in compromising way. |
參考文獻: | 中文文獻\n〈Pikabu官方網站〉（無日期）。取自https://pikabu.cc/\n〈Tinder官方網站指南〉（無日期）。取自https://www.help.tinder.com/hc/zh-tw/categories/115000755686-Tinder-%E6%8C%87%E5%8D%97-\n孔德廉（2019年8月15日）。掛睡、共食、無痛社交──網路世代用線上陪伴App應對寂寞【部落格文字資料】。取自 https://www.twreporter.org/a/new-close-relationships-net-generation-dating-apps\n孔德廉（2019年8月15日）。當寂寞經濟成形、親密關係「無體溫化」，專家怎麼看？【部落格文字資料】。取自 https://www.twreporter.org/a/new-close-relationships-loneliness-economy-expert-opinion\n孔德廉（2021年1月4）。世紀之疫下的親密關係：被演算法推升的數位愛情，撫慰了誰？【部落格文字資料】。取自https://www.twreporter.org/a/covid-19-digital-love-dating-app-loneliness\n方文熙、關荏元（2017年6月）。〈網路交友動機、自我呈現與幸福感之關係〉，「休閒產業與健康促進學術研討會」，臺北市北投。\n宋曜廷、潘佩妤（2010）。〈混合研究在教育研究的應用〉，《教育科學研究期刊》，55(4) ：97-130。\n巫麗雪、葉秀珍、蔡瑞明（2013）。〈遇見另一半：教育婚配過程中的介紹人與接觸場合〉，《台灣社會學》，26：147-190。\n李幸蓉（2009）。《少年使用互動式網路說謊經驗與說謊行為接受度之相關研究》。東海大學社會工作系碩士論文。\n李蕙庭（2017）。《隱私的游擊戰？匿名通訊中藏私現象之研究》。臺灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文。\n谷玲玲（2013）。〈網路親密關係中的自我揭露〉，《資訊社會研究》，24：1-26。\n林家麒（2021年3月2日）。尋找你的真命天菜! 交友軟體使用族群大揭密【部落格文字資料】。取自https://www.eolembrain.com.tw/Latest_View.aspx?SelectID=457\n林淑馨（2010）。《質性研究：理論與實務》。臺北市：巨流圖書。\n邱瀅穎（2018）。《探究臉書新聞小編的編輯日常：從使用Hashtag的戰略與戰術談起》。政治大學傳播學院碩士論文。\n柯皓翔、洪琴宣（2021）。交友×PUA×假投資：分解「沉浸式詐騙」手法，你需要的4個反制手段【部落格文字資料】。取自 https://www.twreporter.org/a/online-scams-solutions\n范毓君（2019）。《未婚成年女性在交友軟體中的性經驗》。臺南大學諮商與輔導學系碩士論文。\n徐江敏、李姚軍譯（1992）。《日常生活中的自我表演》，臺北市：桂冠。（原書Erving Goffman. [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life, New York, NY: Anchor Books）\n張淳萱（2018）。《未婚青年人際關係需求、愛情風格與交友軟體使用狀態之研究》。東吳大學心理學系碩士論文。\n戚幼萱（2017）。《我如何相信你－對交友App的信任建立過程之影響因素》。世新大學心理學研究所碩士論文。\n曹家榮（2008）。〈MSN Messenger 的媒介訊息：從能供性看MSN人際關係展演〉，《資訊社會研究》，14：133-166。\n梁嘉雋（2019）。《大學生的多元文化人格、網路交友動機與人際關係滿意度之研究》。淡江大學教育心理與諮商研究所碩士論文。\n陳向明（2000）。《質的研究方法與社會科學研究》。中國北京：教育科學出版社。\n陳宜秀（2014）。《設計的心理學：人性化的產品設計如何改變世界》，臺北市：遠流。（原書 Norman, D. A. [2013]. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York, NY：Basic Books.）\n陳柏安、林宜蓁、陳蓉萱譯（2006）。《傳播理論》，臺北市：麥格羅希爾。（原書Emory A. Griffin. [2003]. A first look at communication theory. New York, NY：McGraw-Hill Education）\n曾凡慈（2010）。《污名：管理受損身分的筆記》，臺北市：群學。（原書 Goffman, E. [1963]. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York, NY：Simon & Schuster.）\n葉建亨、黃文楨（2011）。〈整合社會資本與社會交換理論探討虛擬社群知識分享意願〉，《中華民國資訊管理學報》，18(3)：76-100。\n謝豐存（2001）。《虛擬世界擇偶--以配對網站的異性交往為例》。臺灣師範大學家政教育研究所碩士論文。\n蘇柔郡（2017）。《高中女生手機相片後製實踐：以Instagram為例》。政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。\n蘇柔郡、吳筱玫（2018）。〈高中女生使用Instagram之日常美學：能供性觀點〉，《新聞學研究》，135：139-191。\n\n英文文獻\nAhuvia, A. C., & Adelman, M. B. (1992). Formal intermediaries in the marriage market: A typology and review. Journal of Marriage and The Family, 452-463.\nAlexopoulos, C., Timmermans, E., & McNallie, J. (2020). Swiping more, committing less: Unraveling the links among dating app use, dating app success, and intention to commit infidelity. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 172-180.\nBergström, M. (2016). Who uses online dating sites in France? Who finds their partner this way？ Population & Societies, 530(2), 1-4.\nBergström, M., & Kramer, R. (2015). Gendered attitudes to age on online dating sites (France, 2000s). Clio. Women, Gender, History, 2, 125-146.\nBirnholtz, J., Guillory, J., Hancock, J., & Bazarova, N. (2010, February). " On my way" deceptive texting and interpersonal awareness narratives. Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 1-4.\nBrown, G., Maycock, B., & Burns, S. (2005). Your picture is your bait: Use and meaning of cyberspace among gay men. Journal of Sex Research, 42(1), 63-73.\nBryant, K., & Sheldon, P. (2017). Cyber dating in the age of mobile apps: Understanding motives, attitudes, and characteristics. American Communication Journal, 19(2), 1-15.\nChan, L. S. (2017). Who uses dating apps? Exploring the relationships among trust, sensation-seeking, smartphone use, and the intent to use dating apps based on the integrative model. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 246-258.\nChan, L. S. (2018). Performing Chinese masculinities on dating apps: Interpretations, self-presentations, and Interactions. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Prague, Czech Republic.\nCornwell, B., & Lundgren, D. C. (2001). Love on the Internet: Involvement and misrepresentation in romantic relationships in cyberspace vs. realspace. Computers in Human Behavior, 17(2), 197-211.\nde Certeau, M. (1984/ 1984). The practice of everyday life (Rendall, S. F., Trans.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.\nDrouin, M., Miller, D., Wehle, S. M., & Hernandez, E. (2016). Why do people lie online? “Because everyone lies on the internet”. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 134-142.\nEllison, N. B., Hancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2011). Profile as promise: A framework for conceptualizing veracity in online dating self-presentations. New Media & Society, 14(1), 45-62.\nEllison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. (2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2), 415-441.\nFeldman, R. S., Forrest, J. A., & Happ, B. R. (2002). Self-presentation and verbal deception: Do self-presenters lie more? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(2), 163-170.\nFiore, A. T., & Donath, J. (2004, April). Online personals: An overview. Paper presented at the meeting of ACM Computer-Human Interaction 2004, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://smg.media.mit.edu/papers/atf/chi2004_personals_short.pdf\nFrench, M., Smith, M. E., Birnholtz, & Hancock, J. T. (2015). Is this how we (all) do it? Butler lies and ambiguity through a broader lens. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 4079-4082.\nGibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Lai, C. H. (2011). First comes love, then comes Google: An investigation of uncertainty reduction strategies and self-disclosure in online dating. Communication Research, 38(1), 70-100.\nHall, J. A., Park, N., Song, H., & Cody, M. J. (2010). Strategic misrepresentation in online dating: The effects of gender, self-monitoring, and personality traits. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(1), 117-135.\nHancock, J. T., & Toma, C. L. (2009). Putting your best face forward: The accuracy of online dating photographs. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 367-386.\nHancock, J., Birnholtz, J., Bazarova, N., Guillory, J., Perlin, J., & Amos, B. (2009). Butler lies: awareness, deception and design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 517-526. doi:10.1145/1518701.1518782\nHaselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 3-23.\nHiggins, E. T. (1987). Self-discrepancy: a theory relating self and affect. Psychological Review, 94(3), 319-340.\nHong, S., Jahng, M. R., Lee, N., & Wise, K. R. (2020). Do you filter who you are?: Excessive self-presentation, social cues, and user evaluations of Instagram selfies. Computers in Human Behavior, 104, 106-159.\nHutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441-456.\nJahng, M. R., & Littau, J. (2016). Interacting is believing: Interactivity, social cue, and perceptions of journalistic credibility on twitter. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 38-58.\nKemp S. (2020, February). DIGITAL 2020: TAIWAN. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-taiwan\nKnobloch, L. K. (2015). Uncertainty reduction theory. The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, 1-9.\nLeary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107(1), 34.\nLeFebvre, L. E. (2018). Swiping me off my feet: Explicating relationship initiation on Tinder. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(9), 1205-1229.\nLevine, R. T., & McCornack, A. S.(2014). An Introduction to advances in deception theory. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 345-347.\nLevine, T. R. (2014). Truth-default theory (TDT) a theory of human deception and deception detection. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(4), 378-392.\nLevine, T. R., Ali, M. V., Dean, M., Abdulla, R. A., & Garcia-Ruano, K. (2016). Toward a pan-cultural typology of deception motives. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 45(1), 1-12.\nMacLeod, C., & McArthur, V. (2019). The construction of gender in dating apps: An interface analysis of Tinder and Bumble. Feminist Media Studies, 19(6), 822-840.\nMarkowitz, D. M., Hancock, J. T., & Tong, S. (2018). Interpersonal dynamics in online dating: Profiles, matching, and discovery. A Networked Self and Love, 50-61.\nMarkowitz, M. D., & Hancock, T. J.(2018). Deception in mobile dating conversations. Journal of Communication, 68, 547-569.\nMayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.\nMcKenna, K. Y., Green, A. S., & Gleason, M. E. (2002). Relationship formation on the Internet: What’s the big attraction?. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 9-31.\nNagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media+Society, 1(2), 1-9. doi: 10.1177/2056305115603385\nNorris, A. R. (2011). Impression management: Considering cultural, social, and spiritual factors. Inquiries Journal, 3(07). Retrieved from http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=553\nPak, J., & Zhou, L. (2014). Social structural behavior of deception in computer-mediated communication. Decision Support Systems, 63, 95-103.\nPruchniewska, U. (2020). “I like that it’s my choice a couple different times”: Gender, affordances, and user experience on Bumble dating. International Journal of Communication, 14, 2422–2439\nRosenfeld, M. J., & Thomas, R. J. (2012). Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. American Sociological Review, 77(4), 523-547.\nRowatt, W. C., Cunningham, M. R., & Druen, P. B. (1998). Deception to get a date. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1228-1242.\nSensor Tower Inc. (2020). Top grossing dating apps worldwide for June 2020. Retrieved from Sensor Tower Web site: https://sensortower.com/blog/top-grossing-dating-apps-worldwide-june-2020\nSharabi, L. L., & Caughlin, J. P. (2019). Deception in online dating: Significance and implications for the first offline date. New Media & Society, 21(1), 229-247.\nShaw, A. (2017). Encoding and decoding affordances: Stuart Hall and interactive media technologies. Media, Culture & Society, 39(4), 592-602.\nSimon Kempr (2020). DIGITAL 2020: TAIWAN. Retrieved from DataReportal website: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-taiwan\nSproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512.\nStatista (2020). Most popular online dating apps in the United States as of September 2019, by audience size. Retrieved from Statista Web site： https://www.statista.com/statistics/826778/most-popular-dating-apps-by-audience-size-usa/\nTimmermans, E., & Courtois, C. (2018). From swiping to casual sex and/or committed relationships: Exploring the experiences of Tinder users. The Information Society, 34(2), 59-70.\nToma, C. L. (2016). Online dating. The International Encyclopedia of Interpersonal Communication, First Edition. doi: 10.1002/9781118540190.wbeic0118\nToma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2010). Looks and lies: The role of physical attractiveness in online dating self-presentation and deception. Communication Research, 37(3), 335-351.\nToma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What lies beneath: The linguistic traces of deception in online dating profiles. Journal of Communication, 62, 78-97.\nToma, C. L., Hancock, J. T., & Ellison, N. B. (2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036. doi:10.1177/0146167208318067\nToma, C. L., Jiang, L. C., & Hancock, J. T. (2018). Lies in the eye of the beholder: asymmetric beliefs about one’s own and others’ deceptiveness in mediated and face-to-face communication. Communication Research, 45(8), 1167-1192.\nWalther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-43.\nWalther, J. B., & Parks, M. R. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in. Handbook of Interpersonal Communication, 3, 529-563.\nWang, C. C., & Chang, Y. T. (2010). Cyber relationship motives: Scale development and validation. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(3), 289-300.\nWhitty, M. T. (2007a). Revealing the `real` me, searching for the `actual` you: Presentation of self on an internet dating site. Computer in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1707-1723.\nWhitty, M. T. (2007b). The art of selling one’s ‘self’ on an online dating site: The BAR approach. In Whitty, M. T., Baker, A. J., & Inman, J. A. (Eds.). Online matchmaking (pp. 57-69). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.\nYeo, T. E. D., & Fung, T. H. (2016). Relationships form so quickly that you won`t cherish them: Mobile dating apps and the culture of instantaneous relationships. In Gruzd, A., Jacobson, J., Mai, P., Ruppert, E., & Murthy, D. (Eds.), SMSociety `16: Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society (pp. 1-6). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.\nZinkhan, G. (2004). Romance and the Internet: The e-mergence of e-dating. Advances in Consumer Research, 31, 153-58. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 傳播學院碩士在職專班 108941024 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108941024 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102401.pdf | 3.28 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.