Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139288


Title: 臺北市國民中學校長真誠領導、教師心理賦權與學校創新經營效能關係之研究
A Study of the Relationships among Secondary School Principals' Authentic Leadership, Teachers’ Psychological Empowerment and Effectiveness of School Innovation Management in Taipei City
Authors: 許峻偉
Hsu, Chun-Wei
Contributors: 秦夢群
許峻偉
Hsu, Chun-Wei
Keywords: 校長真誠領導
教師心理賦權
學校創新經營效能
Principals' authentic leadership
Teachers’ psychological empowerment
School innovation management
Date: 2022
Issue Date: 2022-03-01 18:02:34 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本研究旨在瞭解臺北市國民中學教師知覺校長真誠領導、教師心理賦權與學校創新經營效能之現況。並分析不同背景變項之國民中學教師在知覺校長真誠領導、教師心理賦權與學校創新經營效能之差異情形以及探討校長真誠領導、教師心理賦權與學校創新經營效能之關係,最後探究校長真誠領導、教師心理賦權對學校創新經營效能之預測力分析。
本研究採問卷調查法,共計抽樣56所學校,發出530份問卷,回收442份問卷,經篩選後,共有406份有效問卷。問卷調查結果以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關與多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方式進行分析與探討。
本研究結果獲致以下之結論:
一、臺北市國民中學教師於校長真誠領導、教師心理賦權與學校創新效能皆屬高程度知覺
二、不同「性別」、「年齡」、「服務年資」、「教育程度」與「學校規模」之臺北市國民中學教師於知覺校長真誠領導具有差異。
三、不同「性別」、「年齡」、「服務年資」、「現任職務」與「學校規模」之臺北市國民中學教師於知覺教師心理賦權具有差異。
四、不同「性別」、「年齡」、「服務年資」、「教育程度」與「學校規模」之臺北市國民中學教師於知覺學校創新經營效能具有差異。
五、臺北市國民中學校長真誠領導、教師心理賦權與學校創新效能間整體與各構面皆為正相關。
六、臺北市國民中學校長真誠領導與教師心理賦權對學校創新效能具有預測力。
最後依據本研究結果與結論,提出具體建議,以供教育行政機關和學校校長及未來研究的參考。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the current development of secondary school principals' authentic leadership, teachers’ psychological empowerment and effectiveness of school innovation management in Taipei City. And to analyze the difference between teachers of different background variables, and to explore the relationship among the three variables. This study has aimed to predict school innovation management through principals' authentic leadership and teachers' psychological empowerment.
Through the use of questionnaire survey method, data were collected from 56 secondary schools, distributing 530 questionnaires in total. Valid questionnaires of 406 were collected. All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way-ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple stepwise regression analysis.
The conclusion of this study are as follows:
1.Secondary school teacher's perception of principals' authentic leadership, teachers’ psychological empowerment and effectiveness of school innovation management are all above average.
2.There is significant difference in the Secondary school teacher's perception of principals' authentic leadership in terms of gender, ages, years of service, educational background, and scale of school.
3.There is significant difference in the Secondary school teacher's perception of teachers’ psychological empowerment in terms of gender, ages, years of service, position, and scale of school.
4.There is significant difference in the Secondary school teacher's perception of school innovation management in terms of gender, ages, years of service, educational background, and scale of school.
5.There is a positive correlation among principals' authentic leadership, teachers’ psychological empowerment and effectiveness of school innovation management.
6.Principals' authentic leadership and teachers’ psychological empowerment have a predictive effect on school innovation management.
Reference: 壹、中文部分
丁振豐(2000)。動機理論。載於劉真(主編),教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309154/。
尤浩瑋(2020)。管理職能對員工創新行為影響之研究—心理賦權之中介效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄科技大學,高雄市。
王秀文(2012)。工作動機及因應策略在華人工作壓力歷程中之調節作用(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學,臺北市。
王金良、張大均(2011)。中小學教師心理授權的測量。心理發展與教育,27(1),105-111。
王為國(2019)。教師對十二年國民基本教育課程綱要實施的釋意。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10),31-36。doi:10.6791/TER
王凱萱(2019)。主管真誠領導與員工創造力:信任及心理安全感的觀點(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
王銘聖(2016)。中部地區國民小學校長真誠領導與教師幸福感之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
仲秀蓮(2011)。臺灣地區國民小學校長正向領導、學校文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
朱經明(2010)。教育及心理統計學。臺北市:五南。
何宇龍(2017)。新北市高級中等學校校長知識領導、教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
何高志(2017)。國民中學校長課程領導、組織學習與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立清華大學,新竹市。
吳政聰(2011)。南投縣國民小學校長教學領導與學校創新經營效能之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺中教育大學,臺中市。
吳晏禎(2014)。桃園市國中校長正向領導與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
吳清山(2004)。學校創新經營理念與策略。教師天地,128,30-44。
吳清山(2015)。教育概論。臺北市:五南。
吳清山、林天祐(2003)。教育名詞解釋-增權益能。教育研究,113,160。
吳清山、賴協志(2006)。國民中小學學校創新經營成效、阻力與因應途徑之研究。教育研究月刊,141,58-74。
吳雅芬(2020)。桃園市國民小學建置智慧教室調查及校長科技領導與學校創新經營效能關係分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
呂政憲(2018)。心理賦權、工作塑造與員工創新行為之關係:工作敬業的調節效果(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
呂紹弘(2020)。國民中學校長分布式領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
李怡樺(2018)。臺北市國民小學校長空間領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
李俊緯(2012)。新北市國民中學校長創新領導行為、教師知識管理能力與學校創新經營效能關聯之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
沈其泰(2020)。社會新鮮人的工作搜尋自我效能、工作搜尋期間以及個人與組織適配:焦點式資訊搜尋方法的中介效果。中華心理學刊,62(4),519 - 536。doi:10.6129/CJP.202012_62(4).0004
阮瑋飴(2018)。國民中學校長真誠領導之個案研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。
周婉玲(2011)。臺北市國民中學校長變革領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛(2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究,34,223 - 284。doi:10.6254/2010.34.223
林生傳(2000)。學校效能。載於劉真(主編),教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1314321/。
林沄萱、吳怡旻、黃久美、傅雅麟(2017)。團體對話中的自我覺察。中華團體心理治療,23(1),21-28。
林柏辰(2019)。真誠領導如何影響創新行為?跨層次之中介與調節影響效果(未出版之碩士論文)。 國立清華大學,新竹市。
林席鈞(2013)。心理資本、真誠領導、工作滿意與工作績效之關聯性研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立成功大學,臺南市。
林純暖(2010)。臺北縣國民小學認輔志工社會支持、心理賦權增能感與工作滿意度之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
林啟超(2012)。自我調整。載於劉真(主編),教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1453811/。
林國楨、謝侑真(2007)。學校領導新典範-完全領導(Total Leadership)內涵之初探。學校行政,48,187-209。
doi:10.6423/HHHC.200703.0187
林貴芬(2017)。國民小學校長真誠領導、教師心理資本、學校信任與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
林新發、王秀玲、黃秋鑾、仲秀蓮、顏如芳、鄧珮秀、林佳芬(2012)。國民小學校長知識領導、學習社群對學校創新經營效能影響之研究:以臺灣北部地區四縣市為例。教育行政研究,2(1),69-103。
洪英雄(2018)。臺灣原住民地區國民小學校長真誠領導、教師幸福感、組織健康與學校效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
紀家雄(2013)。國民小學校長創新技巧、學校智慧資本與學校創新績效關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
范熾文、張文權(2019)。運用真誠領導以促進正向教師文化發展之探究。教育研究月刊,304,32-45。
秦夢群(2019a)。教育領導理論與應用。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群(2019b)。教育行政理論與模式(四版)。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群、莊清寶(2018)。學校特色發展與創新。臺北市:五南。
秦夢群、濮世緯(2006)。學校創新經營理念與實施之研究。教育研究與發展期刊,2(3),123-150。
張子超(2000)。分層隨機取樣。載於劉真(主編),教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1302864/。
張仁家、黃佳淇(2010)。從學校創新經營的視角論有效提昇學校行政服務之品質。學校行政,66,155-168。
doi:10.6423/HHHC.201003.0155
張本文(2011)。論教師領導對教師專業發展之影響。學校行政,75,21-36。doi:10.6423/HHHC.201109.0021
張旭嵐(2014)。心理賦權、知覺組織支持對幸福感及創新行為之影響─以預期形象為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
張志誠(2020)。領導行為、真誠領導、信任感與員工滿意度關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立交通大學,新竹市。
張信務、賴文宗、林信志(2020年11月)。中小學專業標準之初探:模糊德菲法之應用。王如哲(主持人),領導素養的過去與未來。2020東亞大區校長學學術研討會,國家教育研究院。
張恒(2019)。臺北市國民中學校長真誠領導、教師社群感與學校組織健康之關係研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
張春興(2006)。張氏心理學辭典(重訂版二刷)。臺北市:東華。
張茵倩(2014)。國民小學校長策略領導、行銷策略 與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
張景媛(2000)。外在動機。載於劉真(主編),教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1303809/。
張靜怡(2018)。真誠領導與創新行為之關係:以工作敬業與利社會動機為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
梁維鈞(2016)。新竹縣國民小學校長真誠領導與教師幸福感關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立新竹教育大學,新竹市。
許文寧(2013)。高中校長轉型領導對教師組織認同影響之研究---教師心理賦權之中介效果分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
許雅筑(2018)。真誠領導對工作滿意度與續業意願之研究:以組織社會化與工作投入為調節變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立高雄餐旅大學,高雄市。
郭朝慶(2017)。新北市國民小學校長知識領導、易經謙卦與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
陳心茹(2011)。心理賦權、品味能力對創新行為關係之研究:以預期形象為干擾變項(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
陳宇軒(2014)。桃園縣國民中學校長分布式領導、教師心理賦權與教師學術樂觀關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
陳李綢(2000)。內在動機。載於劉真(主編),教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1302695/。
彭淑玲、黃博聖、陳學志(2019)。彭淑玲、黃博聖、陳學志。教育科學研究期刊,64(4),87-113。
doi:10.6209/JORIES.201912_64(4).0004
曾義均(2013)。團隊與個人心理賦權對員工服務創新之影響-以組織創新氣氛、正向心理資本為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立中央大學,桃園市。
湯志民(2006)。政大附中創新經營的理念與策略。教育研究月刊,145,60-72。
湯家偉(2018)。國中校長真誠領導之影響因素:華人傳統領導文化之觀點。教育與心理研究,41(4),1-25。
程炳林(2000)。自我效能論。載於劉真(主編),教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1305209/。
童惠玲、呂雅婷(2016年6月)。目標導向對創新績效之影響-心理賦權之調節效果與知識分享之中介效果。尚榮安(主持人),創新與電子商務。2016第19屆科際整合管理研討會,東吳大學。doi:10.6495/CIMBM.2016.034
馮丰儀(2018)。校長真誠領導:理論與實踐。臺北市:五南。
馮丰儀(2019)。以校長真誠領導營造學生學習支持環境。教育研
究月刊,308,80-96。doi:10.3966/168063602019120308006
馮丰儀、楊宜婷(2012)。校長真誠領導實踐之探究。學校行政,80,17-32。doi:10.6423/HHHC.201207.0017
馮丰儀、楊宜婷(2012)。我國國民小學校長真誠領導與教師信任關係之研究。臺北市立大學學報,46(2),1-27。
doi:10.6336/JUT.4602.001
黃文三(2009)。從正向心理學論生命教育的實施。教育理論與實踐學刊,19,1-34。doi:10.7038/JETP.200906.0002
黃玉貞(2012)。國民小學分布式領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
黃昆輝、張德銳(2000)。組織效能。載於劉真(主編),教育大辭書。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1310703/。
黃建翔(2014)。國民小學校長知識領導、資料導向決定與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。臺北市立大學,臺北市。
黃建翔、吳清山(2012)。臺灣近十年學校創新經營研究之分析與展望:以期刊與學位論文為主。教育研究與發展期刊,8(3),1-30。doi:10.6925/SCJ.201209_8(3).0001
黃建翔、吳清山(2018)。國小校長知識領導影響學校創新經營效能之關係-以資料導向決定為中介變項。香港中文大學教育學報,46(1),1-21。
黃國政(2014)。新北市國民小學校長分布式領導、教師工作壓力與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
楊君琦、毛雯慧(2018)。員工與主管適配度、心理賦權與建言行為關係之研究-職場友誼的調節角色。科技與人力教育季刊,5(1),1-24。doi:10.6587/JTHRE.201809_5(1).0001
楊玲凰(2016)。國民小學教師知覺校長真誠領導與學校效能關係之研究–以學校組織氣氛為中介變項(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。
楊朝祥(2014)。十二年國民基本教育:政策爭議與對策。教育資料與研究,115,1-26。doi:10.6724/ERR.201411_(115).0001
楊慶麟(2019)。國民小學校長完全領導、分布式領導、教師組織公民行為與教師創新教學關係之研究。學校行政,119,1-30。doi:10.6423/HHHC.201901_(119).0001
葉佳蓁(2018)。威權領導、心理賦權與正向情感對創新行為之影響(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣科技大學,臺北市。
廖賀柏(2016)。領導的黑暗與光明:不當督導、真誠領導、認知資源與員工創新行為之關係(未出版之碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
臺北市政府教育局(2021)。109學年度臺北市高級中等以下學校概況。未出版之統計數據。取自https://www.doe.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=3FBADB3CFD3F0745&sms=78D644F2755ACCAA&s=7818E556F14E1E1C
趙志林(2019)。臺北市國民小學校長真誠領導、教師正向心理資本與教師組織承諾關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
趙志揚、張彩珠、林致瑋、劉丙燈(2015)。高級中等學校教師心理賦權、學校組織創新氛圍、校長賦權領導與教師創造力教學行為關聯性之研究。教育政策論壇,18(4),131-171。
劉丙燈(2013)。我國高級中等學校校長賦權領導、學校組織創新氛圍、教師心理賦權、教師創造性人格特質與教師創造力教學行為關聯性之探討(未出版之博士論文)。國立彰化師範大學,彰化縣。
劉淑慧、孫頌賢、夏允中、王智弘(2017)。後現代思維與第二波正向心理學在諮商的應用。中華輔導與諮商學報,49,1-15。doi:10.3966/172851862017080049001
蔡進雄(2007)。國民中小學學校創新管理成效、實踐困難與有效途徑之研究。學校行政,47,1-26。doi:10.6423/HHHC.200701.0001
蔣佩臻(2019)。國中小校長真誠領導實踐之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立暨南國際大學,南投縣。
鄭文淵(2013)。國民中學校長空間領導、學校組織文化與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
蕭宏宇(2015)。國民小學校長正向領導、學校公共關係與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
薛凱方(2011)。生涯自主動機歷程與生涯定向、學習投入之模式驗證-以自我決定理論之觀點(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
謝文全(2016)。教育行政學(五版)。臺北市:高等教育。
謝念慈、陳政翊(2018)。從學校經營計畫探究校長領導實踐力。載於吳清基(主編),教育政策與學校經營。臺北市:五南。
謝傳崇、黃瑞真、謝宜君(2016)。國民中學校長翻轉領導與學校創新經營相關之研究。學校行政,104,135 – 159。doi:10.3966/160683002016070104008
謝傳崇、邱世方(2014)。國民小學校長策略領導對學校創新經營效能關係之研究:以學校創新氣氛為中介變項。教育政策論壇,17(2),105-137。
謝傳崇、蕭輝勳(2011)。國民中小學校長知識領導與學校創新經營效能關係之研究。中等教育,62(1),50-70。doi:10.6249/SE.2011.62.1.04
簡忠仁、鄭伯壎、連玉輝(2019)。真誠崇拜或真誠感染?真誠領導的雙路徑模式。中華心理學刊,61(1),1-23。doi:10.6129/CJP.201903_61(1).0001
羅郁晴(2016)。以自我決定論探討成人閱讀動機、態度及行為之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
譚偉明、陳穎堅(2006)。建構理論取向的學校組織學習。香港中文大學教育學報,34(2),1-23。
鐘啟哲(2013)。國民中學校長分布式領導、教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營效能關係之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。

貳、英文部分
Agote, L., Aramburu, N., & Lines, R. (2016). Authentic leadership perception, trust in the leader, and followers’ emotions in organizational change processes. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(1), 35-63. doi:10.1177/0021886315617531
Alfadli, M. A., & Al-Mehaisen, S. M. (2019). The reality of administrative empowerment among the recently employed administrators in the intermediate schools. International Education Studies, 12(6), 120-133. doi:10.5539/ies.v12n6p120
Allameh, S. M., Heydari, M., & Davoodi, S. M. R. (2012). Studying the relationship between transformational leadership and psychological empowerment of teachers in Abade Township. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 224-230. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.046
ALMULHIM, A. F. (2020). Linking knowledge sharing to innovative work behaviour: the role of psychological empowerment. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(9), 549-560. doi:10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.549
Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 304-323. doi:10.1177/1548051814565819
Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Aria, A., Jafari, P., & Behifar, M. (2019). Authentic leadership and teachers' intention to stay: The mediating role of perceived organizational support and psychological capital. World Journal of Education, 9(3), 67-81. doi:10.5430/wje.v9n3p67
Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Walumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., & May, D. R. (2004). Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6), 801-823.doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.003
Avolio, B.J., Luthans, F., Walumba, F.O. (2004). Authentic leadership: Theory building for veritable sustained performance. Working paper: Gallup Leadership Institute, University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Avolio, B. J., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 315-338. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
Begley, P. (2001). In pursuit of authentic school leadership practices. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 353-365.doi:10.1080/13603120110078043
Bhindi, N., & Duignan, P. (1997). Leadership for a new century: Authenticity, intentionality, spirituality and sensibility. Educational Management & Administration, 25(2), 117-132.doi:10.1177/0263211X97252002
Bin Jomah, N. (2017). Psychological empowerment on organizational commitment as perceived by Saudi academics. World Journal of Education, 7(1), 83-92. doi:10.5430/wje.v7n1p83
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.004
Cheng, K. W. (2008). A study on applying the concept of innovation management to accounting curriculum. College Student Journal, 42(2), 625-629.
Chin, J. Mc., & Chuang, C. P. (2015). The relationships among school-based budgeting, innovative management, and school effectiveness: A study on specialist schools in Taiwan. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24, 679–693. doi: 10.1007/s40299-014-0220-3
Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471-482. doi: 10.5465/amr.1988.4306983
Dash, S. S., & Vohra, N. (2019). The leadership of the school principal. Management Research Review, 42(3), 352-369.doi: 10.1108/MRR-11-2017-0384
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
Demirdag, S., & Kalafat, S. (2016). Applying school administrators' authentic leadership skills in conflict situations: The perceptions of substitute teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1644-1651.doi:1644-1651. 10.13189/ujer.2016.040716
Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
Duignan, P. A., & Bhindi, N. (1997). Authenticity in leadership: An emerging perspective. Journal of Educational Administration, 35(3), 195-209. doi:10.1108/09578239710170119
Farrell, J. B., & Weitman, C. J. (2007). Action research fosters empowerment and learning communities. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 73(3), 36.
Feiz, D., Dehghani Soltani, M., & Farsizadeh, H. (2019). The effect of knowledge sharing on the psychological empowerment in higher education mediated by organizational memory. Studies in Higher Education, 44(1), 3-19. doi:10.1080/03075079.2017.1328595
Feng, F. I. (2016). School principals’ authentic leadership and teachers’ psychological capital: teachers’ perspectives. International Education Studies, 9(10), 245-255.doi: 10.5539/ies.v9n10p245
Flaherty, A., O'Dwyer, A., Mannix-McNamara, P., & Leahy, J. J. (2017). The influence of psychological empowerment on the enhancement of chemistry laboratory demonstrators' perceived teaching self-image and behaviours as graduate teaching assistants. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18(4), 710-736.doi: 10.1039/C7RP00051K
Fuller, J. B., Morrison, R., Jones, L., Bridger, D., & Brown, V. (1999). The effects of psychological empowerment on transformational leadership and job satisfaction. The Journal of Social Psychology, 139(3), 389-391.doi: 10.1080/00224549909598396
Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R., & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 343-372. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.003
George, B. (2003). Authentic leadership: Rediscovering the secrets to creating lasting value. New York: Wiley.
Greenier, V. T., & Whitehead, G. E. (2016). Towards a model of teacher leadership in ELT: Authentic leadership in classroom practice. RELC Journal, 47(1), 79-95.doi: 10.1177/0033688216631203
Harter, S. (2002). Authenticity. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (p. 382–394). Oxford University Press.
Herzberg, F. (2017). Motivation to work. Oxford, England: Routledge.Hoy, W. K., & Henderson, J. E. (1983). Principal authenticity, school climate, and pupil-control orientation. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29(2), 123-130.
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration: theory, research. Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005). Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 373-394.doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002
Ismail, S. N., Abdullah, A. S., & Abdullah, A. G. K. (2019). The effect of school leaders' authentic leadership on teachers' job stress in the eastern part of peninsular Malaysia. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 67-80. doi:10.29333/iji.2019.1225a
Jamian, L. S., Ibadallah, B. X., & Fook, C. Y. (2019). A conceptual framework: The influence of school culture types and personality traits on psychological empowerment amongst secondary school teachers in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education, 15(3), 1-13.
Javed, B., Khan, A. A., Bashir, S., & Arjoon, S. (2017). Impact of ethical leadership on creativity: the role of psychological empowerment. Current Issues in Tourism, 20(8), 839-851.doi: 10.1080/13683500.2016.1188894
Karada, E., & Öztekin, O. (2018). The effect of authentic leadership on school culture: A structural equation model. International Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 6(1), 40-75. doi: 10.17583/ijelm.2018.2858
Kowang, T. O., Long, C. S., & Rasli, A. (2015). Innovation Management and Performance Framework for Research University in Malaysia. International Education Studies, 8(6), 32-45. doi:10.5539/ies.v8n6p32
Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 79-102.doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.006
Kulophas, D., Hallinger, P., Ruengtrakul, A., & Wongwanich, S. (2018). Exploring the effects of authentic leadership on academic optimism and teacher engagement in Thailand. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 27-45.doi: 10.1108/IJEM-10-2016-0233
Lardier, D. T., Opara, I., Bergeson, C., Herrera, A., Garcia‐Reid, P., & Reid, R. J. (2019). A study of psychological sense of community as a mediator between supportive social systems, school belongingness, and outcome behaviors among urban high school students of color. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(5), 1131-1150.doi: 10.1002/jcop.22182
Laschinger, H. K. S., & Fida, R. (2015). Linking nurses’ perceptions of patient care quality to job satisfaction: the role of authentic leadership and empowering professional practice environments. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 45(5), 276-283. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000198
Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2013). Development and validation of the school leader empowering behaviours (SLEB)scale. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4): 485–495. doi:10.1007/s40299-012-0047-8
Lee, A. N., & Nie, Y. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions of school leaders’ empowering behaviours and psychological empowerment: Evidence from a Singapore sample. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 260-283. doi:10.1177/1741143215578448
Lei, Z., Zhou, F., & Lei, Y. (2011). Leadership style and employee innovative behavior: The mediating effects of psychological empowerment. 2011 International Conference on E-Business and E-Government (ICEE), 1-4.doi: 10.1109/ICEBEG.2011.5882384.
Li, L., Hallinger, P., & Ko, J. (2016). Principal leadership and school capacity effects on teacher learning in Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 76-100.doi: 10.1108/IJEM-03-2014-0035
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships, and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.407
Liu, F., Chow, I. H. S., Zhang, J. C., & Huang, M. (2019). Organizational innovation climate and individual innovative behavior: Exploring the moderating effects of psychological ownership and psychological empowerment. Review of Managerial Science, 13(4), 771-789. doi: 10.1007/s11846-017-0263-y
Louis, S. K., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315-336.doi: 10.1080/09243453.2010.486586
Louis, K. S., & Murphy, J. (2017). Trust, caring and organizational learning: The leader’s role. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(1), 103-126.doi: 10.1108/JEA-07-2016-0077
Luthans, F., & Avolio, B. J. (2003). Authentic Leadership Development. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship (pp. 241-258). San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
McCharen, B., Song, J., & Martens, J. (2011). School innovation: The mutual impacts of organizational learning and creativity. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(6), 676-694.doi: 10.1177/1741143211416387
Menon, S. (2001). Employee empowerment: An integrative psychological approach. Applied psychology, 50(1), 153-180.doi: 10.1111/1464-0597.00052
Mubarak, F., & Noor, A. (2018). Effect of authentic leadership on employee creativity in project-based organizations with the mediating roles of work engagement and psychological empowerment. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1.doi: 10.1080/23311975.2018.1429348
Muda, A. L., & Fook, C. Y. (2020). Psychological empowerment and organisational commitment among academic staff of public universities in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 26-35.doi: 10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10292
Neider, L. L., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2011). The authentic leadership inventory (ALI): Development and empirical tests. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1146-1164.doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.09.008
Newcomer, K. E., & Wirtz, P. W. (2004). Using statistics in evaluation. Handbook of practical program evaluation, 439-478.
Niehoff, B. P., Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G., & Fuller, J. (2001). The influence of empowerment and job enrichment on employee loyalty in a downsizing environment. Group & Organization Management, 26(1), 93-113.doi: 10.1177/1059601101261006
Neilsen, E. H. (1986). Empowerment strategies: Balancing authority and responsibility. In S. Srivastva & Associates (Eds.), Executive power: 78-110. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Orly S. L., & Tania L. G. (2015). Authentic leadership strategies in support of mentoring processes. School Leadership & Management, 35(2), 183-201.doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.992777
Orly S. L., & Tania L. G. (2016). The multifaceted nature of mentors’ authentic leadership and mentees’ emotional intelligence: A critical perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(6), 951-969. doi:10.1177/1741143215595413
Patterson, F. (1999). Innovation Potential Predictor. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.
Preston, C., Goldring, E., Berends, M., & Cannata, M. (2012). School innovation in district context: Comparing traditional public schools and charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 318-330. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.07.016
Quraishi, U., & Aziz, F. (2018). An investigation of authentic leadership and teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior in secondary schools of Pakistan. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-10.doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2018.1437670
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 15(2), 121-148. doi:10.1007/BF00919275
Read, E. A., & Laschinger, H. K. (2015). The influence of authentic leadership and empowerment on nurses’ relational social capital, mental health and job satisfaction over the first year of practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(7), 1611-1623.doi:10.1111/jan.12625
SAĞNAK, M., KuruÖz, M., Polat, B., & Soylu, A. (2015). Transformational leadership and innovative climate: An examination of the mediating effect of psychological empowerment. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(60), 149-162. doi:10.14689/ejer.2015.60.9
Sanli, Ö. (2019). Examining the effect of teachers' perception of psychological empowerment on the stress level they perceive. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(8), 98-111. doi:10.11114/jets.v7i8.4283
Schermuly, C. C., Meyer, B., & Dämmer, L. (2013). Leader-member exchange and innovative behavior: The mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(3), 132. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000093
Schuckert, M., Kim, T. T., Paek, S., & Lee, G. (2018). Motivate to innovate. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30(2), 776-796. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-05-2016-0282
Seibert, S. E., Silver, S. R., & Randolph, W. A. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332-349. doi:10.5465/20159585
Seibert, S. E., Wang, G., & Courtright, S. H. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981-1003. doi:10.1037/a0022676
Shamir, B., & Eilam, G. (2005). “What's your story?” A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 395-417. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.005
Shapira-Lishchinsky, O., & Tsemach, S. (2014). Psychological empowerment as a mediator between teachers’ perceptions of authentic leadership and their withdrawal and citizenship behaviors. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 675-712. doi: 10.1177/0013161X13513898
Singh, M., & Sarkar, A. (2012). The relationship between psychological empowerment and innovative behavior. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 11(3), 127-137.doi: 10.1027/1866-5888/a000065
Sinha, S., Priyadarshi, P., & Kumar, P. (2016). Organizational culture, innovative behaviour and work related attitude. Journal of Workplace Learning, 28(8), 519-535.doi: 10.1108/JWL-06-2016-0055
Soares, A. E., & Lopes, M. P. (2020). Are your students safe to learn? The role of lecturer’s authentic leadership in the creation of psychologically safe environments and their impact on academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 65-78. doi: 10.1177/1469787417742023
Speer, P. W., & Peterson, N. A. (2000). Psychometric properties of an empowerment scale: Testing cognitive, emotional, and behavioral domains. Social Work Research, 24(2), 109-118. doi: 10.1093/swr/24.2.109
Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465. doi:10.5465/256865
Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of management journal, 39(2), 483-504. doi:10.5465/256789
Spreitzer, G. M., De Janasz, S. C., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered to lead: The role of psychological empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 20(4), 511-526.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<511::AID-JOB900>3.0.CO;2-L
Srivastava, A. P., & Dhar, R. L. (2016). Impact of leader member exchange, human resource management practices and psychological empowerment on extra role performances. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(3), 351-377. doi:10.1108/IJPPM-01-2014-0009
Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681. doi:10.5465/amr.1990.4310926
Treviño, L. K., Hartman, L. P., & Brown, M. (2000). Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review, 42(4), 128-142. doi:10.2307/41166057
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47-59.doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89-126.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293-321.doi: 10.5465/amr.1993.3997517
Yao, J., You, Y., & Zhu, J. (2020). Principal–Teacher management communication and teachers’ job performance: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and affective commitment. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 29(4), 365-375.doi: 10.1007/s40299-019-00490-0
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.48037118
Zhu, J., Yao, J., & Zhang, L. (2019). Linking empowering leadership to innovative behavior in professional learning communities: the role of psychological empowerment and team psychological safety. Asia Pacific Education Review, 20(4), 657-671. doi: 10.1007/s12564-019-09584-2
Zimmerman, M. A. (1990). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between individual and psychological conceptions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 169-177. doi: 10.1007/BF00922695
Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581-599. doi: 10.1007/BF02506983
Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 20(6), 707-727.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(5), 725-750. doi: 10.1007/BF00930023
Description: 碩士
國立政治大學
教育行政與政策研究所
108171006
Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0108171006
Data Type: thesis
Appears in Collections:[教育行政與政策研究所 ] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
100601.pdf8744KbAdobe PDF28View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing