Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139563
題名: 設計思考倫理和專案資本主義精神
The Ethics of Design Thinking and the Spirit of Project Capitalism
作者: 林品君
Lin, Pin-Chun
貢獻者: 高國魁
Kao, Kuo-Kuei
林品君
Lin, Pin-Chun
關鍵詞: 專案資本主義
自主性
本真性
設計思考
博物館學
Project Capitalism
Autonomy
Authenticity
Design Thinking
Museology
日期: 2022
上傳時間: 1-Apr-2022
摘要: 設計思考(Design Thinking)經常被視為打造符合使用者需求的商品/服務之商業策略。全球領導設計和創新公司IDEO,主張它是企業創新和改變世界的方法。目前,它廣泛滲透至企業界和學術界,導致全球正掀起一陣設計思考旋風。此外近年來,創意、適應力、團隊合作也是職場要求軟性技能的排行榜常勝軍。設計思考一般被定位為挖掘創意和適應跨領域合作的心法。順此脈絡,設計思考既能給人帶來愉悅事物的互動體驗,又是作為應對流變世界的系統工具。然而,設計思考真的是如此完美的工具嗎?它的風行僅由於宣傳者的賣力嗎?基本上,本研究欲站在資本主義的社會變遷面上來看待此事。進一步言,本研究也會探討設計思考為個人和社會帶來的影響。\n\n因此,本文首先論證,當今資本主義更接近專案化與碎形化的形式,並且指陳在碎形化的脈絡下,現今國家、城市、組織,乃至生命只能浸泡至專案之中。其次,我們將彰顯資本主義精神與設計思考內涵之間的選擇性親近。資本主義的自主性和本真性精神,分別可以對應到設計思考的實驗精神與體驗設計內涵。因此主張,設計思考正是乘著資本主義精神飛行,才容易被大眾接受和普及。其三,我們欲深入剖析設計思考欲宣揚的倫理,包括創新潛能、以人為本和行動先行等心態建立,分析它們如何正當和增強專案化與碎形化資本主義精神。之後,我們將試圖挖掘設計思考的危險性,反省創新享受引發的焦慮、親密同理帶來的窒息、積極行動造就的疲乏。最後,正視了設計思考的倫理和危險後,我們援引葛洛伊斯的博物館理論,初步推論超越設計思考的社會關係想像。它更接近異質且創新、透明且距離、個體且整體的關係形式。
Design Thinking is usually understood as a business strategy for designing user-centered products or services. IDEO, a top design and innovation consulting firm, has promoted Design Thinking as a business-innovating and world-changing method. Design Thinking has been trending across the industrial and academic worlds in recent years. In addition, creativity, adaptability and teamwork have become indispensable job requirements nowadays, and design thinking is generally positioned as a great training tool to excavate creativity and facilitate cross-disciplinary collaboration. In this context, Design Thinking not only creates a pleasurable user experience and but also presents a systematic tool in response to our topsy-turvy world. However, is Design Thinking a cure-all? Can its proponents take the credits for its popularity? Fundamentally, we intend to understand Design Thinking within the changing context of capitalism. Furthermore, we seek to interpret the impacts of Design Thinking on individuals and societies.\n\nAccordingly, this thesis firstly contends that contemporary capitalism has become project-based and fractalized. To survive in the fractalized world, countries, cities, organizations and even human life itself must be immersed in all kinds of projects. Secondly, the thesis accentuates the elective affinity between the spirits of capitalism and the ethics of Design Thinking. The notions of experimental spirit and experience design in Design Thinking resonate with the spirits of autonomy and authenticity in contemporary capitalism. As a result, contemporary capitalism is able to appeal to the masses effectively by means of Design Thinking. Thirdly, the thesis dives into the discourse of Design Thinking, which comprises the concepts of creative potentiality, humanized design and precession of action with an aim to analyze the ways in which this discourse justifies and strengthens the spirit of project-based and fractalized capitalism. Thereafter, we aim to highlight the dark sides of design thinking, thereby reflecting on anxiety brought out by promoted innovation, suffocation triggered by intimate empathy, and fatigue provoked by positive actions.\n8\nEventually, acknowledging the ethics and dangers of Design Thinking, the thesis resorts to Boris Groys` s museology to theorize a new image of social relation beyond Design Thinking, which is more akin to heterogeneous and innovative, transparent but distancing, individualized yet holistic forms of society.
參考文獻: 第一節、專書\nAlford, R.(2011)。好研究怎麼做。(王志弘譯)。群學。(原著出版於1998年)\nBadiou, A., & Truong, N. (2012). In Praise of Love (P. Bush, Trans.). Serpent’s Tail. (Original work published 2009)
\nBarthes, R.(2019)。神話學。(江灝譯)。麥田出版。(原著出版於1957年)\nBaudrillard, J. (2000). The Vital Illusion. Columbia University Press.\nBaudrillard, J. (2015). Simulacra and Simulation (S. Glaser, Trans.). The University of Michigan Press. (Original work published 1981)
\nBaudrillard, J.(2000)。消費社會。(劉承富、全志鋼譯)。南京大學出版。(原著出版於1970年)\nBaudrillard, J.(2015)。藝術的共謀。(張新木、楊全強、戴阿寶譯)。南京大學出版。(原著出版於1996年)\nBaudrillard, J.(2019)。惡的透明性。(王晴譯)。西北大學出版。(原著出版於1990年)\nBauman, Z.(2018)。液態現代性。(陳雅馨譯)。商周出版。(原著出版於1999年)\nBerardi, F. (2009). Precarious Rhapsody. (A. Bove, E. Empson, M. Groddard, G. Mecchia, A. Schintu, & S. Wright Trans.). Minor Compositions.\nBoltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. (G. Elliott, Trans.). Verso Press. (Original work published 1999)
\nBrown, T.(2010)。設計思考改造世界。(吳莉君譯)。聯經。(原著出版於2009年)\nChipchase, J., & Steinhardt, S.。(2015)。觀察的力量。(洪世民譯)。寶鼎出版。(原著出版於2013年)\nDavies, W. (2014). The Limits of Neoliberalism. Sage Publication.\nFleming, P. (2017). The Death of Homo Economics. Pluto Press\nFoucault, M. (1971). The Order of Discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying The Text: A Post-Structuralist Reader (pp.48-78). Routledge & Kegan Paul.\nGroys. B. (2010). Going Public. Sternberg Press.\nGroys. B. (2021). Logic of the Collection. Sternberg Press.\nHan, B. C.(2018)。時間的味道。(包向飛和徐基太譯)。重慶大學出版。(原著出版於2017年)\nHarvey, D.(2016)。新自由主義簡史。(王欽譯)。上海譯文出版。(原著出版於2005年)\nHochschild, A.(2016)。外包時代。(歐怡欣譯)。深石數位。(原著出版於2012年)\nKelley, D., & Kelley, T.(2014)。創意自信帶來力量。(林育如譯)。聯經。(原著出版於2013年)\nKen L.(2018)。摺紙動物園。(張玄竺譯)。新經典文化。(原著出版於2016年)\nLash, S., & Urry, J.(2010)。符號與空間的經濟分析。(趙偉妏譯)。韋伯出版。(原著出版於1993年)\nMartin, R.(2011)。設計思考就是這麼回事!。(李仰淳、林利冠譯)。 天下文化。(原著出版於2009年)\nMazzucato, M.(2020)。萬物的價值。(鄭煥昇譯)。時報出版。(原著出版於2017年)\nMcGowan, T. (2004). Enjoying What We Don’t Have: The Political Project of Psychoanalysis. University of Nebraska Press.\nMcGowan, T. (2004). The end of dissatisfaction? : Jacques Lacan and the emerging society of enjoyment. State University of New York Press.\nNorman D.(2014)。設計的心理學。(陳宜秀譯)。遠流出版。(原著出版於1988年)\nPatnaik, D. (2009). Wired to Care. FT Press.\nPijl, P., Lokitz, J., & Solomon, L.(2017)。設計一門好生意。(尤傳莉譯)。早安財經文化。(原著出版於2016年)\nRose, N. (1999). Governing the soul. Free Association Books.\nRossman, J. & Duerden, M. (2019). Designing Experience. Columbia University Press.\nRowe, P. (1991). Design Thinking (3rd ed.). The MIT Press. (Original work published 1987)\nSeitz, T. (2020). Design Thinking and the New Spirit of Capitalism. (L. Cerami, Trans.). Palgrave Pivot. (Original work published 2017)
\nSennett, R.(2007)。再會吧!公共人。(萬毓澤譯)。群學出版。(原著出版於1977年)\nSennett, R.(2010)。新資本主義文化。(李繼宏譯)。上海譯文出版。(原著出版於2006年)\nSimon, H. (1996). The Sciences of the Artificial (3rd ed.). The MIT Press. (Original work published 1968)\nSrnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.\nWeber, M.(2020)。基督新教倫理與資本主義精神。(康樂、簡惠美譯)。遠流出版。(原著出版於1905年)\nWhiteley, N.(2014)。為社會而設計。(游萬來、楊敏英、李盈盈譯)。聯經。(原著出版於1993年)\nWodak, R. Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of Critical Discourse Studies (3rd ed., pp.1-23). Sage Publications.\n吳明益(2019)。苦雨之地。新經典文化。\n村上春樹(1993)。國境之南・太陽之西。(賴明珠譯)。時報出版。(原著出版於1992年)\n柴(2012)。集體心碎日記。女書文化。\n瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞(2015)。社會及行為科學研究法:質性研究法。東華書局出版。\n第二節、期刊文章、研究報告\nChristiaens T. (2020). The entrepreneur of the self beyond Foucault’s neoliberal homo oeconomicus. European Journal of Social Theory, 23(4):493-511.\nhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1368431019857998\nHickel, J. (2012). A short history of neoliberalism (and how we can change it). New Left Project. https://www.academia.edu/38364529/A_Short_History_of_Neoliberalism_And_How_We_Can_Change_It_\n游美惠(2000)。內容分析、文本分析與論述分析在社會研究的運用。調查研究,(8),5-42。https://dx.doi.org/10.7014/TCYC.200008.0005\n第三節、網路資料\nfOx(2015年10月15日)。Google 公司的「幻想科技部門」,用這三個思考方式快速設計出劃時代產品的原型。INSIDE。\nhttps://www.inside.com.tw/article/5153-rapid-prototyping-google-glass\nHui, Evi (2017, April 21). Designing from the Car: Why Context Matters. Medium.\nhttps://medium.com/uber-design/designing-from-the-car-why-context-matters-a5e03fa2b744\nKen Li(2016年5月23日)。Netflix 也用 A/B Test 設計不同劇照觀察用戶喜好。unwire.pro。\nhttps://unwire.pro/2016/05/23/netflix-ab-test/news/\nNuys, A. (2019, December 28). New LinkedIn Research: Upskill Your Employees with the Skills Companies Need Most in 2020. LinkedIn Learning Blog.\nhttps://www.linkedin.com/business/learning/blog/learning-and-development/most-in-demand-skills-2020\nOrlik, T., Jimenez, J., & Sam, C. (2021, May 21). World-Dominating Superstar Firms Get Bigger, Techier, and More Chinese. Bloomberg Businessweek. https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2021-biggest-global-companies-growth-trends/\nStinson, L. (2014, Jan 8). With Stunning New Stores, Starbucks Has a New Design Strategy: Act Local. WIRED.\nhttps://www.wired.com/2014/01/starbucks-big-plan-to-be-your-cozy-neighborhood-coffee-shop/\n中田敦(2016年7月29日)。IBM押寶設計思維增聘設計師 背後的邏輯是什麼?。STOCKFEEL。\nhttps://reurl.cc/EZ5Gzk\n夏傳位(2017年5月31日)。簡介「金融化」故事及其測量。巷子口社會學。https://twstreetcorner.org/2017/05/31/hsiachuanwei/\n張育寧(2019年5月26日)。【專訪IBM iX全球副總裁馬修坎迪】IBM如何在強敵環伺下再度讓大象翩翩起舞?。科技報橘。\nhttps://buzzorange.com/techorange/2019/05/26/interview-ibmix-global-leader-matthew-candy/\n陳書榕(2017年4月25日)。「為什麼非得這樣工作?」3張管理學演變圖,給主管的反思。經理人。\nhttps://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/54342\n黃岳涵(2019年3月26日)。直擊密涅瓦(Minerva)大學怎麼上課?線上即時密集互動,線下整個城市都是教室。親子天下。https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5079083
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
社會學系
109254011
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109254011
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
401101.pdf2.2 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.