Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139565
題名: 老鷹變小雞-戰鬥機飛行員兼任參謀對其專業領域之影響
From the Eagle to the Chick? How do Staff Chores Affect Fighter Pilots` Expertise.
作者: 蔡沛謙
Tsai, Pei-Chien
貢獻者: 黃東益
Huang, Tong-Yi
蔡沛謙
Tsai, Pei-Chien
關鍵詞: 飛行員養成    
參謀
角色認知
角色衝突
衝突調適
Pilot development
Staff officer
Role cognition
Role conflict
Conflict adjustment
日期: 2022
上傳時間: 1-四月-2022
摘要: 本文作者為一位戰鬥機飛行員,此研究採自我民族誌的方式撰寫,筆者回顧其過往學習飛行的過程,並藉由出國受訓期間的所見所聞,企圖改變國內的飛行訓練環境。在實際執行時,因飛行專業與參謀職之間的角色衝突,使其領悟到制度上的不完整,導致整體投入的成本無法化為實際效益。經檢視參謀制度與戰鬥人員兩者之間的從屬關係後,筆者得出以下結論:\n現今參謀的本質與以往大不相同,在過去以作戰為導向的作業環境下,參謀作業的核心皆環繞在「能有效支援作戰」的主軸;在我國沈浸於安逸生活六十餘年後,今日的參謀工作已大幅偏離作戰主軸,兩者之間的差異是由於外在環境改變及內在認知的不同所造成。\n文末,筆者提出以下建議:\n(1) 改善現行參謀制度以提升行政效率。\n(2) 改變飛行員的認知以強化人員認同感。\n希望藉由本篇寫作,喚醒國軍憂患意識,改善訓練環境,確保國家安全與人民福祉。
The author of this thesis is a fighter pilot. This research was written in the form of self-ethnography. In this thesis, the author reviewed the process of flight training he received. Having finished the training in the USA, he tried to change flight training environment in Taiwan. However, due to the role conflict between the pilot and the staff, he realized that the system was incomplete and the cost of the overall investment could not be turned into actual benefits. After examining the affiliation between the staff system and combatants, the author drew following conclusions:\nThe core value of staff nowadays is far different from that in the past. In the combat-oriented operating environment, the main mission of the staff focused on "How to support operations effectively? " After living in peace and ease for more than sixty years, the staff in the armed forces today have duties that greatly deviated from the main axis of operations. The differences between the two are caused by the changes in the external environment and differences in inner cognition.\nIn the end of this thesis, the author made the following suggestions:\n(1) Improve the staff system to enhance administrative efficiency.\n(2) Change the pilot`s perception to strengthen their identity in the unit who served.\nIt is hoped that through the initiatives of this thesis, the sense of urgency of the troops will be raised the training environment improved, and national security and the well-being of the people will all be ensured.
參考文獻: 中文文獻:\n何粵東(2005)。敘說研究方法論初探。應用心理研究,25,55-72。\n呂善道(2014)。論偏鄉學校行政人員面臨之問題與解決之道。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(4),20-24。\n祁延慧(2010)。高校教師角色衝突與心理調適。蘭州交通大學學報,29(5),158-160。\n洪錦成、施奕暉(2013)。我國兵役制度的演進、變革與展望。檔案季刊,12(2),30-45。\n徐連達(2010)。中國官制大辭典。上海:上海大學出版社。\n徐琳斐(2020)。公部門幕僚與業務機關之組織衝突困境與解決對策:以臺北市政府法務局為例。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程學位論文,未出版,台北。\n陳昺麟(2001)。社會科學質化研究之紮根理論實施程序及實例之介紹。勤益學報(19),327-342。\n梁群(2014)。飛行員的學習之路。科學發展,495,38-45。\n國安民、陳文成、藍俊雄(2015)。職業軍人參與在職進修對生活與工作滿意度影響之研究-以角色衝突為中介變項。管理資訊計算,4(1),234-248。\n國防部新聞稿(2018)。說明媒體報導「每3人就有1人志願役的天方夜譚?」乙情,2018年10月21日,取自:https://www.mnd.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?p=75692&title=國防消息&SelectStyle=新聞稿#\n國防部新聞稿(2019)。澄清說明「我國現行兵役制度係募、徵併行 並非全募兵制」乙情,2019年7月8日,取自:https://www.mnd.gov.tw/Publish.aspx?p=76377&title=國防消息&SelectStyle=即時新聞澄清專區\n國防部(編)(2021)。中華民國110年國防報告書。台北:國防部。\n張斌(2007)。參謀人員的職責。新理財,2007.2,35。\n張菁雅(2017年9月3日)。中華民國是靠米蟲撐的?自由時報。取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/2182480\n曾錦城(譯)(1989)。參謀的職責(Flanagan原著)。國防譯粹,16 (7),90-92。\n曾冠球(2004)。公務人力彈性化的策略。考銓季刊,39,115-133。\n黃賀(2013)。組織行為:影響力的形成與發揮。台北:前程文化。\n傅凱若、郭庭宇(2021)。公務人員為何沉默?公部門權力距離與員工沉默行為對工作滿意度之影響。文官制度季刊,13(1),35-66。\n葉國豪(譯)(2008)。適才適所的飛行員(Adam J. Hebert 原著)。國防譯粹,35 (1),84-88。\n楊禧瓊、黃宗賢、黃東益(2020)。大學教師兼任學校行政職的角色衝突與調適: 以政治大學為個案之分析。文官制度季刊,12(4),137-170。\n楊禧瓊(2020)。大學教師兼任學校行政角色衝突與調適。國立政治大學公共行政學系研究所碩士學位論文,未出版,台北。\n當代醫學(1997)。醫師應避免介入雙重角色的泥沼。當代醫學,(286),618-618。\n熊秉純(2001)。質性研究方法爭議:來自社會性別視角的探索。社會學研究,2001(5),17-32。\n蔡仁政、翁福元(2014)。小校悲歌:教師兼行政人員的困境、因應與展望。臺灣教育評論月刊,3(4),15-19。\n蔡佳宜(2018)。國民小學教師兼任教學組長知覺角色壓力與因應方式之研究。國立臺灣師範大學課程與教學所碩士論文,未出版,台北。\n蔡佳泓(2020)。兩岸關係和國家安全民意調查。美國杜克大學亞太安全研究中心委託報告,未出版。\n劉慶順(譯)(2016)。戰機飛行員養成要素(Elise Steinberger原著)。國防譯粹,43 (8),58-63。\n蔣逸民(2011)。自我民族誌:質性研究方法的新探索。浙江社會科學,2011(4)。\n鐘碧蘭、吳怡萱、林雯淑(2000)。民族誌研究。教育研究法專題研究。\n\n英文文獻:\nBozeman, B. (1993). A theory of government red tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273-303.\nBoateng, G. O., & Adams, T. L. (2016). “Drop dead… I need your job”: An exploratory study of intra-professional conflict amongst nurses in two Ontario cities. Social Science & Medicine, 155, 35-42.\nChang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.\nGetzels, J. W., & Guba, E. G. (1954). Role, Role Conflict, and Effectiveness: An Empirical Study. American Sociological Review, 19(2), 164-175.\nKaufmann, W., & M. L. Feeney (2012). Objective formalization, perceived formalization and perceived red tape. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1195-1214.\nKoehler, J. W., Anatol, K. W. E., & Applbaum, R. L. (1981). Organizational Communication: Behavioral perspectives (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.\nMattock, Michael G., Asch, Beth J., Hosek, James, & Boito, Michael. (2019). The Relative Cost-Effectiveness of Retaining Versus Accessing Air Force Pilots. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.\nRobbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational Behavior. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.\nRam, N., Khoso, I., Shah, A. A., Chandio, F. R., & Shaikih, F. M. (2011). Role conflict and role ambiguity as factors in work stress among managers: A case study of manufacturing sector in Pakistan. Asian Social Science, 7(2), 113-118.\nWang, Joyu & Gale, Alastair. (2021, October 26). Does Taiwan’s Military Stand a Chance Against China? Few Think So. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved Oct. 29, 2021, from https://www.wsj.com/articles/taiwan-military-readiness-china-threat-us-defense-11635174187
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
109921303
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109921303
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
130301.pdf9.54 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.