Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139569
題名: 國軍幹部公共服務動機、角色衝突與程序規則對工作績效之影響
The Impacts of Army Leaders` Public Service Motivation, Role Conflict, and Rules of Procedure on Job Performance
作者: 翁明琮
Weng, Ming-Tsung
貢獻者: 董祥開
Dong, Hsiang-Kai
翁明琮
Weng, Ming-Tsung
關鍵詞: 工作績效
公共服務動機
角色衝突
繁文縟節
有效規則
Job performance
Public service motivation
Role conflict
Red tape
Green tape
日期: 2022
上傳時間: 1-四月-2022
摘要: 隨著時代的演進,現今的軍隊也被泛稱為廣義的公務員,而公務體系不外乎也就需要龐大的行政文書及業務體系來支撐運作,軍隊如同公務體系一般,也是公文層層堆疊出的工作場域,近十數年來部隊裁撤縮編的組織精簡,人力的使用已不如精實、精進、精粹案前的充裕,大量的要求戰備訓練額外的非本務工作,勢必會壓縮到戰備訓練核心工作的時間及品質,因而使基層幹部產生角色衝突及繁文縟節感知,如何維持及提升基層單位軍士官幹部的工作績效也成為當今刻不容緩的關注焦點。\n本研究旨在探討公共服務動機、角色衝突、繁文縟節、有效規則對工作績效之影響,透過配額取樣方式針對某外島步兵單位進行問卷調查,共發出250份問卷,回收250份,有效問卷215份,經過分析結果發現,公共服務動機及有效規則對工作績效有顯著正向影響,因此,發掘、維持及提高幹部的公共服務動機也是其上級領導階層必須認知的知識及未來組織管理方向。除此之外,本研究亦發現,軍士官幹部的角色衝突及繁文縟節感知均屬中上程度,顯見過多的行政文書業務及額外勤務的確使基層營連級軍士官幹部必須在身兼多職的狀況下遂行戰備訓練工作,必須檢討刪除非必要雜務並針對部隊運作相關實務執行滾動式修正,以確保營連級基層單位能在最好的效率下運作。
Changing along with the time, the military comes to be recognized as general civil servants; on the other hand, the public service system is well know as nothing more than the processes of a huge compilation of administrative documents and a complicated administration system to support itself. Therefore, the military shows similarity to the public service system in the redundancy of official documents produced in each work field. In the past ten years, the military went through a series of downsizing process, the Ginshe, Gingin and Gintsue project. In consequence of the reorganization, manpower is not as sufficient as before. However, the large number of non-essential tasks remain required for combat readiness training, which compresses both the time and quality of the core work of combat readiness training and thus causes grass-roots cadres to have role conflicts and red tape perceptions. How to maintain and improve the work performance of non-commissioned officers and cadres in grass-roots units has also become an urgent issue today.\nThe purpose of this study is to explore the impact of public service motivation, role conflict, red tape, and green tape on job performance. A questionnaire survey was conducted in an infantry unit on one of the remote islands of Taiwan through a quota sampling method. A total of 250 questionnaires were sent out, 250 were returned, and 215 were valid. After analysis, it is found that public service motivation and green tape has a significant positive impact on job performance. Further more, exploring, maintaining and even improving subordinate leader`s public service motivation becomes the necessary knowledge that the leadership has to recognize. In addition, this study also found that the role conflict and perception of red tape among leaders are at the middle to high level; the excessive administrative paperwork and extra duties indeed burdened the battalion and company leaders to be forced to multi-task. To carry out combat readiness training under these conditions, it is necessary to review and rule out the non-essentials and implement rolling planning methods to practices related to troop operations to ensure that battalion and company-level can operate at the optimum efficiency.
參考文獻: 一、中文部分\n上官雉(2017)。兩位中校營長的煩惱,2017年10月06日,取自:https://www.upmedia.mg/news_info.php?SerialNo=26070\n王詠玄(2010)。高雄縣國民小學班級導師角色衝突與主管滿意度之關係。國立屏東教育大學碩士論文,未出版。屏東市。\n王品惟(2018)。我國公務人員公共服務動機之研究:影響因素與其變化。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,台北市。\n王玉珍、李宜玫、吳清麟(2019)。青少年優勢力量表之發展研究。教育心理學報,50(3),503-528。\n呂昭隆(2016)。蔡英文要軍方解決基層勤務繁重問題,2016年06月07日,取自https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20160607003356-260417?chdtv\n吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用實務—問卷分析與應用統計。臺北:知城。\n吳明隆(2014)。論文寫作與量化研究(第4版)。臺北市:五南圖書。\n邱皓政(2015)。量化研究法(二):統計原理與分析技術。臺北:雙葉。\n林義男、張德銳、黃昆輝(2012)。角色衝突(role conflict)。取自 https://pedia.cloud.edu.tw/Entry/Detail/?title=%E8%A7%92%E8%89%B2%E8%A1%9D%E7%AA%81&search=%E8%A7%92%E8%89%B2%E8%A1%9D%E7%AA%81\n林孟玫(2011)。新北市國民小學教師兼任行政職務角色衝突與工作效能之研究。淡江大學教育政策與領導研究所碩士在職專班學位論文,未出版,台北市。\n林靜美(2006)。全面電子檔案管理制度對組織之衝擊-資訊科技同化與繁文縟節,政策研究學報,13(6),173-210。\n周瑛琪、顏炘怡(2015)。管理心理學。臺北市:麥格羅希爾。\n周貴忠(2020)。警察機關目標模糊、繁文縟節與組織效能之研究:正、副主管分工模式之調節效果。中央警察大學警察政策研究所碩士論文,桃園市。\n法博修(2020)。角色衝突與職業倦怠關係之研究-以高雄港務警察總隊為例。玄奘大學企業管理學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,新竹市。\n施嘉衍(2016)。知覺組織支持與工作績效-建言行為、正向心情與角色外顧客服務行為之中介效果。大葉大學人力資源暨公共關係學系。彰化。\n張春興 (1992)。教育心理學。台北:華泰。\n陳重安(2013)。規範與繁文縟節。公共行政學報,44,161-166。\n陳敦源、簡鈺珒(2018)。繁文縟節與組織績效:以臺灣作為個案觀察。文官制度季刊,10(4),25-60。\n陳敦源、黃建勳(2019)。以2011年臺灣文官調查資料探討繁文縟節如何影響公共服務動機。文官制度季刊,11(1),35-71。\n陳展樑(2020)。國軍學習適應、個人工作適配度、公共服務動機對留任意願影響之研究:以大學儲備軍官訓練團為例。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,台北市。\n陸軍司令部(2015)。陸軍指揮參謀組織與作業教範(第三版)。桃園市:陸軍司令部。\n張志銘(2016)。陸戰隊官兵服役價值觀、組織向心力與工作績效相關性研究。海軍學術雙月刊,50(4),79-99。\n張文峰(2018)。繁文縟節與有效規則?檢視大學承接非科技部政府計畫的行政問題。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,台北市。\n張展興(2019)。國軍人員公共服務動機與工作壓力對工作幸福感之影響研究─以南部某空軍基層單位為例。高苑科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,高雄市。\n莊士賢(2016)。國軍公共服務動機與工作績效之研究-以空軍某勤務部隊為例。銘傳大學公共事務學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,台北市。\n陳樞燡(2018)。台灣科技業人力資本對工作績效的影響-以組織承諾為中介變項。未出版碩士,國立政治大學國家發展研究所,台北市。\n康宏暐(2020)。公務人員的個人創新性與公共服務動機對公私部門工作偏好之影響。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,台北市。\n黃英忠(2001)。現代管理學。台北市:華泰書局。\n黃英忠(2007)。管理學概論。高雄市:麗文文化事業。\n黃煌雄(2017)。台灣國防變革。台北市:時報文化出版企業股份有限公司。\n黃奕禎(2018)。公共服務動機及薪資滿意度對離職傾向之影響-以臺北市消防人員為例。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文,台北市。\n劉莉玲、鄧國豐、劉自強(2009)。工作壓力與組織承諾關係之研究─以軍醫外派回任人員為例。國防管理學報,30(1),1-27。\n潘月秋(2009)。工作輪調、工作滿意與工作績效之關係-以台南地區護理人員為例。南台科技大學技職教育與人力資源發展研究所。台南市。\n潘瑛如、李隆盛(2014)。中文版公共服務動機量表之信效度驗證。測驗學刊,61(1),135-158。\n潘瑛如(2020)。組織支持感對公共服務動機與工作績效的調節效果-從軍訓教官退出校園談起。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(10),201-226。\n楊禧瓊(2020)。大學教師兼任學校行政角色衝突與調適。國立政治大學公共行政學系研究所碩士論文,未出版。台北市。\n潘立山(2011)。工作生活品質與工作績效關聯之研究—以臺北市政府都市發展局為例。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。台北市。\n盧心雨(2011)。體育行政人員工作滿意、工作壓力、組織承諾與工作績效之研究。國立臺灣師範大學體育學系博士論文,台北市。\n謝金青 (1992)。國民小學行政兼職教師角色衝突與工作滿意程度之研究。政治大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,台北市。\n嚴志龍、鄭中平(2017)。給論文寫作者的統計指南:傻瓜也會跑統計修訂版。臺北市:五南圖書。\n龔榮津(2001)。行動通訊部門主管領導型態對員工工作績效影響之研究。交通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。新竹市。\n龔靜蘭(2012)。核心能力、工作績效與陞遷機會關係之研究。國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。台北市。\n蘇意婷(2018)。影響公共服務動機與留任意願因素之研究-以衛生福利部社會福利機構為例。國立臺北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,新北市。\n二、外文部分\nAlonso, P., & Lewis, G. B. (2001). Public service motivation and job performance: Evidence from the federal sector. The American Review of Public Administration, 31(4), 363-380.\nBuchanan, B. (1975). Red-tape and the service ethic: Some unexpected differences\nbetween public and private managers. Administration & Society, 6(4), 423-444.\nBaldwin, J. N. (1990). Perceptions of Public versus Private Sector Personnel and Informationl red tape:Their Impact on Motivation. American Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 7-28.\nBozeman, B. (1993). A Theory of Government Red Tape. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273-303.\nBozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2011). Rules and red tape: A prism for public administration theory and research. London, UK: Routledge.\nBorman, W. C. & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance 10(2), 99-109.\nDillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys. The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley.\nDenhardt, R.B. and Denhardt, J.V. (2000). The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review, 60, 549-559.\nDeci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. New York, NY: University Rochester.\nDeHart-Davis, L. (2008). Green tape A theory of effective organizational rules. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 361-384.\nDeHart-Davis, L. (2009). Green tape and public employee rule abidance Why organizational rule attributes matter. Public Administration Review, 69(5), 901- 910.\nFabian H., Rick V. & Judith Z. (2018). Satisfied with red tape? Leadership, civic duty, and career intention in the military. Public Management Review, 20(4), 563-586.\nGoodsell, C. T. (2000). Red tape and a theory of bureaucratic rules. Public Administration Review, 60(4), 373-375.\nGiauque, D., Ritz, A., Varone, F., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2012). Resigned but satisfied: The negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction. Public Administration, 90(1), 175-193.\nKerlinger, F. N.(1986). Foundations of behavioral science. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Wiinston.\nKim, S., W. Vandenabeele, B. E. Wright, L. B. Andersen, F. P. Cerase, R. K. Christensen, et al. (2013). Investigating the structure and meaning of public service motivation across populations: Developing an international instrument and addressing issues of measurement invariance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 79-102.\nNunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.\nPerry, J. L., & L. R. Wise (1990). The motivational bases of public service. Public Administration Review, 50(3), 367-373.\nPerry, J. L. (1996). Measuring public service motivation: An assessment of construct reliability and validity. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(1), 5-22.\nRizzo, House, & Lirtzman (1970). Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly ,15(2), 150-163.\nRosenfeld, R. A. (1984). An expansion and application of Kaufman’s model of red tape: The case of community development block grants. The Western Political Quarterly, 37(4), 603-620.\nSchmidt, F. L., Hunter, John E., Outerbridge, Alice N., Goff & Stephen (1986). Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 432–439.
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
行政管理碩士學程
109921314
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109921314
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
131401.pdf3.41 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.