Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/139884
題名: 關鍵查核事項是制式八股文嗎?
Are KAMs Boilerplate Disclosures?
作者: 戚務君
Chi, Wuchun
張祐慈
Chang, Yu-Tzu
陳美惠
Chen, Mei-Hui
謝安軒
Xie, Anxuan
貢獻者: 會計系
關鍵詞: 會計師個人風格;關鍵查核報告;文字探勘;會計師更換
individual auditor style;key audit matters (KAMs);text mining (textual analysis);auditor switching
日期: Dec-2021
上傳時間: 12-Apr-2022
摘要: 本研究首先利用文字探勘的分析工具檢視影響關鍵查核事項(KAMs)揭露內容變化的決定因素。具體而言,利用2016年與2017年臺灣會計師查核報告的KAM文本,我們將KAM的內容區分為全文內容、風險描述以及查核程序描述,並檢視影響KAM文本差異程度的因素。實證結果顯示,就KAM全文內容而言,企業提供的財務資訊(包含流動資產變化、自由現金流量變化、資產規模變化與營收成長變化)與主簽會計師的個人風格都顯著影響KAM文本差異程度。進一步的分析顯示,主簽會計師的個人風格係反映於查核程序描述而非風險描述。最後,我們發現KAM的文本差異程度與當期分析師的盈餘預測行為有關。換言之,本研究提供KAMs不是制式八股文的佐證,此外也提供KAM的內容具經濟後果的證據性。
This study employs methods of textual analysis to examine the determinants of textual modification in disclosures of key audit matters (KAMs). Specifically, analyzing KAMs disclosed in the audit reports in Taiwan for the fiscal years of 2016 and 2017, we classify the content of KAMs as either risk-related or audit procedure-related, and examine the determinants of modification in KAMs. Empirical results suggest that the fundamental financials (i.e., changes in current assets, free cash flows, size, and growth) and the individual style of the lead audit partner significantly influence textual modification in KAMs. Results from a further analysis indicate that textual modification in the description of audit procedures, but not in the description of risk, reflects the individual style of the lead partner. Finally, we provide evidence for an association between textual modification in KAM disclosures and analyst forecasts. In other words, our findings suggest that KAM disclosures are more than standardized or boilerplate communications and potentially reflect corporate financial performance.
關聯: 中華會計學刊, 17:2, 183 - 244
資料類型: article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6538/TAR.202112_17(2).0001 
Appears in Collections:期刊論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
73.pdf2 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.