Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140229
題名: 我國大學生創業課程學習之共學態度、專業能力與創新實踐關係之研究
A Study on the Relationship among the Co-learning Attitude, Professional Competence and Innovation Practice of University Students’ Learning in the Entrepreneurship Course
作者: 劉亦欣
Liu, Yi-Hsin
貢獻者: 陳木金
Chen, Mu-Jin
劉亦欣
Liu, Yi-Hsin
關鍵詞: 共學態度
專業能力
創新實踐
Co-learning attitude
Professional competence
Innovation practice
日期: 2022
上傳時間: 1-Jun-2022
摘要: 本研究主要目的在瞭解我國大學生創業課程學習之共學態度、專業能力和創新實踐之關係;其中探討不同背景變項的大學生,對於共學態度、專業能力和創新實踐知覺之現況、差異情形;探析共學態度、專業能力和創新實踐之關係;並檢定大學生共學態度、專業能力和創新實踐構方程模式之適配情形。\n依據研究目的,本研究採用問卷調查法,編製「我國大學生創業課程學習之共學態度、專業能力和創新實踐關係之調查問卷」進行調查,以我國北部大學為調查對象,共抽取400位大學生為樣本,計回收300份有效問卷,有效問卷回收率為75%;蒐集的資料以描述性統計分析、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、相關分析及結構方程模式等統計方法進行分析。\n本研究所獲致之結論如下:\n\n一我國大學生創業課程之共學態度整體及各向度呈現中高的程度,其中又以「創業自我管理」得分最高,「創業教學策略 」得分最低。\n二我國大學生創業課程專業能力整體及各向度呈現中高至高的程度, 其中又以「人力資源」得分最高,「財務管理」得分最低。\n三我國大學生創業課程之之創新實踐整體及各向度呈現中高的程度,其中又以「可行評估」得分最高,「創業構想 」得分最低。\n四不同背景變項之大學生在共學態度、專業能力與創新實踐之現況有顯著差異。\n五大學生在共學態度、專業能力與創新實踐三者之間,兩兩具有正相關。\n六大學生在共學態度、專業能力與創新實踐具有相當之適配性檢定獲得驗證支持,能解釋主要變項間之關係。\n依據最後結論,本研究提出相關建議,俾供教育主管機關、學校以及未來研究之參考。
The main purpose of this research is to understand the relationship among the co-learning attitude, professional competence and innovation practice of university students’ learning in the entrepreneurship course, in which to investigate the co-learning attitude, professional competence and innovation practice of university students with different background variables, to analyze the relationship among the co-learning attitude, professional competence and innovation practice, and to conduct goodness of fit tests for the structural equation model among the co-learning attitude, professional competence and innovation practice of university students.\nBased on the purpose of this research, a questionnaire survey method was used and “The investigative questionnaire of the relationship among the co-learning attitude, professional competence and innovation practice of university students’ learning in the entrepreneurship course” was provided for the investigation with a focus of universities in northern Taiwan. According to the sample of 400 university students of this questionnaire survey, 300 valid responses were collected and the valid response rate is 75%. The collected data was analyzed by a series of statistical methods including descriptive statistics, t-test, one way analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment correlation, stepwise multiple regression analysis and structural equation model.\nThe conclusions of this study are as follows:\n\n(1)The university students perceive a moderate-high level in overall and various aspects of the co-learning attitude in their learning of the entrepreneurship course, wherein “entrepreneurial self-management” scores the highest and “entrepreneurial instruction strategy” scores the lowest.\n(2)The university students perceive a moderate-high level in overall and various aspects of the professional competence in their learning of the entrepreneurship course, wherein “human resource” scores the highest and “financial management” scores the lowest.\n(3)The university students perceive a moderate-high level in overall and various aspects of the innovation practice in their learning of the entrepreneurship course, wherein “feasibility assessment” scores the highest and “entrepreneurial idea” scores the lowest.\n(4)There is a significant difference in the current status of the co-learning attitude, professional competence and innovation practice of university students with different background variables.\n(5)There are positive correlations between any two of the co-learning attitude, professional competence and innovation practice of university students.\n(6)The goodness of fit test among the co-learning attitude, professional competence and innovation practice of university students has been confirmed, which can explain the relationship among the main variables.\nGiven the above conclusions, suggestions are provided for the educational authorities, schools and future studies’ reference.
參考文獻: 參考文獻\n一、中文部分\n(一)書籍\n大前研一(2007)。專業:你的唯一生存之道。天下文化。\n比爾.奧萊特(2020)。麻省理工MIT黃金創業課。商業週刊。\n田所雅之、陳朕疆(2018)。創業實戰全書:以科學方法避開99%創業陷阱。商周。\n坂本憲彥,劉錦秀(2019)。一人創業:創業就是,做好一件你真正想做的事!遠流。\n彼得.杜拉克(2009)。創新與創業精神:管理大師彼得.杜拉克談創新實務與策略(增訂版)。臉譜。\n洪世章(2016)創新六策:寫給創新者的關鍵思維。聯經出版公司。\n徐重仁(2017)。創新從有感開始。天下雜誌。\n徐重仁、孫陶然(2017)。創業36軍規:藍天圖書。\n野中郁次郎、勝見明(2011)。北京的蝴蝶,東京的蜜蜂:了解創新的最後一本書。中國生產力中心。\n陳振遠(2018)。創業管理。新陸書局。\n魯明德(2019)。創新創業管理。全華書局。\n劉主編(2018)。創業者的五項修煉:最腳踏實地的創業方法論。上奇時代。\n劉昶(2017)。創業:從0到1的思維與實作。達觀。\n賽門.西奈克(2018)。先問,為什麼?:顛覆慣性思考的黃金圈理論,啟動你的感召領導力(新增訂版)。天下雜誌。\n賽門.西奈克(2020),無限賽局:翻轉思維框架,突破勝負盲點,贏得你想要的未來。天下雜誌。\n(二)期刊論文\n方瀞慧(2017)。創業競賽對微型新創事業創業模式影響之個案研究。國立屏東大學碩士論文。\n王少芸(2019)。高等教育創業教育指標建構與應用之研究-以臺灣U-start創新創業計畫為例。國立政治大學博士論文。\n王令宜(2020)。因應高齡社會推動老幼共學:兼論代間學習之理念與實務。教育研究月刊,104-120。\n王淑卿、熊維舒、彭金山、嚴國慶(2020)。Investigation on the Assessment Competency of Professional Staff for the Talent Quality-management System in Taiwan。中山管理評論,28(1),121-156。\n王愷毅(2020)。不同教學模式對跨領域能力培養之成效研究。大同大學碩士論文。\n王毓瑞(2010)。導師制度之運用與企業人才之培訓-以台電公司新進人員培訓實務為例。台灣教育,662,50-56。\n王滌鴻(2002)。創業課程對創業知識與能力學習成效之研究。國立政治大學碩士論文。\n王麒(2016)。創新與創業學程及校外實習對科技大學電資相關科系學生創業能力影響之研究─以校外實習為調節變項。國立台北科技大學碩士論文。\n王競民(2017)。薪獎制度對組織發展的影響—以不動產仲介經紀業為例。國立台灣科技大學碩士論文。\n任芸萱(2017)。創業團隊參與社會創業競賽之歷程研究。國立師範大學碩士論文。\n朱子君(2010)。人力資源培育與職業能力發展--大學教育目標的省思。教育資料與研究,93,1-14。\n朱延智(2020)。圖解創業管理。五南。\n朱庭瑩(2017)。創業課程學生的創業活動歷程與生涯規劃-以國立成功大學精實創業進階課程為例。國立成功大學碩士論文。\n何晉禛(2019)。臺灣推動創新創業環境之政策與成效探討。國立中央大學碩士論文。\n何維修(2016)。大專院校生網路創業自我效能、正向思考與網路創業意圖關係之研究。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文。\n何誌文(2016)。運用磨課師以協助創新創業之機制與模型的探討。國立成功大學碩士論文。國立成功大學碩士論文。\n吳君立(2016)。創業競賽團隊到後續新創企業發展的改變因素-以科技部創新創業激勵計畫競賽為例。國立政治大學碩士論文。\n吳秀笑、胡秀瑜、洪志成(2015)。跨組織共學社群之實踐:關照幼兒園課程轉型之教保人員情緒。教育研究學報,49(1),107-127。\n吳逸萍(2012)。全面品質管理對於行銷管理、顧客滿意度與顧客忠誠度影響之研究-以國內證券業為例。育達商業科技大學碩士論文。\n吳瑋翎(2016)。大學基礎的創業生態系統建立與分析之研究。國立屏東科技大學碩士論文。\n宋瑪雅(2017)。從創業教育探討團隊行為的縱貫性研究:領導力、溝通障礙、網絡和團隊績效。國立中興大學博士論文。\n李志峻(2019)。臺灣地區大專院校創業教育學程內容之研究。世新大學碩士論文。\n李佳容(2020)。新北市國民中學推動學習共同體對創新實踐關係之研究。淡江大學碩士論文。\n沈秋芳(2020)。專業能力、服務品質對顧客信任及購買意願之影響—以國內銀行電話行銷為例。醒吾科技大學碩士論文。\n沈碩彬、鄭志文、林家禎、葉介山(2019)。招生專業化發展試辦計畫的推行--以靜宜大學為例。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(11),87-92。\n貝家寶(2012)。探討人力資源專業職能與人力資源管理及策略性人力資源管理之間的關係-以台灣造紙業為例。逢甲大學碩士論文。\n阮氏山(2020)。專業能力、服務品質與顧客滿意度關係之研究-以台灣新住民美容產業為例。南華大學碩士論文。\n周靜婷(2020)。大學生參與專業課程融入服務學習之學習滿意度研究-以致理科技大學為例。通識教育學報,11,77-90。\n岳珮喻(2020)。創新創業培育途徑對學生創業自我效能、創業意圖、創業家精神與知能影響之研究。國立台北科技大學碩士論文。\n林于荻、王思峰、陳禹辰(2004)。以Schein 的組織文化理論架構為基礎的探索性個案研究。東吳經紀商學學報,47,59-90。\n林育甄(2010)。探索社會創新發展與實踐-以Ventures In Development為例。輔仁大學碩士論文。\n林芳儀、賴宏昇、王為平(2012)。觀光旅館之餐飲單位主管對餐飲專業能力之認知。輔仁民生學誌,18(1),123-144。\n林亮如(2018)。大學社會責任計畫實踐經驗:社區音樂治療、音樂照護與青銀音樂共學。通識在線,78,101-103。\n林柏儀(2016)。大學城鄉共學想像-國內外交換學生計畫的反思與擴張。師友月刊,592,25-30。\n林虹妤(2016)。臺灣產業創新發展新思維。臺灣經濟研究月刊,39(9),68-73。\n林高仰(2017)。以學生創業團隊觀點探討創業輔導計畫:以國立中山大學創業中心為例。國立中山大學碩士論文。\n林鵬飛(2020)。專業服務組織的經驗學習與知識轉用:以專利事務所為例。國立政治大學博士論文。\n范惟翔、歐予媗、王晨宇(2013)。創業意圖對創業績效之模型建構與競爭效果衡量-兼論創業能力的干擾效果。創新與管理,10(1),87-116。\n范凱雯(2018)。以多層次觀點探討學習型組織與單位績效之關係-以動態創業能力為中介變項、環境競爭性為調節變項。國立台灣科技大學碩士論文。\n高文彬(2020)。產業群聚中企業領導人專業發展之研究:實務社群觀點。政大勞動學報,31,1-27。\n張仁家(2017)。技專校院創業教育與學生創業能力之關聯性探究。人文社會科學研究,11(4),1-24。\n張玉靜(2019)。以學生角度探索校園創業教育服務系統:以國立清華大學為例。國立清華大學碩士論文。\n張宇樑(2020)。教師專業發展:以促進學生理解之教學為進路,教育研究月刊,311,32-45。\n張志幹(2015)。論析手機產品設計之研究方法與議題趨勢(以手機產品設計及介面為例)。明新科技大學碩士論文。\n張倩瑋(2019)。從資源基礎理論談青年創業基地經營之成功要素:臺南市贏地創新育成基地為例。國立中正大學碩士論文。\n張家慈(2011)組織氣候、組織學習與工作滿意度關係之研究-以國營T公司人資人員為例。國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文。\n張義雄、陳儒晰(2020)。數位教學效能與使用意向的關係:專業信心和知識分享的中介作用。數位學習科技期刊,12(2),55-74。\n梁思敏(2019)。動態能力觀點探討台灣校園創業團隊與創業生態系統之互動─以Dcard與盲旅為例。國立政治大學碩士論文。\n梁琍玲(2020)。臺灣終身學習資歷架構藍圖。臺灣教育評論月刊,9(6),19-29。\n莊巧青(2020)。專業能力、消費態度與消費行為之關係。南華大學碩士論文。\n許佳雯(2012)。創業教育方式、創業能力與創業經驗之研究。實踐大學碩士論文。\n許書銘(2020)。專業宏通、多元開創-東海大學博雅學習生態系統的建立與實踐。評鑑雙月刊,84,27-30。\n許淑俐(2010)。創業課程與創業意圖關聯性之研究。實踐大學碩士論文。\n許雅筑(2020)。探討大學創業教育生態系統對形成創業能力之影響。國立陽明交通大學碩士論文。\n郭孚宏(2017)。臺灣技職學校科創中心建設與創新人才培育的模式。商業職業教育,141,21-25。\n郭昭佑、張廷祥、康佳鈴(2020)。教師專業發展評鑑之後設評鑑研究。教育研究月刊,309,59-79。\n郭鳳晴(2020)。教育專業創新與行動研究-教育專業經驗分享類。中山女高學報,19,23-31。\n陳冠宇(2020)應用層級分析法探討大學創業教育生態系統影響大學生創業警覺性之因素重要性。陽明大學碩士論文。\n陳淑敏、宋明娟、甄曉蘭(2010)。大學生專業能力指標之發展以國立臺灣師範大學為例。高等教育。5(2),61-100。\n陳紫玲、洪久賢、孫瑜華(2012)。中小型餐館創業者專業能力分析之研究。創業管理研究。7(3),63-102。\n陳意文、林建江(2012)。全球創業調查與評比指標之回顧。\n陳瑜芬、賴銘娟(2007)。臺灣創業課程現況之探究。創業管理研究,2(3),117-147。\n陳瑞榮(2004)。科技大學學生創業意向之理論模式建構。國立師範大學博士論文。\n陳嘉欣(2005)。技專院校建構學生能力指標現況之分析研究。國立師範大學碩士論文。\n陳蓬桐(2018)。創業家職業地位認知在高等教育創業教育之影響力:以我國大學生為例。雲林科技大學博士論文。\n陳龍潔(2020)。自我效能、成就動機、學習投入與專業能力成長關係之研究-以資訊課程為例。國立師範大學碩士論文。\n曾俐文、林政逸(2020)。大學教師專業發展現況、實施策略與實施成效之研究。高等教育研究紀要,12,87-113。\n程琬婷(2008)。「生意囝仔歹生?」從創業教育看創業家精神培養之探討。朝陽科技大學碩士論文。\n程蘊嘉(2016)。社會創業教育對社會創業之影響研究。輔仁大學碩士論文。\n黃文谷(2011)。教學模式與創業自我效能對創業能力與創業態度影響之研究。國立師範大學博士論文。\n黃彥瑜(2018)。從意圖到實現: 創業教育的創業家預備度累積學習歷程。國立清華大學博士論文。\n黃映涵(2020)。教育創業家目的感之個案研究。國立政治大學碩士論文。\n黃柏彰(2018)。大學創業教育成效之研究-以臺灣大學創意創業學程學生為例。國立台灣大學碩士論文。\n黃偉棋(2018)。澳門高校創新創業教育模式研究:以澳門大學為例。中國文化大學碩士論文。\n黃御家(2019)。運用共同學習法提升國小五年級自然領域課堂學習參與之行動研究。國立台中教育大學碩士論文。\n黃詩云(2016)。台灣創新創業政策研究-以創客創業為例。國立台中科技大學碩士論文。\n黃詩瑤、陳夢(2020)。大學生創業意願影響因素研究。會展前瞻。1(2)。\n黃澤彥(2020)。人格特質、專業能力與工作績效之關聯性研究-以職場友誼為調節變項。國立彰化師範大學碩士論文。\n黃麗君、陳俐君、詹一心(2016)。產業實務之課程介入對提升農學學生行銷技能之效果評估。台灣農學會報,17(1),52-75。\n黃馨漪(2019)。析論佐藤學之學習共同體與合作學習的差異。國立中央大學碩士論文。\n楊居琛(2020)。教師專業發展評鑑與學習共同體之比較-南投縣國小教師個案研究。南華大學碩士論文。\n楊珮青(2005)。從Michael Porter與Philip Kotler理論看臺灣c-GMP國資藥廠的經營策略。逢甲大學碩士論文。\n楊程貴(2020)。大學生自戀型人格對創業意圖之影響:探討調節焦點動機扮演的中介角色與創業教育課程的調節效果。國防大學碩士論文。\n楊鎮源(2017)。臺灣高等教育創新創業實施現況之研究。淡江大學碩士論文。\n經濟日報記者群(2018),創業超新星:看見14家未來獨角獸。經濟日報。\n廖巧玲(2019)。創業訓練與創業態度的關係:多重中介模式。國立台北大學碩士論文。\n廖婉汝(2020)。學習共同體在國小社會學習領域之行動研究。台灣首府大學碩士論文。\n蔡明田、謝煒頻、李國瑋、許東讚(2008)。創業精神與創業績效之關連性探討:創業動機、能力與人格特質的整合性觀點。創業管理研究,3(3),29-65。\n鄭志強、胡俊、施瀾(2019)。開展日本授業研究的文化因素-從野中郁次郎的知識創造理論來看。當代教育研究季刊。27(2),77-109。\n鄭玲兒、歐金池(2019)。問題導向學習在專業實作課程上的應用成效與困境之研究。崑山科技大學人文暨社會科學學報。7,57-70。\n蕭方愉、許雅慧(2019)。專業養成之路--從不同場域看實習心理師專業能力訓練。諮商與輔導。407,44-47。\n蕭仲傑(2017)。創業教育新設組織之策略回應與正當性建立研究:以P實驗室為例。國立屏東科技大學碩士論文。\n蕭佳純(2020)。創意教學信念與創意教學行為關聯之研究:以參與專業學習社群的動機與情形為中介變項。當代教育研究季刊。28(1),1-37。\n蕭玟玲、陳瑞琪人才(2020)。4.0時代我國如何運用大數據分析精準延攬外國專業人才。臺灣經濟研究月刊。43(5),96-105。\n薛法藍(2019)。Professional Translator and Interpreter Training in France: Specificities and Challenges。翻譯學研究集刊。23,79-92。\n謝凝(2019)。馬來西亞高等教育之創業教育分析:從公私立大學創業教育者觀點探討。國立交通大學碩士論文。\n顏如妙、吳思華(2013)。實驗行動對組織創新活動影響之研究。企業管理學報,96,1-23。\n羅安安(2020)。家庭社經地位對大學生創業意願之影響–以學業成就和自我概念為中介變數。國立宜蘭大學碩士論文。\n羅嘉偉(2018)。網路創業教育及網路創業自我效能對於網路創業績效的影響。國立師範大學碩士論文。\n二、外文部分\nAllal, Linda(2020). Assessment and the Co-Regulation of Learning in the Classroom. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 332-349.\nAllen, David S.; Perl, Michael; Goodson, Lori; Sprouse, Twyla(2014). Changing Traditions: Supervision, Co-Teaching, and Lessons Learned in a Professional Development School Partnership. Educational Considerations, 42(1), 19-29.\nAntera, Sofia(2021). professional Competence of Vocational Teachers: A Conceptual Review. Vocations and Learning, 14(3). 459-479.\nBaggen, Yvette; Mainert, Jakob; Lans, Thomas; Biemans, Harm J. A.; Greiff, Samuel; Mulder, Martin(2015). Linking Complex Problem Solving to Opportunity Identification Competence within the Context of Entrepreneurship. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 34(4), 412-429.\nBakken, Yvonne; Carson, Nina; Ohm, Modgun(2019). The Difficult Conversation: Facilitating Students` Professional Learning and Development. Online Submission, Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(3), 40-49.\nBlau, Ina; Shamir-Inbal, Tamar(2018). Digital Technologies for Promoting "Student Voice" and Co-Creating Learning Experience in an Academic Course. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 46(2), 315-336.\nBolzani, Daniela; Luppi, Elena(2021). Assessing Entrepreneurial Competences: Insights from a Business Model Challenge. Education & Training, 63(2), 214-238.\nCarvalho, Andreia; Teixeira, Sergio Jesus; Olim, Leonilde; de Campanella, Sancha; Costa, Teresa(2021). edagogical Innovation in Higher Education and Active Learning Methodologies - A Case Study. Education & Training, 63(2), 195-213.\nCattaneo, Alberto A. P.; Motta, Elisa(2021) I Reflect, Therefore I Am… a Good Professional". On the Relationship between Reflection-"on"-Action, Reflection-"in"-Action and Professional Performance in Vocational Education. Vocations and Learning, 14(2). 185-204.\nCharteris, Jennifer;Wright, Noeline; Trask, Suzanne;Khoo, Elaine;Page, Angela;Anderson, Joanna;Cowie, Bronwen (2021) Patchworks of Professional Practices: Teacher Collaboration in Innovative Learning Environments. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 27(7), 625-641.\nDamanik, Erond Litno(2020) Blended Learning: An Innovative Approach on Social Sciences at Indonesian Higher Education. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(1), 52-65.\nDonnelly(2021). Roisin Learning Development`s Role in Supporting Academic Synergies through Co-Evolution of Teaching Excellence and Practice. Journal of Learning for Development, 8(3), 611-620.\nEden, Raewyn(2015) Teachers` Collaborative Inquiry Featuring Co-Teaching: An Adaptive Professional Learning Design to Support Equitable Mathematics Achievement. Australian Association for Research in Education, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) (Freemantle, Western Australia, Nov 29-Dec 3,\nEtzkowitz, Henry (2016). The Entrepreneurial University: Vision and Metrics. Industry and Higher Education, 30(2), 83-97.\nFan, Yanan(2018). Content Area Pre-Service Candidates Learning Language Teaching with Adolescent Immigrants in an Urban PDS Middle School. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 54-73.\nFix, G. M.; Rikkerink, M.; Ritzen, H. T. M.; Pieters, J. M.; Kuiper, W. A. J. M. (2021). Learning within Sustainable Educational Innovation: An Analysis of Teachers` Perceptions and Leadership Practice. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 131-145.\nGulikers, Judith T. M.; Runhaar, Piety; Mulder, Martin(2018). Large-Scale Studies of Holistic Professional Competence in Vocational Education and Training (VET). The Case of Norway Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 70(2), 212-231.\nGutiérrez Pérez, Regina(2019). The Development of a Metaphoric Competence. A Didactic Proposal of Educational Innovation. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(4). 331-357.\nHansen, Jens Ørding; Jensen, Are; Nguyen, Nhien(2020). The Responsible Learning Organization: Can Senge (1990) Teach Organizations How to Become Responsible Innovators? Learning Organization, 27(1), 65-74.\nHinkle, Christopher M.;Koretsky, Milo D.( 2019). Toward Professional Practice: Student Learning Opportunities through Participation in Engineering Clubs. European Journal of Engineering Education, 44(6), 906-922.\nHodge, Steven; Smith, Ray(2019). Innovation and VET Student Work Placement. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 71(4), 519-537.\nHodgson, Louise(2016). Collaboration around Observation of Teaching: Powerful Professional Learning.Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (MERGA) (39th, Adelaide, South Australia,\nJohnson, Bruce; Flentje, Jane; Bartholomaeus, Clare(2020). Co-Researching and Designing Innovative Learning Approaches in Sexuality and Relationships Education. Pastoral Care in Education, 38(3), 191-207.\nJuuti, Kalle;Lavonen, Jari; Salonen, Visajaani;Salmela-Aro, Katariina; Schneider, Barbara;Krajcik, Joseph(2021). A Teacher-Researcher Partnership for Professional Learning: Co-Designing Project-Based Learning Units to Increase Student Engagement in Science Classes. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6) 625-641\nKeinänen, Meiju Marika; Kairisto-Mertanen, Liisa (2019). Researching Learning Environments and Students` Innovation Competences. Education & Training, 61(1), 17-30.\nKelter, Jacob;Peel, Amanda; Bain, Connor; Anton, Gabriella; Dabholkar, Sugat; Horn, Michael S.; Wilensky, Uri (2021). Constructionist Co-Design: A Dual Approach to Curriculum and Professional Development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(3), 1043-1059.\nKnight, Jim (2021). Moving from Talk to Action in Professional Learning. Educational Leadership, 78(5), 16-21.\nKnight, Jim(2021). Moving from Talk to Action in Professional Learning. Educational Leadership, 78(5), 16-21.\nKopparla, Mahati; Goldsby, Dianne (2019). Preservice Teacher Experiences in Formal and Informal Co-Operative Learning Groups in a Mathematics Course. Journal of Instructional Research, 8(1), 51-61.\nKozibroda, Larysa V.; Kruhlyk, Oksana P.; Zhuravlova, Larysa S.; Chupakhina, Svitlana V.; Verzhihovska,(2020). Practice and Innovations of Inclusive Education at School. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(7), 176-186.\nLahn, Leif Chr.; Nore, Hage(2019). Large-Scale Studies of Holistic Professional Competence in Vocational Education and Training (VET). The Case of Norway. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 6(2). 132-152.\nLeontyev, Vyacheslav V.; Rebrina, Fayruza G.; Leontyeva, Irina A.; Gafiyatullina, Elvira A.(2016). Evaluation of the Development of Professional Competence in Undergraduates: Methodical Aspects. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 6592-6602.\nListon, Beth W.; Wagner, Janet; Miller, Jackie(2013) A Curricular Innovation to Promote Interprofessional Collaboration. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(1), 68-73.\nLivy, Sharyn; Yanni, Marie; Downton, Ann; Muir, Tracey(2019). Enhancing a Mathematics Leader`s Knowledge for Teaching through a Co-Teaching Situation. 42nd, Perth, Western Australia, Jun 30-Jul 4.\nMakhashova, Patima; Meirmanov, Asylbek; Zhunusbekov, Zhaxybek; Makasheva, Orynkul; Mirzaliyeva, Elmira; Ermuratova, Almagul; Sakenov, Janat(2016). On the Development of Professional Competence in Students of Creative Pedagogical Specialties. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11), 4660-4668.\nMcMurray, Sharon; O`Neill, Susan; Thompson, Ross(2016). An Innovative Model for Professional Development. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 16(1), 145-149.\nMiller-Young, Janice; Felten, Peter; Clayton, Patti H. (2017). Learning about Learning-Together. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 23(2), 154-158.\nOvbiagbonhia, A. R.; Kollöffel, Bas; den Brok, Perry(2019). Educating for Innovation: Students` Perceptions of the Learning Environment and of Their Own Innovation Competence. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 387-407.\nPhusavat, Kongkiti; Hidayanto, Achmad Nizar; Kess, Pekka; Kantola, Jussi(2019). Integrating Design Thinking into Peer-Learning Community: Impacts on Professional Development and Learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 31(1), 59-74.\nReeves, Andrew(2019) Classroom Collaborations: Enabling Sustainability Education via Student-Community Co-Learning International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 20(8), 1376-1392.\nRiikonen, Sini Maarit; Kangas, Kaiju; Kokko, Sirpa; Korhonen, Tiina; Hakkarainen, Kai; Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, Pirita(2020). The Development of Pedagogical Infrastructures in Three Cycles of Maker-Centered Learning Projects. Design and Technology Education, 25(2), 29-49.\nRivera Maulucci, Maria S.; Brotman, Jennie S.; Fain, Shoshana Sprague (2015) Fostering Structurally Transformative Teacher Agency through Science Professional Development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 545-559.\nRuskin, Jennifer;Bilous, Rebecca H.(2020). A Tripartite Framework for Extending University-Student Co-Creation to Include Workplace Partners in the Work-Integrated Learning Context. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(4), 806-820.\nRusmansyah;Yuanita, Leny;Ibrahim, Muslimin;Isnawati;Prahani, Binar Kurnia(2019). Innovative Chemistry Learning Model: Improving the Critical Thinking Skill and Self-Efficacy of Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 59-76.\nSaariaho, Emmi; Anttila, Henrika;Toom, Auli;Soini, Tiina;Pietarinen, Janne;Pyhältö, Kirsi(2018). Student Teachers` Emotional Landscapes in Self- and Co-Regulated Learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 24(5), 538-558.\nTai, Kevin W. H.; Wei, Li(2021). Co-Learning in Hong Kong English Medium Instruction Mathematics Secondary Classrooms: A Translanguaging Perspective. Language and Education, 35(3), 241-267.\nTai, Kevin W. H.; Wei, Li (2021). Co-Learning in Hong Kong English Medium Instruction Mathematics Secondary Classrooms: A Translanguaging Perspective Language and Education, 35(3), 241-267.\nTemple Clothier, Anne;Matheson, David(2019). Using Co-Creation as a Pedagogic Method for the Professional Development of Students Undertaking a BA (Hons) in Education Studies. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(6), 826-838\nTsai, I-Chang; Lei, Han-Sheng(2016). The Importance and Satisfaction of Collaborative Innovation for Strategic Entrepreneurship. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(3), 569-582.\nWilliams, Judy; Berry, Amanda (2016) Boundary Crossing and the Professional Learning of Teacher Educators in New International Contexts. Studying Teacher Education, 12(2), 135-151\nWinks, Lewis; Green, Nicholas; Dyer, Sarah(2020). Nurturing Innovation and Creativity in Educational Practice: Principles for Supporting Faculty Peer Learning through Campus Design. Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 80(1), 119-135.\nYoder, Pam; Roome, Jim; Robinson, Mia; Reed, Roberta; Eyolfson, John(2021). What It Takes to Become a Learning System -- Even in a Pandemic. Learning Professional, 42(5), 52-54.\nZadorozhna, Iryna; Datskiv, Olha; Shepitchak, Valentyna(2020). Pre-Service English Teachers` Attitudes to Co-Teaching . Advanced Education, 15, 41-46.\nZhao, Xinjian; Li, Li; Liu, Mingfei; Liu, Jie(2019). Professional Education Reform in Colleges and Universities and Cultivation of College Students` Innovation and Entrepreneurship Consciousness: "Taking Major of E-Commerce as an Example". Higher Education Studies, 9(2), 33-44.
描述: 博士
國立政治大學
教育學系
107152509
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107152509
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
250901.pdf9.03 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.