Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140702| 題名: | 士官督導長之領導生涯-僕人式領導的實踐 The leadership career of the sergeant superintendent - the practice of servant leadership |
作者: | 邱顯金 Chiou, Shean-Jin |
貢獻者: | 廖興中 Liao,Xing-zhong 邱顯金 Chiou, Shean-Jin |
關鍵詞: | 士官督導長 自我民族誌 僕人式領導 國軍領導 威權 Non-commissioned officer superintendent Self-ethnography Servant leadership National army leadership Authoritarianism |
日期: | 2022 | 上傳時間: | 1-Jul-2022 | 摘要: | 本研究是以我切身的軍旅生涯為本，藉由自我民族誌的研究方法來剖析我個人在軍中的歷程及經驗。以自我為客家人的身分，進入到管教嚴謹、限制多重的國軍部隊，從軍中啟航到士官生涯角色的轉變，再到士官督導長對於領導的體會，進而轉換領導的方式，藉由自我軍旅生涯歷程的敘事中來反思領導方式的重要性。由於領導方式的好壞對於的部隊同仁的認同有深層的影響，而傳統威權領導風格經過時代的更迭與觀念的改變，漸漸使得領導者由指揮命令走向服務引導的風格，僕人式領導風格於是形成。\n本研究透過自我敘事，剖析作者自身僕人式領導風格形成的背景，因為看到許多士官同仁在領導部屬時無法與時俱進，調整自己不合時宜的領導方式，進而遭受懲處或淘汰。另外一方面也論述到自身僕人式領導的實踐經驗，藉由在指揮部士官督導長服務期間的經驗，透過部隊訪查關心，了解士官同仁們工作上的困頓、疑難與需要，進而主動協助同仁解決問題，為作者的弟兄姊妹服務。就如同耶穌對門徒所說：「你們當中誰想成為最偉大的領導人，必須先做你們的僕人（為最小的服務）」一般。更重頭詮釋領導權力的意義與效用，從「有權管制你」到「服侍你的需要」，詳細的分享僕人式管理個人經歷的精髓。 This research is based on my personal military career, and uses the research method of self-ethnography to analyze my personal history and experience in the military. Taking the identity of self as a Hakka, entering the national army with strict discipline and multiple restrictions, sailing from the army to changing the role of non-commissioned officer career, and then to the non-commissioned officer supervisor`s experience of leadership, and then changing the way of leadership. The importance of reflecting on leadership styles in the narrative of the military career journey. Because the quality of leadership has a profound impact on the identity of the army colleagues, and the traditional authoritarian leadership style has undergone the change of the times and the change of concept, the leader has gradually changed from the command to the service-oriented style, and the servant leadership style is then form.\nThrough self-narratives, this research analyzes the background of the author`s own servant leadership style, because many non-commissioned officers and colleagues cannot keep pace with the times when leading subordinates, adjust their inappropriate leadership styles, and are punished or eliminated. On the other hand, he also discusses his own practical experience of servant leadership. Through the experience during the service of the sergeant superintendent of the command, and through the troop visit and concern, he understands the difficulties, difficulties and needs of the sergeant colleagues in their work, and then takes the initiative to assist. Colleagues solve problems and serve the brothers and sisters of the author. As Jesus said to his disciples, "Whoever wants to be the greatest leader among you must first be your servant (in the service of the least)." It focuses on explaining the meaning and effectiveness of leadership, from "power to control you" to "serving your needs", and shares the essence of personal experience of servant management in detail. |
參考文獻: | 中文部分\n方中一（1971）。領導統御的研究。臺北：帕米爾書店。\n李幸鎧（2019）。知覺風險、工作滿意度、轉換型領導、組織認同與國軍人員留\n營意願關係之研究。聯大學報，16卷2期，143-157。\n朱永誌（2001）。部隊領導統御之我見。陸軍學術月刊，37（435），23-27。\n何粵東（2005）。敘說研究方法論初探。應用心理研究，25，55-72。\n吳宗祐（2008），主管威權領導與部屬的工作滿意度與組織承諾：信任的中介歷程與情緒智力的調節效果。本土心理學研究，30，頁3-63。\n吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎（2008）。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究，30，頁65-115。\n吳宗祐、徐瑋伶、鄭伯壎（2002）。怒不可遏？或忍氣吞聲？華人企業中主管威權領導行為與部屬憤怒情緒反應的關係。本土心理學研究，18，3-49。\n周婉茹、鄭伯壎、連玉輝（2014）。威權領導。中華心理學刊，30，頁3-63。\n易乃文（2011）。僕人式領導對國軍高層領導的啟示，嶺東科技大學國際企業系\n碩士論文，臺中市。\n凌孝綦（2001）「軍事領導」-家長式領導模式運用之探討，國防雜誌，16（11），99-108。\n翁英欽（2004）。清水溝重建工作的自身俗民誌：一場觀照中的主體化歷程。國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文，未出版，新竹市。\n國防大學編（2000）。國軍與辭典，臺北市：國防大學。\n康正男（2006）棒球總教練威權領導與球員效能之研究：職棒與業餘之比較。大專體育學刊，8（1），112-123。\n張瓀薏（2013）。精進士官、兵留營意願之研究。海軍學術雙月刊，47（2），78-85。\n許士軍（1997）。管理學。臺北：東華書局。\n陳正通（1999）。幹部的領導藝術。陸軍學術月刊，35（401），7-10。\n陳偉寬（2014）。成功領導構建新一代優質國軍幹部。海軍學術雙月刊，48（1），23-35。\n喬良，王湘穗（1999）。超限戰。北京：解放軍文藝出版社。\n黃世忠（2002）。「組織結構、領導風格、員工個人特質、工作特性與工作滿足關係之研究－以中山科學研究院電子系統研究所為例」。中原大學企業管理學系碩士學位論文，未出版，桃園。\n黃淑芬（2005）領導統御-一名資深美國空飛行官的觀點。國防譯粹，32（4），81-90。\n蔡培元（2008）。我僅僅只是一個胖子：記述一段朝向自在的歷程。國立陽明大學衛生福利研究所碩士論文，未出版，臺北市。\n鄭伯壎、周麗芳（2005）。家長式領導三元模式：現代轉化及其影響機制―威權領導：法家概念的現代轉化。行政院國家科學委員會，報告編號NSC 94-2413-H-002-003-PAE。臺北：行政院國家科學委員會。\n鄭秀貴、高麗娟（2008）。威權、仁慈、德性家長式領導：李瑞麟教練之個案研究。北體學報，16，頁157-170。\n謝宛君、高三福、呂雲梅（2008）。教練威權領導的比較與省思。中華體育季刊，22（3），頁67-72。\n羅潔伶、蕭偉昌（2015）。主管領導行為與員工幸福感關係之研究。經營管理論叢，10（1），69-83。\n蘇伯顯（1980）。領導與組織。臺北市：國家出版社。\nGardner(1991)。新領導力，譚家瑜譯，臺北：天下文化出版社。\nKenneth Cloke & Joan Goldsmith(2003)。放下管理，展開領導，余佑蘭譯，臺北：聯經出版社。\nKoontz(1991)。張福聲譯，（臺北：臺灣西書出版社，1991年），頁148。\nNorthouse(2002)。領導學：理論與實踐，吳榮先譯，南京市：江蘇教育出版社。\nRobert F. Grattan(2007)。策略過程，國防部譯，臺北市：國防部部辦室。\nStephen P. Robbins(2006)。組織行為，鄭佳美譯，臺北：臺灣培生教育出版股份有限公司。\nWesley L.Fox(2007)。策略過程，國防部譯，臺北市：國防部部長辦公室。\nWesley L.Fox(2011)。形塑領導力的六大要素，章昌文譯，臺北市：國防部政務辦公室。\n \n英文部分\nBass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan.\nYe, Y., Lyu, Y., & He, Y. (2019). Servant leadership and proactive customer service performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.\nBeazley, H. & Beggs, J. (2002). Teaching Servant-Leadership. In L. C. Spears & M.Lawrence (Eds.), Focus on leadership: Servan-leadership for the twenty-first century (pp.53-64). New York: John Wiley & Sons.\nBlake, R. R., & Mouton, J. S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.\nBlock, P. (1998). From leadership to citizenship. Insights on leadership: Service, stewardship, spirit, and servant-leadership, 87-95.\nChang, H. (2008). Autoethnography as method. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.\nClandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1988). Studying teachers` knowledge of classrooms: Collaborative research, ethics, and the negotiation of narrative. The Journal of Educational Thought (JET)/Revue de la Pensée Educative, 22(2A), 269-282.\nChappel, D. (2000). Fortune`s" Best Companies to Work For" embrace servant leadership. The Servant Leader, Spring, 5.\nChoi, Y., & Mai-Dalton, R. R. (1998). On the leadership function of self-sacrifice. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(4), 475-501.\nCohen, E., & Tichy, N. (1997). How leaders develop leaders. Training & Development, 51(5), 58-72.\nDenzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography (Vol. 17). Sage.\nEllis, C. S. (1995). Final negotiations: A story 0110, loss, and chronic illness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.\nEllis, C. S. (2004). The ethnographic 1: A methodological novel about autoethnography. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.\nEllis, C. S. (2009). Revision: Autoethnographic necfions on lt。nd work. WalnutCreek, CA: Left Coast Press.\nEllis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, and personal reflexivity [G]. N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln, Handbook of qualitative research, (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nFiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.\nGary A. Yukl, Leadership in Organization (New Jersey:prentice-Hall,1998),PP.3.\nHaimann, Theo&Scott, William, Management in the Modern Organization (Boston:Houghton Mifflin Company,1974),PP.349.\nHersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior:\nUtilizing human resources (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.\nHollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective\nrelationships. NY: Free Press.\nHouse, R. J., & Mitchell, T.R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal of\nContemporary Behavior, 3, 81-97.\nJones, S. H. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N. K.Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook 01 qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp.763-792). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.\nKirkpartrick, S., & Locke, E. (1991). Leadership: Do traits matter? Academy of Management Excutive, 5(2), 48-60.\nM. (2002). Servant-Leadership: Three Things Necessary. In L. C. SpeServant-leadership for the twenty-first century (pp. 27-34). New York: John Wiley & Sons.\nReed-Danahay, D. (1997). Introduction. In D. Reed-Danahay (Eds.). Auto/Ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social (pp. 1-17). Oxford, UK: Berg.\nSpry, T. (2001). Performing autoethnography: An embodied methodological praxis. Qualitative inquiry, 7(6), 706-732.\nStogdill, R. M., & Coons, A. E. (1957).Leader behavior: its description and measurement. Columbus: Ohio State Univ.\nStogdill, R. M. (1962). Leadership behavior description questionnaire -Form XII. Columbus: Ohio State Univ. | 描述: | 碩士 國立政治大學 行政管理碩士學程 109921206 |
資料來源: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0109921206 | 資料類型: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | 學位論文 |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 120601.pdf | 1.67 MB | Adobe PDF2 | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.