Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/140744
題名: 合作學習融入專題式學習對國小學童核心素養之影響
The Influence of the Integration of Cooperative Learning into Project-Based Learning on the Core Competencies of Elementary School Children
作者: 蔡松峰
Tsai, Sung-Feng
貢獻者: 李沛錞
Lee, Pei-Chun
蔡松峰
Tsai, Sung-Feng
關鍵詞: 核心素養
專題式學習
合作學習
the Core competencies
Project-based learning
Cooperative learning
日期: 2022
上傳時間: 1-Jul-2022
摘要:   本研究旨在探討合作學習融入專題式學習課程,能否提升國小學生的核心素養能力。研究對象為研究者任教的臺北市某國小第32屆及第34屆的某班級高年級學生。研究者為該兩屆班級導師,透過專題式學習課程,參與公共電視台《小導演大夢想》工作坊影片製作,時間為兩屆的六年級第一學期,八月開始製作影片至十二月底交片。同時在隔年四月參與公共電視台臺灣國際兒童影展,分享影片成果以及欣賞來自各國的兒童影展作品。\n  本研究的目的在於透過合作學習融入專題式學習課程後,是否能提升十二年國民基本教育課程綱要提及之「核心素養」,分別是「自主行動」、「溝通互動」、「社會參與」三大面向能力。依照專題式學習內涵中,強調學習任務、統整學習、多元感官學習、以及多樣認知活動等策略來實施課程,輔以合作學習之優點,包含激發學習動機、改善學習態度、提升學習者自信、發展合作技巧與人際互動,以及建立同儕和諧關係,來逐一探討分析學生核心素養能力呈現之處。研究結果顯示,合作學習融入專題式課程確實能夠促使學生表現出核心素養的三大能力:\n  一、培養學生自主行動素養能力方面,透過合作學習可以激發學生學習的動機;透過專題式學習的學習任務與統整學習之效益,學生必須懂得主動思考問題,決定學習任務,進而主動尋求解決問題的方式。\n  二、培養學生溝通互動素養能力方面,透過發展合作技巧與人際互動,學生學習如何與人溝通,建立同儕和諧關係,促進學生溝通互動之能力;專題式學習的多元感官學習與多樣認知活動,也能促進學生溝通互動之機會,提升團隊向心力,達到同儕和諧關係。\n  三、培養學生社會參與素養能力方面,透過合作學習可以提升學習者自信,建立同儕和諧關係,同理他人感受,喜歡與人互動,且能在團隊中與人合作。教師可以引導學生關心社會議題,針對有興趣之社會議題設計跨領域統整專題式學習課程,完成學習任務的同時也能關心社會,培養共好之能力。根據研究結果,本研究提出相關討論與建議,以供後續實施專題式學習及研究之參考。
The aim of the study was to investigate whether the Integration of Cooperative Learning into Project-Based Learning on the Core Competencies of elementary school children. The subjects of the study were sixth grade students in the 32nd and 34th classes of elementary school in Taipei City. The researcher, a teacher in both classes, participated in the Taiwan PTS "Little Directors, Big Dreams" workshop through the Project Based Learning program to produce videos, starting in August and submitting them in December. In April of the following year, they participated in the Taiwan PTS International Children`s Film Festival, sharing the results of their films and another children`s films from all over the world.\nThe Core Competencies mentioned from the Ministry of Education`s Curriculum Guidelines of 12 Year Basic Education, These competences are divided into three broad dimensions, namely, spontaneity, communication and interaction, and social participation. According to the strategies of Project-Based Learning, which emphasize learning tasks, integrated learning, multi-sensory learning, and diverse cognitive activities, and the benefits of Cooperative Learning, including motivating learning, improving learning attitudes, enhancing learner confidence, developing cooperative skills and interpersonal interactions, and building harmonious relationships with peers, in order to explore and analyze the presentation of students` Core Competencies one by one. The results of the study showed that the integration of cooperative learning into Project-Based Learning did lead to students demonstrating the three Core Competencies:\n1. Cultivating students` ability to spontaneity can stimulate students` motivation to learn through cooperative learning; the learning tasks of Project-Based Learning and the help of integrated learning can make students know how to actively think about problems, decide on learning tasks, and further actively seek ways to solve problems. 2. The cooperative skills will help students learn how to communicate with others, build a harmonious relationship among students, and promote their communication and interaction skills. The project-based learning, with its multi-sensory learning and diverse cognitive activities, will also promote opportunities for students to communicate and interact, enhance team spirit, and achieve a harmonious relationship among students. 3. Teachers can guide students to care about social issues, design learning tasks for social issues they are interested in, and complete learning tasks while caring about society and developing social participation. Based on the results of the study, this study proposes relevant discussions and suggestions for the subsequent implementation of Project-Based Learning.
參考文獻: Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. Student perceptions in the classroom, 1, 327-348.\nBarron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L.,& Bransford, J. (1998). Doing with understanding on problem- and projectbased learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 271-311.\nBarrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. M. (1980). Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education (Vol. 1). Springer Publishing Company.\nBarron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L.,& Bransford, J. (1998). Doing with understanding on problem- and projectbased learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3-4), 271-311.\nBIE (2017). What is project based learning (PBL). 2017/12/15 Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/about/what_pbl\nHANNEY, R., & SAVIN-BADEN, M. (2013). THE PROBLEM OF PROJECTS: UNDERSTANDING THE THEORETICAL UNDERPINNINGS OF PROJECT-LED PBL. LONDON REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 11(1), 7-19.\nJOHNSON, D. W.; JOHNSON, R. T.; SMITH, K. A. ACTIVE LEARNING: COOPERATION IN THE COLLEGE CLASSROOM, (2ND ED.); INTERACTION BOOK: EDINA, MN. 1998.\nJohnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1988). Circles of learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.\nJohnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (1998). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, and Individualistic Learning(5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.\nLarmer, J. & Mergendoller, J. R. (2015). Gold standard PBL: Essential project design elements. 2017/12/15 Retrieved from http://www.bie.org/blog/gold_standard_pbl_essential_project_design_elements\nLurie, H. & Garrett, R. (2017). Deconstructing competency-based education: An assessment of institutional activity, goals, and challenges in higher education. Journal of Competency-Based Education, 2(3), 1-19.\nMcLoone, S., Lawlor, B., & Meehan, A. (2016). The implementation and evaluation of a project-oriented problem-based learning module in a first-year engineering program. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 4(1), 71-80.\nMoursund, D. G. (1999). Project-based learning using information technology. Eugene, OR: International society for technology in education.\nPutnam, J. W. (1993). Cooperative learning and strategies for inclusion: Celebrating diversity in the classroom. Baltimore, Md.: P. H. Brookes. Publication.\nStefanou, C., Stolk, J., Prince, M., Chen, J., & Lord, S. (2013). Self-regulation and autonomy in problem- and project-based learning environments. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(2), 109-122.\nSoparat, S., Arnold, S.R., & Klaysom, S. (2015). The development of Thai learners’ key competencies by project-based learning using ICT. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(1), 11-22.\n王金國(2005)。共同學習法之教學設計及其國小國語科之應用。屏東師院學\n報,22,103-130。\n王金國(2018)。以專題式學習法培養國民核心素養。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(2),107-111。\n王金國(2018)。中小學實施專題式學習的策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,7(5),275-278。\n王金國(2021)。素養導向教學設計的問題分析與建議。臺灣教育評論月刊,10(1),186-192。\n王金國(2016)。對教育「理論」與「實務」的省思。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(1),92-96。\n林永豐(2019)。素養概念的不同內涵與特色。載於林永豐(主編),邁向素養導向的課程教學改革(頁1-19)。臺北市:五南。\n林奇賢(2017)。新世代的創新學習模式:互聯網+PBL理論與實施。臺北:高等教育。\n林穎(2010)。合作學習之概念探討。南華大學社會學研究所網路社會學通訊期刊,89,A21。\n張春興(2000)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北市:東華。\n張新仁、王金國(2012)。活化教學-分組合作學習的理念與實踐。國民教育,52(6),1-4。\n張民杰(2002)。問題基礎學習在台北市國民中學九年一貫課程應用之行動研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,計畫編號:NSC 90-2420-H-031-003。\n李融修(2019)。培養孩子專題式學習-以國小六年級畢業旅行專題為例。臺灣教育評論月刊,8(10),180-185。\n汪慧玲、沈佳生(2013)。合作學習教學策略對大專學生之學習成效與學習態度之影響:以兒童發展評量與輔導課程某單元為例。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,27(1),57-76。\n洪裕宏(2008)。界定與選擇國民核心素養:概念參考架構與理論基礎研究。\n行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。NSC 95-2511-S-010-001\n岳修平、鐘婉莉(2005)。專題式學習小組網路溝通互動之研究。教育學刊,(25),1-23。DOI:10.6450/ER.200512.0001\n許喬雯、岳修平、林維真(2010)。專題式學習小組溝通行為與成員角色之研究。圖書資訊學刊,8(1),137-164。\n黃錫培(2004)。專題式學習的困境。師友月刊,(440),69-71。\n范信賢(2016)。核心素養與十二年國民基本教育課程綱要:導讀《國民核\n心素養:十二年國教課程改革的DNA》。教育脈動,5,1-7。\n賴光真(2016)。分組合作學習歷程學習謬誤之警覺。臺灣教育評論月刊,5(5),92-96。\n蔡清田(2011)。課程改革中的核心素養之功能。教育科學期刊,10(1),203-217。\n蔡清田(2012)。課程發展與設計的關鍵DNA:核心素養。臺北市:五南。\n蔡清田、陳延興(2013)。國民核心素養之課程轉化。課程與教學,16(3),59-78。\n蔡清田, 洪若烈, & 陳延興. (2012). K-12 各教育階段核心素養與各領域課程統整研究: 總計畫期末報告. 國家教育研究院.\n蔡清田, 陳延興, 吳明烈, 盧美貴, 陳聖謨, 方德隆, & 林永豐. (2011). K-12 中小學一貫課程綱要核心素養與各領域連貫體系研究. 國家教育研究院委託研究報告. 嘉義縣: 國立中正大學課程研究所.\n國立臺北教育大學(2016)。教育部分組合作學習工作坊。2016 年 3 月 20 日 取自 HTTP://WWW.COOP.NTUE.EDU.TW\n陳彥廷、姚如芬(2004)。合作學習模式中學生學習表現之探討。臺東大學教育學報,15(1),127-166。\n黃政傑、林佩璇(1996)。合作學習。臺北:五南。\n教育部(2014)。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。取自\nHTTPS://WWW.NAER.EDU.TW/PAGESYLLABUS?FID=52 。\n蘇哲賢(2017)。淺談國小階段培養學生核心素養之理念認知。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(2),83-87。\n閔詩紜(2019)。小學教師十二年國教核心素養之專業成長需求研究。學校行政,(121),185-203。DOI:10.6423/HHHC.201905_(121).0009\n鄭如雯(2008)。專題式學習探析及其在教育上的啟示。學校行政,(57),147-164。\n鈕文英(2012)。全方位課程的理念與實踐。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊,100,41-69。\n鈕文英、吳裕益(2015)。單一個案研究法: 研究設計與後設分析。心理。\n劉秀嫚(1998)。合作學習的教學策略。公民訓育學報,(7),285-294。
描述: 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
107913004
資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0107913004
資料類型: thesis
Appears in Collections:學位論文

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
300401.pdf2.6 MBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.