Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/2099
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.creator何萬順zh_TW
dc.creatorOne-Soon, Heren
dc.date2006-08-
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-19T07:46:50Z-
dc.date.available2008-09-19T07:46:50Z-
dc.date.issued2008-09-19T07:46:50Z-
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/2099-
dc.description.abstractThis paper justifies the different part-of-speech assignments for Mandarin gei in five of its different uses: verbal, preverbal, postverbal, postobject, and purposive, and challenges the unified verbal analysis of preverbal, postobject, and purposive gei. In spite of the grammaticality of postobject verb gei in a serial verb construction, the prepositional dative in Mandarin involves precisely the preposition gei, either in its postobject position or preverbally. The affixal analysis of postverbal gei is refuted, as gei is in fact the verb head in V-gei compounding. The analysis of gei as a complementizer in purposive clauses is endorsed. Finally, I discuss the generality of the analyses put forth and also provide more supporting evidence from historical developments.-
dc.format.extent326442 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.languageen_USen
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.relationLingua, 116(8), 1274-1302en
dc.titleJustifying Part-of-speech Assignments for Mandarin Geien
dc.typearticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.003en_US
dc.doi.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2005.06.003en_US
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:期刊論文
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
J23.pdf318.79 kBAdobe PDF2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.