Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29726
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor祝鳳岡<br>賴建都<br>趙義隆zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisor<br><br>en_US
dc.contributor.author陳羽珊zh_TW
dc.creator陳羽珊zh_TW
dc.date2004en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-11T08:11:38Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-11T08:11:38Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-11T08:11:38Z-
dc.identifierG0090452014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29726-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description廣告研究所zh_TW
dc.description90452014zh_TW
dc.description93zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本論文旨在對台灣區企業施行藝文理念行銷活動作實證研究,以建立企業藝文理念行銷行為模式之觀念架構,並以Sull之關鍵成功因素模式,求得企業藝文理念行銷之關鍵成功因素。本研究選定誠品書店、裕隆汽車、Agnes b.、圓神出版事業機構、以及荷蘭銀行等五家施行藝文理念行銷的企業作深度訪談,除提出企業藝文理念行銷修正後之觀念架構,並發現當理念行銷以「藝術文化」為主題時,應將Kotler主張的參與形式重新定義。\r\n 本研究另針對藝文理念行銷的構面影響提出命題,概述如下:企業主題推廣仍為企業建立品牌、知名度塑造時的基本方式,但現有的趨勢漸漸向聯合議題推廣靠攏;企業最在意藝文夥伴與其形象及目標市場是否相合,最重視企業夥伴或公部門夥伴的資源多寡;企業藝文理念行銷動機強調經營者興趣與認同者,活動類型較為多元,最重視議題的獨特性,較不重視議題與產品的關聯性;藝文理念行銷動機強調短期自利或長期自利的企業,活動類型較單一固定,最重視議題的社會顯著性與產品關聯性;另,對議題性質的謹慎選擇搭配靈活的時間運用、整合行銷傳播、本身及合作夥伴的資源分享,為台灣企業施行藝文理念行銷最重視的共同關鍵成功要素。\r\n 本研究並對實務界提出以下建議:1. 具通路特質的企業,可善用體驗行銷並持續性舉辦長期或短期活動;2. 注重與合作夥伴目標市場的分享以擴大市場;3. 掌握整合行銷傳播的關鍵為:快速的內部溝通及不輕易更改的核心策略。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\r\n第一節 研究動機…………..………………………………………………………………..1\r\n第二節 研究目的……………………………………………………………...……………2\r\n第三節 研究流程…………………………………………………………………………3\r\n第二章 文獻探討 5\r\n第一節 理念行銷……………………………………………………………………………6\r\n第二節 企業施行藝文理念行銷的定義………………………………………..................15\r\n第三節 理念行銷相關文獻…………………………………………………………….….17\r\n第四節 關鍵成功因素……………………………………………………………………..37\r\n第三章 研究方法 45\r\n第一節 研究架構…………………………………………………………………………..46\r\n第二節 觀念架構…………………………………………………………………………..47\r\n第三節 名詞操作性定義…………………………………………………………………..48\r\n第四節 研究方法…………………………………………………………………………..50\r\n第五節 樣本選擇…………………………………………………………………………..51\r\n第四章 訪談分析與命題發展 53\r\n第一節 個案一:誠品書店……………………………………………………………..…..54\r\n第二節 個案二:裕隆汽車……………………………………………………………..…. 62\r\n第三節 個案三:Agnes b…………………………………………………………...……. 70\r\n第四節 個案四:圓神出版事業機構……………………………………………… ..…… 81\r\n第五節 個案五:荷蘭銀行……………………………………………………………....….91\r\n第六節 關鍵成功因素分析………………………………………………………………..102\r\n第七節 跨個案綜合比較與命題發展……………………………………………………..116\r\n第五章 研究結論與建議 143\r\n附錄一 訪談大綱…………………………………………………………………………..153\r\n附錄二 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………..154\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n圖目錄\r\n\r\n圖1-3-1 研究流程圖………………………………………………………………………...…… 3\r\n圖2-1-1 企業與非營利組織之互動方式………………………………………………….…… 12\r\n圖2-1-2 理念行銷運作方式……………………………………………………………….…… 12\r\n圖2-3-1 企業參與公益活動動機………………………………………………………….…… 18\r\n圖2-3-2 企業金錢贊助的基本價值導向………………………………………………….…… 19\r\n 圖2-3-3 企業公益贊助金額占稅前淨利比例與企業規模之關係圖.………………………… 33\r\n圖2-4-1 Sull關鍵成功因素之觀念架構………………………….…………………………… 43\r\n圖3-1-1 研究架構圖……………………………………………….…………………………… 46\r\n圖3-1-2 觀念架構圖……………………………………………….…………………………… 47\r\n圖 4-7-1 修正後之觀念架構圖……………….……………………………………….……… 142\r\n\r\n\r\n表目錄\r\n表 2-1-1歷年理念行銷定義彙整…………………………………………..…………………….….10\r\n表 2-1-2歷年理念行銷特性彙整……………………………………….……………………….…..13\r\n表 2-2-1 Cause related marketing 相關翻譯列表……………………………………………….15\r\n表 2-3-1 影響理念選擇之因素………………………………………………………………………21\r\n表 2-3-2 歷年企業參與公益活動與理念行銷參與形式彙整………………………………………24\r\n表 2-3-3 非營利組織與企業的合作階層表…………………………………………………………26\r\n表 2-4-1 八種確認CSF的分析技術整理表………………………………………………………..39\r\n表 2-4-2 實證研究上確認關鍵成功因素的統計方法………………………………………………43\r\n表 3-3-1 受訪企業背景分析…………………………………………………………………………52\r\n表 4-1-1 誠品書店藝文理念行銷重要案例彙整……………………………………………………55\r\n表 4-1-2 誠品書店藝文理念行銷考量之合作夥伴因素……………………………………………60\r\n表 4-2-1 裕隆汽車藝文理念行銷重要案例彙整……………………………………………………63表 4-2-2 裕隆汽車藝文理念行銷考量之合作夥伴因素……………………………………………68\r\n表 4-3-1 Agnes b.藝文理念行銷重要案例彙整……………………………………………………71表 4-3-2 Agnes b.藝文理念行銷考量之合作夥伴因素………..……………………………….…78\r\n表 4-4-1 圓神出版事業機構藝文理念行銷重要案例彙整…………………………………………82表 4-4-2 圓神出版事業機構藝文理念行銷考量之合作夥伴因素…………………………………88\r\n表 4-5-1 荷蘭銀行藝文理念行銷重要案例彙整……………………………………………………92表 4-5-2 荷蘭銀行藝文理念行銷考量之合作夥伴因素………………………….………………...99表 4-6-1 誠品書店施行藝文理念行銷成功因素整理表…………………………………………..103表 4-6-2 誠品書店施行藝文理念行銷之SWOT分析表……………………………………….…104\r\n表 4-6-3 裕隆汽車施行藝文理念行銷成功因素整理表…………………………………………..106表 4-6-4 裕隆書店施行藝文理念行銷之SWOT分析表……………………………………….…107\r\n表 4-6-5 Agnes b. 施行藝文理念行銷成功因素整理表…………………………..……...…....109表 4-6-6 Agnes b. 施行藝文理念行銷之SWOT分析表……………………….…….………..110\r\n表 4-6-7 圓神出版施行藝文理念行銷成功因素整理表……………..……………….………….112\r\n表 4-6-8 圓神出版施行藝文理念行銷之SWOT分析表…………….………..………….……..112\r\n表 4-6-9 荷蘭銀行施行藝文理念行銷成功因素整理表………..………………………………..115\r\n表 4-6-10 荷蘭銀行施行藝文理念行銷之SWOT分析表………………………………….........115\r\n表4-7-1 企業施行藝文理念行銷之動機比較表…………………………………………………116\r\n表4-7-2 誠品書店藝文理念行銷活動行動決策概表……………………………………...........117\r\n表4-7-3 裕隆汽車藝文理念行銷活動行動決策概表….……………..………………………....118\r\n表4-7-4 Agnes b. 藝文理念行銷活動行動決策概表………..……….………………………..119\r\n表4-7-5 圓神出版藝文理念行銷活動行動決策概表……………………………………………120\r\n表4-7-6 荷蘭銀行藝文理念行銷活動行動決策概表…………………………….………….….120\r\n表4-7-7 企業施行藝文理念行銷之影響因素比較表……………………………………………131\r\n表4-7-8 企業藝文理念行銷之行銷傳播工具組合………….……………………..……………134\r\n表4-7-9 企業施行藝文理念行銷之績效評估方式……………………….……………..………135\r\n表4-7-10 台灣企業藝文理念行銷命題發展總表…………………………………………..…….138\r\n表4-7-11 台灣企業施行藝文理念行銷之關鍵成功因素綜合整理表………..…….………..…..140\r\n表4-7-12 台灣企業施行藝文理念行銷之SWOT綜合整理表……………………………..…141zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0090452014en_US
dc.subject藝術文化zh_TW
dc.subject理念行銷zh_TW
dc.subjectArts & Cultureen_US
dc.subjectcause-related marketingen_US
dc.title企業藝文理念行銷——台灣區初探性研究zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAaker, D. A., 1984, Strategic Market Management, New York: John Wiley and Sons Incorporation.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmott, Nancy, 1996. \"Marketing with a passion,\" Sales and Marketing Management, 146 (January): 64-71zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAndreasen, Alan R. 1996, “Profits for nonprofits: Find a Corporate Partner”, Harvard Business Review, (Non-Dec), 47-62.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarnes, Nora G. and Debra A. Fitzgibbons , 1992. \"Strategic marketing for charitable organizations,\" Health Marketing Quarterly, 9: 103-114zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCaesar, Patricia, 1986. “Cause-Related Marketing: The New Face of Corporatezh_TW
dc.relation.referencePhilanthropy”, Business & Society Review, 59: 15-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChristine V Bullen; John F. Rockart,1981,“A Primer On Critical Success Factors”, CISR ND.69, MIT, P10-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCobb, Roger W., and Charles D. Elder. 1983., Participation in American Politics:zh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe Dynamics of Agenda-Building., 2nd ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCooper, Colleen, 1997, \"Give and thou shall receive,\" Sales and Marketingzh_TW
dc.relation.reference9-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePringle, Hamish and Marjorie Thompson, 1999, Brand Spirit How Cause Relatedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarketing Builds Brands, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRockart, John F., 1979, “Chief Executive Define Their Own Data Needs”,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHarvard Business Review, March-April.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchiller, Z.,1988, “Doing Well By Doing Good”, Business Week, (Dec), 53-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSeymour, H. Fine, 1987, “Social and Nonprofit Marketing: Some Trends andzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIssues”, Advances in Nonprofit Marketing, 2, 71-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSeitel, F.P.,1992, The Practice of Public Relations, 5th ed., N.Y.: Macmillan.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceShell, A., 1989, “Cause-related Marketing: Big Potential”, Public Relationzh_TW
dc.relation.reference林敏華,1996,我國壽險業經營關鍵成功因素及其績效相關性之研究,國立政治大學 保險研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJournal, 45(July), 8-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Scott M. and David S. Alcorn, 1991. \"Cause Marketing: A New Directionzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIn the Marketing of Corporate Responsibility,\" Journal of Consumer Marketing,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8 (Summer): 19-35zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpiggle, Susan, 1994. \"Analysis and interpretation of qualitative daia inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceconsumer research,\" Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (3): 491-502zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSull, Donald N., 2003, “Revival of the Fittest: Why Good Companies Go Bad and How Great Managers Remake Them”, Harvard Business School Presszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTurco, D. M., 1994, “Event sponsorship: Effect on consumer brandzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceloyalty and consumption.”, Sport Marketing Quarterly, 3(3): 35-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUseem, M., 1988, “Market and institutional factors in corporate contributions.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳芝儀、李奉儒,1995,質的評鑑與研究,台北:桂冠圖書股份有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCalifornia Management Review”, winter: 77-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVaradarajan, P. Rajan, 1986. \"Horizontal Cooperative Sales Promotion : Azh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFramework for Classification and Additional Perspective,\" Journal ofzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarketing, 50: 61-73zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVaradarajan, P. R. & Menon, A., 1988, “Cause-related Marketing: A Coalignmentzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceof Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy”, Journal of Marketing, (July), 58-74.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWagner, L. and R.L. Thompson, 1994, \"Cause-related Marketing: Fundrai-zh_TW
dc.relation.referencesing Tool Phony Philanthropy?\", Nonprofit World, Vol.12 (6), pp.9-13.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWebb, Deborah J.,1999, Consumer Attributions Regarding Cause-Relatedzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarketing Offers and Their Impact on Evaluations of The Firm and Purchasezh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳尚恩,2003,廣告公司執行廣告主廣告活動之交易成本與廣告公司關鍵成功要素之 研究,國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIntent: An Experimental Examination, Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia Statezh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUniversity.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王之樵,「藝術雕琢企業形象」,1995,中華民國畫廊導覽,18 期: 20-24。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王怡瑜、夏學理,1999,「我國表演藝術團體之經營機會研究」,空大行政學報,9 期: 387-423。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江世芳,1996,「霖園大手筆贊助雲門~未來五年將與中國時報系主辦十四場雲門舞集 戶外公演」,中國時報,6 月13 日,24 版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江雨潔,2001,善因行銷對品牌權益及非營利組織形象影響之研究,臺灣大學國際企 業學研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference行政院文化建設委員會,1999,文化統計。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余朝權、張家琳,1997,「企業採行善因行銷之研究」,亞太管理評論,第3卷,第zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3期,頁59-82。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳珍芳,1998,「企業文化策略面面觀」,公關雜誌,25 期: 43-47。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林美英,1994,美國工商企業與文化活動之互動,台北:行政院文化建設委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林音因,1999,善因行銷對企業經營績效影響之研究,淡江大學管理科學研究所碩士 論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林瑩滋,2000,台灣企業贊助藝文活動的動機與決策模式之研究,中山大學企業管理 研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳靜吉、曹先進,1991,「企業贊助藝術」,民國七十九年中華民國文化發展評估與 展望:69-99。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周文賢,1999,行銷管理-市場分析與策略預測,台北:智勝文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪昌銘,1999,企業捐贈大學院校行為研究,中山大學公共事務管理研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference洪懿妍,1999,「企業社會責任調查」,天下雜誌,212 期:120-134。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference紀虹,1999,「台灣諾華公司— 堅持『實在』本位,腳踏實地作公關」,公關雜誌, 30 期: 42-47。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙,1997,公共關係:理論、策略與研究實例,台北:正中書局zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceManagement, 149 (3): 75-76zh_TW
dc.relation.reference談琲、夏學理,1995,「台灣工商企業對表演藝術贊助態度之研究」,空大行政學報, 4 期: 59-75。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference涂春河,1991,光電產業關鍵成功因素之研究,中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference曾千豪,2002,休閒產業與發卡銀行策略聯盟績效之研究,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管 理研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference菲利普•柯特勒,2000,行銷管理學。台北:東華書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳昱美,2002,企業贊助活動之相關程度、配套之行銷管理組合及贊助活動個數對於 品牌權益影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳嫣如,1993,從企業公益贊助探討社會福利機構可行的勸募策略,東吳大學社會工 作研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference開忱,「企業vs.藝術團體」,1996,公關雜誌,15 期: 10-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊炳韋,1995,企業贊助公益活動之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馮義方,1999,企業對運動贊助行為之研究,台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡育瑩,1999,「台灣電子業導入ERP 系統之關鍵因素」,國立中興大學企業管理學 研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDaniel, D. Ronald, 1961, “Management Information Crisis”, Harvard Business Review, September –October.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉怡芳,2001,藝文活動行銷傳播策略之研究--以報社贊助大型展覽為例,臺灣師範 大學大眾傳播研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭展瑋,1999,企業贊助文化藝術事業之研究,台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉念寧,1990,大型企業贊助公益活動之研究,台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference薛保瑕,2002,文化創意產業概況分析調查,行政院經濟建設委員會委託計畫案報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference顏龍蒂,1999,議題相關行銷對品牌權益影響之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭思文,2000,非營利組織採行善因行銷行為之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙義隆、王淑姿、劉念寧,1990,大型企業贊助公益活動之研究,行政院國科會科資zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中心。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張英陣,1999,企業與非營利組織的夥伴關係」,社區發展季刊,第85期,頁62-70。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張家琳,1997,台灣企業採行善因行銷之分析,私立東吳大學企業管理研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDeNitto, Emily, 1989, \"Marketing with a Conscience,\" Marketing Communications, 14 (5): 42-46zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許士軍,1980,管理學,台北:東華出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference游舒惠,2001,企業參與公益活動與公益行銷之研究,政治大學企業管理研究所論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference網站部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.aandb.org.ukzh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.absa.org.ukzh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.artsandbusiness.orgzh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.cca.gov.twzh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.abnamro.com.tw/zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.yulon-motor.com.tw/index.jspzh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.eslite.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDoswell, M.,1984. Business and the Arts. Business and Economics Review, 31: 15-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.booklife.com/zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.agnesb.frzh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.ncafroc.org.twzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDoswell, Marshall, 1984. “Business and the arts”, Business and Economic Review, 31(1): 15-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDove, T., 1983, Business in the community: How you can make a difference. The Journal of Insurance, 44: 17-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFerguson, Charles R. and Roger Dickinson, 1982, “Critical Success Factor for Directions in the Eighties”, Business Horizon, May 1982.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGalaskiewicz, J., 1985, “Professional networks and the institutionalization of a single mind set”. American Sociological Review, 50: 639-658.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGalaskiewicz, Joseph, & Burt, Ronald S., 1991. Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(1): 88-105.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrahn, J. L., W. J. Hannaford, and K. J. Laverty, 1988, “Corporate Philanthropyzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceand Marketing Strategy: A Review and directions for research”, AMAzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEducation Proceedings. Series 53, M. R. Solomon et al., eds, Chicago:zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmerican/ Marketing/ association, 67-9zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHambric, Donald C., 1989, “Key Success Factors: Test of A General Theory Inzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Mature Industrial-Product Sector”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.10:zh_TW
dc.relation.reference368.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHenricks, M., 1991, \"Doing Well While Doing Good\", Small Business Reportszh_TW
dc.relation.reference(Nov.), pp.28-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHofer, Charles W. and Den Schedle. 1985, Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, St. Paul: West Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKelly, Bill, 1991, “Cause-related Marketing: Doing Well While Doing Good”,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSale and Marketing Management, 143(3), 60-65.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKotler, Philip, 1996, Strategic Marketing For Nonprofit Organization, 5thzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEd., NJ: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrentler, K. A., 1989, “Cause-related Marketing: Advantages and Pitfalls forzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNonprofit”, The Future o f the Nonprofit Sector: Challenges, Changes, andzh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolicy Considerations, in V.A. Hodgkinson et al., Jossdey Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLarson, J.,1995, “Sweet Charity,” American Demographics, 95(May), 68-72zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeidker, Joel K. & Albert Bruno, 1984, “Identifying and using Critical Factor”,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLong Rang Planning, Vol. 17.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMason, David E., 1992, \"Invasion of the Soul Snatchers: Aliens in our Midst,\"zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNonprofit World, 10: 27-30zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCarville, R. E., & Copeland, R. P., 1994, “Understanding sport sponsorshipzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethrough exchange theory.” Journal of Sport Management, 8: 102-114.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcElroy, K. M., & Siegfried, John J., 1986, “The community influence onzh_TW
dc.relation.referencecorporate contributions.” Public Finance Quarterly, 14(4): 394-414.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcElroy, Katherine Maddox, 1985, “The effect of firm size on corporatezh_TW
dc.relation.referencephilanthropy.”, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 25(2):18-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMullen, Jennifer,1997. \"Performance-based corporate philanthropy: How`zh_TW
dc.relation.referencegiving smart` can further corporate goals,\" Public Relations Quarterly, 42 (2): 42-48zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNaisbitt, J., & Aberdene, P., 1990. Megatrends 2000: ten new directions forzh_TW
dc.relation.referencethe 1990`s. New York : Morrow.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNichols, Don, 1990. \"Promotion the Cause\", Incentive, 164 (8): 28-31zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOldenburg, D.,1992, “Big Companies Plug Big Causes for Big Gains”,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBusiness & Society Review, 83(Fall), 22-23.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePtacek, Joseph J. & Gina Salazer, 1997, “Enlightened Self-interest: Sellingzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBusiness On the Benefits of Cause-related Marketing”, Nonprofit World, 15(4),zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.