Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29734
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor黃懿慧zh_TW
dc.contributor.author呂沐勳zh_TW
dc.creator呂沐勳zh_TW
dc.date2007en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-11T08:12:22Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-11T08:12:22Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-11T08:12:22Z-
dc.identifierG0094452001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29734-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description廣告研究所zh_TW
dc.description94452001zh_TW
dc.description96zh_TW
dc.description.abstract本研究的研究動機主要有二,其一是重新檢視Grunig所提出的優越公關理論在現實生活中是否能夠被實踐;其二是想透過調查所有網路工具被應用的情形,試圖建構出一個完整的網路公共關係效果評估指標。基於要進一步詳細討論上述研究動機,本研究希望達成下列之研究目的:\r\n第一,本研究希望能初步探討台灣地區網路公共關係的應用概況。第二,本研究希望能透過審視公共關係策略與網路傳播工具進一步闡述網路科技是否有助於達成優越公關。第三,提出網路公共關係效果的評估指標。第四,綜合理論與實務界研究結果的兩相對照,進而提出適合企業使用的網路公共關係架構。\r\n研究結果可以分成以下四點簡述之:\r\n第一點,網路公共關係策略,公關人員經常使用資訊中介策略、雙向溝通略、對等溝通策略,其中資訊中介策略和雙向溝通策略可被視為同一種策略。由此可得知,公關可人員能是有可能透過網路公共關係使用雙向對等溝通策略,進而達成優越公關的。另一方面,在網路公共關係中,公關人員很少使用人際溝通策略。\r\n第二點,公共關係策略與網路傳播工具關聯性,資訊中介策略與全球資訊網、部落格呈現正相關;雙向溝通策略與網際即時通訊系統、部落格呈現正相關;對等溝通策略與全球資訊網、網際即時通訊系統、部落格呈現正相關。換言之,公關人員如欲透過使用雙向、對等溝通策略達成優越公關,或許可以考慮使用全球資訊網、網際即時通訊系統、部落格等傳播工具。\r\n第三點,網路公共關係效益,公關人員認為網路公共關係有助於媒體曝光、組織和公眾間關係和組織聲譽。總結言之,網路公共關係有助於公共關係的直效價值。另一方面,公關人員認為網路公共關係對於促進市場營收、危機管理/衝突解決方面的功效並不顯著。\r\n第四點,企業如果欲藉由網路公共關係實踐雙向對等溝通,有三個因素是一定要具備的,第一是要有獨立的公關部門,第二是要讓公關人員受較多的專業公關訓練,第三則是在傳播工具的選擇上必須善用網路即時通訊系統和部落格。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents目錄\r\n第壹章 緒論----------------------------------------------------------------------------------1\r\n第一節 研究緣起與研究背景----------------------------------------------------1\r\n第二節 研究動機-------------------------------------------------------------------5\r\n第三節 研究目的與研究流程----------------------------------------------------5\r\n第貳章 文獻探討---------------------------------------------------------------------------8\r\n第一節 優越公關理論-------------------------------------------------------------9\r\n第二節 網路公共關係理論------------------------------------------------------14\r\n第三節 公共關係策略------------------------------------------------------------18\r\n第四節 網路傳播工具------------------------------------------------------------22\r\n第五節 網路公共關係效果評估------------------------------------------------29\r\n第參章 研究方法--------------------------------------------------------------------------38\r\n第一節 研究架構----------------------------------------------------------------38\r\n第二節 研究問題與研究假設-------------------------------------------------39\r\n第三節 研究方法----------------------------------------------------------------40\r\n第四節 研究設計----------------------------------------------------------------41\r\n第肆章 資料分析與討論---------------------------------------------------------------56\r\n第一節 研究對象基本資料----------------------------------------------------56\r\n第二節 研究結果----------------------------------------------------------------68\r\n第三節 其他研究發現----------------------------------------------------------99\r\n第伍章 結論--------------------------------------------------------------------------------108\r\n 第一節 研究結果主要發現---------------------------------------------------108\r\n第二節 對理論之貢獻與對實務之建議------------------------------------117\r\n第三節 研究限制與建議------------------------------------------------------128\r\n\r\n參考文獻-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------132\r\n附錄一:本研究之問卷-----------------------------------------------------------------137\r\n \r\n圖表目錄\r\n圖1-1 研究流程--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7\r\n圖2-1 文獻探討之流程-----------------------------------------------------------------------------9\r\n圖3-1:本研究架構圖-------------------------------------------------------------------------------38\r\n圖4-1 填答者企業資本型態---------------------------------------------------------------------57\r\n圖4-2 填答者企業員工數目---------------------------------------------------------------------57\r\n圖4-3 填答者企業公關部門及其附屬單位狀況-------------------------------------------58\r\n圖4-4 填答者性別----------------------------------------------------------------------------------61\r\n圖4-5 填答者年齡----------------------------------------------------------------------------------62\r\n圖4-6 填答者教育程度---------------------------------------------------------------------------63\r\n圖4-7 填答者公共關係方面的訓練-----------------------------------------------------------65\r\n圖4-8 公關人員使用公共關係策略概況-----------------------------------------------------74\r\n圖4-9 公共關係策略與網路傳播工具關聯性圖------------------------------------------80\r\n圖4-10 網路公共關係之效益評估效果-------------------------------------------------------94\r\n圖4-11 關係之效益評估效果--------------------------------------------------------------------95\r\n圖4-12 公共關係策略與公共關係效果評估關聯性圖------------------------------------98\r\n圖4-13 組織變項與公共關係策略關聯圖--------------------------------------------------105\r\n圖4-14 個人變項與公共關係策略關聯圖--------------------------------------------------107\r\n圖5-1組織變項、個人人口變項與公共關係策略「資訊中介策略」關聯圖----------113\r\n圖5-2組織變項、個人人口變項與公共關係策略「人際溝通策略」關聯圖----------113\r\n圖5-3組織變項、個人人口變項與公共關係策略「雙向溝通策略」關聯圖----------115\r\n圖5-4組織變項、個人人口變項與公共關係策略「對等溝通策略」關聯圖----------116\r\n\r\n表1-1:網路公共關係效果評估指標-------------------------------------------------------------3\r\n表2-1:網路傳播系統之類型---------------------------------------------------------------------23\r\n表2-2 網路傳播工具特性簡介表--------------------------------------------------------------27\r\n表2-3 網路時代的溝通模式--------------------------------------------------------------------27\r\n表2-4 公共關係策略與網路傳播工具對照表-----------------------------------------------28\r\n表2-5 網路公共關係效益評估指標-----------------------------------------------------------36\r\n表3-1 公共關係策略構面-------------------------------------------------------------------------43\r\n表3-2 網路傳播工具構面-------------------------------------------------------------------------44\r\n表3-3 公共關係效益評估構面------------------------------------------------------------------44\r\n表3-4 關係效益評估構面-------------------------------------------------------------------------46\r\n表3-5 研究問卷題項信度檢驗------------------------------------------------------------------50\r\n表3-6 α係數之意義--------------------------------------------------------------------------------55\r\n表4-1 受訪者教育程度分配次數表------------------------------------------------------------59\r\n表4-2本研究受訪企業基本資料----------------------------------------------------------------60\r\n表4-3受訪者年齡分配次數表-------------------------------------------------------------------63\r\n表4-4受訪者教育程度分配次數表------------------------------------------------------------64\r\n表4-5 本研究受訪企業公關人員基本資料--------------------------------------------------66\r\n表4-6 網路傳播工具使用概況------------------------------------------------------------------67\r\n表4-7 公共關係策略因素分析表---------------------------------------------------------------69\r\n表4-8 公關人員使資訊中介之公共關係策略-----------------------------------------------70\r\n表4-9 公關人員使用人際溝通之公共關係策略-------------------------------------------71\r\n表4-10 公關人員使用雙向溝通之公共關係策略------------------------------------------72\r\n表4-11 公關人員使用對等溝通之公共關係策略------------------------------------------73\r\n表4-12 資訊中介策略與雙向溝通策略因素分析------------------------------------------75\r\n表4-13 網路公共關係公共關係策略與網路傳播工具Pearson相關係數檢定------76\r\n表4-14 研究假設結果一覽表--------------------------------------------------------------------79\r\n表4-15 公共關係策略與網路傳播工具對照表---------------------------------------------81\r\n表4-16 公共關係效益評估因素分析表-------------------------------------------------------82\r\n表4-17 網路公共關係對於促進組織聲譽之效果------------------------------------------83\r\n表4-18 網路公共關係對於促進媒體曝光之效果------------------------------------------84\r\n表4-19 網路公共關係對於促進市場營收之效果------------------------------------------85\r\n表4-20 網路公共關係對於促進危機管理/衝突解決之效果----------------------------86\r\n表4-21 網路公共關係對於促進組織和公眾間關係之效果------------------------------87\r\n表4-22 關係效益評估因素分析表--------------------------------------------------------------89\r\n表4-23 網路公共關係對於促進信任、關係滿意度之效果-------------------------------90\r\n表4-24 網路公共關係對於促進相互控制之效果------------------------------------------91\r\n表4-25 網路公共關係對於促進關係承諾之效果------------------------------------------92\r\n表4-26 網路公共關係對於促進人情與面子之效果---------------------------------------93\r\n表4-27 公共關係策略與公共關係效益評估的相關分析-------------------------------96\r\n表4-28 企業型態與公共關係策略T檢定---------------------------------------------------100\r\n表4-29 員工人數與公共關係策略變異數分析-------------------------------------------101\r\n表4-30 公關部門與公共關係策略T檢定-------------------------------------------------102\r\n表4-31 性別與公共關係策略T檢定-------------------------------------------------------102\r\n表4-32 年齡與公共關係策略變異數分析-------------------------------------------------103\r\n表4-33 教育程度與公共關係策略變異數分析-------------------------------------------104\r\n表4-34 公關訓練與公共關係策略變異數分析--------------------------------------------105\r\n表5-1 公共關係策略問卷題項信度檢驗對照表-----------------------------------------119\r\n表5-2 公共關係效益問卷題項信度檢驗對照表-----------------------------------------121\r\n表5-3 關係效益問卷題項信度檢驗對照表------------------------------------------------123zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0094452001en_US
dc.subject網路公共關係zh_TW
dc.subject公共關係zh_TW
dc.subject網路公關zh_TW
dc.title企業網路公共關係策略、工具、效益之關聯性研究-以電子資訊產業為例zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference參考文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference中文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王新昌(2004):《大學網路公關策略運用之研究--以網站首頁資訊呈現分析為例》。高雄:國立中山大學傳播管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference任永貞(2001):《企業網站首頁之公共關係目標公眾、企業形象與功能分析研究----以國內前五百大企業為例》。高雄:國立中山大學傳播管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李璞良譯(2001):《數位公關—成本少效率高的網路PR實務》。Matt Haig原著。台北:商智文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference岑雅慧(2003):《大學校院體育學系網路公關運作之研究》。台北:國立台灣師範大學體育學系在職進修碩士班。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳筱玫(2003):《網路傳播概論》。台北:智勝文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳宗權(2001):《製造業公共關係策略之探討-以個案公司處理高屏溪事件為zh_TW
dc.relation.reference例》,中山大學管理學院高階經營碩士學程專班碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林靜伶、吳宜蓁、黃懿慧(1996):《公共關係》。台北,空中大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱淑華(2005):《網路公關理論與實務》。台北:揚智文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施瑞瑄譯(2006):《誰沒部落格 : 無形新大陸的無限可能》。台北:商周出版:家庭傳媒城邦文化發行。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙(1995):〈公關理論中的「雙向對等性溝通模式」再省思〉,《廣告學研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference究》,第五集,頁185-201。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙(1997):《公共關係:理論、策略與研究實例》。台北,正中書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙(1997):〈網際網路與公共關係:理論與實務應用的思考〉,《廣告學研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference究》,第九集,頁159-181。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙(2000):〈網路時代的企業公關—格魯尼磨是的理論性重構〉,《廣告學研zh_TW
dc.relation.reference究》,第十五集,頁1-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫秀蕙(2003):〈建立企業網頁公關效果評估指標—以2002年台灣五百大服務業為例〉,《廣告學研究》,第二十一集,頁1-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陸旭芬(2005):《科技製造業公共關係探討:媒體效果、關係效果與組織績效研究》。台北:國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳怡利(2004):《企業網路公關之研究》。台北:國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭書祺(2001):《企業運用網路公關之研究初探—從電腦中介傳播談起》。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃懿慧(2003):〈台灣公共關係學門及研究:1960—2000年之回顧〉,《廣告學研究》,第二十集,頁13-50。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃國禎(2005):《初探部落格在企業內部溝通的可行性》。台北:國立政治大學廣告研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference彭慧明(2000):《報社記者對網路訊息採納態度之初探》。台北:國立政治大學新聞研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉正道(2003):《大學網路公關策略之研究:網路使用者之策略認知和互動滿意度分析》,《廣告學研究》,第二十集,頁51-70。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭阿雪(2002):《網路公共關係運作機制之研究》。台南:長榮管理學院經營管理研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭資穎(2006):《國內基金會公共關係效果與組織績效關連性初探:以文化教育及社福慈善類基金會為主要探討對象》台北:國立政治大學廣播電視學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference藝立協(2003):《Blog : 部落格線上出版.網路日誌實作》。台北:上奇科技。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇世欣(2001):《企業危機溝通管理初探:以台灣企業公關業務負責人調查為例》。台北:世新大學傳播研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBadaracco, C. H. (1998). The transparent corporation and organized community. Public Relations Review, 24:265-272.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBenoit, W. L., & Brinson, S. L. (1999). Queen Elizabeth`s image repair discourse: Insensitive royal or compassionate queen. Public Relations Review, 25(2):145-156.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBroom, G. M., Casey, S., & Ritchey, J. (1997). Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9:83-98.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCantelmo, D. P.(2001). How PR people distribute and the media prefer to receive news release and others PR information: the myths vs. reality. Public Relations Quterly, Fall 2001 46(3):15-17.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCoombs, W. T.(1998). ‘The Internet as Potential Equalizer: New Leverage for Congronting Social Irresponsibility. Public Relations Review, 24(3), 289-303.’zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEsrock, S. L., & Leichty, G. B.(2000) Organization of corporate web pages: Publics and functions. Public Relations Review, 26(3):327-344.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFulk, J. et al. (1996). Connective and communal public goods in interactive communication systems, Communication Theory, 6, 60-87.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDern, D.(1997) Using the internet as the PR tool. Communications News, 34-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, J. E. (1989). A situational theory of environmental issues, publics, and activists. In L. A. Grunig (Ed.), Environmental activism revisited: The changing nature of communication through organizational public relations, special interest groups and the mass media. Monographs in Environmental Education and Environmental Studies. Troy, OH: The North American Association for Environmental Education, 50-82.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, J. E. (2001). Two-way symmetrical public relations: Past, present, and future. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 11-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, J. E., & Hunt, T.(1984) Managing public relations. New York: Holt Rinehart & Winston.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, J. E. and L.A. Grunig (1992). Models of public relations and communications. In J. E. Grunig(ed.), Excellent in public relations and communication management, Hillsdale, NJ:Lawerence Erlbaum Associate, 285-325.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, J. E. (1993). Image and substance: From symbolic to behavioral relationships. Public Relations Review, 19(2):121-139.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, J. E., Grunig, L. A., & Dozier, D. M. (1995, November). Combining the two-way symmetrical and asymmetrical models into a contingency model of excellent public relations. Paper presented to the Association for the Advancement of Policy, Research, and Development in the Third World, Las Vegas, NV.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, L. A., Grunig, J. E., & Vercic, D. (1997, June). Are the IABC`s Excellence principles generic? Comparing Slovenia and the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada. Paper presented to the International Association of Business Communicators, Los Angeles, LA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, J. E., & Huang, Y. (2000). From organizational effectiveness to relationship indicators: Antecedents of relationships, public relations strategies, and relationship outcomes. In Ledingham, J. and Bruning, S. D. (Eds.), Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations (pp. 23-53). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrunig, J. E., & White, J. (1992). The effect of worldviews on public relations theory and practice. In J. E. Grunig (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 31-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHachigian, D. & Hallahan, K.(2003). Perceptions of public relations web sites by computer industry journalists, Public Relations Review, 29(2):43-62.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W.C.(1995) Factor analysis. In L. B. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold(Eds.), Reading and Understanding multivariate statistics(pp. 364-406). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHearit, K. M. (1996). The use of counter-attack in apologetic public relations crises: The case of General Motors vs. Dateline NBC. Public Relations Review, 22(3): 233-248.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHill, L. N., & White, C. (2000). Public relations practitioners’ perception of the World Wide Web as a communications tool. Public Relations Review, 26(1):31-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, Y. (2001a). OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(1): 61-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, Y. (2001b). Values of public relations: Effects on organization-public relationships mediating conflict resolution. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(4):265-301.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, Y. H. (2004). PRSA: Scale development for exploring the cross-cultural impetus of public relations strategies. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2): 307-326.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuang, Y. H. (2006). A revisit of symmetrical communication from an international perspective: status, effect, and future research direction. Elizabeth L. Toth.(Eds.), The future of excellence in public relations and communication management(pp.235-262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawerence Erlbaum associates.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoffman, D. L., & Novak, T. P. (1995). Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: Conceptual foundations.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www2000.ogsm.vanderbilt.edu/cmcpaper.revision.july11.1995/cm cpaper.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoltz, S.(2002). Public Relations on the Net: Winning Strategies to In form and Influence the Media, the Investment Community, the Government, the Public and More! New York: American Management Association.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHon, L. C. (1997). What have you done for me lately? Exploring effectiveness in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 9(1):1-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHon, L. C., & Grunig J. E. (1999). Measuring relationship in public relations. A report for the Commission on Public Relations Measurement and Evaluation, the Institute for Public Relations, Gainesville, FL.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHutton, J. G. (1999). The definition, dimensions, and domain of public relations. Public Relations Review, 25(2):199-214.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHwang, K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 944-974.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJohnson, M. A. (1997). Public relations and technology: practitior perspectives. Journal of Public Relations research, 9(3):213-326.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKent, M. L.(1998) Does your web site attract or appeal customers? Public Relations Quarterly, 43(4):31-33.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKent, M. L. & Taylor, M.(1998). Building dialogic relationships through World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24(3):321-334.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKent, M. L. & Taylor, M.(2003). Maximizing media relations: A Web site checklist. Public Relations Quarterly, 48(1):14-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKent, M. L., Taylor, M. & White, W. J.(2002). The relationship between web site design and organizational responsiveness to stakeholders. Paper presented at the Public Relations Division of International Communication Association annual conference in Seoul, Korea, July 15-19, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKim, Y. (1997). Measuring efficiency: The economic impact model of reputation. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Public Relations Society of America, Nashville, TN.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKim, Y. (2001). Measuring the economic value of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 13(1):3-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaRose, R., & Hoag, A. (1996). Organizational adoptions of the Internet and the clustering of innovations. Telematics and Informatics, 13:49-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeichty, G., & Springston, J. (1993). Reconsidering public relations models. Public Relations Review, 19(4):327-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarken, G. A.(1998) The internet and the web: the two-way public relations highway. Public Relations Quareterly, 43(1):31-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarra, F. J. (1998). Crisis communication plans: Poor predictors of excellence crisis public relations. Journal of Management Studies, 34(5):769-791.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiddleberg, D.(2001). Winning PR in the Wired World: Powerful Communications Strategies for Noisy Digital Space. New York: McGrew-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNohria, N., & Eccles, R.(Eds.).(1992). Networks and organizations: structure, form and action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceParasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L.(1988)SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSproull, L. & Kielser, S.(1991) Connections: News ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVan der Meiden, A. (1993). Public relations and “other” modalities of professional communication: Asymmetric presuppositions for a new theoretical discussion. International Public Relations Review, 16(3):8-11.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhite, C. & Raman, N. (1999) The World Wide Web as a public relations medium: The use of research, planning, and evaluation in web site development. Public Relations Review, 25(4):405-419.zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.