Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29769
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor黃葳威zh_TW
dc.contributor.author陳政佑zh_TW
dc.creator陳政佑zh_TW
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-11T08:16:17Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-11T08:16:17Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-11T08:16:17Z-
dc.identifierG0095453016en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/29769-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description廣播電視學研究所zh_TW
dc.description95453016zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract「選秀節目」風潮近幾年來再度席捲台灣,也成功地進入部分網路閱聽人的生活之中,成為一種習以為常的收視經驗,然而,近期節目收視率的滑落並無法斷然宣告網路閱聽人對「選秀節目」失去興趣,為求貼切地理解其動態的收視經驗,本研究從「日常生活理論」面向切入網路閱聽人之選秀節目收視經驗,研究選秀節目如何在網路閱聽人的生活中佔據特定的空間/時間,並結合相關的閱聽人研究,從「主動閱聽人」、「接收分析」面向,歸納出網路閱聽人結合網路使用所具有的「非同步收視」、「強調互動參與感」、「兼具傳播者身分」之收視特質,形構其動態的日常收視形式,並構成收視實踐模式之基礎,藉以詮釋屬於個體微觀的收視實踐戰術。\r\n本研究以台大批踢踢實業坊【SuperStarAve】BBS板作為研究個案,嘗試運用「網路民族誌」(Netnography)-結合網路文本分析、參與觀察、線上訪談之研究方法,試圖描述網路閱聽人日常生活中的選秀節目收視經驗。研究結論指出,網路閱聽人藉由個人與生活脈絡協商、配置的「戰術」,與節目產製「策略」相對地收視著「超級星光大道」,本研究認為,其日常收視經驗需考量個人所處的生活脈絡與網路傳播情境所造成的收視變動性,並因個人對節目「真誠性」的解讀而變動對「超級星光大道」的日常收視形式;藉網路使用之便,重新組配收看節目之生活空間與時間,也各自建置個人迂迴的收視戰術-兼具反制與延伸之意義。是以,網路閱聽人之選秀節目日常收視經驗乃成為動態的過程,從中展現如de Certeau所指游擊式的收視「戰術」,藉以反制節目產製策略,從中找尋獲致個人收視愉悅與意義之機會。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractRecently, “Talent TV Show “ has become such a popular program genre in Taiwan. This study aims to understand how Internet audiences combine heterogeneous elements of their lives. de Certeau’s theory of everyday practices will be applied to serve as the analytical framework, and concretely describe the modalities of watching TV and the formalities of interpret practices.\r\nThis is a case study that makes use of the research methodology of Netnography to analyze BBS “ SuperStarAve ”. And the main argument of this study shows what Internet audiences’ tactics of watching TV are. Internet audiences alternate different media tactically to fit in with their life arrangements, and they make a detour to interpret the authenticity of the program. In addition, Internet audiences contemplate to seek for opportunities of establishing the trajectory of watching TV to pleasure themselves. \r\nAs a result, it can be concluded that the feature of diversity existing among individual Internet audiences shapes the movement of the everyday experience of watching TV.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論\r\n 第一節、研究動機與問題意識…………………………………………………5\r\n 第二節、研究背景與研究目的…………………………………………………9\r\n 第三節、研究範圍與名詞釋義…………………………………………………12\r\n一、研究範圍………………………………………………………………12\r\n二、名詞釋義………………………………………………………………13\r\n三、本文架構………………………………………………………………15\r\n第二章 文獻探討\r\n 第一節、日常生活理論…………………………………………………………16\r\n一、日常生活之研究面向……………………………………………………17\r\n二、Michel de Certeau之日常生活實踐……………………………………20\r\n三、小結:本研究之日常收視經驗分析架構………………………………25\r\n 第二節、閱聽人理論……………………………………………………………28\r\n一、閱聽人概念之建構性-從閱聽人到網路閱聽人………………………28\r\n二、網路閱聽人之收視與解讀………………………………………………29\r\n三、小結:網路閱聽人之收視經驗分析架構…………………………………45\r\n 第三節、網路閱聽人之選秀節目日常收視經驗………………………………48\r\n一、生活脈絡:網路閱聽人之選秀節目日常收視形式………………………48\r\n二、個人層面:網路閱聽人之戰術收視實踐…………………………………52\r\n三、小結:網路閱聽人之選秀節目日常收視經驗研究架構…………………60\r\n第三章 研究方法\r\n第一節、質化的研究方法…………………………………………………………62\r\n第二節、網路民族誌(Netnography)…………………………………………63\r\n第三節、研究步驟………………………………………………………………65\r\n第四章 網路文本分析\r\n 第一節、網路閱聽人之日常收視形式………………………………………74\r\n 第二節、網路閱聽人之個人收視實踐戰術……………………………………95\r\n第五章 結論、討論與建議\r\n第一節、研究結論與討論………………………………………………………129\r\n 第二節、研究限制與建議……………………………………………………134\r\n參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………137\r\n【附錄一】節目收視率與本研究整理之BBS看板人氣………………………147\r\n【附錄二】本研究之網路文本篩選/分析依據………………………………149\r\n【附錄三】本研究之線上訪談題綱……………………………………………150\r\n【附錄四】本文引用之網路文本作者/篇名…………………………………152\r\n\r\n\r\n圖表目錄\r\n圖一、本文架構圖……………………………………………………………………15\r\n圖二、日常收視經驗分析架構圖……………………………………………………27\r\n圖三、網路閱聽人之收視經驗分析圖………………………………………………47\r\n圖四、選秀節目之商業模式…………………………………………………………54\r\n圖五、本文研究架構圖………………………………………………………………61\r\n圖六、編輯式分析法…………………………………………………………………72\r\n圖七、本文研究步驟…………………………………………………………………73\r\n圖八、本研究歸納之流動收視解讀立場…………………………………………114\r\n圖九、本研究歸納之網路閱聽人選秀節目日常收視經驗模式圖………………130\r\n表一、個案研究類型…………………………………………………………………63\r\n表二、本研究之線上訪談對象………………………………………………………71\r\n表三、【SuperStarAve】BBS板舉辦之「網路徵文」活動……………………………92zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095453016en_US
dc.subject選秀節目zh_TW
dc.subject真誠性zh_TW
dc.subject網路閱聽人zh_TW
dc.subject網路民族誌zh_TW
dc.subjecttalent TV showen_US
dc.subjectauthenticityen_US
dc.subjectInternet audienceen_US
dc.subjectNetnographyen_US
dc.title從選秀節目【SuperStarAve】BBS板看網路閱聽人之日常收視經驗zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMaria Bakardjieva著;丘忠融、李紋鋒譯(2008)。《網路社會與日常生活》。台北,韋伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHills, M.著;朱華瑄譯(2005)。《迷文化》。台北,韋伯。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBriggs & Burke著;李明穎、施盈廷、楊秀娟譯(2006)。《最新大眾傳播史:從古騰堡到網際網路的時代》。台北,韋伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳美娟(2002)。〈整合、互補性網路研究途徑〉,2002年網路與社會研討會論文。國立清華大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳彥明(2006)。〈從「大眾商品的迷」到「政治迷」:初探政治迷的生活實踐與意義〉。中華傳播學會2006年年會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳姿嫻(2006)。〈MSN與日常生活〉。世新公共關係暨廣告學碩論(含碩專班)。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHighmore, B著;周群英譯(2005)。《日常生活與文化理論》。台北,韋伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周慶祥(2005)。《網路新聞-理論與實務》。台北,風雲論壇。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周明怡(2007)。〈性別、世代與社會角色:女性閱聽人韓劇收視經驗差異之研究〉。輔大大傳所碩論。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBabbie E.原著;林佳瑩、徐富珍校訂(2005)。《研究方法-基礎理論與技巧》。台北,雙葉書廊,初版三刷。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorley, D(1999).‘To boldly go…’:The ‘ Third Generation’ of Reception studies. In Alassutari, P.(Ed), Rethinking the media audience (pp. 195-206). London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNabi, R. L(2006) Determining dimensions of reality: a concept mapping of the reality TV landscape. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 51(2), pp.371-390.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNeuman, W. L.(1997). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNewman, J.(2004). Videogames. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNightingale, V.(1996). Studying audiences: The Shock of the real. London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceO"Sullivan, T.(1994). Audience. In T. O"Sullivan et al.(Eds.), Key concepts in communication and cultural studies. p.19-20. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReijnders, S.L., Rooijakkers, G. & van Zoonen(2007). Community spirit and competition in Idols: Ritual meaning of a TV talent quest. European Journal of Communication. 22(3): pp.275-292.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRuggiero, T. E.(2000). Uses and Gratifications Theory in the 21st Century. Mass Communication and Society,3. pp.3-37.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRyan, M. (2001). Narrative as Virtual Reality: Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSaenz, M.(1992). Television Viewing as a cultural Practice. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 1992; 16. pp.37-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林佩璇(2000)。《質的研究方法》。高雄:麗文文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSiapera, E. (2004). From couch potatoes to cybernauts? The expanding notion of the audience on TV channels’ websites. New Media Society, 2004; 6. pp.155-172.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTulloch, J. ,& Jenkins, H. (1995). Science fiction audiences: Wathing doctor who and star trek. London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWebster, J. G. & Phalen, P. F.(1997). The Mass Audience: Rediscovering the Dominant Model. Mahawa, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWinocur, R. (2005). Radio and Everyday Life: Uses and Meanings in the Domestic Sphere. Television New Media, 2005; 6. pp.319-332.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、網路部分zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王曉晴(2009年3月)。〈王偉忠:敢破又敢立,讓觀眾甘心買單〉,《CHEERS快樂工作人雜誌》。網址:zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.cheers.com.tw/doc/print.jspx?id=40288aed1fc6540f011fc66679be0257zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳炳宏(2007),〈從「星光大道」到「電視大道」〉,網站:電視妙管家。網址:zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.tvkeeper.org.tw/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=101&Itemid=26。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference〈流行娛樂節目收視心理研究-以超級女聲的實證分析為例〉,《中國廣播電視學刊》。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邵琮淳(2001)。〈網路歌迷社群認同之研究-以交大機械BBS站歌迷板為例〉。交大傳播研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference〈2007中國電視選秀節目研究〉,中國人搜索行為研究中心。網址:Http://www.searchlab.com.cnzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLivingstone, S. (2004) .Taking Audience Research Into the Age of New Media: Old Problems and New Challenges. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans Sheraton, New Orleans, LA Online <.PDF>. 2008-09-15zh_TW
dc.relation.referencehttp://www.allacademic.com/meta/p112755_index.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMittell, J.(2006). ‘Lost in an Alternate Reality’. Flow 4(7), http://jot.communication.utexas.edu/flow/?jot=view&id=1927.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBeckmann, C. S & Langer, R (2005). Netnography: Rich insight from online research. Http://frontpage.cbs.dk/insights/670005.shtmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference祁容玉(2006)。〈韓劇影音的流動與下載〉,台師大大傳所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference邱慧仙(2008)。〈閱聽人研究方法應用之初探:以國內傳播學期刊為分析對象(1998-2007)〉,2008年圖書資訊暨傳播學進行中論文發表會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林積慶(2008)。〈跨國電視,在地消費--論台灣青年觀眾之美國影集收視經驗〉。政大新聞所碩論。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡幼慧(1996)。《質性研究理論方法及本土女性研究實例》,台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高玉芳(2001)。〈尋找閱聽人-網際網路閱聽人調查方法及其相關問題之探討〉。政大廣電所碩論。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference夏春祥(1999)。《媒介記憶與新聞儀式-二二八事件新聞的文本分析(1947-2000)》。政治大學新聞所碩論。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference唐士哲(2004)。〈民族誌學應用於網路研究的契機、問題,與挑戰〉,《資訊社會研究》,2004年1月,頁 59-90。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference秦琍琍(2007)。〈重要的是觀念與態度--對於「數位傳播」發展的幾個初步觀察〉,《傳播研究簡訊》。2007年5月,第五十期,頁10-13。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭學文(2006)。〈《超級女聲》熱播的傳播學解析〉,《東南傳播》。2006,第一期。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlexander, V著;張正霖/陳巨擘譯(2006)。《藝術社會學:精緻與通俗形式之探索》。台北,巨流圖書公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張玉佩(2000)。〈網路閱聽人-主動/批判/自我展示〉,《當代》,第159期,頁90-101。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張維安(2001)。〈文字模式線上訪談的特質及其限制〉,《資訊社會研究(1)》2001年7月,頁279-297。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張玉佩(2006)。〈從抗拒到思辨:以鄂蘭哲學探討迷群閱聽人的思辨過程〉,《新聞學研究》,2006年7月,第八十八期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張惠嵐(2008)。〈擬仿時代?真人實境節目下「過度的」閱聽人-以《超級星光大道》為例〉,《傳播與管理研究》,2008年7月,第八卷,第一期,頁85-124。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張嬙(2007)。〈迷研究理論初探〉,《國際新聞界》,2007年,第五期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張純純(2007)。〈星光效應之歌唱選秀節目分析〉,《尼爾森媒體新知》,2007年 7月號。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLull, J.著;陳芸芸譯(2002)。《媒介、傳播與文化》,台北,韋伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcQuail , D.著;陳芸芸譯(2003)。《特新大眾傳播理論》,台北,韋伯文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳向明(2002)。《社會科學質的研究》。台北:五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳雪雲(2004):〈媒介與我:閱聽人研究回顧與展望〉,翁秀琪(編)《台灣傳播學的想像》(上),頁305-345。台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳志萍(2008)。〈精進網路研究方法--網路民族誌〉,《圖書資訊學研究》,2卷2期,頁1-15。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許惠千、朱若慈(2007)。〈主動閱聽人的實踐-以破報讀者為例〉,中華傳播學會2007年年會論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃葳威 (1999)。〈虛擬閱聽人?從回饋觀點分析台灣收視/聽率調查現況:以潤利、紅木、尼爾遜台灣公司為例〉,《民意季刊》209期,頁89-131。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃彥瑜(1997)。〈青少年學生對廣播媒介回饋型態研究〉。文大新聞所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃楷元(2007)。〈電子布告欄中的政治意見呈現——以台大批踢踢實業坊政治類看板為例〉。政大新聞所碩論。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorley, D(1992)著;馮建三譯(1995)。《電視,觀眾與文化研究》。台北:遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaran & Davis著;楊志弘、周金福譯(2006)。《大眾傳播理論:基礎、發展與未來》。台北:湯姆生出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊維倫(2002)。〈情境脈絡與台灣日劇迷的收視經驗〉。世新傳播所碩論。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference潘淑滿(2008)。《質性研究:理論與應用》。台北,心理出版社,初版七刷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡念中、張鴻源編著(2005),《匯流中的傳播媒介-以美國與台灣為例》。台北,亞太圖書出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFiske, J and Hartley , J著;鄭明椿譯(1993)。《解讀電視》。台北,遠流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧嵐蘭(2004)。〈閱聽人媒介經驗之建構〉,《中國廣告學刊》,第九期。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧嵐蘭(2007)。《閱聽人與日常生活》,台北,五南。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧嵐蘭(2008)。《閱聽人論述》。台北,秀威資訊科技。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧諭緯(1999)。〈當我們同在一起:BBS社交性討論區之言說分析〉,中正電訊傳播所碩論。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference簡妙如(1996)。〈過度的閱聽人-「迷」之初探〉。中正電訊傳播所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference簡妙如(2008)。〈全球化的「更真實」狂熱:真人實境節目的心理技術〉,《新聞學研究》,第94期,2008年1月。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾翠玲(1998)。〈妳是我的姐妹:電腦中介傳播環境下的美容言談〉。中正電訊傳播所碩論。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅文輝(2002)。〈台北、香港、北京、上海民眾網路及大眾媒介使用行為之比較研究〉。行政院國科會補助專題研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference羅紓筠(2008)。〈手機、青少女與日常生活:手機使用對外在結構的抗衡〉。國立政治大學廣播電視碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、英文部分zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAbercrombie, N & Longhurst, B.(1998). Audiences: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAhearne, J. (1995). Michel De Certeau:Interpretation and its other. UK: Polity Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAlasuutari, P.(1999).Introduction: Three Phases of Reception Studies. In P. Alasuutari, ed. Rethinking the Media Audience. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAllor, M. (1988). Relocating the Site of the Audience. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, pp.217-233.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, D. R. & E. P. Lorch.(1983). Looking at Television: Action or Reaction? In J. Bryant & D. R. Anderson(Eds.). Children"s Understanding of Television: Research on Attention and Comprehension. New York: Academic.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, J. A. (1998). Qualitative approaches to the study of the media: Theory and methods of hermeneutic empiricism. In Joy Keiko Asamen & Gordon L. Berry(Eds.) Research paradigms: Television and social behavior, pp. 205-236. Thousand Oaks: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAndrejevic, M (2004). Reality TV: The work of being watched. Oxford & NY: Rowman & Littlefield.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAndrejevic, M. (2008). Watching Television Without Pity: The Productivity of Online Fans. Television New Media, 2008; 9. pp.24-46.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAng, I. (1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination. London: Methuen.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBausinger, H.(1984). Media, technology and daily life. Media, Culture and Society, 6(4), pp.343-351.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Science. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBiocca, A. F. (1988). Opposing Conceptions of the Audience: The Active and Passive Hemispheres of Mass Communication Theory. Communication Yearbook 11 , pp. 51-80.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarpentier, N. (2003). The BBC’s Video Nation as a Participatory Media Practice: Signifying Everyday Life, Cultural Diversity and Participation in an Online Community. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2003; 6. pp.425-447.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarey, J.(1992). Communication As Culture Essays on Media and Society. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCarroll, N.(2003). Engaging the Moving Image. New Havenm CT: Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCerteau, Michel de (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. (Steven Rendall Trans.) Berkerley: University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChaffee, S. H. & M. J. Metzger.(2001). The End of Mass Communication? Mass Communication and Society, 4,pp.365-379.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCollins, S. (2008). Making the Most out of 15 Minutes: Reality TV’s Dispensable Celebrity. Television New Media, 2008; 9, pp.87-110.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCostello, V. & Moore, B.(2007). Cultural Outlaws: An Examination of Audience Activity and Online Television Fandom. Television New Media , 2007; 8, pp.124-143.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCover, R. (2006). Audience inter/active: Interactive media, narrative control and reconceiving audience history. New Media Society, 2006; 8, pp.139-158.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEvans, E. (2008). Character, audience agency and transmedia drama. Media Culture Society, 2008; 30. pp.197-213.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFelski, R.(2002). The invention of everyday life. In Tony Bennett & Diane Watson(Eds.), Understanding everyday life. p.46-50. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers/The Open University.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGarfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGiard, L. (1998). Introduction to Volume 1: History of a Research Project. The Practice of Everyday Life: Volume 2: Living & Cooking. London: University of Minnesota Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGunter, B.(1988). Finding the Limits of Audience Activity. Communication Yearbook 11, pp.108-126.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHagen, I. (1994). The Ambivalences of TV News Viewing: Between Ideals and Everyday Practices. European Journal of Communication, 1994; 9. pp.193-220.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHagen, I.(2007).’We can"t just sit the whole day watching TV’: Negotiations concerning media use among youngsters and their parents.Young-Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 2007;15(4). pp.339-393.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHill, A. (2000). Fearful and safe: Audience Response to British Reality Programming. Television New Media, 2000; 1. pp.193-213.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHill, A. (2002). Big Brother: The Real Audience. Television & New Media, 2002; 3. pp.323-340.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHighmore, B.(2006). Michel de Certeau: Analysing Culture. London ; New York : Continuum, 2006.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHolmes, S. (2004). “Reality Goes Pop!” Reality TV, Popular Music, and Narratives of Stardom in Pop Idol. Television & New Media, 2004; 5. pp.147-172.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHu , K.(2005). The power of circulation: digital technologies and the online Chinese fans of Japanese TV drama. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 6(2):pp.171-186.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJenkins ,H .(1992).Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York : Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJenkins, H.(2006). Introduction. In Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, pp.1-24. NY & London: New York University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collid. New York & London: New York University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKendall, L. (2000). Recontextualizing “cyberspace” : methodological considerations for on-line research In n S. Jones(ed.). Doing Internet Research. 57-74. Thousand Oaks: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKiousis, D. (2002). ‘Interactivity: A Concept Explication’. New Media and Society 4(3).pp.355-383.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKozinet, R. V. (1997). I Want to Believe: A netnography of the X-philes’ subculture of consumption. In M. Brucks, & D. MacInnis (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, vol. 24. p.470-475. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKozinets, R. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meaning of Star Trek"s Culture of Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, pp.67-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of everyday life. Vol.1: introduction. London, New York: Verso.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLindlof, T. R. & Meyer, T. P.(1998). Taking the interpretive turn: Qualitative research of television and other electronic media. In Joy Keiko Asamen & Gordon L. Berry(Eds.), Research paradigms: Television and social behavior. pp.237-268. Thousand Oaks: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMartin-Barbero, J.(1993).Communication, Culture, and Hegemony: From the Media To Mediations.(Trans. Bt E. Fox & R. A. White). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarvin, L. E. (1995). Spoof, spam, lurk and lag: The aesthetics of text-based virtual realities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(2), pp.1-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcQuail, D.(1997). Audience analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMittell, J. (2004). Genre and Television. New York: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoores, Shaun.(1993). Interpreting audiences: ethnography of media consumption. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.zh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.