Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30393
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor吳思華zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWu, Se-Hwaen_US
dc.contributor.author鄭仲興zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Chung-hsingen_US
dc.creator鄭仲興zh_TW
dc.creatorCheng, Chung-hsingen_US
dc.date2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-11T09:48:04Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-11T09:48:04Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-11T09:48:04Z-
dc.identifierG0893595051en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/30393-
dc.description博士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description科技管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description89359505zh_TW
dc.description95zh_TW
dc.description.abstract創意商品的開發一般而言不但要兼顧新奇、效率而且還要面對較高的不確定性、較短的開發期。像工業設計,是一種需要不斷產生產品變異的同時,又要維持一定開發速度與產品風格的開發方式。由於創意商品的生產具有不確定性特徵,即投入產出之間的關係不再是簡單的線性關係,而是非常複雜的多元關係。\r\n過去的產品開發研究,大都未考慮到不確定性問題,某些研究雖考慮到不確定性問題,但是卻沒有兼顧新奇問題的探討,更有一些研究強調過去經驗的重要性,但是進一步將過去經驗納入管理機制中的研究也不多見。由於創意商品開發的特性,有別於過去生產線式的產品開發,若以一般的管理型態並無法完全掌握這些特殊性,且在工業設計對企業的重要性和密切關係與日俱增之下,設計活動似乎有必要加以有效的管理。\r\n基於上述原因,本研究主要是以演化觀點為理論基礎,透過演化因素的探討,並藉由創意產生機制(變異)、評價機制(選擇)與共同知識的結構及存量(保留),以說明創意產業中知識或創意的變異、選擇與保留之管理,以及這些因素對於創意商品開發績效的影響。簡單地說,整個創意商品的開發過程,可以視為是一個創意元素受演化因素影響,達到改變其商品效果與開發速度的過程。而組織中經理人的角色便在於藉由操控演化影響因素,有意識地管理創意活動過程,進而提高組織生存與發展的機率。\r\n本研究針對國內設計服務業為研究對象,進行問卷調查研究。從結果中發現,首先,在創意產生機制中的平行專案(水平變異)和團隊交換(垂直變異)的目的,前者是藉由加入複數之個人將創意之池擴大;後者是透過團隊交換的方式增加創意碰撞的機會,以擴大創意之池。而由統計分析可知,兩者在一定程度上都有助於擴大創意之池,進而提高產出符合品質要求的設計成果之機率。\r\n其次,在評價機制部分,藉由設計過程中頻繁地查核及多重評價準則的篩選,有助於符合條件的設計創意加速脫穎而出,但是其彼此間的關係並不是單純的線性關係,而是先升後降的倒U型關係。再者,共同知識的精細化程度越高,越能促進創意產生機制中創意發想的開展,而知識存量越高,越能促進評價機制對於開發速度的正向影響。本研究的貢獻,在於補充了產品開發研究中,缺乏處理模糊前端的問題、對於創新與創造力研究,補足缺乏有效管理機制的問題、對於組織內層次演化觀點之研究,提供了可操作性的量化研究、對於設計產業的創意管理提供了初步的解答。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractGenerally speaking the development of the creative products should not only give consideration to the novelty, efficiency and face higher uncertainty, shorter life cycle. Like the industry design, it is one kind of development way, while needing to produce the products and make a variation constantly, and also it is need to keep develop speed and products style. Because the production of the creative products has uncertain characteristics, that relation between the input and output is no longer simple linear relations, but very complicated multiple relations.\r\n\r\nProducts developmental research in the past, not mostly considering the uncertain problem, some studies may consider the uncertain problem, but there is not discussion which gives consideration to the novel request, some studies may puts emphasis on the importance of experience even more, but they seldom put the previous experience into the mechanism of management. Because the development characteristic of the creative products, is different from the product development of the production line type, if with the general management type will be unable to completely keep the particularity, and under the circumstances that the industry design, more and more to the importance of enterprises, it need to manage effectively in design activity.\r\n\r\nAs stated above, this research is mainly to regard the evolutionary view as the theoretical foundation, through the discussion of the evolutionary factors, and the mechanism of creative generation (variation), the mechanism of evaluation (selection), and the structure and stock of common knowledge (retention), in order to explain the creative management of variation, selection and retention in creative industry, and the influence of the performance on the creative products in these factors. To put it shortly, Development process of the creative products, it is a creative element that is influenced by the factor of evolution, and change the outcome of the product effect and developing speed. And the manager`s role is to enhance the probability that evolutionary process will generate organizational survival and prosperity.\r\n\r\nThis research carries on the questionnaire and makes investigations to design company as the research object at Taiwan. Find from the result, at first, the purpose of the parallel project (horizontal variation) and the team exchange (vertical variation) in the mechanism of creative management, the former expands the pool of idea by joining the plural individual; The latter offers more opportunities that the idea collides by way of team exchange, in order to expand the pool of idea. And can know by statistical analysis, the two both contribute to expanding the pool of idea, and then improve the probability of design achievement that the output accords with the quality request.\r\n\r\nSecondly, in the evaluation mechanism, the screening of frequently checking and multiple evaluation criterion in the design process, that promote the suitable creative to appear with higher speed, but its relation between each other is not the simple linear relations, but the inverted-U relation. Moreover, when the categorical degree of common knowledge is higher, can promote the expansion of the idea in the mechanism of creative generation, and knowledge is the higher in stock, can promote the influence of the mechanism of evaluation on developing speed.\r\n\r\nThe Contribution of this research, is supplement to study on new product development, which lack the problem of dealing with fuzzy front, study with creativity and innovation, fill the gap which lacks the effective mechanism of management under study creativity and innovation, to the research that the intra-organization evolutionary perspectives, have offered effective quantity studied, offered the preliminary answer to the creative management in design industries.en_US
dc.description.abstract第一章 緒論 1\r\n第一節 研究背景 1\r\n壹、創意商品開發議題 1\r\n貳、創意商品開發特性 2\r\n第二節 研究動機 4\r\n第三節 研究問題與目的 6\r\n第四節 研究範圍與限制 7\r\n壹、研究範圍 7\r\n貳、研究限制 8\r\n第五節 流程與論文架構 10\r\n第二章 文獻探討 12\r\n第一節 工業設計產業 12\r\n壹、產業形貌 12\r\n貳、設計活動之特性 19\r\n參、設計管理之研究 23\r\n小結 24\r\n第二節 新產品開發相關研究 27\r\n第三節 創意管理相關研究 29\r\n壹、創意、創新與創造力 29\r\n貳、創造力研究 31\r\n參、創意管理研究 34\r\n肆、組織創新研究 36\r\n小結 37\r\n第四節 演化理論的研究 40\r\n壹、生物演化 40\r\n貳、演化因素的作用 43\r\n第五節 演化理論在社會科學中的應用 50\r\n第六節 知識演化模式 57\r\n壹、創意元素的內涵 57\r\n貳、知識的演化 58\r\n第七節、生物觀點與管理機制的對應 60\r\n小結 62\r\n第三章 研究架構 64\r\n第一節 創意管理概觀 64\r\n第二節 創意產生機制 67\r\n壹、平行專案 69\r\n貳、團隊交換 70\r\n第三節 共同知識精細化程度 72\r\n第四節 評價機制 74\r\n壹、查核評價 74\r\n貳、多重評價 75\r\n第五節 共同知識存量 76\r\n第四章 研究方法 78\r\n第一節 案例分析 78\r\n壹、個案公司商品演化現象 79\r\n貳、個案公司訪談資料 82\r\n第二節 研究變數與操作化 89\r\n壹、創意產生機制 89\r\n貳、評價機制 90\r\n參、共同知識精細化程度與存量 91\r\n肆、開發績效 92\r\n第三節 研究設計 94\r\n壹、研究對象 94\r\n貳、資料來源與蒐集 94\r\n第四節 資料分析方法 95\r\n第五章 資料分析 98\r\n第一節 資料收集結果 98\r\n第二節 商品效果相關影響因素之實證分析 105\r\n壹、平行專案對商品效果的影響 105\r\n貳、團隊交換對商品效果的影響 107\r\n參、知識精細化程度對平行專案與商品效果關係的調節影響 108\r\n肆、知識精細化程度對團隊交換與商品效果關係的調節影響 116\r\n第三節 開發速度相關影響因素之實證分析 123\r\n壹、查核頻率對開發速度之影響 123\r\n貳、查核項目對開發速度之影響 126\r\n參、知識存量對查核頻率與開發速度關係的調節影響 129\r\n肆、知識存量於評價項目與開發速度關係的調節影響 130\r\n第四節 研究結果 133\r\n第六章結論與建議 138\r\n第一節 演化觀點與創意商品開發 138\r\n第二節 理論貢獻與實務意涵 144\r\n壹、理論貢獻 144\r\n貳、實務意涵 150\r\n第三節 後續研究建議 152\r\n參考文獻 154\r\n研究問卷 169-
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\r\n第一節 研究背景 1\r\n壹、創意商品開發議題 1\r\n貳、創意商品開發特性 2\r\n第二節 研究動機 4\r\n第三節 研究問題與目的 6\r\n第四節 研究範圍與限制 7\r\n壹、研究範圍 7\r\n貳、研究限制 8\r\n第五節 流程與論文架構 10\r\n第二章 文獻探討 12\r\n第一節 工業設計產業 12\r\n壹、產業形貌 12\r\n貳、設計活動之特性 19\r\n參、設計管理之研究 23\r\n小結 24\r\n第二節 新產品開發相關研究 27\r\n第三節 創意管理相關研究 29\r\n壹、創意、創新與創造力 29\r\n貳、創造力研究 31\r\n參、創意管理研究 34\r\n肆、組織創新研究 36\r\n小結 37\r\n第四節 演化理論的研究 40\r\n壹、生物演化 40\r\n貳、演化因素的作用 43\r\n第五節 演化理論在社會科學中的應用 50\r\n第六節 知識演化模式 57\r\n壹、創意元素的內涵 57\r\n貳、知識的演化 58\r\n第七節、生物觀點與管理機制的對應 60\r\n小結 62\r\n第三章 研究架構 64\r\n第一節 創意管理概觀 64\r\n第二節 創意產生機制 67\r\n壹、平行專案 69\r\n貳、團隊交換 70\r\n第三節 共同知識精細化程度 72\r\n第四節 評價機制 74\r\n壹、查核評價 74\r\n貳、多重評價 75\r\n第五節 共同知識存量 76\r\n第四章 研究方法 78\r\n第一節 案例分析 78\r\n壹、個案公司商品演化現象 79\r\n貳、個案公司訪談資料 82\r\n第二節 研究變數與操作化 89\r\n壹、創意產生機制 89\r\n貳、評價機制 90\r\n參、共同知識精細化程度與存量 91\r\n肆、開發績效 92\r\n第三節 研究設計 94\r\n壹、研究對象 94\r\n貳、資料來源與蒐集 94\r\n第四節 資料分析方法 95\r\n第五章 資料分析 98\r\n第一節 資料收集結果 98\r\n第二節 商品效果相關影響因素之實證分析 105\r\n壹、平行專案對商品效果的影響 105\r\n貳、團隊交換對商品效果的影響 107\r\n參、知識精細化程度對平行專案與商品效果關係的調節影響 108\r\n肆、知識精細化程度對團隊交換與商品效果關係的調節影響 116\r\n第三節 開發速度相關影響因素之實證分析 123\r\n壹、查核頻率對開發速度之影響 123\r\n貳、查核項目對開發速度之影響 126\r\n參、知識存量對查核頻率與開發速度關係的調節影響 129\r\n肆、知識存量於評價項目與開發速度關係的調節影響 130\r\n第四節 研究結果 133\r\n第六章結論與建議 138\r\n第一節 演化觀點與創意商品開發 138\r\n第二節 理論貢獻與實務意涵 144\r\n壹、理論貢獻 144\r\n貳、實務意涵 150\r\n第三節 後續研究建議 152\r\n參考文獻 154\r\n研究問卷 169zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0893595051en_US
dc.subject創意商品開發zh_TW
dc.subject創意管理zh_TW
dc.subject創意產業zh_TW
dc.subject演化觀點zh_TW
dc.subjectcreative product developmenten_US
dc.subjectcreative managementen_US
dc.subjectcreative industriesen_US
dc.subjectevolutionary perspectivesen_US
dc.title創意管理機制與創意商品開發績效之研究:演化理論觀點zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference王志銘(2004),「知識型服務業創業精神與行動歷程之探討─以工業設計公司為例」,國立雲林科技大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王怡勝(2001),「創意解題法(CPS)於產品設計之研究」,國立成功大學工業設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王得煒(1996),「產品設計評價研究」,國立台灣科技大學工程技術研究所設計學程未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王詔賢(2003),「研發團隊創意過程與思考技法之關連研究」,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference台灣創意設計中心(2005),「設計西遊記—設計師的設計旅行」,台北:巨思文化藍鯨出版部。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference石雯侃(2004),「影響文化創意產業從業員工創造力因素之研究-兼論與組織創新之關係」,立德管理學院國際企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference朱晏樟(2003),「整合TRIZ與功能分析之設計方法研究」,國立成功大學機械工程學系研究所未出版博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference何奇峰(2000),「數位環境下產品設計之程序探討」,實踐大學工業產品設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference余立偉(2004),「運用偏好水準直交表提高IGA演化績效:新手機外型設計個案研究」,真理大學管理科學研究所,未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳俊杰(2004),設計意識與設計服務:觀念、管理與經營,台北:亞太圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference吳萬益(2005),企業研究方法,第二版,台北:華泰。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVerona, G.(1999), “A resource-based view of product development”, Academy of Management Review, 24(1): pp.132-142.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVerstijnen, I.M., J.M. Hennessey, C. van Leeuwen, & R. Hamel.(1998), “Sketching and creative discovery”, Design Studies, Vol.19, pp.519-546.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceViladas, X.(2002), “Design in business: strategic innovation through design”, Design Management Journal, Vol. 3 summer, pp.82-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaldrop , M. M.( 1992 ), Complexity – The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos, 「複雜:走在秩序與混沌邊緣」,1994,齊若蘭譯,台北:天下遠見出版.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeick, K. E.(1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading,MA: Addison-Wesley.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWeitzman, M. L.(1996), Recombinant Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhite, S. P.(2002), New Ideas About New Iideas: Insight on Creativity from the World’s Leading Innovators, Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishingzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWolfe, R. A.(1994), “Organizational innovation: review, critique and suggested research directions”, Journal of Management Studies, 31(3), pp.405-430.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWoodman, R. W. & L. F. Schoenfeldt(1990), “An interactionist model of creative behavior”, The Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, pp.279-290.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁明祥(1996),「技術密集產業技術創新過程及關鍵影響因素關係之研究」,輔仁管理評論,第3卷,第2期,pp.21-48。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGallupe, R. B & A. R. Dennis, W. H. Cooper, J. S. Valacich et al. (1992) \"Electronic brainstorming and group size,\" Academy of Management Journal (35) 2, pp.350-369.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWoodman, R. W., J. E. Sawyer, & R.W. Griffin,(1993), “Toward a theory of organizational creativity”, Academy of Management Review, 18(2), pp.293-321.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWorren, N., K. Moore & P. Cardona(2002), “Modularity, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: a casey of the home applance industry” Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp.1123–1140.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZbaracki, Mark J.(1998), “The rhetoric and reality of total quality management”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, pp.602-636.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhou, J., & J. M. George(2001), “When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: encouraging the expression of voice”, Academy of Management Journal, 44, pp.682–696.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZollo, M. & S. G. Winter(2002), “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities,” Organization Science, 13(3), pp.339-351.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZwicky, F.,(1967) “The morphological approach to discovery, invention, research and construction”, New Method of Thought and Procedure: symposium on Methodologies, Pasadena,pp.316-317.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference翁愷仁(2002),「設計資源管理在產品開發過程中之應用研究」,銘傳大學設計管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馬憲彬著(2005),達爾文密碼,台北:海洋文化事業有限公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference婁銘峰(2005),「個人創造力、組織環境及設計績效間之相關性研究」,銘傳大學設計管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張文智 & 姜寶美(1998),「台灣大型商業設計公司經營管理要領之研究」,設計學報,第3卷,第2期,pp.73-84。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGalunic, D. C. & K. M. Eisenhardt(2001), “Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms”, Academy of Management Journal; 44(6), pp.1229-1249zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張文智 & 張仲良(1999),「產品設計公司設計品質管理之研究」,88 年技術與教學研討會論文集工業設計組,pp.1-10。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張吉成(2000),「科技產業知識創新模式建構之研究」,國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所未出版博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張廷源(2004),「風格的分類與演化於產品設計輔助之探討」,雲林科技大學設計運算研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference梁銘剛(2000),「創意思考與建築基本設計之訓練」,銘傳大學設計與管理學術研討會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊立民(2002),「組織創新模式建構與實證之研究---以台灣資訊電子業為例」,成功大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳文龍(2003),「設計+知識=提升產品附加價值」,(網易商業報導 http://biz.163.com)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳文龍(2005),「從Mio50/100談臺灣機車設計」,CADesigner,202期,pp.18-21。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳研次(1991),「從源頭改起(開發設計管理)」,管理雜誌,第206期,pp.42-47。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳兼正(2004),「數位化模式的設計-應用於設計概念發展與篩選之探索」,實踐大學工業產品設計系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳順宏(2005),「工業設計公司知識儲存與分享之研究」,國立成功大學工業設計學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGetzels, J. W.(1975), “Creativity: prospects and issues”, In Taylor, I.A. & Getzels, J. W.(eds.), Perspectives in creativity, Chicago: Aldine.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference程東奕(2003),「設計師的形態解讀能力與其產品造形設計之多變性的關係」,大同大學工業設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference馮朝霖,簡瑞容 & 詹志禹(1996),「多元文化與教育理論、政策與課程」,國家政策(動態分析)雙週刊,卷 131, pp.9-10.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃茗富(2003),「工業設計產業組織能耐、績效制度與競爭優勢之個案分析」,國立雲林科技大學企業管理系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃淑琴(2004),「新產品發展創意產生之研究:顧客價值知識途徑」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版博士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊欲富(2000),創意活力-產品設計方法論,台北:田園城市。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference楊雅婷(2003),「時間壓力與個人創新傾向關係之研究」,國立中央大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference經濟部商業司(1994),「設計業發展、現況與變動趨勢分析, 服務業報導,vol.43。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference詹志禹(2002a),「創造力的定義與創造力的發展—兒童會創造嗎?」,教育研究月刊,第100 期,pp.117-124。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference詹志禹(2002b),「科學發現與知識成長:我們能從科學哲學當中學到什麼?」,應用心理研究,第15期,2002秋,pp.105-127。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蒲怡靜(2003),「電子腦力激盪術於設計創意值之研究」,國立成功大學工業設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlynn, M. A.(1996), “Innovative genius: a framework for relating in dividual and organizational intelligences to innovation.” Academy of Management, 21(4), pp.1081-1111.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉世南、陳秀枝、趙安安(2004),「組織創造力之整合模型:理論與議題」,第二屆創意開發學術研討會,嘉義:國立嘉義大學。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉秀雯(2003),「國際團隊多元性、團隊領導與企業組織環境支援之探討」,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡如菱(2002),「企業內部創新發想過程及影響因素之探討」,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄭傑仁(2005),「創新構想篩選量化模式於傳統產業之應用研究-以燦坤實業與老牛皮國際(股)公司為例」,國立成功大學工業設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄧成連(1997),「論設計管理」,工業設計,第26期,pp.6-12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鄧成連(1999),設計管理:產品設計之組織、溝通與運作,台北:亞太圖書。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference盧碧瑜(2003),「工業設計構想發展階段之草圖與思考模式探討」,華梵大學工業設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference賴昆芳(2001),「現代育林學」http://www.docwww.laikf.idv.tw/book/ SILVI.htmzh_TW
dc.relation.reference錢毓琦(2002),「影響團隊創造力因素之研究-以廣告業為例」,國立臺灣師範大學工業科技教育研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference謝雯雅(2002),「焦點聯想法於設計創意激發之應用研究」,大葉大學設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoerner, S. J.(1994), Chaos and the Evolving Ecological Universe. Luuxembourg: Gordon and Breach Publishers.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference鍾明鴻(1997),創新與設計管理,台北:超越企管。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference簡良純(2004),「組織創新氣候、薪酬制度、個人創造力與創新績效關係之研究」,大葉大學事業經營研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAldrich, H. E.(1979), Organizations and Environments, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmabile, T. M.(1997), “Motivating creativity in organizations:on doing what you love and loving what you do”, California.Management Review, 40 (1), pp.39-58.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmabile, T. M., M. A. Collins, R. C. & Y E. Phillips(1996), Creativity in Context:Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, Boulder, Colo. Westview Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAmabile, T.M.(1988), “A model of creativity and innovation in organization,” Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, pp.123-167.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, P. & M. Tushman(1990), “Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: pp.604-633.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBacon, G., S. Beckman, D. Mowery, & E. Wilson(1994), “Managing product definition in high-technology industries: A pilot study”, California Management Review, 36(3), pp.32-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarker B. O.(2000). “Anytime, any place learning”, Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy. Knoxville: Spring 2000. Vol.15, Iss.1; pp.88-93.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarnett, W. P., H. R. Greve & D. Y. Park(1994), “An evolutionary model of organizational performance”, Strategic Management Journal, 15, pp.11-28.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldschmidt, G.(1994), “On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture”, Design Studies, 15, pp.158-174.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarnett, William P. & Robert A. Burgelman(1996), “Evolutionary perspectives on strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: pp.5-19.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaum, Joel A.C., & Bill McKelvey(1999), Variations in Organization Science. London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBecker, M. C. & Z. Francesco(2003), “Organising new product development: knowledge hollowing-out and knowledge integration”, .DRUID Working Paper 2003.05.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerends, J.J., J.D. van der Bij, K. Debackere & M.C.D.P. Weggeman(2004), “Knowledge sharing mechanisms in industrial research”, Eindhoven Centre for Innovation Studies, The Netherlands,Working Paper 2004.04.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBharadwaj, S. & A. Menon(2000), “Making innovation happen in organizations: individual creativity mechanisms, organization creativity mechanisms or both?”, Journal of Production Innovation Management, 17, pp. 424-434.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlaich, R. & Blaich, J.(2001), Product Design and Corporate Strategy : Managing the Connection for Competitive Advantage, 「產品設計與企業策略 : 競爭優勢環節的管理」, 2003, 楊敏英譯, 台北:麥格羅•希爾國際出版公司.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBlau, J. R. & W. McKinley(1979), “Idea, complexity, and innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, pp.200-219.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBonnardel, N. & T. Sumner(1996), “Supporting evaluation in design”, Acta Psychologica, 91, pp. 221-244.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrockman, J.(1995), The Third Culture, 「第三種文化」,1998,唐勤、梁錦鋆譯,台北:天下文化。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBrown, S. L. & K. M. Eisendardt(1995), “Product development: past research, present findings and future directions”, Academy of Management Review, 20(2): pp.343-378.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGould, S. J.(1997), The panda’s thumb : more reflections in natural history, 「貓熊的大拇指 : 聽聽古爾德又怎麼說」,台北 : 天下文化.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurgelman, R.A.(1996), “A process model of strategic business exit : implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy”, Strategic Management Journal , Volume 17, pp.193-214 .zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurgess, B .H.(1989), Industrial Organization. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBurnside, R. M.(1995), “The soft stuff is the hard stuff: encouraging creativity in times of turbulence”, Compensation & Benefits Management, 11(3), pp.58-64.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCampbell, D. T.(1969), “Variation and selective retention in socio-cultural evolution”. General Systems: Yearbook of the Society for General Systems research 16, 69-85.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCampbell, D. T.(1974), “Evolutionary epistemology”. In P. A. Schilpp(ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper. Open Court: La Salle, Ill. pp.412-463.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChambers, D. & D. Reisberg(1985), “Can mental images be ambiguous?”, Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 11, pp.317-328.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChandy, R. K. & G. J. Tellis(1998), “Organizing for radical innovation:the overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 35, pp.474-487.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChang S. J.(1996), “An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring: entry, exit, and economic performance during 1981-89”, Strategic Management Journal, 17: pp.587–611.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceChung, K.W.(2000), “The substance of design management and recent progresses in the profession in Korea”, Design, Vol. 89, pp.36-38.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCohen, W. B & D. A. Leviathan(1990), “Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly,35(1), pp.128-152.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGould, S. J.(1999), Life’s grandeur : the spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin, 「生命的壯闊:古爾德論生物大歷史」,台北:時報文化.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCooper, R. & M. Press(1995), The Design Agenda: a Guide to Successful Design Management. John Wiley & Sons, UK.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCooper, R. G.(1998), Product Leadership:Creating and Launching Superior New Products, Perseus Books, L.L.C.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCross, N.(1994), Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCsikszentmihalyi, M.(1996), Creativity, New York: Harper Collinszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDarwin, C.(1859), The Origin of Species, 「物種起源」,葉篤莊,周建人&方宗熙譯,台北:台灣商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDavenport, T. & L. Prusak(1998), Working knowledge: How Organization Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDawkins , R.( 1989 ), The Selfish Gene , Oxford University Press, 「自私的基因-我們都是基因的俘虜?」, 1995 , 趙淑妙譯, 台北:天下遠見.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDiehl, M. & W. Stroebe (1987) \"Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: toward the solution of a riddle,\" Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3), pp. 497-509.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDixson, N.(2000), Common Knowledge: How Company Thrive by Sharing What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDoku H.(2000),Download : How to Increase Your Creativiety,「Download 創意」,黃心藝譯,台北:海鴿文化出版.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGovindarajan, V. & A. K. Gupta(2001), “Building an effective global business team”, MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), pp.63-72zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDougherty, D., & E. H. Bowman(1995), “The effects of organizational downsizing of product innovation.” California Management Review, 37(4),pp.28-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDrucker, P. F.,(1988), “The coming of the new organization”, Harvard Business Review,Vol. 66, Jan.-Feb., pp. 45-34.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEhrlich Paul R.(2000), Human Natures : Genes, Cultures, and the Human Prospect,「人類的演化: 基因、文化與人類的未來」,2003,李向慈、洪佼宜譯,台北:貓頭鷹出版.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEisenhardt, K. M. & B. N. Tabrizi(1995), “Accelerating adaptive processes: product innovation in the global computer industry”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), March, pp.84-110.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFinke, R.A.(1990), Creative Imagery: Discoveries and Inventions in Visualization. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFlorida Richard(2003), The Rise of Creative Class,「創意新貴:啟動新經濟的菁英勢力」,鄒應瑗譯, 台北:寶鼎.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGrant, R. M.(1996), “Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm”, Strategic Management Journal,17, pp.109-122.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈曼霖(1997),「設計管理制度面之探討,紡織月刊」,第14期,pp.40-43。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGribbin, M & J. Gribbin(1996), Being Human : Putting People in an Evolutionary Perspective, 「生而為人:從演化舞臺中走來」,台北:天下文化.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGuilford, J. P.(1986). Creative talents: their nature, uses and development. NY:Bearly limited.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGupta, A. K. & D. L.Wilemon(1990), “Accelerating the development of technology-based new products”, California Management Review, 32(2): pp.24-44.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHannan, M. T. & J. H. Freeman(1977), “The population ecology of organizations”. American Journal of Sociology, 82, pp.929-964.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHannan, M. T. & J. H. Freeman(1984), “Structural inertia and organizational change”. American Sociological Review, 49, pp.149-164.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHargadon, A. & R. I. Sutton(1997), “Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), pp.716-749.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHargadon, A. B. & A. Fanelli(2002), “Action and possibility: reconciling dual perspectives of knowledge in organizations”, Organization Science, 13(3), pp.290-302.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHeap, J. & P. Slater(1987), “Managing design: the leeds experience”, in CNAA Development Services Publication No.14, Managing Design an Update, CNAA, pp. 2-9.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHelleloid, D. & B. Simonin(1994), “Organizational learning and a firm’s core competence,” in Hamel, Gray and Heene, Aime(eds.), Competence-Based Competition, New York: John Wiley, pp.213-239.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHerbert, A.(1991), “Bounded rationality and organizational learning”, Organization Science, Vol. 2 (February), pp.125-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference官政能(1995),「產品物徑—設計創意之生成、發展與應用」,台北:藝術家。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHitoshi, K.(1999), SEKKEI KAIHATSU NO HTNSHITSU Management,,「設計開發的品質管理」,2002,張書文譯,中衛發展中心.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHollins, G. & B. Hollins(1991) Total Design:Managing the Design Process in the Service Sector, London, Longman Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJones, S.(1993), The Language of the Genes : Biology , History , and Evolutionary Future,「命運之舞-基因的故事」,1999 ,劉泗翰譯 ,台北:先知.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKamoche K., M. & M. P. Cunha(2001),“Minimal structures: from jazz improvisation to product innovation”, Organization Studies, 22(5), pp. 733-764.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKanter, R. M.(1988), ”When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization.” Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, pp.169-211.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKaufman J. C. & A. B. Kaufman(2004), “Applying a creativity framework to animal cognition”, New Idea in Psychology, 22, pp.143-155.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKnott, A. M.(2003), “Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation”, Strategic Management Journal, 24, pp.687–705.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoch , R.(2000 ), The Power of Laws : The Science of Success, Nicholas Brealey Publishing , London, 「業競天擇-站上巨人肩膀的十七項成功法則」, 2001 ,李芳齡譯, 台北:大塊文化.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKogut, B. & U.. Zander(1992), “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology”,Organization Science, 3(3), pp.383–397.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKotler, P.(2003), Marketing Management, Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林國芳(1999),「世紀末的氣息-真實、我、我自己:藝術創作過程之藝術理論研究」,台北:國立歷史博物館。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuczmarski, T. D.(1988), “Managing new product”, Product Innovation Management Journal, pp.17-29.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKuczmarski, T. D.(1992), Managing New Product: The Power of Innovation 2nd ed., Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKühn, O. & A. Abecker(1997), “Corporate memories for knowledge management in industrial practice: prospects and challenges”, Journal of Universal Computer Science, 3(8), pp. 929 -954.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKwaśnicki W.(1996), Knowledge, Innovation, and Economy: an Evolutionary Exploration, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLamarck, J. B.(1809), Philosophie Zoologique,「動物哲學」,1969,沐紹良譯,台北:臺灣商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLee J. , K. Lee & S. Rho(2002), “An evolutionary perspective on strategic group emergence: a genetic algorithm-based model”, Strategic Management Journal, 23, pp.727zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeonard, D. A., & Swap, W. C.(1999), When Sparks Fly— Igniting Creativity in Groups, 「激發團隊創意」, 2000,施貞夙譯,台北:聯經.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeonard-Barton, D.(1992). “Core capabilities and core rigidities: a paradox in managing new product development”, Strategic Management Journal 13, pp.111-125.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLevinthal , D. A.( 1995 ) ,“Strategic management and the exploration of diversity”, In C. A. montgomery (ed.), Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of The Firm: Towards A Synthesis , Kluwer Academic Publishers , pp. 19-42 .zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLevinthal, D. A., & J. G. March(1993), “The myopia of learning”. Strategic Management Journal, 14[Special Issue], pp.95-112.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference姜家華(1999) 「林木遺傳與育種學」,臺南市 : 臺灣復文興業。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLindbeck, J. R.(1995), Product Design and Manufacture, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. : Prentice Hall,「產品設計與製造」, 1999 ,黃台生譯,台北:六和.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLindkvist, L., J. Soderlund & F. Tell(1998), “Managing product development projects: On the significance of fountains and deadlines”,Organization Studies, 19(6), pp.931-951.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLovas, B. & S. Ghoshal(2000), “Strategy as guided evolution.” Strategic Management Journal, 21, pp.875-896.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLuhmann, N.(1982), The Differentiation of Society, Columbia University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMadhavan, R. & R. Gover(1998), “From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: new product development as knowledge management”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62 (October), pp.1-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMajaro, S.(1988), The Creative Gap: Managing Ideas for Profit. London: Longman.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcKelvey, B.(1982), Organizational systematics: Taxonomy, Evolution, Classification, Berkeley, University of California Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMiner, A.(1994), “Seeking adaptive advantage: Evolutionary theory and managerial action”. In LA. C. Baum & J.V. Singh (eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organization., Oxford University Press, New York, pp.76-89.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMohamed M. A. K.(2002) “Assessing determinants of departmental innovation: an exploratory multi-level approach”,Personnel Review. Vol. 31(5); pp. 620-641.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMohr, L. B.(1982), Explaining Organizational Behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施柏仰(2006),「由國際設計大獎之得獎作品探討產品設計之創新」,國立台灣科技大學設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoorman, C. & A. S. Miner(1997), “The impact of organization memory on new product performance and creativity”, Journal of Marketing Research(34),pp.91-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoran, P. & S. Ghoshal(1999), “Markets, firms, and the process of economic development” , Academy of Management Review, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp.390-412.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMurmann J. P., H. E. Aldrich, D. Levinthal, & S. G. Winter(2003), “Evolutionary thought in management and organization theory at the beginning of the new millennium”, Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 12 No. 1, March, pp. 22-40zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNelson, R. & S. Winter(1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Gelknap Press of Harvard University Press: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNelson, R.(1995), “Recent evolutionary theorizing about economic change”, Journal of Economic Literature, 33(1), pp.48-90.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNerkar, A.(2003), “Old is gold? the value of temporal exploration in the creation of new knowledge”, Management Science. Vol. 49, Iss. 2; pp. 211-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNonaka, I. & H. Takeuchi(1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company. Oxford Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOakley, M.(1990), “Assembling and managing a design team”,in Oaklet,(ed.) Design Management:A Handbook of Issues and Methods, Blackwell, Combridge, pp323-334.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOsborn, A. F. (1963) Applied Imagination, 3rd Edition, New York: Scribner.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePaolucii, E. & M. Natoli(1998), “The role of firm organization and knowledge recombination in product innovation”, SMEs and districts: hybrid governance forms, Knowledge Creation & Technology Transfer Conference,LIUC, Castellanza, Italy, 5-7 Novemberzh_TW
dc.relation.reference孫介仁(2002),「客戶認知工業設計公司服務品質之研究」,銘傳大學設計管理研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePawson, R., J. L. Bravard, & L. Cameron(1995), “The case for expressive systems”, Sloan Management Review, Winter, pp.41-48.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePodsakoff, P. M., & D. W. Organ(1986), “Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects”, Journal of Management, 12(4), pp.531-544.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReed, S.K. & J.A. Johnsen(1975), “Detection of parts in patterns and images”, Memory and Cognition, Vol. 3 , pp.569-575.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRhodes, M.(1961), “An analysis of creativity”. In Isaksen S. G.(ed.), Frontiers of Creativity Research, New York:Bearly Limited.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRivett, D.(1992), “Project management”, in: Lydiate, L. (ed.) Professional Practice in Design Consultancy, The Design Council, London.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRodan, S.(2002), “Innovation and heterogeneous knowledge in managerial contact networks”, Journal of Knowledge Management ,6(2) , pp.152-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRoozenburg, N. F. M & J. Eekels(1995), Product Design: Fundamentals and methods, 「產品設計-設計基礎和方法論」,張建成譯,台北:六合.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRulke D. L. & J. Galaskiewicz(2000), “Distribution of knowledge group network structure, and group performance”, Management Science,Vol.46, Iss. 5; pp. 612-625.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSalter, A & D. Gann(2003) “Sources of ideas for innovation in engineering design”, Research Policy, 32, pp.1307-1324.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchumpeter, J. A.(1934), The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard Business School, Boston.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐宏文(2001),「設計管理中多重設計專案之全面審議架構」,東海大學工業設計學系未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceScott, W. R.(1994). “Institutional analysis: Variance and process theory approaches”, In J. W. Meyer & W. R. Scott(eds.), Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Iindividualism, Sage., pp.81-99.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSimon, H. A.(1991), “Bounded rationality and organizational learning”, Organization Science, Vol. 2 (February), pp.125-134.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, P. G. & D. G. Reinertsen (1998), Developing Products in Half the Time. 2nd ed. ,New York: Van Nostrand Reinholdzh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSober E.(2000), Philosophy of biology. Westview Press Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSternberg, R. J. (1985), “Human intelligence: the model is the message”, Science, 230(4730), pp. 1111-1118.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTerwiesch C. & H L. Christoph(1999), “Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities”, Management science, 45(5), pp.455-466.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThorne, P.(1992), Organizing Genius , 「創意人與管理人的戰爭」,1994,楊幼蘭譯,台北:時報文化.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUghanwa, D. O.(1988), “In search of design excellence”, Design Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4, October,pp. 219-222.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceUlrich K. T. & S. D. Eppinger(1997), Product design and development, McGraw-Hill Companies.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceValacich, J. S., R. Wachter, B. E. Mennecke, and B. C. Wheeler.(1993), “Computer-Mediated idea generation: the effects of group size and group heterogeneity. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on System Sciences, 1993, pp.152-160..zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐銘謙(2004),「產品演化中造形因素與生態性擇相關性之研究」,國立台灣科技大學設計研究所未出版碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVerkasalo, M. & P. Lappalainen(1998), “A method of measuring the efficiency of the knowledge utilization process”,. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45(4), pp.414-423.zh_TW
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.