Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31112
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor周宣光zh_TW
dc.contributor.author文德蘭zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorWen, Te Lanen_US
dc.creator文德蘭zh_TW
dc.creatorWen, Te Lanen_US
dc.date2008en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-14T01:16:33Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-14T01:16:33Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-14T01:16:33Z-
dc.identifierG0903565061en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31112-
dc.description博士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description資訊管理研究所zh_TW
dc.description90356506zh_TW
dc.description97zh_TW
dc.description.abstract近年來世界各國的電視產業均開始從類比邁向數位時代,然而有線電視數位化亦已成為其未來的發展趨勢,對於有線電視業者目前除積極提供原有的影音視訊服務外,也開始紛紛推出互動電視等進階服務。因此有線電視在數位化之後首先面臨的問題就是頻道數大幅增加,而要如何經營、如何提供多樣化的服務、及如何定價這些都將會是急待解決的問題。故本研究希望從經濟學的角度、互動數位有線電視整體產業的影響並考量消費者的利益,採用一個創新的方法「創意問題解決理論」(Theoria Resheneyva Isobretatelskehuh Zadach,TRIZ)來討論互動數位有線電視的定價策略。本研究主要研究目的希望以TRIZ的創新方法求出理想解,並建議未來互動電視之定價策略,提供政府政策做為未來訂定數位電視價格之參考。\r\n本研究建議有線電視在進行互動數位電視發展時應針對不同的頻道服務採取不同的差別定價:對於免費收看的頻道可依據廣告播出的形式分為基本免費頻道與選擇性免費頻道,而付費頻道則可分為單一計價方式、組合計價方式與差別計價。對於法規政策本研究則建議取消費率上限原則、重新訂定節目廣告化與廣告節目化的認定原則與開放有線電視跨區經營的限制。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, global television industry is moving from analog to digital era, and digitalization becomes a trend. The cable operators start to offer advanced services such as interactive televisions in addition to their existing video and audio services. Major issues facing the cable operators include how to operate their businesses, how to provide a variety of services, and how to justify their prices with the substantially increasing channels after digitalization. This study is to discuss the pricing strategy of the digital cable TV using an innovative method of “creative problem-solving theory”(Theoria Resheneyva Isobretatelskehuh Zadach,TRIZ) from the perspectives of economic development, industry, and consumers. We also recommend the pricing strategies for the digital cable TV industry and the government’s price policy based on the TRIZ results.\r\nThis study suggests that the pricing policy for the digital cable TV industry is to offer different services with reasonable price discrimination. For example, free channels can be categorized into basic cable channels and optional cable channels with cable TV advertising. The pricing strategies for the pay channels are the fixing pricing strategy, product bundle pricing strategy, and differential pricing strategy. This study also suggests the authorities to make rate cap expiration, to re-regulate the advertising nature of programs and program-like television advertisings, and to cancel the limitation of the service area of the cable system.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\r\n第一節 研究背景 1\r\n第二節 研究動機與目的 2\r\n第三節 研究範圍與限制 5\r\n第四節 研究架構與方法 5\r\n第二章 文獻探討 8\r\n第一節 互動數位有線電視 8\r\n第二節 各國電視數位化之發展現況與經營模式 13\r\n第三節 市場集中度與產業價值鏈 28\r\n第四節 數位產品之定價概念 32\r\n第五節 閱聽人的收視習慣 42\r\n第六節 台灣目前互動數位有線電視經營瓶頸 43\r\n第七節 創意式解答方法論 46\r\n第三章 研究方法 50\r\n第一節 TRIZ方法論 50\r\n第二節 TRIZ執行步驟 57\r\n第三節 TRIZ 在商業上的應用 58\r\n第四節 TRIZ實例 58\r\n第五節 研究步驟 65\r\n第四章 台灣互動數位電視產業分析 67\r\n第一節 台灣有線電視之市場集中度 67\r\n第二節 互動電視之產業價值鏈 74\r\n第三節 由消費者收視習慣看互動電視之產業發展 76\r\n第四節 小結 78\r\n第五章 資料分析 81\r\n第一節 問題分析 81\r\n第二節 矛盾衝突分析 84\r\n第三節 矛盾矩陣策略分析 88\r\n第四節 評估決策 94\r\n第六章 建議與結論 100\r\n第一節 研究建議 100\r\n第二節 本研究主要貢獻 104\r\n第三節 後續研究 104\r\n參考文獻 105\r\n附件一「TRIZ法」的39項特徵參數 附件1-1\r\n附件二 TRIZ的40 項創新原則 附件2-1\r\n附件三 矛盾矩陣 附件3-1\r\n附件四 商業上使用的31個特徵參數 附件4-1\r\n附件五 在商業上的40個創新原則 附件5-1\r\n附件六 應用在商業上的矛盾矩陣 附件6-1zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0903565061en_US
dc.subject互動數位有線電視zh_TW
dc.subject創意問題解決理論zh_TW
dc.subject定價策略zh_TW
dc.subject產業價值鏈zh_TW
dc.subjectinteractive digital TVen_US
dc.subjectTheoria Resheneyva Isobretatelskehuh Zadach(TRIZ)en_US
dc.subjectpricing strategyen_US
dc.subjectindustry value chainen_US
dc.title以TRIZ方法探討數位有線電視的定價策略zh_TW
dc.titleOn the pricing strategy of digital cable TV by the method of TRIZen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、英文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.Adams W., & Yellen J. (1976). Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economicszh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.Albarran A.B. (1996). Media economics: Understanding markets, industries and concepts. Ames: Iowa State University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.Anandalingam G., & Viswanathan S. (2005). Pricing strategies for information goods. Sadhana 30, p 257-274.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.Avlonitis G.F., & Indounas K.A. (2005). Pricing objectives and pricing methods in the services sector. Journal of Services Marketing,19(1), p 47-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.B. Ruchti, & P. Livotov. (1999). TRIZ-based Innovation Principles and a Process for Problem Solving in Business and Management. The Online TRIZ Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.Bakos Yannis, & Brynjolfsson Erik. (1999). Bundling information goods:Pricing, profits, and efficiency. Management Science, 45(12), p 1613–1630.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.Bernard C., Reimann. (1989). Sustaining the competitive advantage. Strategy & Leadership, vol 7, p 30-39.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.Bhargava K.H. (2003). Contingency pricing for information goods and services under industry wide performance standard. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(2), p 113-136.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.Bitran R.G., & Mondschein V.S. (1997). Periodic pricing of seasonal products in retailing. Management Science, Vol. 43, No.1, p 64-79.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.Caves R. (1982). American industry: Structure, conduct, performance (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference49.顧淑馨譯,1999, Head, Christopher H. Sterling, Lemuel B. Schofield, Sydney W.著,電子媒介新論,台北市:時英出版社zh_TW
dc.relation.reference三、網站部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.http://www.cmcsk.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=118591&p=irol-reportsAnnual searching date: 2007.06zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.http://www.electrablue.com/bluesky/qube/first50.html searching date:2007.04zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.http://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/ searching date:2007.05zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.http://www.tbcom.com.tw/02_business/03_dvs_01_po.html searching date:2007.04zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.http://www.ofcom.org.uk/media/ searching date:2007.03zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.http://www.casbaa.com/ searching date:2007.02zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&id=CaaUCKK-IzYC&oi=fnd&pg=PA187&dq=%22Unauthorized+file-sharing%22+%22the+pricing+of+digital+content%22&ots=rNbiA1ce1w&sig=1fUDjuY8euZE9XNNWA1tPrHW0eE#PPP1,M1 searching date:2007.02zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.www.digitaltelevision.com/law/law1198.shtml searching date:2007.12zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.Chae S. (1992). Bundling subscription TV channels - A case of natural bundling. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, p 213-230.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.Chang Chih-Hao. (2001). Interactive TV Shows incredible Potential. .Asia IT Report. Taipei: Market intelligence Center(MIC)Publication.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13.CHOI Soon-Yong, STAHL Dale, & WHINSTON Andrew. (1997). The economics of electronic commerce. Indianápolis: McMillan Technical Publishing,.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14.Chuang J.C.-I., & Sirbu M.A. (1997). Network delivery of information goods: Optimal pricing of articles and subscriptions. MIT Press, Cambridge,MA.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15.Collis J.D., Bane P.W., & Bradley P.S. (1997). Winner And Losers: Industry Structure in the Converging World of Telecommunications, Computing, and Entertainment. In Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Press, p 159-200.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16.Cronin J.J., & Menelly E.N. (1992). Discrimination vs. avoidance: Zipping of television commercials. Journal of Marketing, 56, p 55-68.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17.Darrell Mann (2004), Hands-On Systematic Innovation for Business and Mangement, Lazarus Press, UKzh_TW
dc.relation.reference18.Danaher J.P. (1995). What happens to television ratings during commercial break. Journal of Advertising Research, 35, p 37-47.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19.Dolan J.Robert, & Simon Hermann. (1996). Power Pricing. NewYork: Simon & Schuster Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20.Dowing M., Lechner C., & Thielmann B. (1998). Convergence:Innovation and Change of Market Structures between Television and Online Services. EM-Electronic Markets,vol8,No4.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21.E. Averboukh. (2003). I-TRIZ for Six Sigma Business Process Management. The Online TRIZ Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference22.Ferreira V.C., & Forcellini A.,F. (2000). TRIZ – Teoria da Solução Inventiva de Problemas. Florianópolis, SC: UFSC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23.H. Smith. (2006). P-TRIZ Formulation. BPTrends.com: http://www.aitriz.org/ai/articles/InsideTRIZ/0207.pdf searching date: 2007.12zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24.Heeter C. (1988). Gender differences in viewing style. Cable Viewing. New Jersey: Norwood.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference25.Hoskins C., McFadyen S., & Finn A. (2004). Media economics –Applying economics to new and traditional media. London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26.Hsiao Yung-Chin. (2005). Creative Solutions from TRIZ for the Business Contradiction in Red Ocean Strategy. The TRIZ Journal.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference27.Koboldt et al. (1999). The Implications of funding for Broadcasting Output. . Funding the BBC. Luton: University of Luton Press., p 47-72.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference28.Krugman M.D., Cameron Y.G., & WhiteM.C. (1995). Visual attention to programming and commercials, the use of in-home observations. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, p 1-12.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference29.Lazear P.E. (1986). Retail Pricing and Clearance Sales. American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No.1, p 14-32.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference30.Ewbel A. (1985). Bundling of Substitutes or Complement. International Journal of Industrial Organization Vol3, p 101-107.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference31.Mazur Glenn. (2000). Theory of Inventive Problem Solving (TRIZ). University of Michigan College of Engineering: http://www.mazur.net/triz/ search by: 2007/10/31zh_TW
dc.relation.reference32.McAfee R.Preston, McMillan John, & Whinston D.Michael. (1989). Multiproduct Monopoly, Commodity Bundling, and Correlation of Values. Quarterly Journal of Economics vol.114.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference33.McQuail D. (1994). Mass Communication Theory 3rd. London: Sage.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference34.Owen M.B., & Wildman S.S. (1992). Video Economics. . Cambridge: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference35.Pepall L., Richards J.D., & NormanG. (2005). Industrial organization –Contemporary theory & practice. Ohio: South-Boulevard.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference36.Pramataris D.,Lekako, G.,& Mylonopoulos, N.K.,Papakyriakopoulos, (2001), Personalized Interactive TV Advertising:The iMEDIA Business Model. EM-Electronic Markets,Vol.11,No.1.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference37.Prim Fabricio Marcelo, & Trabasso Gonzaga Luis. (2005.11). Theory of Inventive Problem Solving Applied To Business Process Management Projects. 18th International Congress of Mechanical Engineering. Ouro Preto, MG.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference38.Quico C. (2003). Are communication services the killer applications for Interactive TV? Or \"I left my wife because I am in love with the TV set\". 1st European Conference on Interactive Television: from Viewers to Actors?zh_TW
dc.relation.reference39.Schiller H.I. (1983). The world crisis and the new information technologies. Columbia Journal of World Business,18(1), p 86-90.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference40.Stigler J.G. (1968). \"A Note on Block Booking\" In The Organization of Industry. Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference41.Valeri Souchkov. (1999). M-TRIZ: Application of TRIZ to Solve Business Problem. Insytec white paper.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference42.Valeri Souchkov. (2005), Root Conflict Analysis (RCA+): Structured Problems and Contradictions Mapping, the ETRIA Conference TRIZ FUTURE 2005, Austriazh_TW
dc.relation.reference43.Valeri Souchkov, Rudy Hoeboer, &Mathijs Zutphenvan (2007), TRIZ for business: Application of RCA+ to Analyse and Solve Business and Management Problem. TRIZ Joural.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference44.Varian H.R. (1998). Markets for Information Goods. California: University of California,Berkeley.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference45.Varian R.Hal. (2000). Buying, sharing and renting information goods. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(4), p 473–488.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference46.Veit Kohnhauser (1999). Use of TRIZ in the Development Process - Zero-Defect-Development for Customer centered Innovative Products. The TRIZ Journalzh_TW
dc.relation.reference47.Waterman D., & Grant A.,. (1991). Cable TV as an aftermarket. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media,35(2), p 179-188.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference48.WhitakerJ. (2001). Inveractive Television demystified. New York: McGraw-Hill.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference49.Wirth O.M., & Bloch H. (1995). Industrial organization theory and media industry analysis. The Journal of Media Economics, 8(2), p 15-26.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference50.Zhu Kevin, & Mac Quarrie Bryan. (2003). The economics of digital bundling: The impact of digitization and bundling on the music industry. Communications of The ACM,46(9), p 264–270.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、中文部份zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1.王永隆,1995,電視新聞時段觀眾轉台行為之研究,台北市: 文化大學新聞研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2.MIC,2006,中國大陸有線電視業者之數位電視服務發展模式分析,台北市: MIC.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference3.王志文,1997,臺灣地區有線電視系統經營者定價模式之研究,台中市:中興大學都市計畫研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference4.王獻飛、蘇凱雄,2006, 數字電視中的條件接收系統,現代電子技術zh_TW
dc.relation.reference5.伊藤元重,2004,經濟學入門,大地出版社.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference6.朱砡瑩,1999,我國有線電視費率管制之研究,台北市:國立政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference7.朱智穎,2001,數位視訊廣播市場及數位STB之評析,台北市: 寶來証券zh_TW
dc.relation.reference8.官雅惠,1999,有線電視產業之訂價策略、福利分析與政策效果,嘉義市: 國立中正大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference9.吳基逞,1996,有線電視產業系統業者頻道組合與訂價策略之研究,台北市:台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference10.周依婕,2003,數位有線電視付費頻道定價之研究-以兒童教學頻道為例,台北市:銘傳大學傳播管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference11.林軒如,2005,有線電視分組付費可能實施方式之研究,台北市:國立政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference12.洪儀芳,2001,台灣與日本數位電視的發展與困境,台北市:國立台灣大學新聞研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference13.洪瓊娟,2001,公有領域中的綠洲,公共電視的發展與未來,台北市: 公共電視文化事業基金會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference14.胡純玉,1997,我國有線電視實施頻道分級收費制度之研究,台北市:世新大學教育學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference15.翁景民、許書銘、楊君琦,1999,台灣地區電影映演市場集中度分析,新聞學研究 (59), p 1-21.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference16.張瑜明,2003,我國有線電視費率制度之分析:一個歷史制度主義的觀點,台南市:國立成功大學政治經濟學研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference17.張育誠,2005,網際網路與電視匯流之關鍵成功因素探討,台北市: 國立政治大學廣電所zh_TW
dc.relation.reference18.張淑惠、林崇偉譯,2005, Walter Eversheim 著,德國AIM 創新管理系統化理論、方法與案例,中國生產力中心zh_TW
dc.relation.reference19.張慧君,2001,數位視訊服務發展現況與趨勢,工業技術研究院zh_TW
dc.relation.reference20.張嬙,2005,數位電視播什麼? 中國大陸數位電視內容產業研究zh_TW
dc.relation.reference21.許冬華,2001,新媒體年代的廣播業研討會,2007年12月 擷取自 傳媒透視: http://www.rthk.org.hk/mediadigest/md0401/03.htmlzh_TW
dc.relation.reference22.陳芸芸、劉慧雯譯,2003,特新大眾傳播理論,台北市: 韋伯文化zh_TW
dc.relation.reference23.陳昭伶,2001,台灣無線電視台數位化研究----以產業與組織觀點分析,嘉義市: 中正大學電訊傳播研究所zh_TW
dc.relation.reference24.陳蕾琪,2006,台灣有線電視產業現況分析,台北市: MICzh_TW
dc.relation.reference25.陳麗鳳,2005,閱聽人收看電視節目類型、收視型態與收視行為之研究,台北市: 中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士在職專班zh_TW
dc.relation.reference26.陳麗鳳,2005,閱聽人收看電視節目類型、收視型態與收視行為之研究,中國文化大學新聞研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference27.李明軒、邱如美譯,麥可波特著,1985,Competitive Advantage(競爭優勢).台北市: 天下遠見出版zh_TW
dc.relation.reference28.彭芸,1986,國際傳播與科技,台北: 三民書局.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference29.彭芸、梁德馨,2006, 95年有線電視收視行為及滿意度調查研究,台北市: 國家通信傳播委員會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference30.彭資淵,2006,互動電視體育節目加值資訊研究:以棒球節目為例. 中華傳播學刊,p 199-237.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference31.塗能榮,2006,台灣數位電視推動問題探討,擷取自 洋洋得意報: http://www.oceanictrading.com.tw/epaper.php?e_id=16zh_TW
dc.relation.reference32.塗能榮,2006,政策與變革- 數位電視觀察與關切系列之七,台北市: 財團法人廣電發展基金會.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference33.塗能榮,2006,科技與神話 - 數位電視觀察與關切系列之四(下),台北市: 財團法人廣電發展基金會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference34.塗能榮,2005,數位電視發展趨勢與推廣策略之研究以台灣五家無線電視台為例,台北市: 世新大學廣播電視電影研究所zh_TW
dc.relation.reference35.蔡淑瑜,2000,有線電視產業因應分級付費制度策略之研究,台北市:國立政治大學廣播電視研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference36.楊秋男,2005,數位電視的未來與現況,台北市: 資策會zh_TW
dc.relation.reference37.葉元之,2004,大陸有線電視數位化中央與地方通方合作,通訊雜誌zh_TW
dc.relation.reference38.詹立宇、張明宗、王嘉齡,2003,產業群聚、垂直分工與企業競爭策略,產業金融季刊 (119),p 127-145zh_TW
dc.relation.reference39.劉幼俐,1997,多頻道電視與觀眾,台北市: 時英出版社zh_TW
dc.relation.reference40.劉志成,2003,TRIZ方法改良與綠色創新設計方法之研究,台南市:國立成功大學機械所博士論文.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference41.劉駿州,2001,數位電視經濟與營運策略分析架構初探,公共電視的發展與未來. 台北市: 公共電視zh_TW
dc.relation.reference42.鄭自隆,2005,位電視廣告管理:一些經營面向的新思考,有線暨衛星廣播電視產業營運議題研討會,台北市: 行政院新聞局zh_TW
dc.relation.reference43.鄭明椿,2003,換個姿勢看電視. 台北市: 揚智文化zh_TW
dc.relation.reference44.鄭逸芳,2003,台北市電影映演之通路成員關係研究-交易成本理論觀點,台北市: 國立台灣師範大學大眾傳播研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference45.鄭嫄嫄,2003,中國大陸使用個人電腦結合互動電視平台可行性研究,台北市: 世新大學傳播研究所zh_TW
dc.relation.reference46.盧琪生,1994,有線電視頻道定價分析,台北市: 國立台灣技術學院管理技術研究所碩士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference47.鍾起惠,1995,多頻道環境觀眾收視行為之研究:以有線電視新店經營區為例,台北市: 國立政治大學新聞研究所博士論文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference48.鍾瑞昌,2005,有線電視費率審議與分組收費對產業之影響,台北市:中華民國衛星廣播電視事業商業公會zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.