1. NCCU Academic Hub
  2. 國際事務學院
  3. 外交學系
  4. 學位論文
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31445
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorChiang,Alexen_US
dc.contributor.author康爾珊zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorKamberi,Elsaen_US
dc.creator康爾珊zh_TW
dc.creatorKamberi,Elsaen_US
dc.date2006en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-14T02:12:16Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-14T02:12:16Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-14T02:12:16Z-
dc.identifierG0922530362en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/31445-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description外交研究所zh_TW
dc.description92253036zh_TW
dc.description95zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAfter the collapse of the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact which marked the end of the Cold War the security arrangements in Europe like the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe (CSCE) , the North Atlantic Cooperation Council (NACO) etc, all appeared to be leading to peace and CEEC security. In light of these historic events, there were many who questioned the need for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and called for the creation of new security arrangements with new leadership roles. This thesis argues that NATO will continue to form the cornerstone of stability, security and dialogue in the \"New Europe”. \r\nThe argument will center on the following assertions 1) The collapse of Warsaw Pact which brought about a condition of instability in Central Europe 2) NATO has proven to be more effective than other security organizations in terms of the capability to solve and address the issues that emerged after the Cold War in CEEC. It has also become involved in security tasks beyond its original mission, which was the defense of the member states from outside attack 3) NATO remains available and will continue to be an indispensable forum in the future in order to bring stability to CEEC.The analysis in this thesis shows that NATO’s specific long-standing functions have remained remarkably unquestioned and even been reaffirmed by the system-change in Europe 1989-1991.zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontentsAbstract\r\n\r\nAcknowledgements\r\nTable of Contents\r\nChapter One Introduction..………………………………………..…................1 . Research Purpose and Question…..…………………...……….. ....9\r\n Literature Review...……………….………………………….……10\r\n Scope of Research….………….…..……………………….………14\r\n Organization of the Thesis……………….…..………………….....14\r\n\r\nChapter Two European Security……………………………….…………….….16\r\n The Emergence of new Security Issues in CEEC.……….………....12\r\n Transnational Threats………………………………....................13\r\n Internal Threats.…..…………………………………………..….17 \r\n Disintegration of Soviet Union (1989-1991)…….………………....19\r\n Dissembling Existent Socialism…….……………………………...22\r\n Reforms in the Political System……….…………….......................22\r\n Soviet Society in Mobilization….……….……………………....23\r\n Neorealism vs. Neoliberalism on European Security........................24\r\n A neorealist perspective………………………………………………..25\r\n A neoliberalist perspective……………………………………….….....26\r\n\r\nChapter Three How to bring Security to CEEC?....................................................30\r\n New European Security Architecture……………………………...30\r\n Evolving European Security..…………………………………....33\r\n NATO Transformation…….………………………………………36\r\n NATO in Cold War Period……………………………………….39\r\n NATO in Post Cold War Period…………………………………..42 \r\n\r\nChapter Four NATO Enlargement………………………………………………..51\r\n The Purpose of NATO’s Enlargement……………………………….51\r\n The CEEC interest in NATO membership………………………......54\r\n The Enlargement Process………...……………………………….....57\r\n NATO enlargement during the Cold War…..…………..…………......58\r\n NATO enlargement after the Cold War.....................................................60\r\n The Success of the Enlargement………………………………………….64\r\n \r\nChapter Five Other European Security institutions…………..………………….72\r\nEU contribution to CEEC security………………………………….73\r\nOSCE contribution to CEEC security………………………………78\r\nThe Primacy of NATO………….......................................................83\r\n Does NATO bring the desired security to CEEC?...................................85\r\n Why is NATO the best option for CEEC?..................................................85\r\n\r\nChapter Six Conclusion…………………………………………………………...........................89\r\n Summary………………..……………………………………….91\r\nBibliography ……………………………………………………………………...94zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0922530362en_US
dc.subjectNATOen_US
dc.titleNATO and CEEC Security in the Post Cold War Erazh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.referenceBookszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAldershot, Hants The Operational Role of the OSCE in South-Eastern Europe. Contributing to Regional Stability in the Balkans. Burlington, Vt: Ashgate, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArnswald, Sven. The Implications of Baltic States EU Membership: Institute of Europaische Politic, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBatt, Judy and Lew, G.Paul. Developments in Central and Eastern European Politics: Duke University Press, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCummings, Sally NOil. Transition and Security in Central Asia: New York, N.Y. Routledge, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCroft, Stuart, Terriff, Terry. Critical Reflections on Security and Change. London: Portland, OR. : Frank Cass, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDawisha, Karen The International Dimension of Post-Communist Transitions In Russia and the New States of Eurasia: New York: M.E.Sharpe, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDerleth, J.William. The transition in Central and Eastern European Politics. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, c2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEliassen, Kjell A. Foreign and Security Policy in the European Union. London Thousand Oaks, Ca: SAGE Publications, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGilpin, Robert. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGasteyger, Curt Walter. An Ambiguous Power: The European Union in a Changing World: Strategies for Europe.Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers, 1996.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoldman, Marshall I. What went wrong with Perestroika?. New York : W.W. Norton, 1992.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHoward, Marc Morje. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe.Cambridge, Cambridge Universtiy Press,2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHyde-Price and Aggestam, Lisbeth Adrian. Security and Identity in Europe: Exploring the New Agenda (Southampton Studies in International Policy) Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIkenberry, G. John. After victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After major wars. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, 2001.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJudy Batt and Paul G.Lew. Developments in Central and Eastern European Politics: Durham, NC, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLaqueur, Walter. 1921.European Security in the 1990s.Deterrence and Defense After the INF Treaty New York: Plenum Press,1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLeonard ,Dick and Leonard Mark. The pro-European Reader. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave, 2002.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLehne, Stefan. The Vienna Meeting of the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1986-1989: A Turning Point in East-West relations. Boulder, Westview Press, 1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMayhew, Alan. Recreating Europe: The European Union’s Policy Towards Central and Eastern Europ.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNagle, John. D. Democracy and Democratization: Post-Communist Europe in Comparative Perspective. London: CA: Sage, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceOla. Baev, Pavel K. Einagel, Victoria Ingrid. Geopolitics in Post-Wall Europe: Security, Territory and Identity.Oslo, International Peace Research Institute,1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePinder, John. The European Community and Eastern Europe. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press,1991.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePickles,J.Smith and Adrian.Theorising Transition: The Political Economy of Post-Communist Transformations.London:Routledge,1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEastern European Journalism: Before, During and After Communism. Cresskill, N.J.: Hampton Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Karen Elizabeth. The Making of EU Foreign Policy: The Case of Eastern Europe. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTsinisizelis J. Michael, Stavridis Stelios, Ifantis Kostas and Chryssochoou N. Dimitris.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTheory and reform in the European Union. Manchester ; Manchester University Press, 1999.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceE M Dwards Geoffrey, and Regelsberger,Elfriede. The European Community and Inter-regional cooperation. London: Pinter Publishers, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcFaul, Michael, and Stoner-Weiss, Kathryn. After the Collapse of Communism: comparative lessons of transitions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWyatt-Walter, Holly. The European Community and the security dilemma, 1979-92.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNew York : St. Martin`s Press, in association with St. Antony`s College, Oxford, 1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWestview special studies on the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. The Soviet Union, 1988-1989: perestroika in crisis? Boulder : Westview Press, 1990.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWhite Stephen, Alex, Pravda, Zvi Gitelman. Developments in Russian Politics. Durham, N.C. : Duke University Press, 4th ed.1997.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceJournal Articleszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceArnold, Jason and Samuel Grier. “NATO Enlargement: Issues and Answers.” Airpower Power Journal 12. (Summer 1998): 71-83.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBaldwin E. Richard.” The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union.” European Economic Review 39 (April 1995): 474-481.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBatt, Judy.” Impact of EU Enlargement on Regions on The EU’s New Eastern Border.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAudition to Governance WG6, (March 2001):20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCooley, Alexander. “Western Conditions and Domestic Choices: The Influence of External Actors on the Post-Communist Transition. Nations in Transit 2003: Democratization in East Central Europe and Eurasia. New York: Freedom House, 2003.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCharles A. Kupchan, Clifford A. Kupchan. “Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe. International Security16.(Summer,1991):114-161.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceCornish, Paul. ”European Security: The end of Architecture and the New NATO.”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Affairs Royal Institute of International Affairs 72, (October 1996):751-769.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDunay, Pal. “Stability in East Central Europe.” Journal of Peace Research .29, (February 1992):1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDuffield S. John. “NATO’s Functions after the Cold War.” Political Science Quarterly 109. (Winter 1994-1995):763-787.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFadok, S. David. “Assessing NATO Enlargement in Light of Europe’s Past and Asia’s Future.” USAF Institute for National Security Studie.( March 1999):1-30.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlaser, L. Charles. “Why NATO is Still Best: Future Security Arrangements for Europe.” International Security.18 (Summer 1993): 5-50.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGnesotto, Nicole.” European Union after Minsk and Maastricht International Affairs.” Royal Institute of International Affairs 68 (April 1992):223-231.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHettne, Bjorn. “Security and Peace in Post-Cold War Europe.” Journal of Peace Research 28. (August 1991): 279-294.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHaerpfer W. Christian W.”Old and New Security Issues in Post-Communist Eastern Europe: Results on 11 National Study.” Europe-Asia Studies 51 (September 1999):989-1011.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIbrayamova, Nuray. “Eastern Enlargement and the European Security Agenda.” Jean Monnet/ Robert Schuman Paper Series 4 (August 2004): 2-20.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrasnov V.Gregory and Brada C. Josep.”Implicit Subsidies in Russian-Ukrainian Energy Trade.” Europe-Asia Studies 49 (July1997):825-843.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKupchan, Charles and Clifford, Kupchan.“Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe”, International Security 16 (Summer 1991):114-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKoslowski, Rey and Kratochwil V. Friedrich. “Understanding Change in International Politics: The Soviet Empire’s Demise and the International System.” International Organization 48.(Spring, 1994):215-247.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKupchan, A. Charles and Kupchan A. Clifford. “The Promise of Collective Security”zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternational Security Vol.20, No.1 (Summer, 1995): 52-61.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLarrabee, F. Stephen. “NATO Enlargement: Prague and Beyond.” Prepared for IISS/CEPS European Security Forum (9 July 2001):1-10.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLayne,Christopher.”The Unipolar Illusion:Great Powers Will Rise.” International Security 17 (Spring 1993):5-51.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLepgold,Joseph.“NATO’s Post-Cold War Collective Action Problem. “International Security 23 (Summer, 1998): 78-106.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLight, Margot and White, S.; Lowenhardt.”A Wider Europe: The View from Moscow and Kyiv.” International Affairs .76 (Jan., 2000): 77-78.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcCalla B. Robert. “NATO’s Persistence after the Cold War.” International Organization, 50(Summer 1996):445-475.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMearsheimer, J. John.” Back to the Future, Part III: Realism and Realities of European Security.” International Security Vol. 15, No.3. (Winter, 1990-1991):216-22.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMearsheimer, John (1990)”Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War”, International Security 15(Summer 1990):5-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMichael,Mastanduno. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S Grand Strategy after the Cold War”, International Security 21 (Spring 1997):49-88.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMoller, Bjorn. “Security Cooperation in Southern Africa: Lessons From the European Experience (NATO, EU, OSCE).” Copenhagen Peace Research Institute(September 2000):1-15.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMotyl. J. Alexander. “Structural constraints and Starting Points: The logic of systematic change in Ukraine and Russia.” Comparative Politics 29(July 1997):443-447.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorrison, John. “Pereyaslav and After: The Russian-Ukrainian Relationship.” International Affairs 69(October 1993):677-703.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMuresan, Liviu. “Non Military Risks to the International Security in Central and Eastern Europe after the Cold War: The Partnership for Future for a Sustainable Security System.” NATO Research Fellowshi (June 1998):1-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNelson N. Daniel and Bentley Samuel. The Comparative Politics of Eastern Europezh_TW
dc.relation.referencePolitical Science and Politics 27 (March 1994):45-52.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePoliti, Alessandro. “European Security: The new Transnational Risks.” EU-ISS Chaillot, Paper 29, Alencon, France, (October 1997):2-25.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRies, Tomas.”NATO Enlargement-A European View.” Prepared for the IISS/CEPS European Security Forum, (9 July 2001).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRuggie John Gerard” The False Premise of Realism.” International Security 20 (Summer 1995): 62-70.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSivonne, Pekka. “European Security: New, Old and Borrowed.” Journal of Peace Research 27(November 1990):385-397.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Alasdair and Wallace Helen. “The European Union: Towards a Policy for Europe.” International Affairs 70(July 1994): 429-444.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSpinant, Daniela. “NATO Enlargements:Towards a Pan-European Security System?” Final Report Submitted to NATO, office of Information Press, (June 30 2000): 1-62.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchimmelfenning. Frank. “The Double Puzzle of EU Enlargement: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Decision to Expand to the East.” Arena Working Paper series, Technische Universitat Darmasta 7 (July 1999).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchake, Kori. “Europe after NATO Expansion: The Unfinished Security Agenda.” Institute of Global Conflict and Cooperation, University of California, Multi-Campus Research Unit. (1998).zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSheetz S. Mark and Mastunduno Michael. “Debating the Unipolar Moment.” International Security, Vol.22, No.3 (Winter 1997/1998):168-174.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVincent E. Jack. “Capability Theory and the Future of NATO’s Decision-making Rules.” Journal of Peace Research, 38 (Jan.2001):67-86.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWallance, William. “From the Atlantic to the Bug, from the Arctic to the Tigris:Where Does it Begin and Ends?” International Affairs 76 (July 2000):475-493.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWelsh, A. Helga. ”Political Transition Process in Central and Eastern Europe.”Comperative Politics 26 (July1994):379-394.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWilkinson, David. “Unipolarity without Hegemony.” International Studies Review 1 (Summer 1999) :141-172.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceInternet Resourceszh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization: http://www.nato.int/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceThe Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe: http://www.osce.org/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWestern European Union: http://www.weu.int/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEconomic Reconstruction and Development in South East Europe: http://www.seerecon.org/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRussian Economic Regional Report: http://www.isn.ethz.ch/zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWarsow Pact:http://www.warsawpact.org/zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.