Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32170
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor蔡英文zh_TW
dc.contributor.author李國維zh_TW
dc.creator李國維zh_TW
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-14T05:17:43Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-14T05:17:43Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-14T05:17:43Z-
dc.identifierG0086252503en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32170-
dc.description博士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description政治研究所zh_TW
dc.description86252503zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract國族是什麼?國族主義又是什麼?\r\n面對許許多多歧異又紛雜的關於國族與國族主義的論述,本論文嘗試另闢蹊徑,從哲學層面來闡釋這一問題。本文區分國族之形成的主觀條件與客觀條件,認為國族不同於國家與民族,不能單純以客觀條件作為依據,而是必須以主觀條件作為依據。本文又進一步區分形式條件與實質條件,認為主觀條件中必須同時包括形式條件與實質條件,也就是說,一群人若要組成一個國族共同體,這些人必須是出於各自之自由意志,決定共同組成一個不同於其他之團體的共同體,而且要尋找並形成某種歸屬核心,當做共同體之根本質素,使之成為維繫共同體之長久存續的道德基礎。\r\n本文以羅爾斯的政治自由主義與民族觀點作為論述根基,由此開展一種新的國族觀點,一種特殊的、只在自由主義式的民主政治體制中存在的政治共同體。並認為,人類理性必然要求人類朝這樣的政治共同體邁進,使每個人的自由都夠有最合理的、最和諧的發展,而不致釀成戰爭衝突。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWhat is “nation”? And what is “nationalism”? There are many diverse and conflicting theories about nations and nationalism. We look into these theories and then abandon them because there are too many definitions. We believe that the nation is a special and unique political community and it accrues only in the liberal constitutional democracy of the modern period. There are two kinds of conditions for the construction of a nation: the subjective condition and the objective conditions. The former is an inner characteristic, while the later are external features. Unlike a state or a people, a nation must be founded the subjective condition as much as the objective conditions. In other words, the subjective condition, human beings’ free will, is the essential bedrock for the construction of a nation. In this perspective, we further distinguish the formal condition from the substantive condition. The formal condition has no content; its only function is pure decision-making. If a group of people is willing to associate together and form a community, it’s necessary for them not only to make a decision but also to decide what community they want to be. Furthermore, they have to search for and fashion their own defining core as the underlying element of the community as well as the moral foundation for the continuance of the community.\r\nBased on John Rawls’ political liberalism and his views about peoples, this paper evolves a new viewpoint of the nation as a unique political community that exists only in the liberal democracy. We also assume it is required by human reason that mankind should move forward to such a political community, enabling everyone to develop his or her liberty in the most reasonable and harmonious way without leading to wars and conflicts.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 導言 1\r\n一、緣起:父親還是母親? 1\r\n二、定義 3\r\n(1)國族 3\r\n(2)國族之主觀條件與客觀條件 7\r\n三、主旨與論證綱要 12\r\n第二章 國族與原生性 17\r\n一、從國族的「肚臍」說起 18\r\n二、法國大革命與初生的國族理念 22\r\n三、國族建構之形式與質料 35\r\n第三章 羅爾斯式的國族證成 I. 道德斷裂與共同體建構 43\r\n一、社會契約論中的道德斷裂 43\r\n二、原初狀態之設計 44\r\n三、理性人與道德人之斷裂 57\r\n四、民主社會與其他社會之斷裂 59\r\n五、亞里斯多德式原則 62\r\n第四章 羅爾斯式的國族證成 II. 主、客觀條件與國族定義 71\r\n一、民族與原初狀態之兩層次應用 72\r\n二、良序民族之定義 78\r\n三、合目的性與政治上的自律自主性 83\r\n四、國族之完全定義 92\r\n第五章 國族之實際建構 95\r\n一、國族之經濟基礎 95\r\n二、他者與自我 96\r\n三、施密特的政治敵友論與主權決斷 98\r\n(1)國族形成之外部條件:政治上的敵人 98\r\n(2)國族形成之內部條件之一:主權決斷 101\r\n四、國族形成之內部條件之二:從歷史中生成 107\r\n(1)交疊性共識之形成 108\r\n1. 憲法性共識 108\r\n2. 交疊性共識 111\r\n3. 作為輔助穩定機制的「公共理性」 113\r\n4. 作為公共理性之最佳範例的最高法院 116\r\n5. 從歷史中產生 117\r\n第六章 結語:國族作為一種應然追求 119\r\n參考書目 125zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0086252503en_US
dc.subject羅爾斯zh_TW
dc.subject康德zh_TW
dc.subject施密特zh_TW
dc.subject國族zh_TW
dc.subject國族主義zh_TW
dc.subject政治共同體zh_TW
dc.subject公共理性zh_TW
dc.subject交疊性共識zh_TW
dc.subject盧梭zh_TW
dc.subject法國大革命zh_TW
dc.subject肚臍zh_TW
dc.subject主觀條件zh_TW
dc.subject客觀條件zh_TW
dc.subject正義原則zh_TW
dc.subjectJohn Rawlsen_US
dc.subjectImmanuel Kanten_US
dc.subjectCarl Schmitten_US
dc.subjectthe principles of justiceen_US
dc.subjectnationen_US
dc.subjectnationalismen_US
dc.subjectpolitical communityen_US
dc.subjectpublic reasonen_US
dc.subjectoverlapping consensusen_US
dc.subjectJean-Jacques Rousseauen_US
dc.subjectthe French Revolutionen_US
dc.subjectnavelen_US
dc.subjectsubjective conditionen_US
dc.subjectobjective conditionen_US
dc.title國族的肚臍:一項關於國族建構的哲學性闡釋zh_TW
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference參考書目zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceActon, Lord,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1910 Lectures on the French Revolution, ed. By J. N. Figgis and R. V. Lawrance, Macmillan Co., Limited. 中譯見秋風譯,《法國大革命講稿》,貴陽:貴州人民出版社,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnderson, Benedict,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso. 中譯見《想像的共同體:民族主義的起源與散布》,吳叡人譯,台北:時報出版,1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 “Introduction,” in Mapping the Nation, edit. by Gopal Balakrishnan, London: Verso, pp. 1-16.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAnsell-Pearson, Keith,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 Nietzsche contra Rousseau, 中譯見《尼采反盧梭》,宗成河等譯,北京:華夏出版社,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBarber, Benjamin R.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age, California: University of California Press. 中譯見《強勢民主》,彭彬、吳潤洲譯,吉林:吉林人民出版社,2006。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBerlin, Isaiah,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRenan, Ernest,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 “What is a Nation?” in Nationality and Nationalism, Vol I, Theoretical Studies, edited by Athena S. Leoussi and Steven Grosby, New York: I. B. Tauris, pp. 27-39. 中譯見李紀舍譯,〈何謂國家?〉,收錄於《中外文學》第14期第6卷,台北:台大外文系中外文學月刊社,1995,頁5-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRorty, Richard,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 Achieving our Country: Leftist Thought in 20th-Century America, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 中譯見《築就我們的國家:20世紀美國左派思想》,黃宗英譯,北京:三聯書店,2006。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRousseau, J. J.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 The Discourses and other Early Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 The Social Contract and other Later Political Writings, edited and translated by Victor Gourevitch, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 《論人類不平等的起源和基礎》,李常山譯,北京:商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 《社會契約論》,何兆武譯,北京:商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 “Kant as an Unfamiliar Source of Nationalism,” in The Sense of Reality: Studies in Ideas and Their History, London: Chatto & Windus, pp. 232-67. 中譯見〈康德,民族主義的一個意外來源〉,收錄於《現實意識》,彭淮棟譯,台北:臉譜出版社,2004,頁307-326。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSchmitt, Carl,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 The Concept of the Political, The University of Chicago Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1982 Der Leviathan in der Staatslehre des Thomas Hobbes, Stuttgart, 中譯見孫善豪譯,《霍布斯國家學說中的厲威也憚》,2004,未刊稿。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceScholz, Sally,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 On Rousseau, Thomson Learning: Wadsworth.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSieyès, Emmanuel-Joseph,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1979 Qu’ Est-ce que le Tiers État? New York: Arno Press. 中譯見馮堂譯,《論特權 第三等級是什麼?》,北京:商務,2004,頁19-88。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Anthony,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 National Identity, Reno Nevada: University: University of Nevada Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era, Oxford: Polity Press, 中譯見《全球化時代的民族與民族主義》,龔維斌、良警宇譯,北京:中央編譯出版社,2002。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 “Nationalism: Past Neglect and Present Power,” in Against the Current: Essays in the History of Idea, edited and with a bibliography by Henry Hardy, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 332-355.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 Nationalism, Cambridge: Polity Press. 中譯見《民族主義:理論,意識型態,歷史》,葉江譯,上海:上海世紀出版集團,2006。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 “The genealogy of Nations: An Ethno-Symbolic Approach,” in When is the Nation? Towards an Understanding of Theories of Nationalism, edited by Atsuko Ichijo and Gordana Uzelac, Oxon: Routledge, pp. 93-97.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSmith, Anthony & John Hutchinson,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 Nationalism: Critical Concepts in Political Science, Vol. 1-5, London: Routledge.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceSoboul, Albert,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1951 La Révolution Française: 1789-1799, Deuxième édition, Paris: Sociales Paris, 中譯見端木正譯,《法國革命:1789-1799》,北京:三聯書店,1956。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceStrauss, Leo,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 “Note on Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political,” in The Concept of the Political, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 81-107. 中譯見劉宗坤譯,〈施米特《政治的概念》評述〉,收入《施米特:政治的剩餘價值》,上海:上海人民,2002,頁212-233。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTamir, Yael,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 Liberal Nationalism, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 65-66. 中譯見《自由主義的民族主義》,陶東風譯,上海:上海世紀出版集團,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDaniels, N.,zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTan, Kok-Chor,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 “Rawls’s Law of Peoples,” in Toleration, Diversity, and Global Justice, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 19-45.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, Charles,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1979 Hegel and Modern Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 “Nationalism and Modernity,” in Robert Mckim and Jeff McMahan ed. The Morality of Nationalism, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 31-56.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTully, James,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 中譯見《陌生的多樣性:歧異時代的憲政主義》,黃俊龍譯,台北:聯經出版公司,2001。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 〈自由主義、民族主義與國家認同〉,台北:揚智。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 〈自由民主的理路〉,台北:聯經出版公司。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1975 “The Original Position,” in Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on Rawls’s A Theory of Justice, edited by Oxford: Blackwell Press, pp. 16-53.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference江宜樺、李強主編zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 《華人世界的現代國家結構》,台北:商周。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference貝十川zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 〈施米特現象和右翼批判理論:讀《危險的心靈:戰後歐洲思想中的施米特》〉,收錄於《二十一世紀》第94期,香港:香港中文大學中國文化研究所,2006,頁4-12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李小兵zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 〈「現實的烏托邦」釋義〉,網路下載。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 〈如何理解和翻譯好 “the Law of People”〉,網路下載。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李明輝zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 〈導論:康德的「歷史」概念及歷史哲學〉,收錄於《康德歷史哲學論文集》,台北:聯經出版公司,頁vii-xxxviii。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李國維zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDelannoi, Gil,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 《論羅爾斯「交疊性共識底理念」》,東海大學政治所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李榮添zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 《歷史之理性:黑格爾歷史哲學導論述析》,台北:學生書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈松橋zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 〈近代中國民族主義的發展:兼論民族主義的兩個問題〉,《政治與社會哲學評論——民族主義專輯》第3期,台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference沈清松zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1987 《物理之後――形上學的發展》,台北:牛頓出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference雨果‧巴爾(Hugo Ball)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 〈施米特的政治神學〉,《道風基督教文化評論——價值的僭政中的神學》,第16期,香港:道風學社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference季衛東zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 Sociologie de la Nation, Paris: Armand Colin. 中譯見《民族與民族主義》,鄭文彬、洪暉譯,北京:三聯書店,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 〈施米特憲法學說的睿智與偏見〉,《二十一世紀》第94期,香港:香港中文大學中國文化研究所,4月號,頁4-12。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林火旺zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 《羅爾斯正義論》,台北:三民。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 〈公共理性的功能及其限制〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference周圍zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 〈從語言的神受人本之辯看赫爾德的多元論身分〉,《道風基督教文化評論——〈創世紀〉與現代政治哲學》第15期,香港:漢語基督教文化研究所,頁185-194。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference施密特(Carl Schmitt)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 〈價值的僭政〉,《道風基督教文化評論——價值的僭政中的神學》,第16期,香港:道風學社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 《政治的概念》,劉小楓編,劉宗坤等譯,上海:上海人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 《政治性的概念》,姚朝森譯,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDreben, Burton,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 《政治的浪漫派》,劉小楓編,馮克利、劉鋒譯,上海:上海人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 《憲法學說》,劉鋒譯,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 《憲法的守護者》,李君韜、蘇慧婕譯,台北:左岸。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference韋伯(Max Weber)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 《經濟行動與社會團體》,台北:遠流出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐迅zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 《民族主義》(修訂版),北京:中國社會科學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐宗懋zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 《台灣人論》,台北:時報出版。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference徐賁zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 “On Rawls and Political Liberalism,” in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, edited by Samuel Freeman, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 316-346.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 〈政治神學的教訓:失節的施米特〉,收錄於《開放時代》第182期,廣州:開放時代雜誌社,3月號,頁67-78。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 〈中國不需要這樣的「政治」和「主權者決斷」〉,收錄於《二十一世紀》第94期,香港:香港中文大學中國文化研究所,2006,頁26-37。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張世英zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 《論黑格爾的精神哲學》,台北:唐山出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張旺山zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 〈史密特的決斷論〉,《人民及社會科學集刊》,第15卷第2期,台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference張裕德zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 《羅爾斯正義理論的「康德式詮釋」之探究》,桃園:中央大學哲學研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference康德(I. Kant)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1990 《道德底形上學之基礎》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDuara, Prasenjit,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 〈在世界公民底觀點下的普遍歷史之理念〉,收錄於《康德歷史哲學論文集》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經:2004,頁3-23。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 〈答「何謂啟蒙?」 之問題〉,收錄於《康德歷史哲學論文集》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經,頁25-35。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 〈論永久和平——一項哲學性規劃〉,收錄於《康德歷史哲學論文集》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經,頁179-193。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 〈重提的問題:人類是否在不斷地趨向更佳的境地〉,收錄於《康德歷史哲學論文集》,李明輝譯,台北:聯經,頁229-253。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 《判斷力批判》,鄧曉芒譯,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference海德格(Martin Heidegger)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 〈尼采的扎拉圖斯特拉是誰?〉,收入劉小楓、倪為國編,《尼采在西方――解讀尼采》,上海:上海三聯,頁3-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許紀霖主編zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 《知識分子論叢——共和、社群與公民》第2期,江蘇:江蘇人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference許鼎新zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 Rescuing History from the Nation, Questioning Narratives of Modern China, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 中譯見《從民族國家拯救歷史:民族主義話語與中國現代史研究》,王憲明等譯,北京:社會科學文獻出版社,2003。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 《希伯來民族簡史》,南京:中國基督教協會神學教育委員會。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference郭建zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 〈為了打擊共同的敵人:施米特及其左翼盟友〉,收錄於《二十一世紀》第94期,香港:香港中文大學中國文化研究所,4月號,頁19-25。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference黃仁宇zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 《資本主義與二十一世紀》,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 〈我對資本主義的認識〉,收錄於《放寬歷史的視界》,台北:允晨,頁101-148。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 〈蔣介石的歷史地位〉,收錄於《放寬歷史的視界》,台北:允晨,頁231-280.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳宜中zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 〈羅爾斯的國際正義論與戰爭的正當性〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》第八期,台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳新民zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDworkin, Ronald,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 《公法學劄記》,台北:三民總經銷。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference亞里斯多德(Aristotle)zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 《物理學》,張竹明譯,北京:商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 《形而上學》,吳壽澎譯,北京:商務印書館。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 《亞里士多德全集:第二卷》,徐開來譯,北京:中國人民大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 《亞里士多德選集:形而上學》,苗力田譯,北京:中國人民大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference童世駿zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 〈約翰‧羅爾斯的「規則」概念及其與當代中國語境的相關性〉,刊於《社會理論學報》第5卷第2期,香港:香港理工大學應用社會科學系,頁405-30。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference萬俊人主編,羅爾斯(John Rawls)等著zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 《政治自由主義:批評與辯護》,廣東:廣東人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1990 “Foundations of Liberal Equality,” in G. B. Peterson(ed.), The Tanner Lectures on Human Values XI, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference廖正睦zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 《德沃金自由主義式平等理論之研究》,政治大學政治所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference趙明zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 《康德〈論永久和平〉的法哲學基礎》,上海:華東師範大學出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡宗珍zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 〈卡爾‧史密特之憲法概念析論〉,收入《政治與社會哲學評論》第5期,頁75-122。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡英文zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 〈西歐民族主義起源的兩種解釋〉,刊於《問題與研究》第38卷第5期,台北:國立政治大學國際關係研究中心,頁77-102.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 〈民族主義、人民主權與西方現代性〉,刊於《政治與社會哲學評論》第3期,台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蔡英文主編zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 中譯見《至上的美德:平等的理論與實踐》,江蘇:江蘇人民出版社,2003。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 《政治與社會哲學評論——羅爾斯紀念專輯(一)》第8期,台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 《政治與社會哲學評論——羅爾斯紀念專輯(二)》第9期,台北:巨流。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉小楓zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 〈施米特論政治的正當性——從政治的概念到政治的神學〉,《施米特:政治的剩餘價值》,1996年第3期,上海:上海人民出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉小楓選編zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 《施米特與政治法學》,上海:上海三聯書店。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉擎zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2006 〈施米特的幽靈〉,收錄於《二十一世紀》第94期,香港:香港中文大學中國文化研究所,4月號,頁13-18。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蘇力zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 〈從契約理論到社會契約理論:一種國家學說的知識考古學〉,《中國社會科學》,1996年第3期,北京。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFreeman, Samuel,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蕭高彥zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 〈理性與公民的共同體:黑格爾民主理念重構〉,收錄於張福建、蘇文流編,《民主理論:古典與現代》,台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,頁73-81。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 〈從共和主義到激進民主――盧梭的政治秩序論〉,收錄於蔡英文、張福建編,《自由主義》,台北:中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,頁1-24。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 〈立法家、政治空間與民族文化――盧梭的政治創建論〉(收錄於《政治科學論叢》第14期,台北:台灣大學政治學系,頁25-46zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 〈西耶斯的制憲權概念:一個政治理論的分析〉,《吳庚大法官榮退論文集:公法學與政治理論》,台北:元照出版社,頁79-114。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 〈國族民主在台灣:一個政治理論的分析〉,收入《政治與社會哲學評論》,第11期,台北:巨流,頁1-33。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference戴華zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 〈羅爾斯與理性直覺主義:對「政治性正義觀」的一項後設研究〉,收入錢永祥、戴華編,《哲學與公共規範》,中央研究院中山人文社會科學研究所,頁77-114zh_TW
dc.relation.reference顧肅zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 《羅爾斯:正義與自由的求索》,瀋陽:遼海出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGellner, Ernest,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1964 “Nationalism,” in Thought and Change, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 147-178.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1983 Nations and Nationalism, Oxford: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 Nationalism, New York: New York University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGoodwin, A. ed.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1957- The New Cambridge Modern History, Vol. VIII: The American And French Revolutions(1763-1793), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 中譯見《新編劍橋世界近代史‧卷8‧美國革命與法國革命》,北京:中國社會科學出版社,1999。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGreenfeld, Liah,,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 The Spirit of Capitalism: Nationalism and Economic Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGross, Feliks,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 The Civic and the Tribal State: the State, Ethnicity, and the Multiethnic State. WestPort: Greenwood Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGutmann, Amy & Dennis Thompson,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton: Princeton University Press. 中譯見《商議民主》,謝宗學、鄭惠文譯,台北:智勝文化,2006。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHabermas, Jürgen,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays. Cambridge: Polity Press. 中譯見《後民族格局》,曹衛東譯,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: Polity Press. 中譯見,童世駿譯,《在事實與規範之間》,北京:三聯書店。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHart, H. L. A.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 The Concept of Law, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 193-200.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHayes, Carlton,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1926 Essays on Nationalism, New York.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHerder, Johann Gottfried,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1772 Über den Ursprung der Sprache, Berlin: Christian Friedrich Voß. 中譯見《語言的起源》,姚小平譯,北京:商務印書館,1998。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHobsbawm, Eric,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1990 Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. 中譯見《民族與民族主義》,李金梅譯,台北:麥田。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHobsbawm, Eric and Terence Ranger, eds.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1980 The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceHuntington, Samuel P.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 Who are We? The Challenges to America’s National Identity, New York: Simon & Schuster. 中譯見《我們是誰?美國國家特性面臨的挑戰》,程克雄譯,北京:新華出版社,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIggers, Georg G.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1983 The German Conception of History, Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press. 中譯見《德國的歷史觀》,南京:譯林,2006。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceIsaacs, Harold R.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1975 Idols of the Tribe, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 中譯見《族群》,鄧伯辰譯,台北:立緒出版社,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKant, Immanuel,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 Practical Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 Critique of the Power of Judgment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKedourie, Elie,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 Nationalism, London: Blackwell.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKohn, Hans,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 “West and Eastern Nationalism,” in Nationalism, edited by John Hutchinson & Anthony D. Smith, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 162-163.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKukathas, Chandran & Philip Pettit,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 Rawls, London: Polity Press. 中譯見《羅爾斯》,姚建宗、高申春譯,黑龍江:黑龍江人民。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKymlicka, Will,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 Contemporary Political Philosophy: an Introduction. Second Edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 中譯見《當代政治哲學導論》,劉莘譯,台北:聯經。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism and Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 中譯見《少數群體的權利:民族主義、多元文化主義與公民權》,鄧紅風譯,台北:左岸,2004。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMccormick, John P.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1997 Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 中譯見《施米特對自由主義的批判》,徐志躍譯,北京:華夏出版社,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMeier, Heinrich,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1998 The Lesson of Carl Schmitt: Four Chapters on the Distinction between Political Theology and Political Philosophy, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 中譯見《古今之爭中的核心問題:施米特的學說與施特勞斯的論題》第一部分〈施米特的學說:四論政治神學與政治哲學的區分〉,林國基等譯,北京:華夏出版社,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1995 Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss: the Hidden Dialogue, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 中譯見《隱匿的對話:施米特與施特勞斯》,朱雁冰等譯,北京:華夏出版社,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMill, J. S.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 On Liberty and Other Essays, Edited by John Gray, Oxford: Oxford University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1957 《功用主義》,唐鉞譯,北京商務。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1996 《論自由》,程崇華譯,北京商務。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMouffe, Chantal,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 The Return of the Political, London: Verso. 中譯見《回歸政治》,孫善豪譯,台北:巨流圖書公司,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1994 The Democratic Paradox, 中譯見《民主的弔詭》,林淑芬譯,台北:巨流圖書公司,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMüller, Jan-Werner,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2003 A Dangerous Mind: Carl Schmitt in Post-War European Thought, New Haven: Yale University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNaticchia, Chris,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2005 “The Law of Peoples: the old and the new,” in The Legacy of John Rawls, edited by Thom Brooks & Fabian Freyenhagen, New York: Continuum, p. 177-194.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceNeumann, Erichzh_TW
dc.relation.reference1991 The Great Mother: A Analysis of the Archetype, trans. by Ralph Manheim, Princeton University Press. 中譯見《大母神:原型分析》,李以洪譯,北京:東方出版社,1998。zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePogge, Thomas,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2004 “The Incoherence between Rawls’s Theories of Justice,” in Fordham Law Review 72/5, pp. 1739-1759. 中譯見〈論羅爾斯兩種正義理論之間的不融貫〉,謝世民、吳瑞媛譯,載於《政治與社會哲學評論》第9期,台北:巨流,2004年6月,頁151-179。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRawls, John,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1971 A Theory of Justice, Harvard University Press. 中譯見《正義論》,謝延光譯,上海:上海譯文出版社,1990。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1993 Political Liberalism, Columbia University Press. 中譯見《政治自由主義》,萬俊人譯,南京:譯林出版社,2000。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 A Theory of Justice, Revised edition, Harvard University Press. 中譯見《正義論》修訂版,李少軍等譯,台北:桂冠出版公司,2003。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 The Law of Peoples, Harvard University Press. 中譯見《萬民法》,李國維等譯,台北:聯經出版公司,2005。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference1999 Collected Papers, Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2000 Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, Harvard University Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2001 Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Harvard University Press. 中譯見《作為公平的正義:正義新論》,台北:左岸文化,2002。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReidy, David A.,zh_TW
dc.relation.reference2002 “People, Persons and Human Rights: Defending Rawls’s View,” in Episteme - NS, v. 22, n. 2, pgs. 33-60.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceReidy, David A., & Rex Martin,zh_TW
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.