Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32207
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor王國樑zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWang, Kuo Liangen_US
dc.contributor.author傅俊貿zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorFu, Chun Maoen_US
dc.creator傅俊貿zh_TW
dc.creatorFu, Chun Maoen_US
dc.date2000en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-14T05:24:44Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-14T05:24:44Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-14T05:24:44Z-
dc.identifierG0088258021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32207-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經濟研究所zh_TW
dc.description88258021zh_TW
dc.description89zh_TW
dc.description.abstract為探討台灣有線電視收視戶對「分級付費制度」之接受意願,本文參考相關文獻,建立台灣有線電視收視戶對「分級付費制度」接受意願的邏輯式模型(logit model),並採用中央通訊社於2000年8月針對台灣有線電視收視戶進行電話訪查之調查資料進行實證分析,先以圖表進行交叉分析,再進行邏輯式迴歸分析,探討消費者人口統計變數(如性別、教育程度等)、收視行為資料(如每日收看有線電視時數、最常收看頻道數等)對「分級付費制度」接受意願之影響程度。依實證結果,男性、教育程度較高、年齡較大、每日收看有線電視時數較低、收看頻道數目較少及目前繳交有線電視費用較高之收視戶,較有意願接受「分級付費制度」。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractTo analyze Taiwan cable TV viewers’ willingness to accept the tiering system, this study first attempts to build a theoretical model of cable TV viewers’ willingness to accept the tiering system based on prior related researches. Secondly, this study applies the logit model to estimate cable TV viewers’ willingness to accept the tiering system based on Central News Agency (CNA) 2000 survey data of cable TV viewers. The empirical results show that male viewers are more willing to accept the tiering system than female. Besides, age, education and current monthly cable TV fee have significantly positive impact on cable TV viewers’ willingness to accept the tiering system while daily watching hours and the number of channels viewed have significantly negative impacts.en_US
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1\r\n第一節 研究背景與研究動機\r\n第二節 研究內容\r\n第三節 研究方法\r\n第二章 分級付費制度之介紹 4\r\n第一節 分級付費制度的內容\r\n第二節 以訂價理論分析基本頻道分級方式\r\n第三節 分級付費制度的優點與對市場的可能衝擊\r\n第四節 台灣實施分級付費制度的現況\r\n第三章 文獻回顧 8\r\n第一節 探討「分級付費制度」可行性之相關文獻\r\n第二節 國外文獻對有線電視需求相關變數的研究\r\n第四章 理論模型 11\r\n第一節 理論模型建立\r\n第二節 變數選定\r\n第五章 實證研究 15\r\n第一節 實證模型建立\r\n第二節 資料說明\r\n第三節 交叉分析\r\n第四節 迴歸分析結果\r\n第六章 結論與建議 27\r\n表一 台灣有線電視訂戶普及率 29\r\n表二 解釋變數一覽表 30\r\n表三之一 迴歸分析結果一 31\r\n表三之二 迴歸分析結果二 32\r\n附註 33\r\n參考文獻 35zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0088258021en_US
dc.subject分級付費zh_TW
dc.subject有線電視zh_TW
dc.subject邏輯式迴歸zh_TW
dc.subjecttiering systemen_US
dc.subjectcable TVen_US
dc.subjectlogit modelen_US
dc.title台灣有線電視收視戶對分級付費制度接受意願之探討zh_TW
dc.titleA study of Taiwan cable TV viewers` willingness to accept the tiering systemen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference參考文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference王秀玉(1999),台灣地區有線電視系統產業結構及需求特性分析,國立東華大學國際經濟研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李宛靜(1999),市場競爭對有線電視績效影響之研究,國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference林建志(2001),有線電視系統業者因應頻道分級之決策探討,大葉大學工業關係研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference胡玉純(1997),我國有線電視實施頻道分級收費制度之研究,世新大學傳播研究所碩文論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference高玉玲(1997,8),「從美國有線電視分級收費的經驗探討台灣分級收費的可行性」,衛星與有線電視。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference莊春發(1998),「有線電視分級付費可行性分析」,有線電視發展協進會委託研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference陳靜瑩(2000),有線電視服務品質之研究–有線電視服務品質評估指標之建構,國立中正大學電訊傳播研究所碩士論文。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉幼琍(1994),有線電視經營管理與頻道規劃策略,台北:正中書局。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉幼琍(1997),多頻道電視與觀眾:九○年代的電視媒體與閱聽人收視行為之研究,台北:時英出版社。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference劉幼琍、王國樑及陳清河(2001),「有線電視分級付費之策略分析」,台灣有線視訊寬頻網路發展協進會委託研究計畫。zh_TW
dc.relation.reference蓋洛普(2000),「北區、中區、南區有線電視業者服務品質及收視滿意度調查」,行政院新聞局委託研究報告。zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAgresti, Alan (1996), An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEastman, Susan and Douglas A. Ferguson (1997), Broadcast/Cable Programming, CA: Wadsworth.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFord, George S. and John D. Jackson (1997), “Horizontal Concentration and Vertical Intergration in the Cable Television Industry,” Review of Industrial Organization, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 12: 501-518.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMayo, John W. and Yasuji Otsuka (1991), “Demand, Pricing, and Regulation: Evidence from the Cable TV Industry,” RAND Journal of Economics, Mount Morris, IL: Rand Corp., Vol. 22, No. 3, Autumn 1991, 396-410.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMcFadden, Daniel (1974), “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,” in Frontiers in Econometrics (P. Zarembka Ed.), London: Academic Press, 105-142.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMorey, Edward R. (1981), “The Demand for Site-Specific Recreational Activities: A Characteristics Approach,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 8, 345-371.zh_TW
dc.relation.referencePacey, Patricia L. (1985), “Cable Television in A Less Regulated Market,” The Journal of Economics, Vol. XXXIV, No. 1, September 1985, 81-91.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceRubinovitz, Robert N. (1993), “Market Power and Price Increase for Basic Cable Service since Deregulation,” RAND Journal of Economics, Mount Morris, IL: Rand Corp., Vol. 24, No. 1, Spring 1993, 1-18.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWaterman, David and Andrew A. Weiss (1997), Vertical Integration in Cable Television, London, England: The MIT Press.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWebb, G. Kent (1983), The Economics of Cable Television, Toronto, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.zh_TW
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
item.openairetypethesis-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.