Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32231
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisor翁永和zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorWeng, Yung-Hoen_US
dc.contributor.author劉乃瑜zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Nai-Yuen_US
dc.creator劉乃瑜zh_TW
dc.creatorLiu, Nai-Yuen_US
dc.date2005en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-14T05:27:52Z-
dc.date.available2009-09-14T05:27:52Z-
dc.date.issued2009-09-14T05:27:52Z-
dc.identifierG0093258033en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/32231-
dc.description碩士zh_TW
dc.description國立政治大學zh_TW
dc.description經濟研究所zh_TW
dc.description93258033zh_TW
dc.description94zh_TW
dc.description.abstract外人直接投資(foreign direct investment, FDI)在經濟理論中是相當熱門的議題,它代表了讓地主國(host country)國資本累積、技術進步在短時間內快速增加的可能,因此許多國家往往會採取某些吸引外資的政策,再搭配國內制度或是貿易政策的改變,以追求經濟成長。然而,外來直接投資對地主國可能產生的所得重分配的影響,本文即是對此做一深入探討,並以台灣製造業資料來研究外來直接投資是否會擴大工資不均等的情形。\r\n研究期間從1981~2004年共24年,依產業特性將製造業分為十大類,分別採取兩種不同的迴歸模型,包括自我迴歸落遲分配模型(auto regressive distributed lag model, ARDL model)與縱橫資料(panel data)迴歸模型等。實證模型上由生產理論出發,選擇作為解釋工資不均等的變數包括外人直接投資比例、出口比例、進口比例及產出成長率等四個變數。由實證結果得到以下結論:\r\n(1)就個別產業來看,FDI對台灣製造業工資不均等的影響並不一致,反應出產業特性不同,FDI所扮演的角色也不盡相同。其中FDI會惡化皮革與毛皮製造業的工資不均等情形,減輕橡膠及塑膠製品製造業與非金屬製品製造業的工資不均等情形,對其他製造業則是無明顯影響。\r\n(2)就整體製造業的情形來看, FDI對工資的不均等的淨效果為正,但效果不大;出口、產出成長率有輕微使工資不均等擴大的情形,而進口則是可輕微縮減工資不均等的狀況。\r\n(3)若是將十大製造業依產品特性區分為「民生」、「化學」、「機械」電子等三大工業,則可以發現FDI對民生工業有明顯擴大工資不均等的情形,在其他兩大工業則是無顯著影響。zh_TW
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 i\r\n目錄 ii\r\n表目錄 iii\r\n圖目錄 iii\r\n第一章 緒論 - 1 -\r\n第一節 前言 - 1 -\r\n第二節 研究動機 - 2 -\r\n第三節 研究目的 - 3 -\r\n第四節 研究架構 - 4 -\r\n第二章 文獻回顧 - 6 -\r\n第三章 實證模型與研究方法 - 15 -\r\n第一節 實證模型 - 15 -\r\n第二節 研究方法 - 18 -\r\n第三節 資料來源與處理 - 27 -\r\n第四章 實證結果分析 - 32 -\r\n第一節 台灣製造業外人直接投資與工資不均等概況 - 32 -\r\n第二節 自我迴歸時間落差分配模型(auto regressive distributed lagged model, ARDL)的實證結果 - 39 -\r\n第三節 縱橫資料(panel data)迴歸分析的實證結果 - 46 -\r\n第五章 結論 - 52 -\r\n參考文獻 - 56 -\r\n附錄一 資料來源 - 58 -\r\n附錄二 各變數單根檢定結果 - 59 -\r\n附錄三 ARDL實證結果 - 62 -\r\n附錄四 Panel Data實混合估計證結果 - 66 -zh_TW
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.source.urihttp://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0093258033en_US
dc.subject外人直接投資zh_TW
dc.subject工資不均等zh_TW
dc.subject自我迴歸落遲分配模型zh_TW
dc.subject縱橫資料zh_TW
dc.subjectforeign direct investmenten_US
dc.subjectwage inequalityen_US
dc.subjectauto regressive distributed lag modelen_US
dc.subjectpanel dataen_US
dc.title外來投資對工資不均等的影響-以台灣製造業為例zh_TW
dc.titleThe Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Wage Inequality : Evidence from Taiwan Manufacturing Industryen_US
dc.typethesisen
dc.relation.reference一、英文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceAitken, B., A. Harrison, and R. E. Lipsey (1996), “Wages and foreign ownership : a comparative study of Mexico, Venezuela, and the United States,” Journal of International Economics, 40, 345-371.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceBernard, A., J. Jensen, (1997), ”Export, skill upgarding and the wage gaps,” Journal of International Economics, 42, 3-31.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceDas, S.P. (2002), ”Foreign direct investment and the relative wage in a developing economy,” Journal of Development Economics, 67, 55-77.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceEgger, H. and V. Grossmann (2003), ”The double role of skilled labor, new technologies and wage inequality,” Metroeconomica, 56:1.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceFeenstra, R.C. and G.H. Hanson (1997), “Foreign direct investment and relative wages : evidences form Mexico’s maquliadoras,” Journal of International Economics, 42, 371-393.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceGlass, A.J. and K. Saggi (2002), “Multinational firms and technology transfer,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics , 104, 495-513.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceKrusell, P., L. Ohanian, J.V. Rios-Rull, and G.J. Violante (1997),”Capital-skill comnplementarity and inequality : a macroeconomic analysis,” Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Research Department Staff Report 239.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceLipsey, R.E. and F. Sojöholm (2004) “Foreign direct investment, education and wages in Indonesian manufacturing,” Journal of Development Economics, 73, 415-422.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMachin, S., J. Van Reenen (1998), “Teohnology and changes in skill structure : evidence from seven OECD countries,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1215-1244.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMundlak, Y.,(1978), “On pooling time series and cross section data,” Econometrica, 46, 69-85.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceMarkusen, J.R. and A.J. Venables (1997), “The role of multinational firms in the wage-gap debate,” Reviews of International Economics, 5(4),435-451.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTaylor, K. and N. Driffield (2003), ”wage inequality and the role of multinationals : evidence from UK panel data,” Labour Economics 12, 223-249.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceTsou, M.W. (2002), “Wage drifferentials in Taiwanese manufacturing, 1982-1997,” Asian Economic Journal, 16, 317-335.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVelde, D.W. (2000),”Foreign direct investment and unskilled workers in US manufacturing,” paper presented at Royal Economic Society Conference at St. Andrews.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceVelde, D. W. and O. Morrissey (2004), “Foreign direct investment, skills and wage inequality in east Asia,” Journal of Asia Pacific Economy , 9, 348-369.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWu, X. (2000),”Foreign direct investment, intellectual property rights, and wage inequality in China”, China Economic Review, 11, 361-384.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceWu, X. (2001), “The impact of foreign direct investment on the relative return to skill”, Economics of Transition, 9, 695-715.zh_TW
dc.relation.referenceZhao, Y. (2001), “Foreign direct investment and relative wages : The case of China”, China Economic Review, 12, 40-57.zh_TW
dc.relation.reference二、中文文獻zh_TW
dc.relation.reference李謙儀,「外來投資對台灣製造業波及效果之研究」,國立台灣大學國家發展研究所碩士論文,2001。zh_TW
item.languageiso639-1en_US-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairetypethesis-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec-
Appears in Collections:學位論文
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
index.html115 BHTML2View/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.