Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ah.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/33046


Title: 國中教師甄選口試決策歷程之研究--以結構方程模式檢驗
Authors: 呂秋萍
Contributors: 胡悅倫
呂秋萍
Keywords: 教師甄選
口試
結構方程模式
類我效應
teacher selection
interview
structural equation modeling
perceived similarity
Date: 2004
Issue Date: 2009-09-17 15:10:12 (UTC+8)
Abstract: 本研究目的旨在探討國中教師甄選口試,背景變項(口試委員特徵、應試者特徵、應試者學經歷)及口試委員心理因素(應試者儀容舉止、應試者受喜愛程、應試者教師專業、口試委員類我效應),如何影響國中教師甄選口試評價結果以及這些因素與口試評價結果間的因果關係模式。
本研究採用問卷調查法進行,研究工具為「口試評量表」。資料蒐集的對象以93年度台北縣、台北市及桃園縣擔任國中教師甄選之口試委員為對象。參與本研究之口試委員共78位,每位口試委員口試應試者的人數3至23人不等,共回收口試評量表883份,有效量表844份。每位口試委員填答之量表以10份作為本研究原始資料選取之基準,共選入有效量表570份進行資料分析。
根據資料分析的結果,本研究獲致結論如下:(1)口試委員口試經驗、教育程度、職務,應試者教育背景、任教領域等背景變項對口試評價結果有顯著影響。(2)本研究建構之「國中教師甄選口試決策模式」,獲得實證資料驗證。模式中各心理因素對口試評價結果之總效果以口試委員類我效應最強,其餘依次是應試者受喜愛程度、應試者教師專業、應試者儀容舉止。
The purpose of my study aimed at investigating how the background variables (interviewer characteristics, applicant characteristics, the educational background and past experience of the applicants), the interviewer’s psychological factors (the appearance and behavior of the applicants, the likability of applicants, teacher specialty of the applicants, and the perceived similarity of the interviewer), influence the interview assessment of the teacher selection in junior high school. And how the relations of cause-effect modeling between those mentioned-above factors and the result of interview assessment are formed.
The survey is used and the instrument is the Interview Assessment Form. The objects of data-gathering are those who are the interviewers of junior high school teacher selection in Taipei County, Taipei City, or in Taoyuan County, in 2004. A total of 78 interviewers participate in my research, and each interviewer has 3 to 23 interviewees. Thus, a total of 883 Interview Assessment Forms are collected, 844 of which are effective forms. The average ten Assessment Forms answered by each interviewer are chosen as the standard of the choice of original data, and a total of 570 effective Assessment Forms are selected for data analysis.
According to the result of data analysis, the conclusions of my research are as follows: (1) Such background variables as the interviewer’s interview experience, level of education, job position, the educational background of the applicants, and teaching fields have significant influences upon the result of interview assessment. (2) The decision model of the interview of junior high school teacher selection well developed in study is verified by well-examined data. From the analysis of Structural Equation Modeling, the strongest influence of the psychological factors upon the total effect of interview assessment is the interviewer’s perceived similarity, followed by the likability of applicants, teacher specialty of the applicants, and the appearance and behavior of the applicants.
Reference: 一、中文部分
王家通、吳裕益(民75)。國中優良教師之特質及其背景研究。教育資料文摘,98,83-130。
行政院教育改革審議委員會(民85)。總諮議報告書。台北市:教育部。
朱炳憲(民91)。應用模糊理論及分析層級程序法於國中教師甄試。國立中正大學數學研究所碩士論文,未出版。
吳復新(民89)。面談的問題及其改進之道:兼評高考一級口試改革方案。空大行政學報,10,27-67。
吳福春(民91)。國中教師甄試相關問題研究─以台南縣市為例。臺南師範學院教師在職進修教育行政碩士學位班碩士論文,未出版。
李幸穗(民92)。應試者面談過程所呈現的訊息對面談評價的影響─以企業員工的招募甄選為實驗情境。國防大學國防管理學院後勤管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
林育瑋(民89)。應徵者印象管理策略對甄選面談決策的影響。國立台灣科技大學管理研究所企業管理學程碩士論文,未出版。
邱皓政(民92)。結構方程模式。台北:雙葉書廊有限公司。
范揚隆(民85)。微觀面試行為之研究。東海大學企業管理學系碩士論文,未出版。
修慧蘭(民82)。個人特質、非語言訊息與人際適應之關係。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版。
張明輝(民88)。學校教育與行政革新研究。台北:師大書苑。
黃小鳳(民90)。性別角色刻板印象、晉升者性別及平權意識喚起對晉升決策的影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
黃芳銘(民93)。結構方程模式理論與應用。台北:五南。
許崇憲(民92)。教師人數逐漸以女性為主流嗎?教育與心理研究,26(1),61-83。
楊庭懿(民91)。應徵者印象管理策略對甄選面談決策之影響:以面談訓練為干擾變數。國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文,未出版。
葉連祺(民88)。我國中小學教師甄試之研究。教育資料文摘,39:6(233)44-64。
鄧文慧(民85)。主管性別、應徵者性別與晉升潛能對甄選決定的影響。國立政治大學心理研究所碩士論文,未出版。
謝臥龍(民86)。優良國中教師特質之德懷術分析。教育研究資訊,5(3),14-28。
二、英文部分
Anderson, N., & Shackleton, V. (1990). Decision making in the graduate selection interview:A field study. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 63-76.
Arvey, R.D. (1979). Unfair discrimination in Employment Interview: Legal and psychological aspects. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 736-765.
Arvey, R.D., & Campion, J. E.(1982). The Employment Interview: A Summary and Review Recent Research. Personnel Psychology, 35, 281-322.
Baron, R. A. (1983). Sweet smell of success ? The impact of pleasant artificial scents on evaluations of job applicant. Journal of Applied Psychology,68, 709-713.
Baskett, G. D.(1973). Interview Decision as Determined by Competency and Attitude Similarity. Journal of Applied Psychology,57(3), 343-345.
Bigoness, W. J. (1976). Effect of applicat's sex, race, and performance on employers' performance ratings: Some additional findings. Journal of Applied Psychology,61, 80-84.
Carlson, K. D., Connerley M. L., & Mecham III R. L. (2002)Recruitment evaluation: The case for assessing the quality of applicants attracted. Personnel Psychology, 55, 461-490.
Cohen, S. L., & Bunker K. A. (1975). Subtle effects of sex role stereotype on recruiter’ hiring decision. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 566-572.
Delli, D. A., & Vera, E. M. (2003). Psychological and contextual influences on the teacher selection interview: A model for future research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17:2, 137-155.
Dipboy, R. L., Fontenelle, G. A., & Garner, K. (1984). Effects of previewing the application on interview process and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology,69, 118-128.
Dipboy, R. L., Fromkin, H. L., & Wiback, K. (1975). Relative importance of applicant sex, attractiveness, and scholastic standing in evaluation of job applicant resumes. Journal of Applied Psychology,60, 39-43.
Dougherty, T. W., Ebert, R. J., & Callender, G. C. (1986). Policy capturing in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 9-15.
Gifford, R., Ng, C.F., & Wilkinson, M.(1985). Nonverbal cues in the employment interview:Links between applicant qualities and interviewer judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 729-736.
Gilmore D. C., Beehr T. A., & Love K. G., (1986). Effects of applicant sex, applicant physical attractiveness, type of rater and type of job on interview decision. Journal of Occupational Psychology,59, 103-109.
Gorman, C. D., Clover, W. H., & Doherty, M. E. (1978). Can we learn anything about interviewing from “interviews” of paper people? Two studies of the external validity of a paradigm. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 165-192.
Graves, L. M. (1993). Sources of individual differences in interviewer effectiveness:A model and implication for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 349-370.
Graves, L. M., & Karren, R. J. (1992). Interviewer decision processes and effectiveness: An experimental policy-capturing investigation. Personnel Psychology, 45, 313-340.
Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1988). An investigation of sex discrimination in recruiters’ evaluations of actual applicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 20-29.
Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). The effect of sex similarity on recruiters’evaluations of actual applicants: A test of the similarity-attraction paradigm. Personnel Psychology, 48, 85-98.
Grove, D. A. (1981). A Behavioral consistency approach to decision making in employment selection. Personnel Psychology, 34, 55-64.
Haefner, J. E. (1977). Race, age, sex, and competence as factor in employee selection of the disadvantaged. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62, 199-202.
Hamner, W. C., Kim, J. S., Baird, L., & Bigoness W. J. (1974). Race and sex as determinants of ratings by potential employers in a simulated work-sampling task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 705-711.
Keenan, A. (1977). Some relationships between interviewers’ personal feelings about candidates and their general evaluation of them. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 50, 275-283.
London, M., & Poplawski, J. R. (1976). Effects of information on stereotype development in performance appraisal and interview contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 199-205.
Marlowe, C. M., Schneider, S. L., & Nelson, C. E. (1996). Gender and Attractiveness Biases in Hiring Decisions: Are More Experienced Managers Less Biased? Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 11-21.
Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter G. W. (1990). An alternative selection procedure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
Oliphant, V. N., & Alexander, E. R. (1982). Reacts to Resumes as a Function of Resume Determinateness, Applicant Characteristics, and Sex of Raters. Personnel Psychology, 35, 829-843.
Peters, L. H., & Terborg, J. R.(1975). The effect of temporal placement of unfavorable information and of attitude similarity on personnel selection dw2ecisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 279-293.
Posner, B.Z. (1981). Comparing recruiter, student, and faculty perceptions of important applicant and job characteristics. Personnel Psychology,34, 329-339.
Powell G. N., & Butterfield D.A. (2002). Exploring the influence of decision makers' race and gender on actual promotions to top management. Personnel Psychology, 55, 397-428.
Rand, T. M., & Wexely, K. N.(1975). Demonstration of the effect,”similar to me,”in simulated employment interview. Psychological Reports, 36, 535-544.
Raza, S. M., & Carpenter, B.N. (1987). A model of hiring decisions in real employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 596-603.
Rynes, S., & Gerhart, B. (1990) Interviewer assessments of applicant 'Fit': an exploratory investigation. Personnel Psychology, 43, 13-35.
Schmitt, N. (1976). Social and situational determinants of interview decision: Implications for employment interview. Personnel Psychology, 29, 79-101.
Singer, M. S., & Sewell, C. (1989). Applicant age and selection interview decisions: Effect of information exposure on age discrimination in personnel selection. Personnel Psychology, 42, 135-154.
William, A. C., Siegfried, D., & Pearce L. (1981). Forced attention to specific applicant qualifications; Impact on physical attractiveness and sex of applicant biased. Personnel Psychology, 34, 65-75.
Description: 碩士
國立政治大學
教育研究所
91911012
93
Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0919110121
Data Type: thesis
Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 學位論文

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
11012101.pdf11KbAdobe PDF767View/Open
11012102.pdf12KbAdobe PDF701View/Open
11012103.pdf11KbAdobe PDF740View/Open
11012104.pdf11KbAdobe PDF757View/Open
11012105.pdf30KbAdobe PDF871View/Open
11012106.pdf91KbAdobe PDF921View/Open
11012107.pdf94KbAdobe PDF1154View/Open
11012108.pdf113KbAdobe PDF985View/Open
11012109.pdf46KbAdobe PDF814View/Open
11012110.pdf28KbAdobe PDF1500View/Open
11012111.pdf123KbAdobe PDF1321View/Open


All items in 學術集成 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


社群 sharing